Mubarak Says He Won't Run for President Again; Obama Says Transition "Must Begin Now"
Tuesday 01 February 2011
by: David D. Kirkpatrick and Mark Landler, The New York Times News Service | Report

After watching President Hosni Mubarak's speech, protesters in Cairo's Tahrir Square wave their shoes in the air. (Photo: Scott Nelson / The New York Times)
Cairo - President Hosni Mubarak announced that he would not run for another term in elections scheduled for the fall, appearing on state television to promise an orderly transition but saying he would serve out his term. In comments translated by CNN, he swore that he would never leave Egypt but would “die on its soil.”
Television cameras showed the vast crowds gathered in Tahrir Square in central Cairo roaring, but not necessarily in approval. The protesters have made the president’s immediate and unconditional resignation a bedrock demand of their movement, and it did not appear that the concession mollified them. Reports said that thousands of protesters in Cairo's Tahrir Square chanted "Leave! Leave!" after the speech.
Mr. Mubarak’s announcement came after President Obama urged him not to run, effectively withdrawing America’s support for its closest Arab ally, according to American diplomats in Cairo and Washington.
The message was delivered by Frank G. Wisner, a seasoned envoy with deep ties to Egypt, the American diplomats said. Mr. Wisner’s message, they said, was not a blunt demand for Mr. Mubarak to step aside now, but rather firm counsel that he should make way for a reform process that would culminate in free and fair elections in September to elect a new Egyptian leader.
This back channel message, authorized directly by Mr. Obama, appeared to tip the administration beyond the delicate balancing act it has performed in the last week — resisting calls for Mr. Mubarak to step down, even as it has called for an “orderly transition” to a more politically open Egypt.
In remarks after Mr. Mubarak’s announcement, Mr. Obama said he spoke directly to the Egyptian leader. “He recognizes that the status quo is not sustainable,” Mr. Obama said. The president said he told Mr. Mubarak an orderly transition ”must begin now” and “include opposition parties.” And to the young people protesting the government, Mr. Obama said, “We hear your voices.”
It was not clear whether the administration favored Mr. Mubarak’s turning over the reins to a transitional government, composed of leaders of the opposition movement and perhaps under the leadership of Mohamed ElBaradei, or to a caretaker government led by members of the existing government, including the newly appointed vice president, Omar Suleiman.
The decision to nudge Mr. Mubarak in the direction of leaving is a critical step for the United States in defining its dealings not just with its most critical ally in the Arab world, but also with the rising swell of popular anger on the streets of Cairo and in countries like Jordan, Yemen, Algeria and Tunisia.
Mr. Wisner, who had been expected to leave Egypt on Tuesday but decided to extend his stay, is among the United States’ most experienced diplomats, and a friend of Mr. Mubarak. His mission was to “keep a conversation going,” according to a close friend of Mr. Wisner.
As a result, this person said, the administration’s first message to the Egyptian leader was not that he had to leave office, but rather that his time in office was quickly coming to a close. Mr. Wisner, who consulted closely with the White House, is expected to be the point person dealing with Mr. Mubarak as the situation evolves, and perhaps as the administration’s message hardens.
Mr. Wisner’s mission took shape over the weekend in a White House meeting, after Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton recommended him to the national security adviser, Thomas E. Donilon.
Reinforcing the administration’s message to Mr. Mubarak was an Op-Ed article in The New York Times on Tuesday by Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts, the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, in which he advised Mr. Mubarak to bow out gracefully “to make way for a new political structure.”
Egyptians turned out around the country on Tuesday in the largest demonstrations yet to demand Mr. Mubarak’s ouster. They may hold to that demand and want even more far-reaching change, as Tunisians did after their strongman president, Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, fled in mid-January.
In Tahrir Square earlier in the day, the chants of perhaps 200,000 protesters had suggested that the demonstrators would not stop at Mr. Mubarak’s departure.
“The people of Egypt want the president on trial,” some chanted for the first time, shadowed by the burned headquarters of Mr. Mubarak’s ruling party and a vast complex housing a bureaucracy many Egyptians have accused of endlessly humiliating them.
Others chorused: “The people of Egypt want the government to fall.”
“Nobody wants him, nobody,” said El-Mahdy Mohamed, one of the demonstrators. “Can’t he see on the TV what’s happening?”
