Obama Vows to End Homelessness in Ten Years
Tuesday 22 June 2010
by: Tony Pugh | McClatchy Newspapers | Report

(Photo: Ed Yourdon)
Washington - The Obama administration on Tuesday unveiled an ambitious plan that aspires to end homelessness among some of society's most vulnerable groups within the next decade.
"Opening Doors," a "Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness," calls for ending child and family homelessness in 10 years while wiping out chronic homelessness and homelessness among veterans in five years.
According to the 74-page plan, "Stable housing is the foundation upon which people build their lives — absent a safe, decent, affordable place to live, it is next to impossible to achieve good health, positive educational outcomes or reach one's economic potential."
The plan is a significant breakthrough because there's never been a comprehensive federal effort to end homelessness with a timeline and measureable goals, said Nan Roman, the president of the National Alliance to End Homelessness.
"To me that's really important, because we know that when the Bush administration made a commitment to end chronic homelessness, it really made a huge difference," she said. "It changed how resources were allocated. It caused better coordination, and the result has been that the chronic numbers have gone down. Now they're taking that same approach and they're expanding it to the other homeless populations. I think that's significant."
Other advocates also lauded the plan's goals, but they questioned the lack of details about how some of the proposals would be paid for.
"The big question is whether preventing children and families in the U.S. from becoming homeless is important enough for Congress" to increase homeless-program funding, "and I don't think they'll do that without enough pressure and leadership from the White House," said Maria Foscarinis, the executive director of the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty. "In order to achieve these goals, the funding has to be there, and that means the administration has to really be firm and advocate."
"Opening Doors" comes a week after a government report showed that nearly 1.6 million people, including more than 170,000 U.S. families, spent time in homeless shelters last year as the recession, mounting foreclosures and record unemployment sent people scrambling for shelter.
The number of families in homeless shelters jumped 7 percent by nearly 11,000 families from 2008 to 2009. Overall, family homelessness was up 30 percent in 2009 from 2007.
The economic stimulus bill has helped 357,000 people by moving some from homeless shelters into their own apartments and by providing rent payments to prevent others from becoming homeless. Many agencies that distribute the money already have exhausted or committed their two- and three-year allocations, however, and some are turning away needy people as their funding dwindles.
With most homeless shelters at capacity, many homeless families are moving in, or "doubling up," with friends and relatives in overcrowded households.
Against this backdrop, federal legislation that President Barack Obama signed in May 2009 required the U.S. Interagency Council on Homelessness to develop "Opening Doors" as the first national plan to combat homelessness.
While it's more a road map for direction than a detailed blueprint for immediate action, "Opening Doors" outlines the government's commitment to make homelessness a priority for all federal agencies and to partner with states, localities, private organizations and other stakeholders to make existing homeless programs more effective and efficient by using strategies that already have proved to be successful, Most notable among these efforts is combining housing and supportive services for the chronically homeless.
Nationally, there are 234 community plans to end homelessness and 84 percent of them are 10-year plans, according to the National Alliance to End Homelessness.
Last year, the alliance identified four factors as crucial for plan success: putting a person or organization in charge of its implementation, setting specific numeric goals, setting a timeline for completion and identifying a funding source. In a survey of the first 90 communities to establish 10-year plans, however, the alliance found that only 8 percent of those plans had dedicated funding sources and only 18 percent had specific numeric goals. Only 41 percent set timelines for implementation and 35 percent had people or groups in charge of achieving the plans.
A demonstration project that the Obama administration requested in its 2011 federal budget proposal offers a glimpse into the kind of multi-agency programming that "Opening Doors" envisions.
The Obama proposal would direct 4,000 Section 8 housing vouchers to homeless people who need treatment from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration along with health care, child care and employment services from Medicaid and Temporary Assistance for Needy Families.
This multi-layered assistance is known as permanent supportive housing. It's primarily for chronically homeless people who have disabilities, are tough to employ and are prone to long, frequent bouts of homelessness. The Obama proposal is modeled after similar efforts during the George W. Bush administration, which set a goal in 2002 to end chronic homelessness in 10 years.
Under the Bush initiative, the nation's chronic homeless population fell to 111,000 in 2009 from nearly 156,000 in 2006, after 42,000 permanent supportive housing slots were added. In deference to the Bush efforts, "Opening Doors" proposes to "finish the job of ending chronic homelessness in five years."
"Opening Doors" will focus resources on housing youths who age out of the foster care program at 18 and often end up homeless within a few months. Similar attention will be paid to homeless veterans, who accounted for 13 percent of the people who were in shelters last year.
The new plan also calls for government and private sources to provide more rent subsidies for individuals and families who are at risk of becoming homeless. The subsidies, similar to the Section 8 housing program, would allow recipients to pay a maximum of 30 percent of their income for housing.
