On the Subject of Quitting
Friday 03 December 2010
by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: orsorama, TalkMediaNews)
My head is swimming. My hands are shaking. My teeth are grinding together so hard that my jaw muscles look like I'm storing walnuts in there for the winter.
For once, these symptoms are not being caused by politics. I have not had a cigarette in four days. I have been gobbling nicotine lozenges like M&M's, and am breathing freely for the first time in twenty years. I think I've got this thing licked.
As it turns out, I picked exactly, precisely the right week to undertake this daunting exercise. I might as well have; with everything that has been going on, the physical symptoms I have been suffering - wooziness, tremors, grinding teeth, anxiousness, sleeplessness, and the occasional bout of extreme rage - would have been present anyway. Might as well have something good come out of it.
It was the right time to quit, because if I had still been smoking this week, I would have been sorely tempted to stab a butt out in my eyes, to spare me from having to witness a Democratic presidential administration fly apart at the seams...and not because of some nefarious right-wing plot or media malfeasance. No, Mr. Obama and the pinheads who advise him did this to themselves, and it is disgraceful beyond all measure to behold.
A federal wage freeze was how the week began. Really, Mr. President? What's next? A big sign on the White House lawn saying, "The GOP was right. - BHO" would not surprise me. Way to concede a very contested economic point without putting up even the slightest indication of a fight. Paul Krugman said it best on Friday:
After the Democratic "shellacking" in the midterm elections, everyone wondered how President Obama would respond. Would he show what he was made of? Would he stand firm for the values he believes in, even in the face of political adversity?
On Monday, we got the answer: he announced a pay freeze for federal workers. This was an announcement that had it all. It was transparently cynical; it was trivial in scale, but misguided in direction; and by making the announcement, Mr. Obama effectively conceded the policy argument to the very people who are seeking - successfully, it seems - to destroy him.
So I guess we are, in fact, seeing what Mr. Obama is made of.
It got worse as the week went on. A dog-and-pony meeting between Mr. Obama and congressional Republicans yielded one of the most ridiculous presidential statements since Richard Nixon's demented, gin-soaked farewell address. According to White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, Mr. Obama took responsibility for the partisan tone in Washington DC. "The president acknowledged he needed to do better," said Gibbs.
As a quick recap, before he was even inaugurated, Republican members of Congress were calling President Obama a Marxist Hitler on the House floor. (Had that ever happened before?) Then there was Jim DeMint, who compared Obama to Napoleon and Hitler in the same month. Let's not forget Michele Bachmann's warning that Obama was going to brainwash our children in Marxist gulags to go with her constant hectoring about "socialism."
Then came the Birther Caucus - that group of 17 Republican lawmakers who questioned Obama's citizenship and even introduced legislation which suggested the President isn't quite American. And when Obama planned to address the nation's school children on their first day of class, Republicans rioted.
We can't leave out Republican Joe Wilson's shouting "You lie!" during the State of the Union - which was also without precedent, not to mention the House Republicans cheering their en masse vote against the stimulus, the "death panels," and "pulling the plug on grandma." Can't leave out Lamar Smith (R-TX) suggesting Obama should be impeached for not protecting the border. And who can forget Republican members of Congress proudly speaking at event under a banner that compared the law to the holocaust - all while Republican officials nationwide almost weekly compared Obama to Hitler.
There is a lot of talk about Mr. Obama's character, or lack thereof, these days. He's not a fighter, he's too conciliatory, he's weak, he's unprepared, he's a secret Republican, etc. I have an outside-the-box theory about Obama that may explain all this: Stockholm Syndrome. The malady arises when a hostage situation goes on long enough that the hostages begin to identify with their captors, and in some cases, go so far as to stand up for them, and even defend them in public and in the courts. The GOP has been pounding on Mr. Obama since his presidential campaign began almost four years ago, and I think the pressure and stress might have blended his sense of direction. Left has suddenly become right, and the Democratic President of the United States has become the most eloquent advocate for everything he was elected to put a stop to.
If the White House needed any further evidence that their conciliatory approach (read: retreat) will never, ever, ever, ever yield results with the GOP, all they had to do was check the news wires approximately 0.0000034 seconds after the "meeting" with the GOP ended. After coming together with the president to talk about trying to get along, the GOP emerged and announced with one voice that they would block every single piece of legislation - including a bill to make sure unemployed people don't lose their benefits on the doorstep of Christmas - until Congress made permanent George W. Bush's tax cuts for rich people. As of this writing, it looks for all the world like the White House is going to cave on this issue as well.
Hope. Change. Fail.
And, hard as it is to believe, the worst was yet to come.
In its first months in office, the Obama administration sought to protect Bush administration officials facing criminal investigation overseas for their involvement in establishing policies the that governed interrogations of detained terrorist suspects. A "confidential" April 17, 2009, cable sent from the US embassy in Madrid to the State Department - one of the 251,287 cables obtained by WikiLeaks - details how the Obama administration, working with Republicans, leaned on Spain to derail this potential prosecution.
. . .
Back when it seemed that this case could become a major international issue, during an April 14, 2009, White House briefing, I asked press secretary Robert Gibbs if the Obama administration would cooperate with any request from the Spaniards for information and documents related to the Bush Six. He said, "I don't want to get involved in hypotheticals." What he didn't disclose was that the Obama administration, working with Republicans, was actively pressuring the Spaniards to drop the investigation. Those efforts apparently paid off, and, as this WikiLeaks-released cable shows, Gonzales, Haynes, Feith, Bybee, Addington, and Yoo owed Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton thank-you notes.
Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus...and with any luck, he will put some courage in Mr. Obama's stocking this year, right next to the lump of coal the president's dismal, disappointing, demoralizing performance has earned him. In one week, the man certified the viability of Republican economic policy in the face of overwhelming evidence that Republicans have no economic policy beyond "We Like Rich People." He took responsibility for the crappy tone in Washington while being called a Nazi terrorist Marxist socialist non-citizen. He appeared all too ready to capitulate on the Bush tax cuts, even as an overwhelming majority of Americans want them done away with.
And to cap it all off, the Wikileaks document dump exposed the fact that Mr. Obama and his people went out of their way to derail even the most outside chance that some form of justice might be done after eight years of rampant Bush-era criminality. Mr. Obama waxed positively lyrical about the need to seek that justice during his presidential campaign. From the look of things, that promise - like so many others he made on the trail - turned to dust the moment he entered the Oval Office.
I quit smoking this week. The President quit on me this week. I know a whole lot of people who are about to quit on him, if they haven't already.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
i quit smoking two years ago
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 16:43 — Anonymous (not verified)i quit smoking two years ago
Regardless, the Chains
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 16:48 — Vic Anderson (not verified)Regardless, the Chains Smoking Chump at the Casa Blanca buck stop abides.
Hi William! CONGRATULATIONS
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:14 — Veda Stram (not verified)Hi William!
CONGRATULATIONS on quitting cigarettes. BE an ex-smoker.
I smoked 2 and a half packs a day for over 24 years. I quit about once every few months for all those years. As "they " say, quitting was easy. It was the not starting that was a bitch.
I quit in 1988 when I discovered that people were not going to listen to me talking about the abuse of animals in experimentation as long as I was a smoker.
So...I quit. It was miraculously easy with, no physical, emotional, spiritual, blah-blah crap. I quit because I knew people just might HEAR ME about animal experimentation! I haven't smoked since 1988.
A miracle...Something that could NOT happen, DID happen!
Veda
I quit 21 years ago and have
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:27 — Sandy Cook (not verified)I quit 21 years ago and have never looked back or wanted another cigarette--until this week. Gave up hard liquor at the same time and am now re-thinking that move as well.
The sad thing for me is that the man doesn't realize the power and the persuasive ability that he has, or doesn't seem to. He is gifted and it is all going to waste.
Bah Humbug (wanted to say otherwise but in deference to the season)
Almost immediately after
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:31 — An (not verified)Almost immediately after being elected, President Obama showed his true color- yellow. He is not a leader. Orator, yes, thinker, maybe, but leader? Never. The health care bill should have been Medicare for all, but when some called it "Socialism" he backed down. So "Socialism" is OK for those over 65, but not for those under, especially when congresspeople have the creme de la creme health care for life. That's Elitist Socialism. I never suspected when he was running for the Presidency and I supported him, that he has no spine. He doesn't know how to cajole people, button-holing them, inviting them to the White house for breakfast or lunch, whatever it takes to win individuals over, one by one, or even two by two. Like Woodrow Wilson, he is a great scholar, but has no concept of the job of Presidency.
You are not alone in your
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:36 — Anonymous (not verified)You are not alone in your misery, William.
In this 24/7 news cycle it is not too late to primary him out with a true progressive. Remember that 27% of those polled thought the health care bill did not go far enough. The GOP used this polling data to say no one likes Obama care, and as Michael Moore points out 14 million young voters stayed home for the mid-terms. See where I'm going here?
We're already networking, and with a fire in the belly candidate, we could swing it. All we need is 35% since the right will be split as well.
Just hoping.....
I quit on the P.O.S. when he
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:38 — jurassicpork (not verified)I quit on the P.O.S. when he was still campaigning. I voted for Kucinich in my state's Democratic primary. Obama's not the worst president ever. But he still had more than two years to go.
My most profound empathy
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:41 — Loren Bliss (not verified)My most profound empathy with Mr. Pitt. A two-pack-a-day man, I quit smoking on 23 September 1995 and haven't smoked since. But the effort was unmitigated hell; I even had to stop drinking lest booze weaken my non-smoking resolve. Nicotine is a neurotransmitter that momentarily alleviates dyslexia, and because I am both a nicotine addict and a dyslexic, quitting brought my intellect to a full stop: it was five years before I could again carry on a real conversation, six years before I could again write. But quitting no doubt extended my life, even at the expense of an uncontrollable, inexplicable 100-pound weight gain, a mysterious post-nicotinic condition suffered by about 35 percent of former smokers -- may you be in the more fortunate 65 percent!
Yeah, I'm ready to quit on
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:43 — Steveinpdx (not verified)Yeah, I'm ready to quit on him. I've been one of those 'exhausted defenders' for the past two years but I have now snapped.
