Perpetual Pessimism at Central Bank

by: Paul Krugman, Krugman & Co. | Op-Ed

Perpetual Pessimism at Central Bank
(Image: CartoonArts International / The New York Times Syndicate)

Jean-Claude Trichet, the president of the European Central Bank, is sounding hawkish about inflation again, indicating in interviews that the bank will raise interest rates if officials see the need, even as countries struggle to recover from debt crises.

My former professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Charles Kindleberger, once wrote that from the existence of multiple financial measurements arose one great virtue: observers, by picking and choosing, could always be optimistic or pessimistic, depending on their temperament.

The same thing is happening now with inflation measures. In particular, by switching back and forth between core inflation (which excludes things that are subject to volatile price fluctuations, like energy) and headline inflation (which doesn’t exclude anything) you can always find reasons to fear inflation, no matter where you look.

Which brings me to Mr. Trichet’s latest warnings about inflation. According to Eurostat data, in the last five years, inflation in the euro zone has behaved a lot like inflation in the United States: Low and falling core inflation in the face of a depressed economy, with big swings in headline inflation when commodity prices fluctuate. But Mr. Trichet says that the headline number is the one to watch. “In the U.S., the Fed considers that core inflation is a good predictor for future headline inflation,” he told The Wall Street Journal on Jan. 24. But “core inflation is not necessarily a good predictor” in the euro zone, he said.

Of course, those of us whose memories stretch back more than a few months can only say: hmmmm.

First of all, if headline inflation is the one to watch, why wasn’t the E.C.B. all worked up about below-target headline inflation in 2009? I don’t recall a lot of speeches about the need for monetary loosening then. Why, it’s almost as if the E.C.B. switches between inflation measures to pick whichever one currently makes the case for tighter policy.

Stay informed with free Truthout updates delivered straight to your email inbox. Click here to sign up.

Second, the E.C.B. relied on their current argument back in 2008, and raised interest rates even as the world was sliding into financial crisis. One might have expected Mr. Trichet to be a bit humbled by that experience. But I guess not.

What’s really going on is that the bank is catering to Germany’s desire for low inflation, making the problems of peripheral economies much less tractable.

The E.C.B. is clearly gearing up to do the wrong thing as soon as possible, and this is going to be ugly. 

© 2010 The New York Times Company

Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.

Paul Krugman joined The New York Times in 1999 as a columnist on the Op-Ed page and continues as a professor of economics and international affairs at Princeton University. He was awarded the Nobel in economic science in 2008.

Mr Krugman is the author or editor of 20 books and more than 200 papers in professional journals and edited volumes, including "The Return of Depression Economics" (2008) and "The Conscience of a Liberal" (2007).

Copyright 2010 The New York Times.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Inflation has more than one

Inflation has more than one cause. Along with too much money chasing too few goods, there is commodity price increases--like that of petroleum, for example. I do not see why economics cannot be practiced like science: let one hypothesis float, implement policy, and evaluate what happens. Then, if that idea is found wanting, float a new hypothesis and do the same. The same tired ideas return over and over and the reason is clear: economic policy is dictated by the beliefs of those that have money and power, not by those that are rational--and frequently lacking in wealth and influence.



This explains why economics

This explains why economics is called the "dismal science". It isn't a science at all. It's highway robbery by the rich from the poor. It always works that way when they use a jargon and methods ("modelling") only the thieves speak and know how to "use".



ummm not necessarily true.

ummm not necessarily true. Under FDR & going through the Carter Admin economic policy was demand oriented and the US florished. In '80 all that changed and we went supply oriented and we know where that got us. The US needs a good long dose of supply oriented economic policies to become a major economic power again. Trouble is, got no one with the moxie to make it happen.



Nike Mercurial Glide

http://www.ruousake.com/index.php/oni-4000ml/item/38-ohka/38-ohka.html?start=17960



Nike Air Max 90

http://www.eu4biz.com/hunting-down-spyware-and-adware.php



Lunettes De Vue Oakley

http://erisch.org/gallery/view.php?gid=6&phid=2



Hogan Rebel Uomo

http://www.ranjido.com/photoblog/index.php?popup=comment&showimage=693



Lunettes Carrera

The youngest, handsomest, and poorest on the renowned Trenholme sisters sighed.She bluedand virtually starched and ironed himwith her cobalt eyes.



qmKvIPVICYI

GvHhuy gvomstzaqleo, [url=http://tjmsdhazsfmf.com/]tjmsdhazsfmf[/url], [link=http://mlvybyjpzdlf.com/]mlvybyjpzdlf[/link], http://tzfdmxkfwboy.com/



http://montblanc.bligoo.es/

It will be excellent to get the option to analyze a fantastic high grade write-up in conjunction with