Funding rental vouchers through the Department of Housing and Urban Development's Section 8 program has proved a difficult battle in Congress. The House of Representatives hasn't yet begun floor debate on the Section 8 Voucher Reform Act, which passed the House Financial Services Committee last July. The bill would provide subsidies for 150,000 more low-income families, but housing advocates are pushing for another 2 million vouchers over the next 10 years; that would double the current amount.
The report also calls for replenishing the nation's dwindling supply of affordable rental housing by funding the National Housing Trust Fund, which was created in 2008 as a permanent federal funding source to help construct, renovate and preserve 1.5 million units of rental housing for low-income families over 10 years.
The fund was slated to provide up to $1 billion a year for states and local governments to award grants to developers and organizations that agree to build or rehabilitate low-income housing, but Congress hasn't funded the measure because of the economic downturn.
From 2001 to 2007, the stock of affordable rental units fell by 6.3 percent, or 1.2 million units, while the supply of high-rent units increased 94.3 percent. For every new affordable-housing unit that's constructed, two are demolished, abandoned or converted to condominiums or expensive rentals, according to the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Well, he didn't actually
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 12:45 — Anonymous (not verified)Well, he didn't actually stop many foreclosures created by Wall Street, whom at the current time has watered down any threat to their casino.
The only part that will
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 13:05 — Ravan Asteris (not verified)The only part that will really have a long term effect is building more affordable housing units. Otherwise it's just an expensive game of musical chairs. See http://wraphome.org/index.php/campaigns/without-housing for why.
Housing is available
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 13:17 — Anonymous (not verified)Housing is available everywhere, banks own a whole lot of it, I think the lie is that their isn't enough "affordable" housing, BS, it's Wall Street that price fixes, get them out of housing and viola, end of imaginary "crisis". Government uses the ruse of "affordability" to exercise eminent domain on behalf of developers, who's business of building takes priority over homelessness, or countless other social problems for that matter.
We've tried the housing
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 13:21 — Anonymous (not verified)We've tried the housing projects approach, basically allowed to fester when Gov decided to stop the funding. This is a pathetic gesture from Obummer, who seems to be reaching for the stars at this point in his atrocious presidency. He actually blames homeowners for the bubble and resulting collapse, wiping out millions of jobs, and now this non-specific bellow of hot air. His administration has worked to derail regulations that would have prevented another disasterous bubble that made many people homeless in the first place. Impeach!
This is one of the most
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 14:13 — JSD (not verified)This is one of the most difficult problems facing this country, and the problem with any good idea will be funding and follow-through administration.
We could try 'homeless camps' for example, but for political success, the perception has to remain that this is well thought out and administered, and no one is stealing from it.
And, whatever you do, you have to keep out gangs and drug dealing.
It's a huge undertaking to balance control with respect for human rights and dignity.
And, at the first signs of fiasco, legislatures will shut it down, or withdraw funding.
So, I am very glad to hear the President talking this way. 'The devil is in the details,' couldn't be truer here.
What faith can those on the
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 14:59 — Vic Anderson (not verified)What faith can those on the street have in Obummer's reneging rhetoric? They may as ill, Pray INSTEAD for relief from the fury of Bernanksters, Wall Street-walkers and now Barry's Grease-gun Molls!
"affordable housing" aka
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 16:03 — Anonymous (not verified)"affordable housing" aka government housing and nothing says success more than the term "government housing."
If we deported all illegals
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 16:52 — Midwest Tom (not verified)If we deported all illegals and truly closed our borders would we even have a problem? There are thousands of jobs now going to illegals that citizens could and would do. As the economy worsens how do we determine who does not get supported? In my opinion the last group to get cut should be the police, because the one thing that destroys a society is corrupt police. One of the early targets should be AID for DEPENDENT CHILDREN. The program that has produced over 80% of our prison population.
Until bailout supports are
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 18:12 — Anonymous (not verified)Until bailout supports are removed, prices hit bottom, and the predators take the plunge with them, homelessness will increase exponentially.
I am living homeless too, fortunately with a van, and will continue to indefinitely until the economy normalizes.
Expect homelessness to double, triple, and quadruple until then.
The loudest squealing and oinking will be from the 'rich' or more accurately, the 'we thought we were rich' crowd as they watch their 'investments' evaporate.
I have NO sympathy whatsoever for them on this, but I do know that when they are finally wiped financially, as they MUST be, that I would never force them to live in the street as they have so many others.
The gov technically now owns
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 18:16 — Anonymous (not verified)The gov technically now owns over 75% of US housing. It should come out and SAY SO, removing ALL other claims from these properties. THEN let Uncle Sam be our new landlord.