For him to not stand up to the monumental hypocrisy of the republicans is stunning. Dude, Americans love a President who fights for something. We're not loving you anymore.
We don't need a "Facilitator in Chief".
Welfare for the wealthy.
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:48 — Jim W (not verified)Welfare for the wealthy. More than Republican economic policy: a Zen mantra for them. They must deserve it after all the jobs they've created with the money they don't know what to do with. Yeah, right. Helping hand for the unemployed? Forget it. Republicans would rather see them desperate enough to become criminals. Then we can spend $45,000 a year (per person) to put them in prisons. What a Great Society the Republicans promise us!
Anyone BUT Obama will get my
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:48 — Anonymous (not verified)Anyone BUT Obama will get my vote in 2012. The man has turned his back on us, the economy, justice and common sense. Let him look to his Republican buddies for votes in 2012 and see how that works out for him.
I live in San Francisco, probably the most reliably Democratic city in the country and I can't find ANYONE that wants Obama to have a second term. If we wanted a Republican president, we would have voted for McCain.
That you quit Obama is more
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:50 — Anonymous (not verified)That you quit Obama is more significant to me than that you quit smoking. Thanks, for, finally, seeing the truth.
One quibble. The President
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:52 — Roman Berry (not verified)One quibble. The President did not quit on you this week. The President quit before he was even the President. See 20 June 2008 and the FISA vote.
The President didn't quit. He never started. There is no way that all of this is by accident. One could not do this badly without trying.
Well I never smoked but
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:53 — AnonymousDV (not verified)Well I never smoked but agree Obama has done a horrible, miserable job and I am so displeased I could spit! All he apparently cares about is getting the repubs to accept him thinking that might get him reelected.
I worked to help elect this
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:53 — Anonymous (not verified)I worked to help elect this shell of a man. But I got off the bandwagon very quickly with the appointments of the Harvard-Goldman cabal and then the escalation of the pre-emptive wars. Never again will I work for a national candidate. Back to local politics.
William. Re smoking
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:54 — Dan (not verified)William. Re smoking cessation. The first to weeks are physical. The rest of your life is mental. But it gets easier. Chew nicorette for about 1.5 years. But not stopping is not an option.
Congrats on quitting
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:55 — aim (not verified)Congrats on quitting smoking! Its harder than hell! Just like America's economy right now! I've quit Obama too! If he hasn't figured out by now that glad handing the Reps is a failed strategy, then he should just go home to Chicago or better yet back to school! Hopefully not Harvard either!
Well I never smoked but I
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:59 — AnonymousDV (not verified)Well I never smoked but I totally agree Obama has done a horrible, miserable job and I am so displeased I could spit! Has he even done one single thing that was consistent with the wishes of the people who put him in power? I think not.
Obama didn't quit on you
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 17:59 — Anonymous 2 (not verified)Obama didn't quit on you this week, Will. He quit on all of us way before his nomination, when he promised the men behind the curtain who had groomed him for the presidency that he'd never do anything to upset the status quo. He always was, and always will be a tool of the corporatocracy, a creature of the empire.
"Hope." Yeah, right.
Congrats on the guts and
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:02 — 1worldaddy (not verified)Congrats on the guts and gumption to quit smoking and then stick with it!
Congrats on speaking your mind and doing the legwork to back up your views.
POTUS needs to let FLOTUS run things for the next 90 days. Do what Ronnie did, turn it over and just chill out. Michelle will make up for the 3 decades of damage and tarnish Nancy brought on our nation. Clean water and healthy food and children the world over, green energy and the rewarding jobs that this would generate. Cum on cum on!
Seriously though. Can we
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:06 — Steve (not verified)Seriously though. Can we just sit the man down in a room, have an intervention, and be over with this? How long do we have to sit on our hands while our president fumbles so completely and so ridiculously that even the blind can see it?
When...ever...in American
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:08 — Anonymous (not verified)When...ever...in American political history has the media promoted a viable presidential election opponent the very day after the President-elect, Obama, was elected (read Sarah Palin)?
Still today there are more Palin "news" stories than Obama stories.
The mainstream (liberal my arse) media also said...every day.... day in and day out...since January 2009... for one year and 10 months.... that the Democrats were headed for a big defeat in the midterms, with no real evidence or reason behind the claim.
But they made it happen by saying it again and again... that's the real crime going on in America.
So you don't want Obama to
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:08 — Kate (not verified)So you don't want Obama to cave.
He stands firm and as the GOP has promised nothing, nada, zip gets done.
But you'll feel real good.
Do I have that right?
gratz on choosing to quit
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:10 — Bearzerker (not verified)gratz on choosing to quit smoking... i quit cold turkey about 5 years ago now after smoking for 35+ years...
and have quit Bambam now for almost a year... seriously, i feel liberated...
just imagine... it will be 2014 before we get another real chance to undo the Bush43 mistakes that have taken us to this point in our history...
I quit smoking on December
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:11 — Mr. Gart (not verified)I quit smoking on December 16th 1989, after smoking 2 packs a day for 14 years. I am not ready to give up on President Obama. I am waiting for him to come out of denial and to come out swinging. He needs to accept the inevitable; that he will be a one term president. And he needs to make the best of that by fighting for every promise and every principle he brought to the Oval Office in January 2009. There is still time for him to become one of the great presidents of the USA, time to secure his place in history. But he can't wait too long.
Go William, you can do it.
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:13 — Anonymous (not verified)Go William, you can do it. Just take one hour, one day, one week, one month at a time. If you light up, you have to start over. If you've made it three days, you've gotten over the worse hump you'll ever slog over in your whole life. If you've made it a week, you're almost there. That metallic taste will fade along with the clenching. I quit cold turkey--no lozenges--they didn't exist yet. My husband quit by just telling himself he didn't need one, yet. It's been over twenty years for him, twenty five for me. Obama, I've heard, sneaks cigs all the time. You will live longer and feel better despite all the crappy stuff going on in Washington D.C. Be proud of yourself.
I threw in the towel this
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:20 — Anonymous (not verified)I threw in the towel this week with Obama after seeing him meet with Republicans and AGAIN try to be conciliatory with them.
Didn't he figure out that this approach didn't work the last time of around, meaning for the last two years?
Between all of this and his stance on education reform that reeks of privatization, another item that was on the Republican's agenda, I've given up on the guy.
Do keep up your fight to quit smoking though.
I smoked for 20 years and then quit 18 years ago. That was worth the battle.
My husband quit smoking 2+
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:20 — JMNJ (not verified)My husband quit smoking 2+ packs a day after 46 years by using CHANTIX, which is a prescription drug that helps. It costs about $100/month which is much less than the cigarettes he was buying here in NJ.
Geeez, (and I can't believe
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:24 — Anonymous (not verified)Geeez, (and I can't believe I'm sayin this), give the guy some slack, Pitt! I'm not crazy about what the man has done (or hasn't done), but why didn't you come up with a shoulda for brother Barack? All I read was your attacks (which are pretty much true and well deserved), but where's the, "okay, you've dug yourself in a good one, sir, but here's what we should try to do from here on out..."
I can shoot down a blind bird with a broken wing, too.
But I would have made a few to-do lists, such as:
Cut the military budget by 50%this year, with a projected elimination of 75% of what we we now poop down the ol crapper...With the $250 billion we got left, we can still have fun waging some little war with someone,( I'm sure we can pick on Somalia, those starving wusses wouldn't even put up a fight!)
With the money we can:
Retrofit EVERY FREAKING HOUSE, BUILDING, OR YURT IN THE COUNTRY so they are 100% energy efficient. Simultaneously, we begin a serious, concerted and undying mission building wind, solar, etc, power plants.
Lotsa jobs, boys and girls, lotsa GOOD, HIGH PAYING, LONG-LASTING jobs.
Create incentives for corpses (that's the plural of corp, right?) to stay in this country. It'll take more than tax breaks, but if that's what the Republicrats want to hear, then, mazel tov, lets give to em!
Levy extra taxes on corpses who choose to use slave labor in countries with no environmental regs. or value human life.
Just to name a few to start (I have a list...).
Seriously. Besides surrounding himself with the Cretins From the First Dimension Banking Corpse and making really bad moves regarding militarism, and kowtowing down to big pharma with that pitiful health bill, and a bunch of other shit that I don't have the space to go in here, WTF could any human being possibly do while so many arrogant, ignorant back- stabbing sons of bitches IN YOUR OWN PARTY who won't support you?!!
I mean, I was REALLY pissed when all of the bushettes were totally let off the hook, but Jesus, the walls were caving in on all sides (or so it seemed) at the time, and pursuing these egg cartons would not only have taken up a lot of time but money and cost a hell of a lot of political capital from the get-go. ("See, I TOLD you he was just another angry negro waiting to stick it to whitey!").
Add to that the kind of surreal, Homer-esque epic-style barrage of attacks (like the birthers, et al) that he had to take in good grace after answering every Orwellian accusation.
Smoking cigarettes?!
If I had to deal with the absolute onslaught of vicious, self-righteous, mean and ugly mental rape on an almost hourly basis (and that's just from the 'Democrats'), I'd start shooting heroin right in my fucking eye!!(to quote the dear HS Thompson)
It's really weird (okay, it's freaking terrifying) when I see that the socialism, Hitler and Nazi labels not only being lobbed, but sticking.
Intelligent people who actually should know better parrot this to me all the time.
What's even better are the claims from the New Worlders are how Obama is working with Al Gore, the UN, the Tri laterals, Bilderburgs and, of course, George Soros to use chem trails to change the weather and slowly exterminate us all. The remainder are to be held in concentration-style camps in the midwest where we will be experimented on and used as slave labor in the bauxite mines.
Except for the bauxite mines, I'm not making this stuff up.
This is why people turn to the Lord...
good time to quit smoking...
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:25 — Anonymous (not verified)good time to quit smoking... thanks, we need you.
and I bet you wrote today's column before Obama flew to Afghanistan to tell our troops we are there to drive back the Taliban and secure our country. Hello? Anyone there? Yep, good time to quit smoking.
where the hell is my post!?
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:28 — Anonymous (not verified)where the hell is my post!?
Has he even done one single
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:30 — terri (not verified)Has he even done one single thing that was consistent with the wishes of the people who put him in power? I think not.
