Phoenix Rising ... and the Struggle Continues
Tuesday 03 August 2010
by: Randall Amster J.D., Ph.D., t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

(Photo: evan.finn)
I've written a lot about Arizona since the national controversy over SB 1070 took hold, and in particular during recent weeks as the struggle over the bill's implications and ultimate fate began to reach a fever pitch. This focus is not accidental by any means; I've lived in Arizona for fifteen years, and I care deeply about the causes of social justice reflected in the debate over immigration. What I've seen here during this time, and especially over the past few days, indicates to me that we are on the cusp of something truly extraordinary. As the creeping fascism of immigrant-bashing becomes starkly evident, people are starting to move from protest to solidarity, and from fear to determination.
Obviously the immigration issue is one that arouses people's passions, sometimes leading to intense vitriol being displayed on both sides, but in particular by those who recite paradoxical slogans like "What part of illegal don't you understand?" Folks in this camp take great pains to assert that "it's not about race," and that people like myself are advocating an "open borders" philosophy that will lead the nation to ruin. Proponents of Arizona's "attrition through enforcement" approach to the issue (as epitomized by SB 1070) often argue that illegal immigrants are taking American jobs, draining social services, and causing violent crime to rise. They assert, in short, that we need to build a wall and build it high, with "us" firmly on this side of it and all of "them" shipped back to the other side where they belong.
Lo siento, amigos. Your arguments are nonsensical, and are missing the larger point. People will come here no matter how high you build that wall, because we've dumped our toxic corporations and immiserating economic policies on the other side, from which most of us would flee as well. People will come here because they have family members here (legally) and want to be united with them. People will come because these are, in many cases, their ancestral homelands and part of their cultural heritage. People will come for the same reasons that our ancestors came, legally or otherwise.
And our lives will all be the richer for this. One need only spend a little time with Mexican immigrant communities to appreciate their inherent dignity, spirit of generosity, and emotional grace. These are decent, honest, kind, hardworking people who, ironically, possess many of the traditional skills being lost in our rampantly mechanizing culture: building things, growing food, and rearing children, for instance. Of course there are some bad apples in the bunch; this is no "noble savage" utopia. But there is a cultural ethos at work that is dynamic and passionate about many of the values we are losing.
Arizona's nativist policies and legislative antipathies completely miss the mark. Laws like SB 1070 represent an attempt to pit white workers against nonwhite workers, while the bosses laugh all the way to the bank. They divide families and create an environment of fear that is intended to tamp down the potential political power of migrant communities. They create a category of second-class people made up equally of those who are documented or not. They pass the blame for economic woes and cultural disarray down the line instead of up the ladder, further away from the corrupt bankers and military industrialists who have actually fomented the crises in our midst. Anti-immigrant laws and sentiments express the worst aspects of our Americanism, and threaten to irreparably rend the fabric of society.
Against this, people have begun to lose their fear, and are rising up in their streets and neighborhoods. Mexican-American communities have been under siege for a long time here in Arizona, with the reign of terror led by (but not exclusive to) the self-parodying sheriff, Joe Arpaio. In an impromptu press conference held outside his grim jailhouse on July 29th (the day SB 1070, or what was left of it, took effect), the sheriff deflected questions from reporters and ordinary people alike, with smug retorts like, "Oh, we're gonna pick up a lot of 'em today!" and "Excuse me, I've got raids to conduct now." The highlight of his open mockery came when a young woman of color with an expensive camera asked him a pointed question. "Who are you with?" he asked, to which she replied, "The CBS Evening News." Revealing his true colors, the sheriff snorted and dismissively opined, "Hmph. You don't look like it." This led another young woman to bluntly assert, "You're an un-American racist!" Her eyes were filled with both pride and sadness when she said it.
Click here to sign up for Truthout’s FREE daily email updates.
A few blocks away, hundreds of demonstrators took to the streets and sidewalks to register their opposition to anti-immigrant policies in general and the notion of SB 1070 in particular. Even though a judge had struck down many of the bill's worst parts, people still understood that this was simply one small piece of a much larger struggle for human and civil rights. "The bottom line," said one speaker to a small crowd, "is that even with the judge's ruling, we're worse off today than we were yesterday." The fact that things got only incrementally worse rather than monumentally worse wasn't lost on people, and the larger implications of the issue remained uppermost in their minds. "Our communities have a lot in common," said a speaker from the NAACP, "and too many of our children are sharing the same prison cells." A day earlier, daring activists unfurled a massive banner from a downtown crane that effectively encapsulated the dominant sentiment and the aim of the struggle: "STOP HATE."
