Pac-Man Hacked Onto a Touch-Screen Voting Machine Without Breaking "Tamper-Evident" Seals

by: Brad Friedman  |  The BRAD BLOG | News Analysis

Pac-Man Hacked Onto a Touch-Screen Voting Machine Without Breaking "Tamper-Evident" Seals
(Image: jhalderm / YouTube)

This is your Sequoia touch-screen voting machine....

Sequoia touch-screen voting machine.

This is your Sequoia touch-screen voting machine with Pac-Man hacked onto it without disturbing any of the "tamper-evident" seals supposedly meant to protect it from hackers...

Sequoia touch-screen voting machine hacked to play Pac-Man.

Any questions?...

Sequoia's voting machines, used in some 20% of U.S. elections, employ Intellectual Property (IP) still owned by a Venezuelan firm tied to Hugo Chavez. Sequoia itself is now owned by a Canadian firm called Dominion. (Though Dominion, like Sequoia itself before them, lied about the continuing Venezuelan/Chavez ties in their recent announcement of the acquisition, as detailed exclusively by The BRAD BLOG, to little notice, in June.)

Also See: Are Arizona's Political Leaders Deliberately Blocking Electronic Voting Machine Transparency?

The Pac-Man hack onto the Sequoia/Dominion voting machine was revealed this week. It was accomplished without breaking any of the "tamper-evident" seals that voting machine companies and election officials claim are used to ensure nobody can physically hack into them without being discovered.

"We received the machine with the original tamper-evident seals intact," the hackers from Princeton and University of Michigan report. "The software can be replaced without breaking any of these seals, simply by removing screws and opening the case."

Here's a video of Pac-Man running on the hacked Sequoia touch-screen voting machine...

This particular Sequoia DRE (Direct Recording Electronic) voting machine model is known as the AVC Edge. It used to be described on the Sequoia website and promotional materials as "tamperproof". It has been hacked previously and has failed time and again in recent elections, even though election officials continue to force voters to use them.

Click here to get Truthout stories like this one sent straight to your inbox, 365 days a year.

For example, the AVC Edge miscounted votes in New Jersey in 2008, the same election during which the systems also failed to even boot up when polls opened at a Hoboken precinct, forcing voters, including the state's then Governor John Corzine, to wait some 45 minutes before they could cast a vote on it at all. Whether those votes were recorded accurately as per the voters' intent, once the machines finally booted up, is scientifically impossible to know. Use of any touch-screen voting machine is the equivalent of a 100% faith-based election. No votes cast during an election --- none --- can be verified as having been accurately recorded on such systems. Ever.

J. Alex Halderman and Ariel J. Feldman, the academic computer science and security experts who hacked the Sequoia machine, this time with Pac-Man, report that "In 2008, the AVC Edge was used in 161 jurisdictions with almost 9 million registered voters, including large parts of Louisiana, Missouri, Nevada, and Virginia."

As first reported by The BRAD BLOG in 2006, Halderman and Feldman previously hacked a touch-screen voting machine made by Diebold Election Systems, Inc. (which became Premier Elections Solutions, which was then also purchased by Dominion, just like Sequoia). They hacked the Diebold/Premier system with a virus that was able to pass itself from one machine to the next and flip the results of an entire election with little chance of detection. That hack was demonstrated, among other places, live on Fox "News" shortly after it was announced. (Watch the video here.)

Short of adding "tamper-evident" seals to these machines --- the same seals that went undisturbed when Pac-Man was hacked onto the Sequoia AVC Edge machine --- very little has changed since 2006, and most of the same hackable (and often 100% unverifiable) electronic voting systems are still in use today, in both primary elections this year (such as the one where the unknown, unemployed campaign-less Alvin Greene was said to have defeated the four-term state legislator and circuit court Judge Vic Rawl for the Democratic U.S. Senate nomination), as well as in the general elections this November.

The voting machines not made by Sequoia, as used in the other 80% of jurisdictions in the U.S., work largely the same way, and are largely equally as hackable.

Here are details and more pictures on the Pac-Man hack fom the Diebold/Virus and Sequoia/Pac-Man hackers themselves, though the way they explained it all on their YouTube posting when publishing the video above, tells you just about all that you need to know...

This is the Sequoia AVC Edge touch-screen DRE voting machine. In 2008, it was used in jurisdictions with almost 9 million voters. Alex Halderman and Ari Feldman replaced the voting software with Pac-Man. They did this in three afternoons, without breaking any tamper-evident seals. It would be easy to modify the software to steal votes, but that's been done before, and Pac-Man is more fun.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



"Sequoia's voting machines,

"Sequoia's voting machines, used in some 20% of U.S. elections, employ Intellectual Property (IP) still owned by a Venezuelan firm tied to Hugo Chavez. "

Okay, then, if this is true, we should see hacked elections producing LEFT WING COMMUNIST CANDIDATES, OR AT LEAST LEFT WING LIBERALS or SOCIALISTS. No such luck!

The problem of voter fraud is one entirely done from the Republican side of things.



The fact that our elections

The fact that our elections have been completely corrupted has been evident for at least a decade. Which brings up an interesting question: "What method remains with which to restore an honest government?"

I think you know the answer, and it isn't pretty, or easy. Are Americans up for it? I seriously doubt it. Not as long as their TV works, and they can reliably use it to mask any "dangerous noise" in their brains.



LIced-christ, Are you nuts?

LIced-christ,

Are you nuts? Because a Venezuelan company owns Sequoia, then leftists must be hacking into voting machines? Come on. Your head isn't filled with that gray matter for the purpose of balance, you know. It can be used for more practical purposes.