Then you're not thinking. The very first bill signed into law by this president made equal pay for equal work a concept with some teeth in it-Lily Ledbetter Act. You may not like the final form of the Health Reform Act, may not think it went far enough-but it exists, and people who could not get health insurance in this country now can because of it. Go back and look at the man's specific campaign promises, and you'll see that almost all of them have either been kept or have been addressed.
If he WERE the dictator that some of our more paranoid fantasy prone citizens declared him before he ever took office, then maybe he could have somehow shoehorned every one of those through. But the fact that he crammed as many down their throats as he did...I tip my hat, Mr. President. This site claims to be dedicated to truth and facts. I see no evidence of that of late.
As for the issues where it seems the President "let his side down"...not prosecuting the Bush Six, for example...would you people THINK? One, the President of the United States doesn't have a "side". He's the President of the United States. Two is a corollary to One. As bitter a pill as it is to swallow, it is not necessarily in the best interests of the country for our former high command, so to speak, to be prosecuted for war crimes on the world stage. There are better ways to handle those atrocities. There really, really are.
I chose to give up blogging
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:33 — Bob King (not verified)I chose to give up blogging instead. :)
I quit for two years, once, but I prefer sanity, on the whole.
Hence my choice. :)
I'm tired of listening to
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:33 — Anonymous (not verified)I'm tired of listening to the democrats vilify obama. what is wrong with all of you? Bush was a terrible president, but the republicans never broke ranks, did they?
What do you want from Obama? The real problem is the blue dog democrats. What more can Obama do? he can't do anything. Nothing. Nada. He is not giving in to the republicans. There is nothing else he can do ---when he had the democratic congress------the blue dog democrats went against him in everything.
HE COULD NOT GET THE VOTES----DON'T YOU PEOPLE GET IT? THE VOTES WERE NEVER THERE. HE DID NOT HAVE THE SUPPORT OF HIS OWN PARTY. THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS IN THE POCKETS OF THE RICH, JUST LIKE THE REPUBLICANS.
WHY DON'T YOU ALL STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT OBAMA AND START ANALYZING THE SITUATION INSTEAD OF JUST LISTENING TO YOURSELF TALK NONSENSE.
Quitting smoking is a
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:39 — RLee (not verified)Quitting smoking is a choice, and it's easy once you've actually made the choice to not be a smoker. Talking yourself into believing that's really what you want is the hard part.
You won't look back. Congrats to you for your success.
Obama is simply just trying
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:43 — Anonymous (not verified)Obama is simply just trying to stay ALIVE..hoping to keep his family ALIVE. No president since Kennedy will die for his country.Makes no different which party is in the White House and should a independent or third party ever get there in my lifetime nothing will change. The Power That Be controls all of us. Giving up smoking may allow you a few more years. Going against the Power That Be would be a death sentence for the sitting president.
I like the suggestion that I
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:44 — sigridsmith (not verified)I like the suggestion that I found in one of the health books that I read. Sorry, I don't remember where I read it. Write a contract with yourself stating that if you take so much as one puff on a cigarette or other tobacco product before a given date (90 days from now?), you will donate X dollars (make it the most you can afford) to your least favorite charity (maybe Focus on the Family ?) That should keep you on the straight and narrow. When you are finished with that contract, write another one. If you've got the cigarettes beat, make the new contract for sugar or refined carbs.
It's because of people like
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:51 — Anonymous (not verified)It's because of people like you that Obama is in the position he's in. If we hadn't all been kvetching for the first year and a half that he wasn't doing enough, maybe progressives wouldn't have given up and would have gone out and voted.
You are a bigger help to the Republicans than Obama will ever be,.
Now, Mr. Pitt, why don't you
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 18:56 — Anonymous (not verified)Now, Mr. Pitt, why don't you tell us what you REALLY think! Seriously, thank you for telling it like it is. Having read your articles for some time, I know that this eloquently stated anger did not come out of irritability from quitting smoking; but you made a good connection between quitting TWO bad habits. Stand fast with both. Now, where do we go to find an electable progressive leader?
HEY! THIS ARTICLE IS NOT
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 19:05 — Anonymous (not verified)HEY! THIS ARTICLE IS NOT ABOUT QUITTING SMOKING, YOU ADDICTS!
I hate conspiracy theories
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 19:08 — Not Confused (not verified)I hate conspiracy theories but I can only wonder if he was threatened to go along with the plutocracy?
Oh yes, poor obama ... being
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 19:10 — Anonymous (not verified)Oh yes, poor obama ... being held hostage by the republicans' ideas and all ... I'm just glad that they at least let him out to play basketball occasionally and see his family.
It sure took a long time for pitt to pull his head out of the donkey's ass and finally muster up the objectivity to even consider the possibility that his precious president and party have been shitting on him ... and the entire country, but for their plutocratic sponsors ... this whole time. My respect for pitt is practically non-existent at this point. He's still holding on to this goddamn nonsensical notion that obama is congenitally well-intentioned and all his feeble analysis springs forth from that delusion. No, william ... he's not being held hostage by republican ideas ... it's who he is ... he lied to you you fucking moron!
Z
Mr. Pitt, You are still a
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 19:28 — OldGuy (not verified)Mr. Pitt,
You are still a better man than I. After listening to one of my birdbrained co-workers jabber about the enormous debt Obama has rung up ("the biggest spender in history"), how "everyone hates Obama care," and how Obama's "poll ratings are the worst in history," I tried to explain how many places all that was untrue and was told that "I'm not talking about Bush or Reagan, I'm talking about Obama."
"So, Obama is the worst Obama in history," I asked. After a few minutes of Faux News bluster, I realized that Americans are too dumb to save. We deserve exactly the government we get and what we get is "by corporations, of corporations, and for corporations." We're doomed and I quit, too.
No one has ever been "held
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 19:32 — OldGuy (not verified)No one has ever been "held hostage by the republicans' ideas." There is no such thing. Never has been, never will be. The whole concept of pseudo-conservative philosophy is the recycling of failed PR materials.
Yeah, I'm sure that he was
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 19:39 — Anonymous (not verified)Yeah, I'm sure that he was completely unaware of the danger of being president and came in with the most noblest of intentions before they pulled him aside shortly after inauguration and threatened to kill him and his family if he didn't serve the plutocrats to their liking. At this point, that's the only thing that makes any sense with obama being such a great guy and all. Well, you've heard his speeches, haven't you ...
Hey, they probably put a gun to his head and made him run for president! Yeah, that's it!
Z
It was a simple thing to
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 19:40 — Anonymous (not verified)It was a simple thing to quit smoking after almost 43 1/2 years...and I was at least a pack and a half a day smoker. I just made up my mind to quit and Quit. Never had a minute of withdrawal or any desire to ever pick up another cigarette. It is really all a matter of mind over matter..and deciding to do something and then Doing it , with no second guessing the decision.
I have resolved never to vote for Obama again. I have discovered that he has no backbone..and that is reason enough. He is not good for the Nation. Neither are the Republicans. I am a Registered Republican and have been for over fifty years...but I have never voted a straight ticket in all that time. I have not voted for a Republican President since Reagan. And almost didn't then, because he had Bush, Sr. as his VP. But figured 'what harm can a VP do' ? Well, now we know.
I think that Obama was Allowed to Win so as to prepare the way for a Republican in 2012. It was a foregone conclusion that a Republican had as little chance as a snowball in hell of being elected..not after the Mess that Bush, Jr.and Dick Cheney had caused So the reasoning by the Republican Party was that it would be a simple matter to undermine a President of Color because there are still a lot of Racism in this country. And a lot of dumb people that are easily bamboozled.
I think a Deal was struck with Obama. ( Which was 'Do no harm to the Cause', because we, the Republican, intend to stop Obama dead in his tracks from doing a thing that we do not want him to do. My own opinion, of course.
Yeah, I'm sure that he was
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 19:41 — Anonymous (not verified)Yeah, I'm sure that he was completely unaware of the danger of being president and came in with the most noblest of intentions before they pulled him aside shortly after inauguration and threatened to kill him and his family if he didn't serve the plutocrats to their liking. At this point, that's the only thing that makes any sense with obama being such a great guy and all. Well, you've heard his speeches, haven't you ...
Hey, they probably put a gun to his head and made him run for president! Yeah, that's it!
Z
Barak Hussein Obama is a
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 20:05 — futhark (not verified)Barak Hussein Obama is a Plutocrat, like just about every other politician in Washington, DC. He kowtows to the interests of the wealthy and powerful, in the hope and expectation that they will assist him to be like them: wealthy and powerful. He's the willing tool of an elite oligarchy that is the only segment of our society that is really served by our government.
I've thought more than once
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 20:08 — Anonymous (not verified)I've thought more than once that either:
1) someone is threatening him or his family if he bucks the financial/war establishment.
2) he was elected to demoralize progressives. Ie, he misled us about his true agenda for the express purpose of rallying the progressive ranks so that we be pacified by believing in a false hope, then lose our morale when his administration turned against those of us who got him elected.
3) his advisers are whispering in his ear that there is no progressive base, that the midterms really do mean that Americans want regressive policies. That he is an unpopular president. Perhaps it is his morale that is in the toilet. Maybe he's just tired.
I don't know. But what he's doing right now (and has done/not done sporadically through his presidency) doesn't make sense from any sort of conventional analysis. So basically, I think he's either being threatened, beaten down, or was totally corrupt to begin with.
I wish it didn't matter what he does, but we're running out of time on some of this stuff.
I was amazed that the press
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 20:28 — midwest Tom (not verified)I was amazed that the press thinks that a wage freeze for Federal employees was a big thing. Bloomberg reported that the average Federal wage plus benefits is $126,049 , while the average in the private sector is $63,000; slightly less than half. A hospital in Richmond Indiana announced yesterday that they were cutting all employees 5%; in my opinion a much better plan than laying off people.
I'm not quitting till I get
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 20:37 — alen51 (not verified)I'm not quitting till I get this damed feedback loop
figured out,or until humans figure out that they
do not need a gun or a god to be good.