While the numbers fell short of the million called for at the square, the protest rivaled some of the most epic moments in Egypt’s tumultuous modern history, from the wars with Israel to a coup that sent a corpulent monarch packing on his yacht in 1952.
With little regard, protesters defied a curfew that has become a joke to residents here and overcame attempts by the government to keep protesters away by closing roads, suspending train service and shutting down public transportation to Cairo. Some walked miles to the square, whose name means liberation. Others woke up there in the muddy patches where they had slept for days.
“No one would have imagined a week before that this would happen in Egypt,” said Bassem Ramsis, 37, a director who returned from Spain for the uprising.
The momentous events in Egypt, the most populous Arab country and once the axis on which the Arab world revolved, have reverberated across the region. Earlier in the day, King Abdullah II of Jordan fired his cabinet after protests there, and organizers in Yemen and Syria, with their own authoritarian rulers, have called for protests.
In scale and message, the protests in Egypt were a remarkable expression of unity in a country that once represented the Arab world’s nexus but stagnated under Mr. Mubarak’s withering authoritarianism. Peasants from southern Egypt joined Islamists from the Nile Delta and businessmen from upper-class suburbs rubbed shoulders with street-smart youths from gritty Bulaq in a square that served as a vast tapestry of a country’s diversity joined in a blunt message: Mr. Mubarak must surrender power.
“Go already,” read one sign held aloft. “My arm’s starting to hurt.”
Tens of thousands of people also took to the streets of Alexandria, Egypt’s second-largest city, north of Cairo on the Mediterranean coast.
Meanwhile, the thousands of foreigners seeking to flee the country led to chaotic scenes at the Cairo airport. The United States ordered all nonemergency embassy and other American government personnel to leave the country, fearing unrest as the protests continue.
The breadth of the uprising, organized by youthful activists and driven by the legions of poor and dispossessed in Egypt, a country of 80 million, stunned even those most critical of Mr. Mubarak’s government. The Muslim Brotherhood, Egypt’s most powerful opposition movement, has largely stayed in the background. Other opposition leaders — the Nobel laureate, Mohamed ElBaradei among them — have struggled to cultivate support among the protesters, whose demands seem to grow as the uprising gathers force.
Margaret Scobey, the American ambassador to Egypt, spoke by telephone to Mr. ElBaradei, the former head of the International Atomic Energy Agency who has emerged as a potential rallying point for opposition, as American officials sought to navigate an uprising that has not only challenged their most loyal ally in the region but also posed a threat to a broader American-backed order in Jordan, Yemen and the oil-rich Persian Gulf.
Mr. ElBaradei told Reuters that Mr. Mubarak must leave the country before any dialogue could start between the opposition and the government.
“There can be dialogue but it has to come after the demands of the people are met and the first of those is that President Mubarak leaves,” Mr. ElBaradei told Al Arabiya television. “I hope to see Egypt peaceful and that’s going to require as a first step the departure of President Mubarak. If President Mubarak leaves, then everything will progress correctly.”
Calls for Mr. Mubarak to step aside had been growing. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan of Turkey — a predominantly Islamic country often held up as a model of Western-style democracy — canceled a visit to Egypt planned for next week, urging Mr. Mubarak to “listen to people’s outcries and extremely humanistic demands” and to “meet the freedom demands of people without a doubt,” Reuters reported.
David D. Kirkpatrick reported from Cairo and Mark Landler from Washington. Reporting was contributed from Cairo by Anthony Shadid, Mona El-Naggar, Kareem Fahim, and Robert F. Worth from Cairo; Nicholas Kulish and Souad Mekhennet from Alexandria; and Alan Cowell from London.
This article, "Mubarak Says He Won’t Run for President Again," originally appeared at The New York Times.
© 2010 The New York Times Company
Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
A last desperate attempt to
Tue, 02/01/2011 - 16:41 — Curt (not verified)A last desperate attempt to maintain US hegemony in the region, and if the demonstrators stick to their stated objective they will not cease. The Egyptian people know well enough that any orderly transition with Mubarak at the helm will just result in oppression and rigged elections, and if they allow things to return to normal in Egypt their cause will be lost.
