Opium Production in Afghanistan: Strong and Corrupt as Ever

by: Nadia Prupis, t r u t h o u t | Report

Opium Production in Afghanistan: Strong and Corrupt as Ever
Afghan National Security Forces patrol an opium field in Bala Baluk, Afghanistan. (Photo: U.S. Navy Petty Officer 1st Class Monica R. Nelson / isafmedia)

Efforts by the United Nations (UN), the US military and the Indian government to curb opium production in Afghanistan since 2007 have been largely ineffective, due in large part to the ties between the drug trade and the Taliban.

Afghanistan is the world's largest producer of opium, the raw material harvested from poppies to make heroin, as well as alkaloids like codeine and morphine. According to two cables released this month by WikiLeaks, Afghanistan's supply of opium exceeds the world's demand for heroin, with its unsold stock currently totaling 12,400 tons. Taliban-linked drug cartels emerging along the southern border of the country, where 99 percent of production takes place, influence the majority of poppy cultivation by coercing farmers into growing the crops for a strong and well-supplied insurgency.

According to Antonio Maria Costa, former executive director of the UN Office of Drug and Crime (UNODC), the cartels treat the excess stock like a "savings account," a practice that could pose a serious threat to peace efforts if it is used to fund the Taliban insurgency.

The UN released a report in October stating that Afghanistan's opium production dropped by nearly half from 2009 levels – however, the decrease was not due to military efforts, but rather the spread of a disease that affected opium fields in Kandahar and Helmand province after crops started to flower.

According to the report, poppy cultivation levels remained the same and were particularly high in the insecure southern and western areas. "These regions are dominated by insurgency and organized crime networks," UNODC executive director Yury Fedotov stated in a press release. "This underscored the link between poppy cultivation and insecurity in Afghanistan, a trend we have observed since 2007."

Costa told the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) during a September 2009 briefing that, "High cultivation trends were linked to the insurgency presence, particularly in areas with an absence of Afghan governance structures and security stability."

Stay informed with free Truthout updates delivered straight to your email inbox. Click here to sign up.

The drug trade in the south of the country is compounded by Afghan President Hamid Karzai's treatment of traffickers, including granting early releases to well-connected suspects. Karzai also pardoned five border police officers, who were caught with 124 kilograms of heroin and sentenced to serve 16 to 18 years in prison each, "on the grounds that they were distantly related to two individuals who had been martyred during the civil war."

In February 2007, then-President Bush told reporters in a speech that the United States was supporting Karzai in his efforts to end both the cultivation of opium and the corruption that compounds the country's drug trade. "[We're] helping the president in a variety of ways to deal with the problem," Bush said at the time. "One way to deal with the drug problem is for there to be a push back to the drug dealers, and a good way to push back on the drug dealers is to convict them and send them to jail."

Further complicating the drug trade in Afghanistan are the actions of the country's neighbors, particularly Pakistan, according to Afghan Minister of Defense Abdul Rahim Wardak. Wardak told Afghanistan Ambassador Karl Eikenberry during a December 2009 briefing that the Pakistani army was helping the Afghan Taliban find sanctuary in areas "deeper into Pakistan."

National Intelligence Estimates (NIE) reports released earlier in December concluded that the war in Afghanistan cannot be won without Pakistani forces helping to root out Taliban militants on their borders.

Foreign policy expert and Boston University professor Stephen Kinzer agrees that the drug trade in Afghanistan cannot be tackled solely as a US military issue. "Trying to curb the poppy production could be … a real serious interest of [the US]," Kinzer said. "However, like most of our problems in Afghanistan, this one cannot be solved by us alone. It can only be solved on a regional basis."

Ending heroin production is "a great example of a social and political interest that the US shared with Iran, but we're telling them if they don't cooperate on a nuclear issue, there will be no other cooperation. Our policy towards Iran is self-defeating," Kinzer said. "American military action alone, no matter how focused and how intense, is not going to change the situation in a substantial way."

Rather than fighting the cultivation through military efforts, Kinzer said, the US government should purchase the annual poppy crop from Afghan farmers for an estimated $3-4 billion a year – the same amount spent on the war in Afghanistan every month.

