News in Brief: Fast Food Workers to Vote on Joining Wobblies, and More ...
Thursday 21 October 2010
by: Mike Ludwig, t r u t h o u t | News in Brief
Fast Food Workers to Vote on Joining Wobblies
On Friday, the often eccentric and low-paid workers at Jimmy John's sandwich franchises in Minnesota will vote on unionizing with the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW), according to The New York Times. Most workers make minimum wage ($7.25) and are fed up with uncertain hours and cranky bosses. The local boss, Milwaukee franchisee Mike Mulligan, told the Times that his portion of the fast-food chain is under attack by a "dangerous socialist-anarchist organization." Some of his workers accuse him of red baiting, and he spends $3,000 a day on a union busting firm, according to the IWW. Jimmy John's is a fast-food sandwich chain that often pops up in Midwest college towns and bohemian neighborhoods and is notorious among the youth for subjecting workers to low pay and harassment. The historic IWW union (better known as the Wobblies), currently boasts 1,600 members, and most recently made headlines during an attempt at organizing Starbucks' coffee baristas.
Obama Losing Support of Voters in Crucial Districts
A majority of people voting in crucial midterm Congressional elections say that President Barack Obama either brought no change to America or change for the worse, according to a new poll by The Hill. Only 26 percent of voters in ten competitive House districts say Obama has delivered on his promise to bring change to America, while 41 percent of voters say he has brought change for the worse, and 30 percent say he has made no difference in Washington.
Green Party Attacks Democrats for Shifting Right
A Green Party official told RawStory.com that the Democratic Party has shifted to the right and it's time for liberal voters to consider an alternative. "This is a very opportune moment to tell people that whether you elect Democrats or Republicans, you're basically getting a GOP agenda," said Green Party spokesmen Scott McLarty. The Democrats are moving right on issues like health care and climate change, and have gone along with Republicans by supporting the wars and military spending, according to McLarty.
Tons of Marijuana Burned in Mexico
The Mexican government held a media event and burned a massive 134-ton pile of confiscated marijuana on Thursday, according to The New York Times. The giant pot bonfire in Tijuana is meant to hype a government victory in Mexico's bloody drug war. The weed is expected to burn for days and came from the largest bust in the country's history.
Obama's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Challenge Is Traditional, Not Mandatory
A recent Huffington Post article explains the legal tradition behind the Obama administration's decision to challenge a federal judge's ruling that declared the "don't ask, don't tell" unconstitutional despite the President Obama's effort to repeal the ban on openly gay military members. The Department of Justice is generally charged with defending laws enacted by Congress. But as a prominent gay rights attorney pointed out on Tuesday, exceptions have been made on the federal level. The Huffington Pos pointed out that the George H. Bush administration's Justice Department refused to defend a 1992 cable television law that the former president originally vetoed because he believed it was unconstitutional.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
The Joe Miller/journalist
Thu, 10/21/2010 - 15:18 — Anonymous (not verified)The Joe Miller/journalist episode ought to make it very clear that the republicans are planning and organizing a military dictatorship for 2012, or sooner if they can organize a coup d'etat. The urgency of this cannot be overstated, especially now, two weeks before the first stage in the takeover.
Futhermore, it has to be assumed that Miller's active-duty military thugs, as they acted in direct defiance of U.S. law and the consitution, did so with the explicit knowledge and connivance of their military superiors, who have made it clear that no disciplinary or legal action will be taken.
The Democrats, as disturbing as many of their actions are are nowhere nearly as far as the Republicans along the road to outright dictatorship.
Voting for democrats is simply a matter of keeping the public debate going vs. the end of every vestige of democracy in this country.
"But this year’s midterm
Thu, 10/21/2010 - 15:38 — Anonymous (not verified)"But this year’s midterm elections will once again result in only Democratic or Republican candidates winning. Other than staying home and not voting, nearly all voters will employ the lesser-evil justification. Just one problem: That lesser-evil strategy has resulted in the dismal state of the nation that angers most Americans.
The only logical conclusion is that lesser-evil voting perpetuates all the cancerous evil plaguing the political system. This should not surprise anyone. Regardless of party affiliation, major party candidates convincingly lie to voters and the tons of money poured into politics create a mass propaganda machine from both parties that deceives voters.
...
Your lesser-evil vote perpetuates evil. Do you want to live with that? "
How Your "Lesser Evil Vote" Perpetuates Evil
globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=21530
"Lesser evil vote", oh how
Fri, 10/22/2010 - 02:07 — Joe the voter (not verified)"Lesser evil vote", oh how we hide our heads in the sand and swing our behinds in the air.
How hard is it to 'choose the lesser?'
How hard is it?
Flip a lever, fill a line, a bubble. Hand in, mail in, send over the internet your insignificant but potentially oh so powerful input....
How significant is voting anyways?
Far from perfect, totally flawed as currently configured, but better than the sand in the eyes and ass in the air... :)
Hate to be flippant or rude, but you are a coward or a fool if you are too proud or ignorant to cast your vote, to express your opinion in our semi annual dance of public opinion polls and propaganda machine churns.
Don't tell me a Roberts court is no different than a Warren court.
Heck, sometimes waiting in line to get a latte is more difficult than voting. So don't pretend you are some type of 'revolutionary' if you obtain.
As a better man than me said. "Get up, stand up for your rights."
Cheers,
Joe
Joe the voter, I think union
Fri, 10/22/2010 - 10:05 — Lavrenti Beria (not verified)Joe the voter,
I think union activists still call people like you a scab. A civil rights activist would probably use the term, Uncle Tom. I'll call you a schlemiel. If, after all the evidence the last several decades have laid bare of the unspeakable corruption in our political system and its utter unresponsiveness to the peoples' interests, you're still unable to see through the illusion presented by the two-party edifice, you have sacrificed any claim to sanity. Headline: moral people don't identify themselves with maggots. Stay home on election day.
Everything I could say in
Fri, 10/22/2010 - 11:12 — Austin Loomis (not verified)Everything I could say in answer to the anons, and to Joe the voter, was already said 234 years ago:
"...all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security."
The problem, of course, being that television (which must be destroyed) has greatly expanded the amount of evil that most Americans can and will suffer.
Not speaking for anyone but
Fri, 10/22/2010 - 11:16 — Austin Loomis (not verified)Not speaking for anyone but me and the bat in my pocket, but I "see through the illusion presented by the two-party edifice" just fine. I know it's going to either fall or be brought down; I just don't want to be under it, or to leave anyone else stranded under it, when it collapses, and I don't want to knock it down on top of the decent lives people have built outside it.