Curt says it all. The latest
Tue, 02/01/2011 - 17:48 — AnonymousDV (not verified)Curt says it all. The latest Obama misstep will probably result in fair elections just like it did in Afghanistan, not to mention Iran.
I am pleased and proud that
Tue, 02/01/2011 - 18:38 — Anonymous (not verified)I am pleased and proud that Pres. Obama made this reasoned and pragmatic approach to Egypt's Murabak which indicated support of the protesters as well as respect for Mr Murabak.
I am saddened and
Tue, 02/01/2011 - 19:21 — Ed Lee in AZ (not verified)I am saddened and embarrassed that President Obama has the power and ability to influence Egypt's dictator... without even a direct phone call.
It is reality of course that America holds sway all over the world through it's military and economic might.
It is also disgusting to know we are and still operate as an empire --of fear and manipulation.
If you are listening, the Egyptian people hate Mubarak about as much as they do the United States! I've heard them myself, outside Luxor, denouncing Albright when Clinton was in office.
So don't be so proud about this latest U.S. proclamation... please. Consider how we got here.
Biden declared 'Mubarak is
Tue, 02/01/2011 - 21:30 — Bill O'Rights (not verified)Biden declared 'Mubarak is no dictator' - does that make Biden a Progressive or a Conservative?
Webster Tarpley, one of the
Tue, 02/01/2011 - 21:45 — Anonymous (not verified)Webster Tarpley, one of the most brilliant and respected online historians, claims that for the last three years, as revealed by Wikileaks, the USA has been secretly promoting the overthrow of Mubarak because of his unwillingness to sufficiently embrace neoliberal austerity measures, including taking more IMF money. Obama and his cohorts are just another group of lying, thieving, imperialistic American thugs that love to bully other countries by overthrowing their governments. Shame on the USA and on Obama.
The only difference between
Tue, 02/01/2011 - 21:47 — Anonymous (not verified)The only difference between egypt, tunisia, and the US is that the former are controlled by state-run agencies and propaganda.
The US is controlled by private-run agencies and propaganda, mercenaries of those at the very top, who suck on the teat of our treasury for their bonuses while opposing the same for people who are losing the roofs over their heads.
What, exactly, was the
Tue, 02/01/2011 - 21:54 — Andrei Vyshinsky (not verified)What, exactly, was the requirement for Obama to address the situation in Egypt at all if, and in his own words, its "not the role of any other country to determine Egypt’s leaders". Why has he made any recommendations at all concerning Mubarak's future? Did Mubarak solicit his comments? I hardly think so. You'd think that with Obama's being the last in a long line of American administrations to enlist Arab despots in the cause of Israeli expansionism that there would be a certain embarrassment in his approaching an honest to goodness peoples' revolution in the Middle East with words of congratulation and encouragement. What noxious chutzpah, what nauseating hypocrisy. No one needs you or your commentary, Mr. Obama. The Egyptian people are doing just fine at the moment, thank you.
One more thing to add.
Tue, 02/01/2011 - 22:09 — Anonymous (not verified)One more thing to add. Obama, in his Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech, showed his true red, white and blue colors in the following way, and this should never be forgotten, esp. in the context of his dogmatic commands aimed at Egypt's ousted leader: Obama held up Iraq as an example of the successful use of war by the US of A. He also intimated that such an obviously successful venture would be replicated in Afghanistan and other places. So is it any wonder that Wikileaks exposed the USA as meddling in Egyptian politics for the last three years to produce the very result you are seeing today? Behind the scenes the U.S. is desperately trying to install their new "yes man" in Egypt so that the USA can BURY Egypt in IMF loans for the next hundred years. What you are looking at my friends is the reality that the USA is an acting, fascist dictator playing world events like puppets for its own economic, military and political purposes. I feel ugly being an American due to the endless corruption done in the name of patriotic self righteousness and dumb American expansionism that has literally trashed the whole earth.
Note the contrast: In Egypt,
Wed, 02/02/2011 - 00:18 — Anonymous (not verified)Note the contrast:
In Egypt, Obama wants to hasten the demise of a relatively secularist dictatorship and its replacement with an Islamist state. (Democracy in the short term, Muslim Brotherhood in the long term.)
In Iran, Obama was for the theocracy and against the demonstrators who wanted to topple the theocracy and replace it with a secular democracy.