Good god
I shoulda
thought about
that sooner
Will, I'm starting a support
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 20:50 — Bite (not verified)Will, I'm starting a support group for those who have not realized, or will not admit, or cannot state, with pure mental clarity, that Obama is a dyed in the wool, Conservative Republican. Would you like to join? Once you can stand up and admit to your addiction of continuing to believe he's a thwarted, obstructed, progressive Democrat, you'd be shocked at the burden that lifts from your shoulders. It's not hard to do, really, all you need to do is start referring to Mr. O as a RIGHT WING DEMOCRAT. Before you know it, the human mind puts the pieces of the puzzle together and accepts it, all on its own -- "Oh my God, a Right Wing Democrat is a Fucking Conservative Republican." Oh my fucking god!," you will exclaim.
Wow, a fellow "Z"---who got
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 20:55 — Zee (not verified)Wow, a fellow "Z"---who got it right! Pitt not only deserves no respect, he and Mark Karlin and John Aravosis all owe us an apology for shoving this loser on the netroots when it was evident to any reality-based progressive that this Reagan-loving, post-partisan "Uniter" that threw the base under the bus from the get-go----even before the FISA aboutface----
So Pitt is not fluffing the Precious anymore. Karlin will probably be the last one on his knees but Pitt and Aravosis get no sympathy for their belated teeth-gnashing after all the BASHING and BANNING they did back when it could've made a difference to face reality.
To those humans residing on
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 21:11 — A true patriot (not verified)To those humans residing on planet earth who still think Obama is doing the best he can considering the circumstances: think again. He's NOT!
After more than two years in office now, he's not going to turn into a progressive and he's not going to grow a spine. He's not playing chess while Republicans play checkers. Obama is in way over his head and it's painful to watch.
We're facing almost two more years of him throwing progressives a few crumbs every now and then while he pursues his "blue dog" agenda. At this rate, by 2012 you should be able to count the remainder of his base on the fingers of both hands.
Obama will then either decide to not seek a second term or run again and possibly get trounced by some Republican lunatic. He is the wrong Democrat for the job at what could have been the right time for this country. What a waste!
How did this baloney that
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 21:27 — Anonymous (not verified)How did this baloney that Obama is so smart get started? Where is the evidence that he is smart? I just don't see the smart.
He's looking pretty dumb these days.
In fact, I can't think of a dumber president in all of American history.
Obama had control of both the Executive branch of government and the Legislative Branch, he had the good will of a majority of the American people who wished him well and hoped he would do well -- and yet, he has completely screwed up.
Obama is the most pathetic excuse for a president we have ever had.
To some previous responder
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 21:27 — Anonymous (not verified)To some previous responder who thinks that medicare is "socialism", a quick reminder for your vapid brain. Payroll deductions go into the medicare trust. Those deductions that you give to the trust your whole working life are held in the trust and some of that money is used to invest in government bonds, adding more money to the trust. When you get old and are no longer working and able to afford health care, money is taken from that trust to help pay the majority of your medical bills. The government does not give you money from any budget, or out of their pocket, therefore medicare does not effect the deficit. It only comes from the trust built on payroll deductions. Ergo, no socialism you dolt.
If Obama weren't black,
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 21:32 — mysterioso (not verified)If Obama weren't black, there would be no party of NO. This is the most thinly veiled racist reaction to a black president. At the end of his 4 years in the white house, all the racists in the world will say, "see, never give a black man a white man's job".
Barack Obama undoubtedly is
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 21:33 — Jim (not verified)Barack Obama undoubtedly is a fine man, intelligent, well-meaning and certainly a very likable character. He would have made a brilliant supreme court justice or attorney general. He just is not tough enough for politics, does not understand the hard-ball negotiating, arm-twisting, etc. that goes into being an effective political leader. Moreover, two years in the job seem to have taught him nothing. For Obama not to understand the necessity of isolating the Republicans on something like the irresponsible windfall tax reductions for the rich verges on political illiteracy. He just does not get it, which is too bad. We took a big step forward with this country's shameful history on race with his election, but I am afraid that ultimately is going to be his most important legacy. We need to look for a fighter for 2012. Anybody got a suggestion?
A Kiss On Your Forehead for
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 21:37 — Union Square (not verified)A Kiss On Your Forehead for quitting the nicotine addiction!
President Obama will be our
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 21:57 — Steve Johnson (not verified)President Obama will be our President for at least two more years. We need to fully support him. It does no good to publicly criticize his performance. I do believe, however, that the democrats are behaving stupidly.
I quit smoking cold turkey in 1962 when I was 31, in the Navy, and on cruise with the USS Oriskany. I'm now 79 and feel great.
i quit trusting democrats in
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:03 — lefty (not verified)i quit trusting democrats in 1968 .
Yeah, poster jimmy: It's
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:03 — Anonymous (not verified)Yeah, poster jimmy: It's absolutely undeniable that barak obama is "a fine man, intelligent, well-meaning" man. Who could ever doubt that! It's as doubtless and persistent as gravity. We know that this harvard law school graduate is a fine man becoz he told us so ... doesn't that prove it! And since he is a fine, well-meaning man, there has to be a reason why his actions keep unfortunately effectuating evil. Becoz, of course, it's completely unintentional ... he's well-meaning, he told us so! ... and so the only reasonable explanation for the evil that effectuates is that the evil republicans make him do it, And the reason that the republicans are able to make him do it is becoz this intelligent man hasn't learned anything in his two years on the job. See! Proof proven!
Well, I guess it all makes complete sense if the undoubtable truth that you begin your feeble thought process from is that obama is a great guy and then take your tiny pathetic partisan mind and wind it into a pretzel from there. jimmy, close your mouth, you're drolling ... and stop fondling that obama bobble-head doll ... and get that goddamn dumb ass glazed look off your face becoz you're a damn fool!
These demo-zombies try to proffer this mind-splitting nonsense that obama is both a smart man ... which is undeniable IMO (I’m sorry a 47 year old black man just doesn’t stumble and trip his way to the top stage in the world) … and a good man who somehow keeps continually, almost daffily, being tricked into effectuating evil. It can’t be both, but watching these childish morons contort their logic trying to balance both of those contradictory beliefs on their emotionally affected pinhead brains is enough to make me so dizzy that I want to vomit. You're fools and little different than the goddamn idiots on the other side. You are also a big part of the problem with this country.
Z
How can we expect to change
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:20 — Still in the fight (not verified)How can we expect to change a political landscape that has eroded to its current sad state over the course of decades if we are not willing to haul the necessary materials one stone at a time? Out of frustration should come a concerted effort to make the change that we want. How in the world can one man do it alone? As Hemingway wrote, "A man alone doesn't stand a f#%*ing chance.". So, yes, trim the fat, quit smoking, but for goddam sakes don't quit on participating in our democracy! I'm sitting in Kathmandu, Nepal right now where police act with impunity and people expect their palms to be greased as a daily course of affairs. We have the protected right in America to stand up and be counted for what we believe. And by god, if we don't have that right anymore, then pick up your ax and fight like a farmer! You all want to quit something?! Quit bitching and
make a stand!
Even after waking up from
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:21 — Paul Palmer (not verified)Even after waking up from sleep, and seeing in one politician after another the folly of hoping a politician is going to do what he promises in the campaign, Americans are going to go right into the next election talking about campaign promises.
Wake up guys. This business of sending representatives out into the void to do their personal thing is insane. "I will vote my conscience". Sure, my conscience is for sale and nobody can challenge me is what they mean.
What can be done to build policy promises and campaign promises into some kind of bond? I don't know the answer but I know one needs to be found. What if some bold candidate appointed a citizens committee of five of his people to be an oversight committee on his votes. Five citizens true to keep tabs on his votes and his promises and report back to his constituents. Does any existing candidate have the balls for this? Any better method?
This business of sending off independent so-called representatives to suck up some of the good life and vote their conscience is a fraud.
And that filibuster. Why do I hear nothing but passive willingness to be shat on by the Pubs with that filibuster routine? Why isn't the left demanding a change in those rules? If the Neanderthals had to actually filibuster by reading the dictionary into the Federal Register, like in the old days, they wouldn't be able to just yell "filibuster" and make Obama fall down on his knees in tears.
Let's look for changes in the elections procedures that would undercut the southern strategy.
Whatever point you are
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:26 — Jim (not verified)Whatever point you are trying to make in that rambling posting of yours, the point of mine, which you are free to disagree with if you can come up with a semi-intelligent argument free of childless name-calling, is simply that Barack Obama is not a tough enough political negotiator. He certainly s not "evil", perhaps just not up to the job. This rather simple point has unleashed all your ranting and ravings. Take your meds and get a good night sleep. It will all look better tomorrow.
I really want to ask a
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:31 — billy bob (not verified)I really want to ask a serious question:
Is there any precedent in this country's history, of a sitting president being successfully primaried by his own party, so that a NEW candidate could HONESTLY represent them in what would have been his second term? If so, did that new candidate win?
I don't want to think thoughts most of us don't want to discuss openly, but I'm afraid it's come to this. Does he want to represent the Democratic Party? If Howard Dean ran a serious campaign against him in the primaries, I'd definitely take my chances and vote for Dean. Actually, I'd even vote for Pat Paulson or one of the Jonas Brothers, if I thought they'd stand a good chance of winning and REALLY REALLY REALLY promised to be sincere representatives of the Democratic Party.
Unless I’m mistaken, I think this is basically what happened to President Johnson. He probably would have lost the Democratic Party's nomination in '68 if he'd bothered to run again. Why? Because he wasn't viewed as seriously representing them (if only we knew then, how much worse it could get...). Nixon only won because Robert Kennedy was murdered. Robert Kennedy WOULD HAVE probably been the next president.
cont.
cont. At this point, I'd
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:33 — billy bob (not verified)cont.
At this point, I'd RATHER vote for Lyndon Johnson in the next Democratic primaries than President Obama. SERIOUSLY - LYNDON FREAKIN' JOHNSON! ...and I don't mean the old Lyndon Johnson brought forward in a time machine, either. I mean Lyndon Johnson - NOW!
Seriously. Dig him up and wheel his box to a debate. I'll vote for him.