Nothing new. We don't want

Nothing new.
We don't want honest elections--just entertainment of the basest sort, fed by a press that increasingly defines "news" and "issues" to meet the very low standards of viewers. Give them bread and circuses, Nero said.



I mean, really, what the

I mean, really, what the hell is wrong with paper and pencils marking x's on them?

No hanging chads, no hacking; the only (remote) danger is just good old ballot box stuffing, which is pretty easy to detect as is most ballot tampering.

It's cheap, it's simple, it's safe, it's renewable, and it's biodegradable. Besides, the pulp and paper industry could use the work.



@16:57 You completely

@16:57

You completely misunderstood/misread my comment. Shame on you! GO READ IT AGAIN, SLOWLY.



LOL, love it. That actually

LOL, love it. That actually makes a trip to the polls worthwhile!

Lou
www.isp-logs.es.tc



We should have the Swiss

We should have the Swiss come in and supervise our elections. We should go back to paper ballots and just be patient for a few days to get results.



Why are we importing voting

Why are we importing voting machine software in the first place?

Diebold and Sequoia now operate on proprietary software that cannot be verified hack-free by sources other than the manufacturers themselves.

I propose a contest similar to the competitions to design and build a car with the highest gas mileage. In this competition, US academic institutions would compete to develop to most secure, accurate, and reliable voting machine software. One requirement would be that the code be published so independent experts, including hackers, could check the software for security flaws. We have a lot of very bright students in America. I'm confident they would come up with a far more trustworthy system than exists today.



DakotaMark: No doubt your

DakotaMark: No doubt your proposal has merit, and also no doubt, several students/student groups likely could come up with a secure, trustworthy system that would resist hacking and would be auditable. However, your proposal is predicated on the assumption that the 'powers-that-be' have ANY interest in free and fair, little-d democratic election processes. I submit that such is an untenable assumption.

This corruption/scam has been going on/expanding like a viral disease since at least 1998-2000 election cycle. It is highly improbable that the oligarchs/plutocrats would permit actually "cleaning up" the system, when the existing methodology yields such satisfactory results (for them).



x's on paper can be tallied

x's on paper can be tallied electronically and then re tallied at another location if there is a question republicans might have pulled one off in Ohio but that doesn't mean we can say others won't learn how



Amazing! It's been ten years

Amazing! It's been ten years since the presidency was stolen from Al Gore; six years since it was stolen from John Kerry and STILL our election process has not been adequately cleaned up. Just because Obama won handily in 2008 doesn't mean it will happen again.

Some Democrats welcome the idea of a far right-wing whack job running in 2012, thinking it means an easy victory for the left. But if potential Republican election theft is factored in, along with a continued dumbing down of the populace, then the unthinkable nightmare scenerio of something like "President Sarah Palin" and "Vice-President Michele Bachmann" may not be quite so far-fetched after all.



There already exists a

There already exists a voting system more secure and accurate than anything in use today. Instead of secret, proprietary software and "trusted officials" with keys or codes, it achieves security by openness and transparency. Observers with different interests keep each other honest. Even the source code is on the web. It runs on ordinary PCs, but where extreme paranoia is justified, the BIOS chip should be made unmodifiable and potted in place. Check out www.savioc.com.



If anyone doubts the ability

If anyone doubts the ability of hackers to destroy any of our systems, read Richard Clarke's Cyber Wars. We are stupid if allow any method but hand counting to determine elections.



Fascists don't DO democracy,

Fascists don't DO democracy, people. You can't vote fascists out of power. Democratic things like voting are a joke to the FASCISTS running this country.

Get with the Big Picture.



I like DakotaMark's idea but

I like DakotaMark's idea but still think we could make do with optical scanners. If there's a doubt about the count there's an artifact, the scanned ballot, that can be manually counted. But on the other hand 00:10 is right; fascists don't do democracy, and right now there are an awful lot of fascist demagogues on the playing field.



Trusting people with paper

Trusting people with paper votes is SO much safer. Right.

Reminds me people being freaked out with "e-commerce". Freaked out about putting your credit card over the "information superhighway"! Oh lord! But giving your credit card number over an unsecured phone line to an anonymous part-time pizza dude was totally safe.



Forget voting. Don't waste

Forget voting. Don't waste your time. Quit pretending you live in a democratic society where voting means something. It's gone--democracy and everything that goes with it is GONE, including voting. They will never leave power by being voted out.

Get over it and get with the program. The only way to remove the evil bastards running the country now is by force. You can't vote them out of office. Haven't you gotten that picture yet with Obama?



You're hardly one to talk,

You're hardly one to talk, Anonymous (coward) on 8/27 at 00:01. Force works against the armed class, how, again?



F50 Pas Cher

Cheers! it is really useful to ourselves!



Adidas Antwerpen

You guys have a wonderful website intending the following, KIU!



Prada Shoes Online

"http://www.acsystemspc.com/acsystems/index.php/producto/quick-heal-corporativo/quick-heal-admin-consol-4-6?start=80"|"--"|"37.31"|"Quick Heal Consola de Administración 4.6"|"--"|"--"



Zapatillas Mbt

http://www.doktermuhsin.com/index.php/artikel/artikel-kesehatan/item/21-jka-=-jaga-kesehatan-anda/21-jka-=-jaga-kesehatan-anda?start=6170



Good White Ostrich Feathers For Sale

Wohh just what I was looking for, regards for posting.



fKdRJhlJxZTMl

FUpKIR dchcirttitwp, [url=http://eqnymgcjcogy.com/]eqnymgcjcogy[/url], [link=http://xrolpwjkvvbm.com/]xrolpwjkvvbm[/link], http://iyhhkjydxadl.com/



heel lift

Major thanks for the post.Really looking forward to read more. Want more.



Liam

I really like and appreciate your article post.Thanks Again. Great.