One in Three Americans Lacked the Income Needed to "Make Ends Meet" in 2009; Young Adults Among the Hardest Hit
Thursday 16 September 2010
by: Shawn Fremstad | The Center for Economic and Policy Research | News Analysis

(Photo: Ed Yourdon / Flickr)
Today the Census Bureau released a report on trends in income, including median income, income inequality and income poverty, and health insurance coverage between 2008 and 2009. As expected given the increase in unemployment-which grew from 7.4 percent in December 2008 to 10 percent in December 2009-the report shows a substantial deterioration in Americans' economic security between 2008 and 2009.
The Census figures show that in 2009 one out of every three Americans had incomes that fell below the amount (roughly $45,000 for a family of four) that most Americans and various budget estimates show is needed to "make ends meet" at a basic level. Also, of particular note, the report shows substantial increases in the poverty rate and the rate of people without health insurance, as well as declines in median income for various demographic groups.
Income Poverty and "Making Ends Meet"
In 2009, some 43.6 million people had incomes below the federal poverty line. The income-poverty rate increased both overall-from 13.2 percent in 2008 to 14.3 percent in 2009-and for all racial and ethnic groups, except Asians (for whom the increase was not statistically significant). The number of persons living below the poverty line has now increased for three consecutive years. The largest percentage increases in poverty were experienced by families headed by a single man (3.1 percent) and children under age 6 (2.6 percent).

There is broad recognition that the current poverty line ($21,756 for a family of four in 2009) falls far below the amount of income needed to "make ends meet" at a basic level.[1] When established in the early 1960s, the poverty line was equal to nearly 50 percent of median income. Because it has only been adjusted for inflation since then, and not for increases in mainstream living standards, the poverty line has fallen to just under 30 percent of median income. As a result, to be counted as officially "poor," you have to be much poorer today, compared to a typical family, than you would have in the 1960s.
Both public opinion research conducted by Gallup and other pollsters, and basic budget analyses conducted by the Department of Commerce and various non-governmental research organizations, suggest that the minimum amount needed to "make ends meet" at a basic level is around $45,000 to $50,000 for a family of four. While the Census report does not report data for such a standard, it does provide data on the number of people with incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty line, which is a roughly equivalent income level. These figures show that one out of every three Americans in 2009 had income below 200 percent of the poverty line, and that the percentage of such people increased by 1.1 percentage points between 2008 and 2009, and by nearly 4 percentage points since its lowest recorded level (29.3 percent) in 2000.[2]
Be a part of the movement for non-commercial media! Contribute today by clicking here.
Young Adults Especially Hard Hit
Young adults and adults in their 30s and early 40s were particularly hard hit. For example, householders age 24 and younger saw their median incomes drop by 4.4 percent, a decline second only to that of non-citizens (4.5 percent). Young adults age 25 to 34-who already had among the highest uninsurance rates, with more than one in four uninsured in 2008-experienced the largest increase in the share of people without health insurance (2.6 percent).
Median Income and Full-Time Employment
After a record decline between 2007 and 2008, overall median income apparently stabilized in 2009 (the decline from $50,112 in 2008 to $49,777 in 2009 was not statistically significant). However, there were considerable differences in the median income of various demographic groups. In general, non-Hispanic whites, Blacks, young adults, married couples, and people living in the suburbs experienced declines in median income. The largest declines were experienced by Blacks (4.4 percent); householders under the age of 24 (4.4 percent); and non-citizens (4.5 percent). The elderly were the only group to experience an income gain of a similar magnitude (5.8 percent). This increase reflects in part the roughly $13 billion in supplemental Social Security payments that last year's Recovery Act provided to seniors.
There were also steep declines in the number of workers with full-time or any earnings during the year. The number of workers with full-time, year-round earnings declined by 4.8 million between 2008 and 2009, a 4.6 percent decline. The decline in full-time, year-round workers was greater for men (3.8 million jobs and 6.3 percent) than for women (1 million jobs and 2.3 percent). Similarly, the number of workers with any earnings during the year declined by 2.4 percent between 2008 and 2009, although there was less of a difference between male and female workers on this measure (a 2.6 percent decline for men and a 2.2 percent decline for women).
Health Insurance
The number of people without health insurance rose from 46.3 million in 2008 to 50.7 million in 2009. The increase in uninsurance would have been much larger had public health insurance programs not taken up much of the slack. The number of people covered by private insurance fell from nearly 201 million in 2008 to 194.5 million in 2009; this decline was offset by a nearly 5 million person increase in the share of people covered by Medicaid and military health care programs.
