Nurses' Unions for Health Care

by: Laura Flanders  |  GRITtv

More GRITtv

The California Nurses Association and other nurses' unions were some of the strongest voices for real healthcare reform, continuing to call for single-payer Medicare for All even now. But with the birth of the new National Nurses United, the nurses are fighting battles on all fronts for healthcare - from a strike at Temple University Hospital in Philadelphia to struggles with Massachusetts' program.

Joining us from Boston to talk about the nurses' union, patient care, and what's next after this healthcare bill is Karen Higgins, co-president of National Nurses United, who says that any fight on behalf of patients is their fight. 

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Look out nurses, this is

Look out nurses, this is Federal SOP: Claim the program is what you wanted (instead Of SINGLE-PAYER as PROMISED and you clearly Fought FOR), then keep you busy with these diversionary fights and thereby dilute your efforts to refocus on single-payer! Better "keep your eyes on The PRIZE": SINGLE-PAYER!!



Speaking as an RN who nearly

Speaking as an RN who nearly worked that strike (don't have a PA license) - I am pro union and support the RNs striking. I am a leftist. I am also desperate to have work. You will find that many if not most of the RNs working a strike are broke, are single parents, maybe have lost their houses, and are desperate for work. I am on unemployment because I cannot get hired - I feel now it's age discrimination (over 50 yrs). So please don't demonize RNs who work a strike. It is hard as hell to walk into a new facility and have to hit the ground running. Do you all also hate travel RNs? Some of us can barely get by and will take work whereever we can get it. We also support you and would love to have a great benefitted union job, ourselves.



What is so disgusting to me

What is so disgusting to me (among other things) about our health care system is how much money goes into billing people, and how little into direct care. I read at the Physicians For A National Health Care site about this one hospital with 900 beds - and 1 nurse per a ridiculous amount of patients - yet, one billing person per bed!! This is obscene.

Under the present *overhaul*, there is a lot of expansion of garbage -- especially, billing garbage - whether it's for the state, the insurers, the IRS, on and on this goes. I read they're hiring 20,000 people for the IRS just to go after people on these mandates. When this could be easily coming out of a payroll tax through simple single payer legislation opening up Medicare. And we could be hiring 20,000 nurses (at the very least) instead.

Yet as this interview reports, instead, they are virtually not expanding nurse services. Don't we need to hire more nurses? I mean, DUH.

They're making such a show of their "courage" in Washington, and they haven't been courageous at all.

What a bunch of elected twirps.



It seems the nurses are

It seems the nurses are going to be key now in moving the national discussion back into single payer, and what everyone knows should have been on the table, but wasn't, because the insurance ghouls.



I wish all the people who

I wish all the people who don't like the way things are in the US whether it be Healthcare or the war or the expanding deficit would look in the mirror rather than trying to blame "them" whomever that might be.

What is wrong with our government is that our elected officials primary focus is to guarantee their own reelection rather than do what is best for their constituents. The only way to stop that is to vote against everybody who is currently in office and then make it clear to their replacements that they will be in office for one and only one term unless they pay attention to those whom the represent.

Unfortunately that will never happen because most of you who complain vote for letters (D or R) rather than people, and you always vote for the same letter regardless of how you think that things are going.

If your member of the House of Representatives did not support single-payer (Medicare for All), set yourself free and vote for a different letter this November.



"Truthout" huh, how about

"Truthout" huh, how about the TRUTH abOUT the vote in Brewster MA, last OCT,390 mna members out of 23000 voted at an distant site on a thursday afternoon to affiliate with NNU! 1.9% of voting members nevermind the fact
that most MNA members on a thusday afternoon are at WORK. YUP no mail in ballots you Had to be IN BREWSTER!.maybe if "TRUTHOUT" did real 'JOURNALISM" instead of echo chamber rah-rah interviews with one of the masterminds of the vote( crime) last year we (MNA NURSES) would have more respect for a clearly left wing site with an agenda which i would bet most MNA nurses find alien( see Scott Brown election). Tom Adams RN for 27 yrs, MNA, 22 yrs( still at bedside)



I have to echo Tom’s

I have to echo Tom’s skepticism. Karen’s opinions would have a lot more credibility if she wasn’t one of the Massachusetts Nurses Association Board members behind the Sham vote to merge with the CNA/NNU last October, and who was then quickly “appointed” to the co-president seat of the NNU.      

 



14:34, I sympathize with

14:34, I sympathize with your sense of hopelessness, but I don't think what you propose is going to get anything except the Republicans back for another round. I think the best course of action is to keep trying to get better candidates out there at the local level, do the best with what we've got, one compared to the other, and strategize where Americans really do have power. Not so much at the polls, but with their pocketbooks as consumers. Let's face it, health care is, in a way, a civil war. Elections are, for the most part, bullshit. The more people deal with that directly, the more they'll have to decide whether they're willing to put down their lives or not, and drop their effing insurance or refuse to pay these bills or stop going for medical care. People are going to keep dying anyway. The point is whether or not their death is going to mean anything or get our society overall, further on, as a result of that. That, I am beginning to think, is the true spirit of "revolution." You don't have to literally pick up a gun or be violent. But you have to be willing to lay your life down. No one else can do it for you. No ones else can tell you to do it. But as far as voting is concerned, this is the big mistake of the progressive movement today. They think we can fix things if just enough people can elect a third party candidate. Or punish the 1st party by sending in the second party. Or they get so frustrated because they can't steam up the ship, so to speak. It's much easier and much less costly, believe it or not, to do it the way I am suggesting -- and mind you, I can't make anyone else do anything stupid or smart. They have to decide for themselves. Can you imagine if Americans were really seized with the fervor of the Founding Fathers? At this point, the last thing, IMV, they would do, is think about the voting polls. Did George listen when Ben Franklin went over, as a representation?



14:34, Imagine if we were

14:34, Imagine if we were actually able to elect Ralph Nader, for example, to the presidency. There's no doubt someone like him openly supports single payer. And would continue to do so (though we know just getting into the presidency means they sell out along the way). But, for the sake of argument, we get someone in who doesn't sell out. What in the world would Ralph do differently that could actually get single payer through considering all the scoundrels in Washington? And considering that his election is a near impossibility, how in the world, in our lifetimes, would we see an entire or near entire Congress filled with his clones? Just speaking mathematically, that is. So, the answer has to lie elsewhere. IMO.



14:34, In conclusion (since

14:34, In conclusion (since your comment obviously sparked some thoughts for me .. :) ) .. Health care reform is so unforthcoming, at this point, and even if it passes, with the economy as it is, still unforthcoming -- I simply accept that I will die if something critical happens and I can't get care in time, or, I can't get care at all. So, I think more people have to face this. Not the polls. But the fact that they MAY lose their life. They MAY lose their home. So let people vote whatever the way they want. But REALIZE that this is not the road to change. Don't get riled up about the voting. Organize where change can really be effected. Die on their effing doorsteps. Dump the bodies at the door. Show up the hospitals en mass, anonymous, demanding health care as your effing right as an American without the gd health insurance companies! Don't pay your bills! Make it mean something, and do it together. Thank you for listening if you're there. Peace.