I'd vote for a PICTURE OF FRANKLIN ROOSEVELT! Just to be reminded that someone of his caliber once represented this country and this party makes it even MORE shameful that we can no longer seem to elect a President who does as much good as an inanimate object! AT LEAST, an inanimate object would get NOTHING done! As Jon Stewart once said, complaining about Democratic spinelessness in Congress, "They can't even get NOTHING done!!!"
cont.
cont. Right now, GIVING UP
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:34 — billy bob (not verified)cont.
Right now, GIVING UP the "hope" that things will ever improve in this country would be a HUGE IMPROVEMENT over "Democrats", like Obama HANDING repugnicans everything they want on a silver platter, giving them a full-body massage, fetching their slippers & pipe, and looking adoringly into their eyes like an adopted lap dog - or a 19th Century wife!
Right now, I don’t think it would be a bad idea to FORCE President Obama’s hand by making him realize that he WILL be primaried by a SERIOUS candidate who WILL ACTUALLY represent the people who voted for “change” in 2008. Personally, I don’t think he WANTS our vote.
Hey jimmy, I'll keep it very
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:39 — Anonymous (not verified)Hey jimmy,
I'll keep it very simple for you: Evil is as evil does.
Z
jimmy, "you are free to
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:42 — Anonymous (not verified)jimmy,
"you are free to disagree with if you can come up with a semi-intelligent argument free of CHILDLESS name-calling"
I'm free to disagree with you even if I do have children.
Z
what perplexes me is number
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:44 — Anonymous (not verified)what perplexes me is number of those who have missed the euphemism. I highly doubt Mr Pitt wanted us to simply discuss his smoking habit. Well at least the attempts to gut Social Security have been put on the back burner, that is for about another year until the GOP controlled congress gear up for the next assault. Also comes the symbolic vote on not giving the rich more Bush tax breaks that at least got republicans balking. But the bottom line is, until Obama decides that playing patty cake with the GOP is not a good move, his chances at regaining a bid for a second term becomes less tenable.
To 02:27 —
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:45 — Anonymous (not verified)To 02:27 — Anonymous:
You're right in principle. BUT, correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't Congress been actually USING the money from that trust fund for the past 30 years or so, to help fund the rest of the government? In fact, I've heard the i.o.u. should come to an amount over a trillion dollars. So, Social Security / Medicare is not only not socialistic, but has become a general fund being used to supplement the revenue generated by taxes. If not for this, there wouldn't even be a DIS-honest discussion of it going bankrupt in the next few decades.
Again, correct me if I'm wrong.
Just sticking a in here to
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:51 — Stephen (not verified)Just sticking a in here to end this boldness. Just don't stop being bold with your quitting.
Z, sorry, writing this from
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:55 — James Brennan (not verified)Z, sorry, writing this from my Blackberry on the train, meant to cast no aspersions on your masculinity. Meant "childish". That one still stands. "Evil sees as evil does?" Oh come on now, Obama is "evil"? That's a pretty strong word, one I would reserve for few people--Hitler, Genghis Khan, etc. But you're free to hate Obama if you like, you will certainly will have lots of company, though it is not company I would personally want to keep.
Doesn't ANYONE moderate this
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 22:57 — Anonymous (not verified)Doesn't ANYONE moderate this site? Please get rid of this spoiler Z's mindless and repeated rant.
jimmy, "Take your meds and
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 23:00 — Anonymous (not verified)jimmy,
"Take your meds and get a good night sleep. It will all look better tomorrow."
Thanks for your advice, but I'll defer. I don't know exactly why, but something makes me think that you're a little bit out of your league in giving medical advice.
But I'm sure that no matter what happens ... no matter what the head pr man of the establishment does today ... that he'll still look the same to you tomorrow as he did the moment that you fell in love with him.
Z
I wonder if President Obama
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 23:03 — Beltwaylaid (not verified)I wonder if President Obama is struggling with doing w/o cigs? I'm sure his doctor advised him to do so to promote healing of his cut lip. And I can proudly say that I voted for Nader.
Spot on! Before the 2008
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 23:38 — Will123 (not verified)Spot on!
Before the 2008 election, I had spent hours and 100's of faxes to Harry Reid and Nancy Palosi and my Senators and Representatives to PLEASE bring impeachment for war crimes to the people who clearly had committed them. But they ignored mine and millions of others request.
After the election, I thought that President Obama would stand up and show the rest of the world that we really do believe in truth and justice.... but no, it has not happened.
And now the flaws in the logic to keep the tax cuts for the rich while taking away unemployment payments to the poor seems obvious to not just Rachel Maddow, but to most Americans. And yet, why is it that the President does not seize this opportunity to do what is right, and at this point obvious?
He needs to realize that the recent election does not show the will of the people as much as the will of the corporate supported media.
He needs to communicate and implement the democratic agenda - to support the American dream and ideals with fiscally responsible, viable policies to deal with the current economic crisis - and ignore the republican agenda - which seems to include total financial irresponsibility and socialism for the rich!
A lot of people think that
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 23:42 — John Cutler (not verified)A lot of people think that Obama 'has no spine', that he 'caves' easily, or whatever; that he can't stand up to the Repugnacrats and their obvious absurdities -- even though a majority of The People want him to.
I can't believe that what we're seeing can happen simply out of 'weakness' -- there's gotta be some other hidden agenda that The People somehow aren't privy to.
It appears that even the sharpest Progressive investigative reports and commentators aren't aware of it either .... They repeatedly can't grasp how 'Obama can be so weak.....' etc., instead of finding out what's REALLY going on.
Anybody got a clue? Maybe we really have just a one-party system, and Obama is just a fake Dem that the Repugnacrats ran as an 'opponent' to McCain? So that no matter who won the election (battle), the Repugs 'won the war'.
One thing I'm too old to
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 23:47 — Loren Bliss (not verified)One thing I'm too old to quit -- and it's a damn shame -- is living in this damn Moron Nation called the United States; at age 70 and in declining health, I no longer have the option of immigrating to Canada, Europe or anywhere else.
Though I voted for Obama, I recognized he was giving us all the finger when he appointed the hate-pastor Rick Warren to read the inaugural invocation: the ceremonial equivalent of a keynote address at a political invention.
From that moment on, I knew "change we can believe in" was never more than a Big Lie, that Obama had been hired by the Ruling Class to do exactly what he is doing -- functioning as Barack the Betrayer -- and that "hope" is thus forever reduced to imbecility.
Well,
Fri, 12/03/2010 - 23:55 — eldoryder (not verified)Well, Will......congratulations on the nicotine cessation. I put down a four pack a day habit six months ago with the "methadone" solution of the "E-cigarette" which is nicotene held in a glycol solution, run past a burner and inhaled. 90% less toxins than cigarettes, no smell and only water vapor exhaled.
I wish there was such a cure for Obama.
Epic Failure.
The best observation I've heard yet is "If Hillary gave Obama ONE ball, then they'd both have a pair!" I was a Hillary delegate, and I'm still convinced she would NOT have been "rolled" by the Republicans like he has been so far.
I can only hope that if Obama gets ONE more nomination for the Supreme Court, he names Hillary. That one action would validate his Presidency for me.
Good for you, WRP! Keep the
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 00:01 — Anne Ominous (not verified)Good for you, WRP! Keep the emphysema and cancer from getting you. Get out and exercise vigorously to get rid of the tension the political sewage is causing. Too many wonderful people have been lost decades before their times to needless cripplers and killers like emphysema and cigarette-induced lung cancer. Stay with us. Whatever happens with politics, we need people like you.
I quit 7 March 2009 after
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 00:24 — Maheanuu (not verified)I quit 7 March 2009 after smoking for 58 years. Something to do with having non stop asthma attacks and no breath to hardly breathe. I am now breathing fairly normally, show no cancer in the lungs (don't ask me). And shooting for another 5 to 10 years of Progressive Life to live...
You can make it Mr. Pitt.... I know I did it and never have looked back. I breathe much easier and find that I am not falling down tired if I do some strenuous thing that used to put me on my butt...
You make me proud! I have followed you for years from your posts I believe in the Daily Chimp (if my memory serves me right) years ago to today...
Wishing you fair winds and following seas
Ken Jackson
CPO USN Ret.
Stockholm syndrome,
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 00:30 — Anonymous (not verified)Stockholm syndrome, Schlockholm syndrome, it does not g.d. matter why he's acting
like a dazed rabbit being run over by a tank,
it's time to go up against the tank
hammer and tong.
Well people, when are you (pundits listen up!!)
when are you gonna just say this is it , this is our declaration and manifesto,
Barack Obama has
abdicated his responsibility to preserve, protect, and defend the constitution,
he ain't our standard bearer anymore.
Let's get on to some REAL leadership and get campaign 2012 going
loud and strong and big time NOW!!!
When Obama was running for
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 00:50 — Anonymous (not verified)When Obama was running for president, I was not for him. He was too inexperienced, but the press wanted him. They sold him constantly. At the debates, it was the Obama and Hillary show with no one else getting any air time.
I guess that should have told us something. He is the man for the corporatist, not the people. Is he better than a Republican? Hard to tell, since he has retained so many of their policies.
I wish Howard Dean would run, or Nancy Pelosi. They both REALLY understand the Republican game.
I want someone who - when the Republicans threaten to hold their breathe until they pass out - says "Be my guest." Someone who - when the Republicans are "too busy" to come to dinner at the White House will say "fine, I will work with whoever shows up" and doesn't set another date for them. I want someone who will force them to vote against unemployment benefits and an against school lunch for poor kids. Let them filibuster. Then, you will have them on tape and on CNN clearly fighting to defeat any proposal that helps the country or helps the middle class.
I have never missed voting in an election, but I will be sorely tempted to do. Obama is jest keeping the seat warm for the next person.
Obama is not weak. He is a
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 01:08 — Anonymous (not verified)Obama is not weak. He is a scumbag that betrayed all the people that voted for him. From day one he installed right wing people in his administration. Even before he got elected he actually stopped his campaign to go approve a bailout with no conditions of any kind.
I've been quitting on Obama,
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 01:25 — Anonymous (not verified)I've been quitting on Obama, too, William, this past week. Wikileaks has done it for me, and now, Lieberman telling Amazon what to do, and the economy just sucks.