Impact of Social Insurance, Recovery Act and Other Policies
It's important to note that these numbers largely do not reflect legislation enacted in 2009 and 2010 to boost job growth and increase economic security. While the Recovery Act was signed into law in the first quarter of 2009, most of the financial assistance provided by it to low- and moderate-income households comes in forms (including tax credits and in-kind assistance) that are not factored into the official poverty and median income numbers. In addition, many of the investments in the Recovery Act were not made until the latter half of 2009 and this year. The impact of these investments will only show up in the figures for 2010 (released this time next year) and in subsequent years.
Finally, health care reform, which will, among other things, ultimately extend public health insurance to nearly all currently uninsured Americans with incomes below 125 percent of the poverty line, and provide subsidies for insurance up to 400 percent of the poverty line, has only begun to be implemented. Most of the expansions in coverage will not occur until 2014. Many uninsured young adults, however, will benefit next year from a health care reform provision that allows them to stay on their parents' insurance policies until age 26.
[1] For more on this point, see Fremstad, Shawn. 2010. "A Modern Framework for Measuring Poverty and Basic Economic Security." Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research.
[2] See Table 5. Percent of People by Ratio of Income to Poverty Level, Census Bureau, Historical Poverty Tables-People.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
The wealthy and the GOP have
Fri, 09/17/2010 - 15:19 — Dwight Bobson (not verified)The wealthy and the GOP have the poor and middle class right where they want them. How do the poor/middle class take revenge? Be angry with those trying to help them. Yup, welcome to the species, Americanus Ignoranti.
"The largest percentage
Fri, 09/17/2010 - 15:31 — Natasha (not verified)"The largest percentage increases in poverty were experienced by families headed by a single man (3.1 percent) and children under age 6 (2.6 percent)."
How many families are there that are headed by children under age 6? LOL
$22k for a family of four?
Fri, 09/17/2010 - 15:33 — CleverTitania (not verified)$22k for a family of four? It really has become time to redefine the poverty line. You could barely pay a year's worth of rent or a mortgage, for a family of four, on that much. And I'm not just talking about in places like NY, where that amount of income is literally insane. But even here, in IL, it would cost you about $10k a year just for a roof that would adequately house 4 people.
And on top of this, they want people to eat better, when the better quality food you eat the more it costs.
Heard on the street: -What,
Fri, 09/17/2010 - 15:59 — Anonymous (not verified)Heard on the street:
-What, then? would you be Rupit Moeduck?
--G'day mate, yeah!
-What are ya doin' out on the street , Roopit?
--C'n ya spare us an extra dahlah, mate?
I'm down t' me last 20 billion!
“The American Dream, Part
Fri, 09/17/2010 - 17:14 — Anonymous (not verified)“The American Dream, Part 1: The End?”(by: Shawn Fremstad. Truthout. 9/16/10). Maybe never was one. We have been dreaming for more than 200 years. Time to wake up, sleeping beauty. But, oh! Oh! Sorry no princess.
Natasha20:31-"largest %
Fri, 09/17/2010 - 18:59 — Anonarcmous (not verified)Natasha20:31-"largest % increase ..by 1] single men & 2] children under age 6: these are not connected by just facts about 1]men & 2] children independent of each other. Agreed: not well written.
At what point will the
Fri, 09/17/2010 - 20:51 — Frank Zaski (not verified)At what point will the middle and underclass be so financially hurt that we will demand an economic Magna Carta from the oppression of the kings of commerce and their puppet Republican Party?
Making Ends Meet For Whom?
Sat, 09/18/2010 - 13:08 — Can You Do Simple Math? (not verified)Making Ends Meet For Whom? - If it is for the people, it is a matter of allowing the housing market to follow the laws of gravity rather than more government interference - but if it is making ends meet for the bond-holders of the banks, it is propping the housing market up indefinitely.
We have such a regulated FDA, that a person can't support themselves by selling eggs and milk to their neighbors without navigating ridiculous red tape - this country bears no resemblance to it's former agrarian roots - all in the name of 'food safety' - I say 'safety' is being able to feed your family - directly, and without the interference of government, or their taking a cut at the point of sale.
We are not so wealthy as to afford such regulation - time to shut down the FDA and leave it up to the State and local agencies.
What do the Corporations
Sun, 09/19/2010 - 22:16 — Anonymous (not verified)What do the Corporations need ordinary Americans for?
What does Congress need them for, either, since the Corporations have bought the elections ?
One thing I can say: Get your money out of PayPal and close those accounts.
Selling eggs is profitable
Mon, 09/20/2010 - 06:46 — Anonrcmous (not verified)Selling eggs is profitable only if you have the structure to carry salmonella.