Islamists (those who want Islamic theocracy, that is) must love Obama.
Colonialism is over and the
Wed, 02/02/2011 - 07:12 — Giovanna Lepore (not verified)Colonialism is over and the USA needs to get a grip and realize it has neither the influence nor the right to tell other nations and their people what they can do.
Time for the USA to turn its attention at home and help its own people.
For those incorrectly
Wed, 02/02/2011 - 07:57 — Curt (not verified)For those incorrectly fearing that some radical Islamist state will arise in Egypt as a result of an absence of understanding of the land and its peoples, Juan Cole has an excellent piece today explaining the political landscape there and suggesting the likely outcome of any free elections should the people persevere. I strongly urge those that have been misled by propaganda promoting those fears to read it, as Egypt is perhaps the least likely of the Arab states to turn to any fundamentalist theocratic form of government.
The Egyptian people should
Wed, 02/02/2011 - 09:31 — Mors (not verified)The Egyptian people should have the right and be given the utmost respect from all nations, including US, to choose their own government. They have shown the courage and the will to persevere in the shackles of Imperialist Americas' dictatorship and have risen up in unimaginable solidarity to kick the murderous bums out.
We should learn from their example. Yes, the Arab/Muslim world is showing America how democracy is achieved.
America is a laughingstock.
Curt, You are nuts. Even
Wed, 02/02/2011 - 09:38 — Anonymous (not verified)Curt,
You are nuts. Even under Mubarak, apostates and Coptic Christians are heavily persecuted. Demonstrators have been calling for attacking Israel. It will get worse.
Nameless 14:38, you
Wed, 02/02/2011 - 10:32 — Curt (not verified)Nameless 14:38, you obviously are obtaining your information from right-wing propaganda sources, not unbiased, honest sources. Coptics haven't been heavily persecuted, and when recently attacked by radical Muslims (whom were not a part of the Muslim Brotherhood) it was Muslims that stood up as human shields to protect them and their places of worship from harm. In addition, although I have been following the events in Egypt closely on several news sites I have yet to hear ANY demonstrator call for attacking Israel. I would be surprised if among 1,000,000 demonstrators there weren't a few stating such tripe, and I would be surprised if there weren't some fear-mongering news site didn't seek them out. Perhaps I'm nuts, but I'm not deluded.
I've been following the
Wed, 02/02/2011 - 10:52 — Mors (not verified)I've been following the Middle East uprising, especially in Egypt, with a sense of excitement and hope. These brave people are showing the world, and particularly America, how democracy is won. The Muslim/Arab world is throwing off the shackles of imperial western influence in all its hipocrasy and destroying The New World Order as seen through the eye of a Bush. It gives me hope for a true age of humanity, which esoterically is named, The Age of Aquarius.
This is G-d speaking through G-ds' children.
Everyone I've tried to talk to about the event in the Middle East has said: it's scary. Nothing more, just: it's scary. I can only surmise that people are afraid of "terrorism" and, too, their inability to rise up as well and meet the challenge of this millennium. If we would just look at this immense gathering of Arab peoples of different denominations standing tall, as one, against tyranny; if we would just notice the peaceful vigilance of their rebellion; if we would just see our own plight in terms of theirs, there would be no need to fear.
Americans: your government is no different from that of its client states.
Americans: your government is abusing and destroying your rights through constant war, domestic distractions and economic holocaust.
Americans: your government is not a democracy and doesn't WANT a democracy.
Americans: your entire governing body is guilty of high treason.
Americans: you, too, must rise up and dare, yes DARE to say no, as your beloved first wife of your beloved Ronnie Reagan instructed. But, first you must get off the couch and stop believing in TV.
Please, for the life of the planet, for your own sake, start a rebellion. Let the Arab world know that they are not alone, but that we are all children of the same G-d.
This is not a call to arms. It's a call to consciousness.
Peace be ours now.
Curt, Use your brain. Copts
Wed, 02/02/2011 - 13:06 — Anonymous (not verified)Curt,
Use your brain. Copts are voting with their feet and fleeing Egypt. The "human shields" thing: Who were these Muslims trying to protect the Copts from? Their fellow Muslims, that's who. The fact that there was a need for human shields shows there is indeed persecution. The human shields aren't there 24/7.