Out of Iraq? Maybe Not.

by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

Out of Iraq? Maybe Not.
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: The U.S. Army, yomanimus)

This Just In: the war in Iraq is not over.

There has been plenty of news of late to obscure this fact, to be sure: GOP Senator Bunning of Kentucky single-handedly screwed hundreds of thousands of Americans with his obstructionism in the well of the Senate before finally backing down amid a storm of criticism. Kay Bailey Hutchinson failed to upend the sitting Texas governor's re-election bid, thanks in no small part to Tea Party sentimentality. The health care reform debate is back on the front burner, and the American people have been getting a half-assed education on what "reconciliation" means from news media people who can barely spell the word. Democratic Rep. Charlie Rangel, who has been in the Capitol building longer than the sink in the men's room, has taken a leave of absence from his committee chairmanship under a cloud of scandal.

It's all very interesting, and for reporters who adore writing about process instead of policy, or facts for that matter, there has been plenty of grist for the mill.

Press play to listen to author William Rivers Pitt read his column, " Out of Iraq? Maybe Not.":

Press play to listen to author William Rivers Pitt read his column, "Out of Iraq? Maybe Not.":

But there has also been this:

Even with Iraqi security forces on a heightened state of alert in advance of Sunday's national elections, dozens of Iraqis were killed on Wednesday in a devastating series of suicide bombings in the restive city of Baquba.

The attacks began with two car bombings near campaign offices and government buildings Then, as swarms of people rushed to hospitals, ferrying the dead and wounded and looking for relatives, a man hiding a suicide belt under a dirty white robe entered the emergency room, a local policeman said.

Grieving relatives screamed amidst the rubble, calling out the names of loved ones even as security officers scrambled to lock down the entire city. The attacks left at least 31 people dead and 55 wounded, according to local security officials. The attacks in Baquba were similar to the large bombings in Baghdad in recent months, with militants striking several targets in a coordinated and deadly fashion.

... and this:

Followers of Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr on Tuesday accused Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki of starting "a psychological war" against them ahead of next week's parliamentary elections.

The accusations come amid increased speculation that the Sadrists could have an increased role in the new parliament, potentially receiving more votes than candidates from the Supreme Islamic Iraqi Council (SIIC) within the Iraqi National Alliance, al-Maliki's main Shiite Muslim competition.

... and this:

The civilian death toll in Iraq jumped to 211 people compared with the previous month, officials said on Monday, a sign of rising violence in the run-up to a March 7 parliamentary election. Overall violence in Iraq has fallen in the last two years, but a series of blasts in recent months shattered the peace before a national vote, seen as a crucial test as Iraq emerges from years of war, sanctions and sectarian slaughter. In January, 135 people died violent deaths.

On February 5, twin car bombs killed at least 40 people and wounded 145 others in Iraq's holy city of Kerbala as hundreds of thousands of Shia pilgrims observed a religious rite. Sunni Islamist insurgents such as al Qaeda and members of Saddam Hussein's outlawed Baath party are still capable of staging devastating attacks. The attacks appear aimed to undermine Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's Shia-led government before the parliamentary election and highlight the shortcomings of the security forces.

... and this:

BAGHDAD - A roadside bomb near a liquor shop killed the store's owner and wounded three people in western Baghdad, police said.

TARMIYA - A motorbike packed with explosives wounded nine people, including four policemen and two members of a government backed militia, in Tarmiya, 25 km (15 miles) north of Baghdad, an interior ministry source said.

YUSUFIYA - A roadside bomb went off near a market, wounding three people in the town of Yusufiya, 20 km (12 miles) south of Baghdad, police said.

KHALDIYA - A car bomb targeting a member of Anbar's provincial council killed one civilian and wounded six others in Khaldiya, 85 km (50 miles) west of Baghdad, police said.

KIRKUK - Police found the bullet-riddled body of a man wearing traditional Kurdish clothes in eastern Kirkuk, 250 km (155 miles) north of Baghdad, police said.

BAGHDAD - A sticky bomb attached to a car wounded four people on Saturday in the Shula district of northwestern Baghdad, police said.

... and this:

The number of Iraqis killed in war-related violence increased by 44 percent between January and February, with civilians accounting for almost all of the casualties. The rise in killings raised doubts about the atmosphere before next Sunday's Iraqi election, which the United States hopes will produce a stable government that could ease withdrawal of American troops by the end of next year.

Casualty figures have fluctuated widely in recent months and are far below those seen in past years, when sectarian violence was rampant. But the rise in killings is reflected in numbers collected both by the Associated Press and by Iraqi authorities. At least 255 Iraqis were killed in war-related violence last month, according to an AP count, 44 percent more than the 177 reported in January. At least 383 Iraqis were killed in December and 93 in November, reflecting no clear trend.

The AP statistics also show that more violence was directed at civilians than at security personnel in February, compared with the previous three months. Ninety-three percent of those killed in February were civilians, compared with about two-thirds in November, December, and January.

George W. Bush, while he was in office, made it patently clear that the United States would be in Iraq until the Earth crashed into the sun, if he had his way. The reasons for this are, by now, patently clear: Republicans tend to win elections when people are afraid, wrapped in flags to support our troops, or both. Plus, George's buddies in the oil-and-defense industry have enjoyed galactic profits thanks to the ongoing conflict. Plus, he could not, or would not, admit to having made a blood-drenched error in judgment by pursuing a costly house-to-house urban war that delivered Iraq into the hands of neighboring Iran, because he's just not built for admitting error, and because any such admission might conclude with him and his merry men getting invited to spend some time in a small room with bars on the doors and windows in the Hague.