The AP recently reported that 700 soldiers died in Afghanistan in 2010, making it the deadliest year so far in the nine-year war. Much of the violence is centered in the southern part of the country, where the Afghan army being trained by US forces is often the main target of Taliban attacks.
 

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Nadia Prupis is Truthout's Media Policy Reporting Fellow.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Before 9/11 there wasn't any

Before 9/11 there wasn't any opium production. We went in there because, someone said, that was where Osama bin Laden was. Opium production stated (again) soon after.



There was opium production

There was opium production in Afghanistan in the nineteenth century. It doesn't matter when opium production started in Afghanistan. We have no business being there in the 21st century. or any other century. We are losing our young people to death and dismemberment, for no good reason, except to keep the military-industrial complex in business.



If the whole drug business

If the whole drug business were to be de-criminalized, licensed, and regulated just as real estate, pharmaceuticals, liquor, tobacco, food adulteration, hospitals, shipping, transportation, airport control towers, pesticides . . . and so on, then poppy growing land could be released for food production and a lot of other good things could happen to increase the humane potential of the human species. Why not go for the better instead of the worst?



Why do we demonize an

Why do we demonize an economy that has discovered a solid way of working for its people?

When did the West discover moral rectitude with regards to opium? The "wars" on drugs are the only answer we can come up with, and all these conflagrations do is increasingly debase any moral compass we may have.



Thu, 01/06/2011 - 21:27 —

Thu, 01/06/2011 - 21:27 — Anonymous (not verified)

We will never, EVER de-criminalize the drug business. Why?

Governments, like the US and the UK, use illegal drugs, like heroin and cocaine, as "untraceable commodities" payments for their "international relations" activities (ie terrorist activities, coup d'état operations, back-door unannounced arms deals, etc.) There are many incidences of this: Iran-Contra, for one. Here's another--google "Kosovo "Freedom Fighters" Financed by Organised Crime" by globalresearch.



This is dated FEB 15 - 2001

This is dated FEB 15 - 2001 Who's telling the truth?

http://opioids.com/afghanistan/index.html



I think the US military is

I think the US military is failing us completely! We've been in Afghanistan for years now, so where is the great tasting Black Afghani Hash that should be flooding our country now? I just don't understand why the English soldiers can bring back all that great Hash for Old Blighty... but our soldiers are too chicken shit (or downright incompetent) to do the same for AMerika. Shame on them all! I mean... what in the hell are we fighting for? All our trillons of taxpayer dollars to murder people and destroy their culture and land - and I can't even smoke a bowl of decent Hash!! What has this country come to? May God help us all...



I don't think they're

I don't think they're "coercing" people to work in this industry as much as the article suggests. The country has no other industries in which people can make a living. I read that, for single mothers, it can be a boon, having a little piece of land to grow poppy and quietly raise one's children. The alternatives? If she were to toe the moral line under the Bush/Karzai initiative? Prostitution, at best.

Other than that, when are we getting out of there? We can't afford to be in Afghanistan; we have enough problems we need to invest in here at home.

The problem with the peace process is not Afghanistan's ownership of large quantities of heroin. It's our sold out politicians who are not representing the People and what we want, but the corporations.



To prevent opium from

To prevent opium from growing for a few years, just treat the area with then herbicide trifluralin, or close relatives at rates suitable to remove grasses from cotton, beans or even wheat. It does not like it. Legal Tasmanian poppy growers are only too well aware of that.

However, for the cost of the war, it would be cheaper to buy all produced at the going price plus sufficient to overcome any disincentive by the existing buyers which will de fund much of the opposition. The product can be then used in the pharmaceutical industry.

Of course ending prohibition would cut the price of the product and cause a problem for the growers.

We might as well do somthing positive re drug abuse, and not the racially based prohibitions favoured by the decaying US empire.



they will never "eradicate"

they will never "eradicate" a cash crop - such naivite. Didn't the CIA set up Federal Opium Express years ago in SE Asia?