Pakistan Seals Off NATO Supply Line to Afghanistan After US Air Attack
Thursday 30 September 2010
by: Jonathan Adams | The Christian Science Monitor | Report

(Photo: Master Sgt. Sarah Webb / DVIDSHUB)
A US air attack that mistakenly killed three Pakistani border troops sparked the government to close the Torkham border post, a vital NATO supply line into Afghanistan.
Taipei, Taiwan - Pakistan on Thursday blocked a key NATO supply line into Afghanistan after accusing US-led forces of mistakenly killing three Pakistani paramilitary border troops in a helicopter raid hours earlier.
The events are testing the already fragile US-Pakistan alliance against Al Qaeda terrorists and Taliban militants holed up in remote, rugged mountain terrain in northwestern Pakistan tribal areas.
They come also as details continue to emerge of an alleged large-scale terror plot against targets in Europe hatched by Pakistani-based militants that was reportedly disrupted in its early stages by Western intelligence and air strikes in Pakistan. Some reports said the US and NATO's stepped-up air attacks were aimed at the plot's planners.
The Associated Press reported that NATO has launched a probe into the alleged killing of the three border guards that Pakistani officials said took place at a checkpoint on the Pakistani side of the border in the Upper Kurram region Thursday (see map). Pakistan has lodged complaints.
"We will have to see whether we are allies or enemies," Pakistani Interior Minister Rehman Malik said of the border incident, without mentioning the blockade. ...
Over the weekend, NATO helicopters fired on targets in Pakistan at least two times, killing several suspected insurgents they had pursued over the border from Afghanistan. Pakistan's government protested the attacks, which came in a month during which there have been an unprecedented number of US drone missile strikes in the northwest, inflaming already pervasive anti-American sentiment among Pakistanis.
Two Pakistani government officials said that shortly after the alleged incident, Pakistan moved to block the Torkham border post at the edge of the Khyber tribal region, according to AP. Pakistan reportedly closed the same passage briefly in September 2008 after a US special forces raid into Pakistani tribal areas, according to the Congressional Research Service (pdf). The New York Times calls it "the most important border crossing for trucks supplying NATO-led coalition troops in Afghanistan."
On Thursday, the Pakistani daily Dawn reported a fresh round of attack-helicopter strikes by coalition forces against targets in Upper Kurram. Local officials strongly condemned the new strikes as "an attack on Pakistan's sovereignty," Dawn reported.
The Daily Telegraph reported late Wednesday UK time that 15 to 20 British citizens are currently training inside Al Qaeda-run terror camps in Pakistan, citing "Western intelligence sources."
The disclosure comes after the CIA launched drone strikes on Pakistan training camps in North and South Waziristan in an attempt to disrupt an Al Qaeda-plot to launch an attack targeting Britain, France, and Germany.
The plans would have seen terrorists sent on to the streets, probably of the capital cities, to shoot random passersby before heading in to landmark buildings. Intelligence sources said that the attacks would have been coordinated for maximum impact and may have been aimed at financial institutions. However, the terror cells had not yet travelled to Europe and the targets were still unclear.
Pakistan has been the recipient of lavish US support. From 2001 to 2008 it received some $5.3 billion in US aid, including $3.1 billion in development and humanitarian aid, making it one of the top recipients of US aid funding, according to the 2009 Congressional Research Service report (pdf) on US-Pakistani relations. Pakistan also received in that time some $6.7 billion in military "reimbursements" from the US for its counter-terror efforts, the report said.
But although Pakistan is a nominal ally in the US-led war on Al Qaeda, anti-American sentiment runs strong among the Pakistani population, and "there exist widely held suspicions among foreign governments and independent analysts alike that Islamabad’s civilian government does not fully control the Army, that the Army does not fully control the intelligence agencies, and that the these intelligence agencies have lost their ability to rein in the very militant groups they helped to create," wrote the report's author, K. Alan Kronstadt.
In June 2008, 11 Pakistani Frontier Corps soldiers were killed in a US bombing raid, according to the report.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Another undeclared war, the
Thu, 09/30/2010 - 14:28 — Holy Jeeze (not verified)Another undeclared war, the war on Pakistan.
This great intelligence coup
Thu, 09/30/2010 - 15:14 — drosera (not verified)This great intelligence coup Nato conducted, the "large scale terrorist plot"--who believes it? You get a bunch of military people together, none of whom understand a word of the native language and who depend upon paid informants to get information--and you will have a plot to blow up the world--or at least New York City. And it is a great way to get populations on edge and ready to pay for the next military incursion into Pakistan or God knows where else. I believe the US and Nato about as much as the Taliban. It's one bunch of terrorist thugs against another. Screw them both.
Pakistan's government is
Thu, 09/30/2010 - 17:57 — Anonymous (not verified)Pakistan's government is trying to send message to the United States. They're not serious about cutting our supply lines. The crossing will stay closed for a day or two and then re-opened with as little fanfare as possible...THIS TIME. But Pakistan is so fragile that almost anything - a coup, civil unrest, or even more flooding - could close the border crossings again at any time. That's a huge problem for the U.S. military, because we've got more troops in Afghanistan than can be supplied by air. If we can't get supplies in via Pakistan's roads then the only choice will be to make unpleasant emergency deals with other neighboring countries or face a miniature Stalingrad for our forces.
Strength to the Pakistanis.
Thu, 09/30/2010 - 22:06 — FR Tothus (not verified)Strength to the Pakistanis. Please let them be successful in cutting off US supply lines, permanently. Maybe they can end the war of terror the American people themselves cannot make their own government end. Maybe they can make the damned Yankee go home where he belongs, or go bomb and murder someone else's civilians.
Killing your allies does`t
Fri, 10/01/2010 - 03:52 — Anonymous (not verified)Killing your allies does`t help peace.Pakistan is doing a great favor to the american taxpayer, keep the pass closed!
AP-Suspected militants set
Fri, 10/01/2010 - 11:12 — Anonymous (not verified)AP-Suspected militants set ablaze at least 27 tankers carrying fuel for U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan on Friday.
Do you hear that sound? That's India clapping. Good day.
If they are "not serious",
Fri, 10/01/2010 - 15:26 — radline9 (not verified)If they are "not serious", then why did they burn all the trucks and cargo? Seems pretty serious to me. Pakistan has long been protecting Osama and the taliban. The reason we couldn't finish off the taliban is because they get safe haven in Pakistan. I think we should get the hell out anyway. They want to escalate the war there and we will be bogged down in Pakistan for 10 to 20 years. End these endless wars!
If we had good relations
Fri, 10/01/2010 - 15:33 — Straight-Ahead (not verified)If we had good relations with Iran, we could build a road from the Iranian coast right up into Southern Afghanistan, set up another Red Ball express and resupply our boys right in the heart of Helmand province, the heart of Taliban territory! Oh, I forget, we don't have good relations with Iran. But we could use the CIA and a few billion dollars to foment a revolution by the Balouchi (sometimes spelled Baluchi) people of SE Iran, even including the Afghan and Pakistani Balouchi populations. We could make a whole new country out there, carved outta parts of Iran, Afghanistan and Pakistan. Talk about nation building! What an opportunity! That'd show all those non-cooperating countries where the real power and gennius lies. Then we could have a supply route for our military, and a freight route to take out the mineral wealth of Afghanistan that . . .
Oh, I do get carried away sometimes.