New York Ends Prison Gerrymandering

by: Michelle Chen   |  Color Lines | Report

You've heard the shrill debate about shredding the 14th amendment and redefining citizenship, mostly driven by reactionaries who are willing to gut the Constitution in order to exclude immigrants. To understand just how radical such a change would be, look at new legislation in New York that shows how the constitutional concept of citizenship and representation has enabled the enfranchisement of marginalized groups across three centuries of U.S. history.

The New York bill, approved by the legislature last week, aims to eliminate so-called prison-based gerrymandering, by barring counties from using census data to inflate their population numbers. Under current policy, the census counts the state's incarcerated residents in the county where they're imprisoned. So a young man from the Bronx convicted of a felony may spend much of his adult life as a "resident" of the upstate prison town where he rarely even sees the world outside his cell block. His story, multiplied by tens of thousands, has led to a skewing of political district lines, shifting power to whiter upstate regions from the darker, poorer five boroughs, home to a cluster of troubled communities from which prisoners are disproportionately drawn.

The Prison Policy Initiative explains that this numbers game of local politicians "padding" their districts with prison headcounts, which has impacted an estimated 44,000 mostly Black and Latino New Yorkers, "artificially enhances the weight of a vote cast in those districts at the expense of all districts that do not contain a prison."

This distortion of the demographic landscape has an eerie historical precedent: The Three-fifths compromise of the slavery era allowed Southern states to count enslaved (disenfranchised) Blacks as a fraction of a "real" citizen for electoral purposes.

According to PPI's research, seven New York State Senate districts depend on prison-based gerrymandering for their very existence. In one City Council ward in Rome, New York, residents should thank the thousands of imprisoned neighbors they've passed by on the way to the polls, who constitute about half of the "official" population, for making local votes count a little bit more.

While the new bill parallels other recent reforms to New York's criminal justice system, the legislation alone will not reverse the incarceration frenzy that has hollowed out poor urban communities. It also won't alter public funding allotted based on census data, nor will it correct the misrepresentation of gender ratios in communities where young men of color are systematically swept up by police.

But the initiative, which reflects similar campaigns underway in other states, does begin to undo the perverse incentive to keep shoving people into upstate prisons, where county governments may profit from their physical presence without heeding their political interests.

Forty-five years after the passage of the Voting Rights Act, hundreds of thousands of incarcerated people have been politically and socially disenfranchised, removed from the electorate and the workforce, and their communities. Until they're free to participate fully in democracy, the new law ensures that many at least will be counted as part of the communities they've been pulled away from, instead of the ones that lock them up 

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Shred the constitution?

Shred the constitution? Really, that's what you think would be happening if the gift of citizenship was limited to those in the country legally?
Those of us that support limiting automatic citizenship probably have a much better understanding of the intent of the 14th amendment than you seem to. It's original intent was to provide the rights of citizenship to people that were brought here against their will, as in sold into slavery.
I love the fact that the USA is made up of people from all around the world, but I am certainly very concerned about people coming here illegally and then having children as a method of obtaining entrance as family members of a citizen. You should too.



I've read about this in the

I've read about this in the past, so the new law sounds good. I have never thought it right, either, that a prison sentence should deprive a person of their right to vote. This has always struck me as absurd and unjust. We would all be better off if the people in prison also voted. They would vote with the interests of regular people, not the Washington crooks. Also, the opportunity to vote is rehabilitative. I am sure many of the people in prison, now, didn't vote before they wound up in prison. I suspect that there is a correlation between non-voters and people in prison, and also those who vote and do not wind up there.

But obviously, we don't have a prison system for the reasons it's *supposed* to be there. So rationality is irrelevant.



Where in the U.S

Where in the U.S Constitution does the govt. have the power to deny any citizen the right to vote? That is an issue for real progressives as well as right wing constitutionalists.

What about barring the unemployed from voting, since they don't pay income tax? Why not bar welfare moms, since they don't contribute? Why not ban those convicted for spouse abuse or DUIs, to "teach them a lesson"? Where does this end? Well it shouldn't have ever begun.



This reform proposal was

This reform proposal was much better than those introduced in some states. In Wisconsin the proposal was to simply not count prisoners at all! Not only would the (rural) counties housing prisoners not be able to count them, the (urban) home communities would not be able to either. Luckily that proposal failed to move forward.