I quit over 10 years ago, after smoking about 20, and I did not do it cold turkey (which failed for me after a number of tries), but by first getting to know my smoking habit very well, and then eliminating one cigarette after the next, over a period of time, working down from the least important to most important cigarettes. The most important, which were about two or three took a process of years to get rid of, one by one. Until I was smoking one a day, for some year. Then one day, I got the energy to give that one up too. I loved smoking, and freely acknowledge it. Acknowledging how much I enjoy(ed) it, instead of chastising myself, worked better for me. Also regular exercise, breathing, and remembering that there was someone who needed me alive, and not dying of lung cancer in X number of years (I'm a parent -- but you can also think about how your future child is going to need you as healthy as possible, William. And how nice fresh clean air at home will be for them.) Also count how much money you save. And put it towards something you can see the results in.
All I can say is Malcom X...
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 02:05 — Publius (not verified)All I can say is Malcom X... Read his speech. I believe it was called, "The Ballot or the Bullet".
We knew Reagan entered his
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 02:10 — Davidson Loehr (not verified)We knew Reagan entered his presidency in 1981 drooling to start busting unions and uppity workers to make this -- the fact he loved best about America -- a country where someone can get rich, then treat all below them as servants or "useless eaters." Bush I was just so gee-gollied to be President, he couldn't think of anything actually to do once he moved into the White House. Clinton, surely the brightest President in a long time, learned that if he played ball with the big money people, they would take care of him handsomely -- He "earned" at least $100 million since leaving office -- probably bonuses for the billions taken in by NAFTA and the WTO. GWBush aroused no expectations, except that he was there to pay back his daddy's friends who bought his faux entry into the Winners Circle--and, hoping against hope that he wouldn't say too many things so stupid they became lasting embarrassments (Think of, "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me ... fool me twice ... Well, you can't fool me twice.)
But Obama! Editor of the Harvard Law Review, professor at the University of Chicago Law School -- It was like Bush took the IQ meter so far below ground that Obama while campaigning made some of us wonder if he might belong in the same class with Jefferson, Lincoln, those few larger-than-life Presidents who bent the country toward truth, justice, hope, change ....
That's why This was the most cynical betrayal of the bunch. To promise through his golden oratory to serve precisely those most tender ideals -- truth, transparency, national health plan, an end to GWB's secret government, signing statements letting the President do whatever he likes, make those in government immune from prosecution for so many crimes gleefully committed against humanity --He rang every bell for voters anywhere to the Left of Atilla the Hun.
And then.... Then it suddenly became a sad variation on the old story of The King's New Clothes, with a low and insulting twist: our freshly crowned king immediately got dressed in attitudes, secrets, and flat-out duplicity, while thinking nobody would notice him because he dressed like a Republican.
In steering a vulture-stage capitalism toward the plutocracy, kleptocracy and fascist tyranny that seem to succeed dying democracies, It's important to remember, as Machiavelli taught, that you don't need your people to like you -- only to fear you. And you must destroy the masses' hope for change they can believe in, so far fewer will even bother to vote.
We understand that the other Democrats have been castrated, and it could have been caused by the unexpected shock. Rumor at least has it that coming off a tough sweaty speech, Obama's blackface makeup ran off, revealing the man who had been inside the costume all along: Jeb Bush. But you should have told us. We can't keep getting whiplashed like this, or most will just give up trying to fight you. And then where will you be?
Oh wait....
It's people like you that
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 06:12 — ShrubTheWarCriminal (not verified)It's people like you that smoked Obamantion's platitudes that put this unik in office in the first place. It's a little to late to come out of your stupor now Mr. Pitt.
His record BEFORE the nomination showed he was a corporate whore.
His actions just after being elected show he was a corporate whore as he surrounded himself by corporate pimps.
His actions now....well you STILL do not get the picture...Stockholm syndrome,wishing for Santa to do the job !?
I HOPE he gets impeached, because even Palin could beat him now.
Stick to the cigarettes.
Look up Obama's pre-election
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 06:19 — Abby (not verified)Look up Obama's pre-election pledge to the AIPAC and ALL will make perfect sense.
If you're going to vote Republican or Democrat, you're going to remain fucked irrespective of who resides in the White House or who controls Congress.
Look up Obama's pre-election
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 06:22 — Abby (not verified)Look up Obama's pre-election pledge to the AIPAC and ALL will make perfect sense.
If you're going to vote Republican or Democrat, you're going to remain fucked irrespective of who resides in the White House or who controls Congress.
I Started smoking when I was
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 07:15 — Philip (not verified)I Started smoking when I was young, smoked for 15 years then quit for 21 years. Twenty one good years. Quitting Cigs was one of the most difficult and best things I ever did for myself. Started again about three years ago, bad move I know, but at least I’m not on anti-depressants or overweight. ha ha
If this is the best Mr Obama and the Dems can do, I may as well jump to smoking as much as I can now, it seems to make all this a little easier to take. (Didn’t the Russians use Vodka?, yuk) Besides, I once had a conservative tell me the best thing a liberal could do to save the planet is... well you know. And we all know conservative logic is impeccable and infallible.
IMO, if President Obama again (what appears needlessly based on the facts available to me) caves to republicans on this tax issue, then he will only be re-elected if he runs on the republican ticket. I honestly was a strong republican for many years, and I will NOT vote for republicans again, but at this rate, I will either stay home or throw my vote away on a third party which I know stands little to no chance in doing what Obama could not or would not stand up for. And I doubt I’m the only non-conservative thinking like this.
But my logical side tells me that is probably wrong, that he is a good man, the best we have, and I would not want to be in his shoes with the weight he must carry. As logical as that sounds to me, that is not what I “see” when I don’t even see a verbal fight or an honest explanation for the lack of it. And I really had hope in him, what he campaigned on. I really hope I am not a fool, but I’m losing hope on that too.
All that articles and
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 09:38 — Jason Trask (not verified)All that articles and thinking of this sort accomplish is to further erode Obama's strength. As progressives leave the democrats to their own devices, the republican party is strengthened. When Sarah Palin or some other republican gets elected in 2012, the progressives who bailed will bear a lot of the responsibility.
Z at 3:03, you stole my
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 09:45 — Anonymous (not verified)Z at 3:03, you stole my thunder,but man you have said exactly what i have been thinking (but much more articulately) about these disgusting obombabot`s who i fully agree are as harmful to this country ( if not more) than the repuklicans. thanks
Tobacco companies and other
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 10:40 — David (not verified)Tobacco companies and other corporations own Obama and both political parties, as they have owned Bush, etc. So WRP, realize that your cigarette addiction is a form of assisted suicide that a corporation induced you to choose, in which you pay them so that they can sell you a drug that you kill yourself with. That's how evil the capitalist profiteers are, and a similar paradigm operates in the military industries, the Pentagon, bankers, mining, logging, etc. The death industries control the planet, and the tobacco industry helped you kill your lungs. Read Derrick Jensen's What we Leave Behind and you will see the reality of what's happening. And never go back to the tobacco. It's suicide.
Congratulations! the
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 10:58 — boragaindem (not verified)Congratulations! the koolaide is finally wearing off! oh and on quitting smoking as well. All of us who saw Obama for what he was 3 years ago truly thank you for giving him to us. Too bad the entire country has to suffer for it and that it gave us back the repugs in record time.
What kills me is that after
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 10:59 — radline9 (not verified)What kills me is that after Obama has let down all of us progressives, is the right wing hates him more than ever and has made it their agenda to make him a one term president above all else. They play the race card every chance they get. It's "in" to disrespect the president. I had an inkling that having a black president might be more trouble than it's worth, but on election night I was very proud of my country for electing Obama. I am old enough to not expect miracles from a democratic president. Politics in America is about character assassination and in the case of the Kennedys, real assassination. Politics just keeps getting uglier and uglier. The working man has lost and the billionaires have won. That's the way it has been and always will be. The super rich will destroy this country and still be super rich. We are truly in the age of "stupid"!
I worked hard on the Obama
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 11:16 — Anonymous (not verified)I worked hard on the Obama campaign, first time I ever believed in a political candidate - guess that shows what a good actor he is -never again. Congratulations on stopping smoking - I stopped 30 years ago and best thing I ever did. I have never felt so foolish & manipulated. My husband commented during my hard campaign work to save my time - he is no different than all the others because they are all beholden to big money in all forms. I pooh poohed him saying this one is different - what a fool I have been.
Basically, obama is a
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 12:31 — Anonymous (not verified)Basically, obama is a low-life, vacuous, narcissistic piece of trash that hijacked the hopes of tens of millions of people so that he could strut and preen on the world’s biggest stage and have us join him in a celebration of himself. He’s a disgusting human being.
Z
Obama is hoping to
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 12:54 — Bite (not verified)Obama is hoping to capitalize on the REPUBLICAN VOTE in 2012. There is a very real possibility THEIR MAN will earn conservative votes and win. Obama has made it CRYSTAL clear that he does not want to succeed legislatively with help from the Left. What he has made totally clear is that he wants it from the Right. And his recent apology to the Republicans that he will try to do "better" to act as a bipartisan politician MEANS THAT HE NOW INTENDS TO SWING EVEN FURTHER TO THE RIGHT. Get ready, friends, it's coming! NeoLiberal Trash, educated by Summers and his ilk, is the meaning of "Obama."
The undemocratic Democratic
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 13:30 — Anonymous (not verified)The undemocratic Democratic Party, of which Mr. Obama is a member, is not a political party in the real sense of the term. They are a safety valve which is used when the pressures for change start to build pressure inside the system. If I can mix metaphors, the undemocratic Democratic Party is also a stick used to beat real reformers when they rightly call things the way they are in America.
If you haven't seen the various clips circulating throughout the Internet tubes on "The Death of the Liberal Class" by Chris Hedges, please check them out. The undemocratic Democrats in Congress and the White House have sold the working class and the middle class down the river.
Most of the bloggers here
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 13:44 — Barbara Scott (not verified)Most of the bloggers here deserve another eight years of a Bush-like administration.
Obama was never a
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 13:45 — Michaelyn (not verified)Obama was never a progressive. He didn't quit on us -- he NEVER WAS. Too bad people fell for the soaring rhetoric and didn't do their homework.