The election in Iraq is coming, and so there has been a detonation of violence in Iraq. President Obama inherited this nightmare from George and the boys, and campaigned heavily on getting the United States out of there by next year. Make no mistake: this is, was, and will always be Mr. Bush's war, but the sudden spike in death and destruction on the eve of Sunday's elections - according to the Smart Boys in the Pentagon and NSC, anyway - might wind up tossing Obama's removal plans into a cocked hat.

We should never have been there to begin with. We should not be there now. Let the word go forth from this time and place: we must be gone from there before another year passes. No matter the circumstances, we must go. Hundreds of Iraqi civilians have died since the New Year, as have ten American soldiers.

It is enough.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



William Rivers Pitt is a Truthout editor and columnist.  He is also a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: "War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know" and "The Greatest Sedition Is Silence." His newest book, "House of Ill Repute: Reflections on War, Lies, and America's Ravaged Reputation," is now available from PoliPointPress.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Don't expect anything from

Don't expect anything from our Peace Prize President. He's not different from Bush in his core commitments to occupation.



But Oildinero greases the

But Oildinero greases the Obamarama merry-go-round of the middle east: Not this year; NOT NO HOW! (Ignore the general BetrayUS behind the Company Gates).



New boss, same as the old

New boss, same as the old boss. Will Obama cave again and take the GOP (Greedy Old Persons) position and stay the course in Iraq? He wants to listen to the Generals (Offense Department) instead of the American public who are fed up with these wars ($2B per day for the MIC). 36,000 lobbyists and corrupt politicians/judges interfering with real democracy. Let's try the Green Party.



Our hearts are broken. We

Our hearts are broken. We who rode buses to Washington 57 hours in two days to let our numbers be counted..who thought this man Obama was one of us. We who elected him and wept and believed we had a champion for peace at last. Now we are cynical. We watched him get tackled on the field by the vicious racist republicans and then held down and hogtied by the generals. He folded. He molded.
Revolution.



When the oil runs out, then

When the oil runs out, then the US will be out of Iraq! When the oil ends, and it will, the US military machine dies, along with the US. And of course the rest of the world. Coming to a theater near you very soon. Learn more at: http://www.kunstler.com/



If Obama uses this to try

If Obama uses this to try and prolong the war the Iraqies will go ballistic. With equal pressure at home I think he'll reconsider.



Obama will reconsider

Obama will reconsider anything Rahm Emanuel tells him he should reconsider. Neither man has any conviction about anything, both are ego driven. Emanuel is in love with the art of the deal and Obama is in love with himself.



I am just as tired of Iraq

I am just as tired of Iraq and Afghanistan as everyone else is. But part of me is downright frightened by some of the responses I see here. I had mixed feelings about Iraq from day one. Those mixed feelings have become downright anger, disgust, and sadness at what has come as a result. But at this point, I can't help but say that we, as a nation, have an obligation to the Iraqi people, as well as ourselves. The responses I read here seem to lean along the vein of "get us out and forget the Iraqis." While it was the stupidity of Bush and Cheney that got our nation involved in Iraq to begin with, at this point we all have an obligation to leave the people of Iraq in a better situation than we made for them. It is not enough to just be tired and want out. We put them into an impossible bind, and we have a duty to help guide them out of it. We can't just keep dropping the ball whenever we feel like it. That is exactly how Afghanistan got into where it is today. We can't let that happen again.



Iraq has an election coming

Iraq has an election coming up. Why not put the occupation on the ballot? Let the people decide if they want our "help" or not.



Anon@04:29 says: "we all

Anon@04:29 says: "we all have an obligation to leave the people of Iraq in a better situation than we made for them. [...] We put them into an impossible bind, and we have a duty to help guide them out of it." Basically, he or she is saying that, if the bull keeps blundering around the china shop long enough, the crockery will start to reassemble itself.



The recent events Rangel,

The recent events Rangel, bombings, Bunning, etc. only drive home the point that if the US were a building that it would be condemded. Why didnt the Obama group go after Bush and company legally? Really, thats a must, even if it provokes violent reactions from the right. That would be all right too because insurection by the tbaggers could provide the reason for marshal law and mass arrests of Republicans, If you think change can be instituted any other way...



No one has mentioned that a

No one has mentioned that a lot of the violence was brought on by the elected govt, and its more militant Shiite, pro-Iranian allies: they disqualified most of the prominent Sunnis and secularists running against them in the election--500 barred from running.

What would you do, if you were set to win at least significant power, and the gang clinging to power did that to you?

Point is: the US can't solve this by staying. The Iraqis are going to have to sort this one out on their own.



This is all mental

This is all mental masturbation. The US role in Iraq has nothing to do with politics, nor freedom for Iraqis, nor rebuilding anything. It is about the second largest proven reserves of oil on the planet. We debate this policy and that strategy, and this general and that president, but it is a simple as was the economic meltdown.

Oil is now the platinum of the future. It is scarce and those who own it control the destiny of a world that has no real immediate choices for dealing with our self-induced habit. So we can continue debating Obama this or Emanuel that, or Bunning this or Boehner that, but none of that amounts to a hill of beans.

I, for one, plan to finally vote my conscience in 2010 and again in 2012, because to do otherwise simply perpetuates the farce that there is any substantial difference between the DLC/Hamilton Project Dems and the corporate puppet Republicans. Obama proved that pretty words, like pretty beads, can fool just enough of the natives to enslave them. Its past time to call bullshit and abandon the political parties that got us into our imperial nightmare.



This war is still Bushes war

This war is still Bushes war because he started it and made it Obama's inheritance. I wanted it to end quickly as possible when Obama became president. It was a campaign promise. I'm still lobbying the president to end the war quicker. It doesn't mean he is the worst president. There are only two people who would end the war quicker. Dennis and Ron. And how are they going to get elected president?