Modest rents and fair, low prices determined by actual demand with tight credit only can then be the norm.
America is crippled as a nation when the majority of it's citizens are left without shelter and basic medical just to keep a handful of pigs filthy rich.
These ' rich' need not be
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 18:16 — Anonymous (not verified)These ' rich' need not be punished and must NOT be assisted until they are on normal terms like everyone else. They are unsustainable in their unearned position of 'superiority'. It is unnatural and will continue to destroy our country until they are allowed to fall to their actual worth.
Actually, it's the police
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 18:25 — Anonymous (not verified)Actually, it's the police who produced 100% of our prison population.
I'm not a Republican nor a
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 19:14 — Anonymous (not verified)I'm not a Republican nor a Libertarian; I used to be Democrat. I'm sick of how the Democrats have sold us down the river time and again. I don't have faith one that this balloon is gonna fly. It's a scam. I'm burnt out on all this bullshit. Obama better come across big time. Obama and the Obama administration has a lot of compensating to do, and it has to swing way way way over to the left to balance all the rightwing BS that has happened over the last 25 years.
It has been the rightwing of the Republican and Democrat parties that have bankrupted this country. Both right wings are to blame for this. That means the common ordinary people that support these bastards. Yes, there are definitely rightwing Lefties. The right wing of the Right are even worse. And I have never seen a left wing of the Right. So do the math.
End homelessness; yah. Not.
We homeless are going to camp on the White House lawn and in the Rose Garden until this new snake oil really happens. Seeing is believing.
Providing housing for these
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 19:15 — Anonymous (not verified)Providing housing for these people is not going to solve the problem...most of the homeless are either mentally ill, alcoholics, or drug addicts or all of the above and until that is addressed you can provide all the housing you want to but they will ultimately end up back out on the streets...I live in San Diego where the homeless problem has been getting worse and this is a much deeper problem than a simple lack of housing. There is also a big problem at the beaches with young homeless people that are really just nasty punks and very violent. Obama is just as out of touch with reality as Bush was...
That's another g-damn lie,
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 19:31 — Anonymous (not verified)That's another g-damn lie, that the "homeless suffer from intractable problems" ergo there is nothing we can do for them. This is the liberal white wash of Reagan era hostility that said "They must want to be on the street". Bullsh#t!
Arm the homeless!
All your homeless will be
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 20:17 — mot (not verified)All your homeless will be dead in ten years.
All "new " homeless will be dead in ten years+
whatever from this historic POTUS date.
Your whole country has become a twisted & brutal
B movie in which you're trapped.
Many of the chronically
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 20:38 — Anonymous (not verified)Many of the chronically homeless do suffer from mental health and substance abuse issues...but that doesn't mean there isn't anything that can be done for them. Any plan to tackle homelessness must include some plans and funds earmarked for psychiatric and drug/alcohol treatment. The reason why this never happens in the real world is that it's easier and much more politically expedient to just throw these people in jail. After all, a jail cell is technically a home...
The 'homeless,' suffer rates
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 21:29 — Anonymous (not verified)The 'homeless,' suffer rates of chronic mental illness and drug dependency at less than the 'homed.'
Check the statistics, more than anything this lie told about the 'chronically homeless,' has hurt the cause of helping those who are not homed.
As a society, this proves the adage that helping those less fortunate and those unable to care for themselves is less a priority than helping the 'filthy rich' retain their wealth.
"vows to end homelessness in
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 23:08 — Anonymous (not verified)"vows to end homelessness in ten years."
That sounds very good to me. Why not sooner, though? There's an awful lot of unused housing lying around.
A remarkable amount of
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 23:59 — P Williams (not verified)A remarkable amount of affordable housing is to be had in manufactured home parks where you pay ground rent for the site. I own a double wide 28 feet by 60 feet with a large porch. It has three bedrooms and two full baths, one en suite. Legally, it's treated as a vehicle. But it isn't going anywhere unless the park management opts to sell it in a conversion. If that would happen, my investment in my home might be virtually gone. Poof. I'm in a good park. There are many good parks. But unscrupulous owners can do and have done terrible things to force people out, losing everything and facing displacement or homelessness. We need equitable law that stabilizes this segment of the population and addresses assistance when necessary for the ground rents. It's a lot cheaper for the government to keep people in their homes than try to help them after they've lost them.
This is absurd--He can't
Wed, 06/23/2010 - 06:33 — morgan1 (not verified)This is absurd--He can't even deal with joblessness for those recently unemployed and being discriminated against (See Want Ads stressing no unemployed need apply). Foreclosures are still on the rise and hundreds of thousands of strips malls, houses, apartment bldgs and town homes are sitting empty--There is no shortage of housing for anyone. Long term homeless need medical, housing, shelter and social programs merely to survive and those have been gutted, and are being gutted as I write this. Hell, he can't even get us out of the ME or deal with the Gulf crisis. He will be gone in less than two years, so his 10 year plan is all smoke and mirrors and a "feelgood" moment. BS.