CANDIDATES' VOTING RECORDS COMPARED — January 2005 through 2008 (while all three were Senators)
Fourteen of the most significant, most prominent, and/or most revealing votes taken during this period. (NV means "not voting.")
(1) Confirmation of Condoleeza Rice to be Secretary of State
Vote taken: 1/26/2005
Analysis: Neo-con, war criminal
Clinton: Yes
Obama: Yes
McCain: Yes
(2) Tort "reform" (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Vote taken: 2/10/2005
Analysis: Opposed by more than 68 consumer, civil rights, environmental and labor groups, it was described as the "final [Republican] payback to the tobacco, asbestos, oil and chemical industries, at the expense of ordinary families whose health has been compromised."
Clinton: No
Obama: Yes
McCain: Yes
(3) Dayton Amendment (S.Amdt. 31) to the 2005 Bankruptcy Act
Vote taken: 3/3/2005
Analysis: Would cap credit card interest rates at 30%. Senator Dayton provided examples of predatory lenders charging vulnerable people more than 1000%/year interest. Republicans argued that "free-markets" should set interest rates, and government should not interfere.
Clinton: Yes
Obama: No
McCain: No
(4) Energy Policy Act of 2005
Vote taken: 7/29/2005
Analysis: Often referred to as the Dick Cheney Energy Bill (industry lobbyists wrote it in secret in his White House office), this corporate-welfare bill was called "bad policy" by Public Citizen because it gives "billions of dollars in unjustified subsidies to the fossil fuel and nuclear energy industries," rolls back environmental regulations for the oil and gas industry, and "repeals the Public Utility Holding Company Act (PUHCA), an essential consumer protection that ensures that electric utilities exist to serve the people, not the profit interests of large corporations."
Clinton: No
Obama: Yes
McCain: No
(5) Dorgan Amendment (S.Amdt. 1665) to the 2005 Commerce Appropriations Bill
Vote taken: 9/15/2005
Analysis: Would prevent future NAFTA-like trade deals that allow "dumping" of products into the U.S. at prices below their cost of acquisition (harming U.S. farmers, ranchers, businesses and workers), by prohibiting the Commerce Department from weakening current countervailing duties and antidumping laws.
Clinton: Yes
Obama: No
McCain: No
(6) Confirmation of John Roberts to the Supreme Court
Vote taken: 9/29/2005
Analysis: Hard right-winger
Clinton: No
Obama: No
McCain: Yes
(7) Confirmation of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court
Vote taken: 1/31/2006
Analysis: Hard right-winger
Clinton: No
Obama: No
McCain: Yes
(8) USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization
Vote taken: 3/1/2006
Analysis: Allows the government to spy on citizens in "fishing expeditions" without probable cause or a court order, including listening to telephone calls, intercepting emails, accessing private medical records, library records and bank records, and searching homes and businesses without permission or knowledge.
Clinton: Yes
Obama: Yes
McCain: Yes
(9) Nomination of Dirk Kempthorne to be Secretary of the Interior
Vote taken: 5/26/2006
Analysis: Hard right-winger who received an overall score of zero from the League of Conservation Voters during his six years in the Senate.
Clinton: No
Obama: Yes
McCain: Yes
(Hillary and just seven other Democrats voted to block Kempthorne's nomination.)
(10) Feinstein Amendment (S.Amdt. 4882) to the 2007 Department of Defense Appropriations Act
Vote taken: 9/06/2006
Analysis: Outlaws use of cluster bombs in most cases, in order to protect civilian lives from unexploded cluster munitions.
Clinton: No
Obama: Yes
McCain: No
(11) Iraq withdrawal timeline goal (2007 Supplemental Appropriations Act)
Vote taken: 3/29/2007
Analysis: Provides that, "The President shall commence the phased redeployment of United States forces from Iraq not later than 120 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, with the goal of redeploying, by March 31, 2008, all United States combat forces from Iraq."
Clinton: Yes
Obama: Yes
McCain: No
(12) Kyl-Lieberman resolution on Iran
Vote taken: 9/26/2007
Analysis: Tantamount to a declaration of war (Sen. James Webb, former Secretary of the Navy).
Clinton: Yes
Obama: NV
McCain: NV
(13) Feingold-Reid Amendment (S.Amdt. 3164) to the 2008 Department of Defense Appropriations Act
Vote taken: 10/3/2007
Analysis: Requires the President to safely redeploy all U.S. troops from Iraq by June 30, 2008, except for those needed for al Qaeda operations, security and training.
Clinton: Yes
Obama: NV
McCain: No
(14) Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) amendment (H.R. 6304)
Vote taken: 7/9/2008
Analysis: Legalizes warrantless wiretapping of, and spying on, Americans by the federal government in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution. Covers up and excuses more than 30 felony crimes committed by President Bush when he authorized the illegal wiretaps. Provides retroactive immunity to lawbreaking telecom companies and terminates all pending lawsuits against them.
Clinton: No
Obama: Yes
McCain: NV
A good progressive would have voted as follows:
(1) Condoleeza Rice: NO
(2) Tort "reform": NO
(3) Cap credit card interest rates at 30%: YES
(4) Energy bill: NO
(5) Prevent unfair trade deals: YES
(6) John Roberts: NO
(7) Samuel Alito: NO
(8) USA PATRIOT Act Reauthorization: NO
(9) Dirk Kempthorne: NO
(10) Outlaw cluster bombs: YES
(11) Iraq withdrawal timeline goal: YES
(12) Kyl-Lieberman resolution on Iran: NO
(13) Iraq withdrawal timeline requirement: YES
(14) Illegal wiretapping: NO
Here are the candidates' progressive vote totals:
Clinton score: 10 of 14
Obama score: 4 of 14
McCain score: 1 of 14
I literally get a headache
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 15:25 — Anonymous (not verified)I literally get a headache when I see how the American voters, myself included, were bamboozled into placing an Obama vote - which was supposed to stand for change, justice, freedom and equality. I'm to the point where I want to grab him by the collar and demand that he make those changes that he promised on the campaign trail.
Ok, that's not in the realm of possibility, but as the people that we are, when something as important as a President screwing around with our lives and our livelihood, no amount of grumbling from us will result in change. We MUST and SHOULD make it clear to the president that he is failing miserably in his task as leader of the free world. His report card should be personally delivered to him from every single voter who voted for him. Republicans excluded. Perhaps this action from the voters might serve as a wake-up call to him possibly shame him to doing the things he promised.
I'm proposing a show of force to contend with this mediocrity, by showing up on the steps of the White House in the millions.
I would definitely clear my calendar for this event! You?
Th real smoking habit that
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 16:04 — Anonymous (not verified)Th real smoking habit that people need to quit is the idea that elections in America CAN change anything. I admit I caved into hope while voting, along with the excitement they are able to generate during campaigns (and this time, packaged as a 1st woman or 1st African American), but all along, I was skeptical, and expected that we would be in for a number of disappointments, some quite great, as far as war and health care were concerned.
(I know any longer post won't make it past the spam dragon, so I'll continue below)
(continued from above, we
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 16:09 — Anonymous (not verified)(continued from above, we hope)
One of the reasons I have never begrudged 3rd party voters, even in the height of the presidential campaign "orgasms" wheereupon masses of people go insane (picturing Republicans in power, for example) and feel that they in the thoes of mini deaths, as expected and hoped for by the corporate campaign people well versed in titilating you all into frenzies -- so that internet mobs are ready to strangle anyone supporting Ralph Nader, among others, anyone retaining their sobriety, not to going to the bar for their (essentially) one night fuck of hope, and send them to the guillotine for ruining the nation. Which we can already see hints of, now, coming down the road, if you ever participate at huffpost. (i.e. Criticizing Obama or encouraging others to vote 3rd party can be equated with supporting Palin.)
(continued past the spam dragon, below) ..
(continued from above, we
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 16:21 — Anonymous (not verified)(continued from above, we hope)
So, you have understand, just like understanding your smoking habit when you quit, William, that you too, are a one-night stand sex addict like the rest of consumer America when it comes to voting. Worse yet, you're a writer, and as you get caught up in the throes of mass frenzy, you are encouraging it even more, since you participate in the mass media consumption machine (albeit to a much lesser extent at places like truthout.)
Why, personally, I don't have the answers as far as continuing to vote for democrats or going third party. Sure, turn in a ballot, cross everryone off if you must, but I'd be insane if I pointed the finger at people voting for neighbor or told everyone I know they're jeopardizing the nation's health and well being if they don't vote for democrats.
(continuing past the spam dragon ..)
As far as change is
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 16:23 — Anonymous (not verified)As far as change is concerned, it's silly to think violent overthrow of government when people are violently dying every day, in terms of health care. If you're ready to violently overthrow a government, what would be much more effective than picking up a gun, is calling your health insurance company and canceling your policy. (I'm not suggestng, in the least, William, your wife do so. Obviously you should take full advantage of your policy.)
But this, in my opinion, is more along of the lines of where Americans should be heading, with their thinking, if they are serious about real change. If they are sitting there thinking, "m'god, the only that will change this country is another american revolution. and I am ready to go down to my local walmart on this, man! "
But you would amazed at the number of people willing to talk about gun and roses, but when it comes down to reality, if you suggested they cancel their health insurance policies -- (kind of along the lines of the frenchman on youtube suggesting people take their money out of the banks) -- they'll be ready to figuratively guillotine you, just like the democratic party campaigners getting ready to come.
Cheers. Have a nice weekend all. Breath, walk, and eat real food. And most of all, remember who really owns your orgasms, you can indeed say no to the schmuck at the bar, give up those cigarettes, but be patient and kind to yourselves.
PEACE.
In a nut shell, we the
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 16:38 — Anonymous (not verified)In a nut shell, we the People are their one-night stand. They'll ever be walkng out the door in the morning to go back to their real wives and husbands -- the corporations.
Accept it, America. Vote, but stop looking for answers there. Like the American farmers who put down their plows and picked up their guns -- pick up yours too -- but in the form of your cell phones -- and cancel your health insurance policies.
Of course this should be organized and doctors and hospitals should be compelled to participate and put their money where their mouths are (since they say 55% support opening up Medicare) -- but that is something we DO have control over, while the elections, we do not. It is a sick co-dependent relationship, where the cheaters using you always return home to the real spouse.
