Nuke U: How the University of California Is Helping to Blow Up the World

by: Norman Solomon  |  The Bohemian | Op-Ed

On my way to the Los Alamos National Laboratory a few years ago, I found it listed in a New Mexico phone book—under "University of California."

Since the early 1940s, UC has managed the nation's top laboratories for designing nuclear bombs. Today, California's public university system is still immersed in the nuclear weapons business.

Sixty-five years after the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on Aug. 6 and 9, 1945, the University of California imprimatur is an air freshener for the stench of preparations for global annihilation. Nuclear war planners have been pleased to exploit UC's vast technical expertise and its image of high-minded academic purpose.

During most of WWII, scientists labored in strict secrecy at the isolated Los Alamos lab in the New Mexico desert, making possible the first nuclear weaponry. After the atomic bombings of Japan, UC continued to manage Los Alamos. And in 1952, when the government opened a second nuclear bomb generator, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory east of San Francisco, UC won the prize to manage operations there, too.

A few years into the 21st century, security scandals caused a shakeup. UC lost its exclusive management slots at Los Alamos and Livermore, but retained major roles at both laboratories.

In mid-2006, the Los Alamos lab went under a new management structure, widened to also include Bechtel and a couple of other private firms. A year later, a similar team, likewise including UC and Bechtel, won a deal to jointly manage Livermore.

At Los Alamos, I learned that the new management team was, legally speaking, an LLC, a limited liability corporation. I'm still trying to wrap my mind around the concept of "limited liability" for managers of a laboratory that designs nuclear weapons.

Weird, huh? But not any stranger than having the state of California's top system of higher education devoted to R&D for designing better ways to blow up the planet.

Yes, those laboratories do some nifty ecological research and other laudable things. But nuclear weapons remain central to the labs' mission. And, lofty rhetoric aside, the federal government is pouring billions more dollars into the continuous high-tech pursuit of nuclear weapons "modernization."

Last spring, the White House announced plans for this decade that include investing $80 billion "to sustain and modernize the nuclear weapons complex"—in addition to "well over $100 billion in nuclear delivery systems to sustain existing capabilities and modernize some strategic systems."

In fact, the U.S. government is now on a jag to boost spending for its nuclear arsenal. As the Livermore-based organization Tri-Valley CAREs noted weeks ago, "the 2011 budget request for nuclear weapons is the largest in our nation's history; bigger than under George W. Bush and a whopping 40 percent higher than the amount spent for nuclear weapons activities on average during the Cold War."

Credit where due: the UC-managed laboratories for nuclear bombs have been on the cutting edge of digital advancement. Their record recalls a comment from Martin Luther King Jr., who noted the proliferation of "guided missiles and misguided men."

When I interviewed Los Alamos press officer Kevin Roark, he explained that "this laboratory has been at the forefront of computing research and development" from the Manhattan Project days of slide rules and punch cards to the lab's present-day computers, with one able to do upwards of 100 trillion calculations per second.

An official website of the University of California boasts that "UC has been involved in the management of these laboratories since their inception—a relationship spanning seven decades—as a public service to the nation." With a lab on the UC Berkeley campus included in the mix, "the three laboratories have a combined workforce of more than 21,000 and operate on federally financed budgets totaling more than $4 billion."

For sure, there's plenty of money sloshing around to reward the masters—and academic servants—of the nuclear weapons industry. But should the University of California be managing laboratories that design the latest technologies for nuclear holocaust?

Norman Solomon is national co-chair of the Healthcare Not Warfare campaign and the author of many books, including 'War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death.' He lives in Marin County.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



UC slid down that potential

UC slid down that potential well some time ago.
BP is a major UC "partner" as has been Bechtel
for generations now. And need one remind anyone that that flipping fascist torture memo
man, John Yoo, is a tenured professor of "law"
at UC Berkeley's "law" school?



All that money sloshing

All that money sloshing around and they can't study the connection between radiation and cancer or recognize that uranium is poisonous? I don't buy it.

How do we know they are not just part of a 'Christian' plot to kill us all? Everyone that I know who works there, or has worked there, was a devout Christian.

Since they promote 'End Times' theology, I think we should take the idea that it is a murderous conspiracy very seriously.

I have an idea, lets do it BEFORE it is too late.



Berkeley has a bad rap as a

Berkeley has a bad rap as a hotbed of liberalism.

It was discoveries like those written about in this article that led to the student anger of the 60s and 70s there. And UC was not alone. All colleges and universities have been tapped by the Defense Department for research.

Maybe so-called conservatives could comfortably and knowingly live next to nuclear research facilities, but I doubt it. Somehow Three Mile Island is not a tourist draw. I submit that it was thinking people of all stripes who were dismayed back in the 60s.



Most of the major research

Most of the major research universities were heavily into nuclear and other types of weapons development back in the '60s. That's in part what Mario Savio at U C Berkeley and all the people at Columbia were trying to raise awareness about. And that's what the national security apparatus was so upset about to the point of threatening student protesters unless they shut up about it. What we have now--a nation that goes to war based on lies because the military-industrial complex needs to reduce its inventory so we can spend $600B more a year is no more than the logical outgrowth of what was forged then. But the way the economy is going there isn't going to be "plenty of [tax] money" to keep this up: you have to have a job if you're going to be taxed.



Some years after Ike's

Some years after Ike's famous Military-Industrial Complex, some guy added to it: Military-Industrial-Academic Complex, regognizing that our govt pours billions into research at our universities, mostly for millitary studies. Some of this work has a spill over into the private non-military sector, after some time, but the idea that the govt would simply grant money for research smacks of soclialism so they got away with it because it was for our military needs (?). Ask around at any university about govt grants and you will see what the money is for. Berkeley is a famous and very bit example of a marriage between the two rather than a simple grant of money.



We should be both accurate

We should be both accurate and fair. Although I agree with Norman Solomon's overall thesis, the Berkeley campus is not a weapons lab, and the major directions of its research efforts for the last fifty years or so deserve praise not condemnation. For instance, under the direction of Arthur Rosenfeld the Lawrence Berkeley Lab pretty much initiated successful practical research on building energy conservation, e.g., heat retaining windows. Moreover at least one past LBL Director, Andrew Sessler, has been (and still is) an important fighter for international human rights, and was known as such when appointed as Director. Whether or not the UC Berkeley leadership should be criticized for its willingness, indeed eagerness, to manage the Los Alamos and Livermore Labs, maintaining LBL merits approbation.