Seize all the foreclosures
Wed, 06/23/2010 - 07:55 — Anonymous (not verified)Seize all the foreclosures from the lying, cheating, stealing wall street boys and give them to the people who are in need. Hell, while your at it, reduce every other mortgage by 15 years of payments to make up for the "bubble". And if the banksters don't like it, then we'll add a new tax of 99% to any corporate profits in excess of 500k and any salary in excess of 500k.
As the mother of a young man
Wed, 06/23/2010 - 10:10 — Anonymous (not verified)As the mother of a young man who has a mental illness and has had substance abuse problems in the past (fortunately we are in Canada, so he is not homeless--but too many mentally ill people are homeless here as well) I can tell you that the best hope for the mentally ill to normalize their lives (i.e. continue treatment, find employment, etc.) is to have a secure place to live. Anyone who has researched mental illness knows this.
The homelessness of mentally ill people began when institutions were closed down but follow-up and support in the community did not happen, though it had been promised.
Also, more and more, homelessness is affecting ordinary people who do not have mental illness or addiction problems.
It's extraordinary the
Wed, 06/23/2010 - 12:16 — Joanne Baek (not verified)It's extraordinary the generalization that goes on about homelessness by those outside the experience without considering the realities of simply not having enough money to supply basic needs, and therefore to maintain housing and health.
The last time I knew the stats (a while ago), 50% of the homeless were women and children who had left abusive domestic situations. With rising numbers of returning vets and foreclosures, I am sure there are still as many women and children in homelessness fleeing abuse, but that they are less in overall percentage. Do you really want to assume these women and children are mentally ill, drug addicts, or there because illegal aliens displaced them? Might you instead consider empathy, and then solutions?
I ask you where you would go if you had insufficient funds, even insufficient credit to pay your rent or mortgage, or even pay for the cheapest place available? And if you had no family or friends to help? Are you mentally ill and a substance addict?
In our society builders do not build because people need homes--builders build to make money. Therefore they don't build for those with the least financial resources... the better profits will always be from those of greater means. Building codes back up the difficulty of building cheap and unlikelihood of building for those in real housing need.
Now, imagine you have no money (your place of employment folded, and you can't find another job... or your cancer treatments cost you everything and you are still sick), and you are evicted, or leave before you are. No place to sleep, food is rare to say the least, and when you fall asleep in a public place, someone wakes you up with a foot. Prolonged sleep deprivation, starvation, no one kind to you... how is YOUR mental health holding up after weeks of this? after months? after years?
If mental illness and drug abuse rather than home-less-ness is what brings people into homelessness, why do foster kids end up there so quickly once families aren't paid to keep them? Again, empathy and solutions, please for these people. And imagine having grownup in one of the less wonderful foster placements, never feeling wanted, and then graduate into the world of homelessness and having the whole world treat you as unwanted?
Could we value people instead, no matter what their health, financial, and relationship status is, and allow them sleep, food, housing, access to a living, social participation and education?
Programs are important, but empathy and respect and kindness can also begin some of the changes needed. Protecting the right to sleep when a person needs to sleep would be very helpful. Buying an extra lunch and giving it to someone would be very helpful. And if you make a friend you could consider sharing that spare room. These aren't answers, but they are starts, they are part of the answer.
Who said that ALL of the
Wed, 06/23/2010 - 15:16 — Anonymous (not verified)Who said that ALL of the homeless population in this country have psychiatric/addiction problems? Of course many of the homeless are victims of abusive/fractured living situations, lack of employment, foreclosure, or otherwise down on their luck. Yet it's impossible to deny that some of the homeless don't also suffer from serious, untreated, psychiatric and substance abuse problems. Granted, these conditions may not be what made them homeless in the first place (although they often are via loss of job, inability to manage one's finances, legal troubles) but they are certainly a major force in keeping them on the streets.
If you truly value humanity and expect these individuals to live a healthy and independent life of their own, once you've given them food and shelter, you must address any underlying behavioral issues that contribute to their homelessness. That includes, as Anon 15:10 said, extended community followup. To argue for anything less is simply short-sighted and inhumane.
Yesterday on Harvard Square
Fri, 07/02/2010 - 15:04 — Arminius Aurelius (not verified)Yesterday on Harvard Square in Cambridge , a healthy young man in his early 20's held a sign , Homeless and Hungry . I have 2 solutions :
1. Put them in the Military for 4 years , we need more cannon fodder.
2. Our infrastructure is deteriorating , put them to work , teach them a trade , it would be a mandatory 4 year tour of duty.