COME TO TERMS WITH THIS AMERICA AND QUIT SCREWING AROUND.
They don't call it "screwing
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 16:45 — whaler (not verified)They don't call it "screwing America" fer nothin'.
Their true deep and abiding commitment is to the corporations.
The only politician who
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 17:10 — Anonymous (not verified)The only politician who never disappointed me was Howard Dean. If he would run again, I'd go right back out to the streets for him. Barack Obama, not so much.
To the person who quipped
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 17:41 — Anonymous (not verified)To the person who quipped about "obamanation," you're just as caught up in rhetoric, too, just from the far right instead.
Great post sharing real information on voting records. Obama also was a no-show on many votes -- part of his political strategy, it was surmised during the campaigns - that allowed him to rise in power. He really didn't have much of a paper trail, and his campaign was built on this idea of trust -- people just handed themselves over on his word.
Most of their articles
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 18:15 — Anonymous (not verified)Most of their articles supported the airport crack-down. W.R.P. is mostly smoke and mirrors entertainment, not serious intellectualism. To make them "look" like they're with the "proletariat." It's like the Republicans with their "lumpen" proletariat variety to keep the masses titilated. He'll be smoking forever, in the figurative sense. And his article on "Thanksgiving" was crap. William Burroughs he is not.
I think Obama is just
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 20:42 — Ellamay (not verified)I think Obama is just hanging in there and hoping, in two years, to get out of town in one piece with his family intact.
Kennedy didn't make it.
Have been getting my
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 21:41 — Anonymous (not verified)Have been getting my (cheaper) nicorettes for a decade from an Australasian country. It's insane that the anti-smoking effort is coming from so far away. At great environmental cost.
I was watching a show on Democracy Now where a guest, living in Southern Chile decried that his hotel butter came from Australasia when HIS region produces very good butter, locally. He thought it was an insane economic model.
Michaelyn, Great analysis.
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 23:24 — Anonymous (not verified)Michaelyn,
Great analysis. May I ask where you found all of that?
Nothing will change until
Sat, 12/04/2010 - 23:53 — Bobin Canada (not verified)Nothing will change until Americans stop voting for "Cheerleaders" (Reagan, Bush, Clinton, Bush, Hilary, Obama, etc.). I dismissed Obama as an airhead before the primaries. It's the people who were gullible enough to swallow his BS that are the big barrier to real change.
Renee Locks9:22 pm Where can
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 00:24 — Renee Locks (not verified)Renee Locks9:22 pm
Where can we get accurate accounts of what is really going on?
If the Republicans desire is to forget the over 3 trillion dollar debt left by the Bush administration and continue to talk about the cut back on taxes for the uber wealthy as a tax hike, how can we have any meaningful discussion about how to deal with our dilemnas?
Delete
A friend just sent me this
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 02:35 — Anonymous (not verified)A friend just sent me this article. I think the left is just as out of touch as the right, as you can see his poll numbers have not changed much after all the bashing from left, right and everywhere. I still have faith in him. He will be remembered as a great President. Just remember what he inherited.
American are uninformed. They believe commercials, for crying out loud.
I quit on him with the Gulf
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 07:26 — Kym (not verified)I quit on him with the Gulf fiasco and him bending over for BP.
A friend of mine said something interesting this week. He said, "Ya know, those assholes are suppose to represent US but they never do, they just represent their own interests or their interests that can be bought. I don't understand why we even need them anymore - we have computers or access to computers, we can speak for ourselves now. Get them all OUT!" Chaos or cool? It's thinking outside the box anyway. Honestly tho, who needs 'em?
They are not our peers. They're millionaires so, all things considered, I guess they do represent themselves and the sociopathic corporations they're in bed with.
Good for you that you stopped smoking Will. We need you around for a long time to keep writing ;-)
anonymous at 7:35...they may
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 10:12 — Anonymous (not verified)anonymous at 7:35...they may believe in commercials,but believing in obomber is even DUMBER
Obama and his handlers know
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 12:19 — Brian (not verified)Obama and his handlers know nothing about negotiation and bargaining, when and how to cooperate, when to stick to what you believe in, when to fight and when fighting does more harm than good. They don't understand that you NEVER compromise with WRONG, and you never give up on your core principles. Cooperation for its own sake is worse than empty, it is destructive. If you don't stand up for anything, you will quickly fall down.
OK - what if Obama really is
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 14:50 — B (not verified)OK - what if Obama really is a person of integrity, and ran to show everyone that the Dems cannot be relied on? Maybe he is sacrificing himself to make it really obvious that the system is beyond repair.
It reminds me a little of Sir Thomas Moore. He was tasked by the Tudors with writing a history of Richard III. Even though he was a highly respected scholar, there are egregious factual errors sprinkled through out that work, that don't appear in his other work. He of course had to write a very negative view of Richard III. But as a person of integrity, he left clues that might cause a future historian to pause.
It's interesting to ponder at least. Perhaps Obama is a true progressive whose greatest contribution will be showing ordinary people how badly broken the system is. Will they get it?
Oh my B, Of all the dumbass
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 15:43 — Anonymous (not verified)Oh my B,
Of all the dumbass things from all the dumbass demo-zombies that this comment section is infested with, that takes the cake hands down: obama should be credited for rising to the top ... running as a man of the people and purveyor of change that you can believe in ... and then not even making a feeble attempt to deliver on what he promised and instead doing the exact opposite ... to prove to us that it can't be done. HAHAHAHAHAHA. BRILLIANT!!!!!!
I think you're trying to play 11-dimensional chess when your brain can't handle anything more than checkers.
You demo-zombies are SO DAMN DUMB becoz you spend all your brain power thinking back from the assumption that your precious party and president are congenitally well-intentioned while the evidence to the contrary has been piling up for over 4 years now. YOU'RE SO PATHETIC!
Z
William, Yeah, it's really
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 16:05 — tmaloney (not verified)William,
Yeah, it's really discouraging. We'll just have to keep complaining and shouting out warnings while we wait for economic conditions to degenerate to the point where enough of our countrymen realize that they've been bamboozled.
My hope is that the Economy falls apart before the Ecologic life-support system of the planet falls apart.
In the meantime, stay away from those cigarettes. Don't let the bastards ruin your personal health even before they ruin everything else.
To Michaelyn, Sat,
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 16:07 — tmaloney (not verified)To Michaelyn, Sat, 12/04/2010 - 18:45,
Thanks. I've printed that summary and will refer to it in the future.
Z, I agree it was a far-out
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 16:24 — B (not verified)Z, I agree it was a far-out thing to say. I don't think it's a much of a real possibility. I do think he has betrayed his progressive base. But I also think he is a smart guy. So I'm just trying to think outside the box.
All I know is that this latest week has more people talking about quitting on the system and taking up real revolution than I've heard in a very long time. It just makes one think...
But responding to you is probably much like Obama trying to appease the repubs. You've just decided that everyone who doesn't spew the same thing you do is a dumbass.
B, It's pretty obvious that
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 18:05 — Anonymous (not verified)B,
It's pretty obvious that obama has sold us out purposely ... and cynically ... but if one can't stomach that, I guess it forces one to be "over creative" in trying to explain why he just so happens to always find some way to keep his corporate sponsors tickled.
Z
It's not that I can't
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 19:34 — B (not verified)It's not that I can't stomach it. It just doesn't make much sense to me. Why misrepresent yourself if you're going to just do what the other guy would have done?
I think we can agree that he sold us out. I'm guessing Hilary would have too. Her hubby certainly did, though he never ran as a progressive. I'm actually not a democrat, but up until last week I did believe that Obama was who he said he was. He just seemed so real.
I was the one who posted originally that it looks like he is either being threatened, has been beaten down, or is intentionally betraying us.
I'm just curious. I don't know what's going on, just what it looks like. I am not making up theories to make myself feel better; I'm just asking questions of a situation that doesn't really make much sense.
P.S. I agree with you that I don't like the division on this site between "not verified" posters and FB posters. It's yucky.
More and more of us are
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 22:07 — Ed McC (not verified)More and more of us are edging closer and closer to some kind of insanity by the total insanity of our leaders ...especially Obama who seems to have his head embedded in the entire Republican Party's you know what! What kind of society will we have? I guarantee you that all of this is traumatizing people psychologically and yet most people sit still and bob their heads like bobble heads. Time to bring back the guillotine and chop off some deserving heads. Leaders, media, corporate CEOs and other facilitators as well.
I work on a college campus,
Sun, 12/05/2010 - 22:28 — sassyfafa (not verified)I work on a college campus, and one thing I'm convinced of: Hilary would never have taken the election if she'd won the primary. It was Barack Obama's inspiring young people to get involved in politics that brought them out in droves and won the election for him. So if we'd all been brilliant enough to "read the future" and supported Hilary (for whom, by the way, I have a great deal of regard), we'd be trashing President McCain today instead. Where would you rather be?
B, Keep this premise in the
Mon, 12/06/2010 - 00:02 — Anonymous (not verified)B,
Keep this premise in the back of your head:
obama is a narcissio-path. He loves himself much more than anything else. His ego demands a large audience ... you can see it on the way he just loves strutting and preening for the crowds and doing the talk shows … and he is willing to sell out 99% country, after misleading them with promises of change, all so that he can have the biggest stage in the world and the masses can join him in a celebration of himself. It’s the most important thing in the world to him … by far ... and he caters to the power structure becoz he believes that it is the most essential element in gaining that platform.
Not only is he a bad president, he is a bad person.
Z
Do any of you understand yet
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 16:16 — dave (not verified)Do any of you understand yet why us third-party freaks continually "throw our votes away" instead of encouraging this charade?
Mr Obama, there's a way you
Wed, 12/08/2010 - 01:41 — Anonymous (not verified)Mr Obama, there's a way you can get what is good for the people and defeat rethuglicans as well. Threaten to hit them and their warmongering constituents in the pocket book. So tell them to both extend benefits for the unemployed and forget about tax cuts for the rich or you will exercise your authority as commander in chief to pull the troops out of Afghanistan. Just think you would probably get what you want and you would instantly restore your popularity with the people.