The demonstrations in Phoenix and across the state were supported by solidarity actions around the country, from Los Angeles to New York. The protest in Phoenix was the epicenter of engagement because of its obvious centrality to the core of the entire controversy. People, many of whom were undocumented, gathered en masse at the state capitol all day to picnic, dance, and listen to speakers. It was not a rancorous demonstration, but merely an announcement of their presence and diminished fear. Across town, a throng took to the streets adjacent to Cesar Chavez Park and in front of Sheriff Arpaio's offices. Under the banner of "We Will Not Comply" and against a background of ringing chants like "No one is illegal; power to the people" and "Arrest Arpaio, not the people," civil disobedients linked arms and sat-in in the tradition of "we will not be moved" political protest. More than 50 were arrested in total, including a few journalists and legal observers, a mother of six young children, community activists, a university professor, and many people of faith.
Despite the occasional caustic remark aimed at Arpaio and various state politicos, the protests in Phoenix were remarkably measured and principled. Some of the rhetoric and signage with Nazi-like imagery were intended to heighten the implicit racism lurking behind SB 1070, yet also made some in the crowd a bit uncomfortable. But are people supposed to be politically correct when calling out racist policies and the devastating pressures of living in a police state? Tensions began to boil over during demonstrations at the county jailhouse, where sheriff's deputies pushed against the noisy crowd with shields up and batons in hand, only to be pushed back into the jail by the throng of peaceful protesters in a process that was repeated again later in a sort of synchronized protest choreography. And over the fracas, a woman silently raised a poignant sign: "Let your compassion be greater than your fear."
And indeed, a great deal of compassion was on display in Phoenix on a sweltering day where the desert heat matched the heat of emotions in the streets. Protesters assisted each other with hydration, shared food, and took pains to be certain the park was completely cleaned up before vacating it. Some even asked the cops if they were okay, standing in the hundred-plus degree heat in full black riot gear like they were. On the other side, one police commander told his troops as they prepared to mass arrest civil disobedients: "One at a time guys, real slow, nice and easy...." A double column of cops with plastic handcuffs at the ready was approaching a wall of protesters blocking the street, and before engaging stopped to pass a bottle of water among themselves in what was a very basic, human moment. At the same time, activists in the crowd shared water among themselves in a parallel manner that suggested something about how we might go forward in the spirit of common humanity. As if to reinforce the point, as one officer was loading an elderly woman into a paddy wagon, she asked about the fate of her nice water bottle that had been removed from her person; the officer retrieved it, and handed it to one of her comrades on the sidewalk for safekeeping, before gently assisting her into the wagon.
None of these small moments account for the terrorization of communities and the damage done to families every day at the hands of the state. Protesters can at least take some measure of comfort in Arpaio's admission that the resources being diverted to deal with the demonstrations had delayed his plans to conduct immigration raids that day, albeit temporarily. People reading this from afar might have a hard time fully appreciating the magnitude of these issues, and how much fear has been induced in migrant communities by these sorts of nascent pogroms. But when people begin to lose their fear, bolstered by allies and advocates in a shared struggle, we start to catch a glimpse of what a better world might look like in actual practice. One could see this in Guadalupe at the stroke of midnight on July 29th, when scores of residents of that small Mexican and Yacqui community (joined by activists) blocked the entrance to their town for over an hour, tying up traffic and, ultimately, peacefully dispersing when sheriff's deputies indicated a reluctance to engage in mass arrests that night.
All of this is merely the beginning of an ongoing struggle, representing perhaps the overarching challenge of humankind. Can we live together, in complementary fashion among ourselves and with the earth that we all share, or will we squander our opportunity in ruthless competition and institutionalized exploitation? The showdown in Arizona suggests a path forward, and begins to articulate the goal in the very means being utilized: shared struggle, mutual interdependence, common humanity, principled resistance, solidarity, compassion, equity, and the inherent power of people to change the conditions of their lives. I'm proud to report that my fellow Arizonans have risen up, and will not give up, in this quest. Far from being some "pie in the sky" optimism or romantic longing, this is as tangible and effective as a sip of water in the desert.
As the blistering Arizona sun turned to blessed monsoon rain, the downtown Phoenix streets emptied with a lingering chant on the breeze: "Que queremos? Justicia! Cuando? Ahora!" People everywhere are thirsting for justice, and will continue working to make it available to everyone, equally and without reservation. As one small hand-held and rain-soaked sign said, "There's no THEM, just US."

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Another corporate PR hack,
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 14:32 — Anonymous (not verified)Another corporate PR hack, insulting Arizonan by calling them "nativists" and new slur. Then he follows with BS, like fences can't stop people. Then why do prisons use them? Why does no one run across the Korean border?
But I agree, people will come here if they can get jobs and visas, and a billion would come here if this clown has his way. If they border was secured, this problem wouldn't exist, so these criminals wouldn't have to live in fear of arrest.
BTW, free trade with Mexico hurt American jobs too, and I nor any working Americans had any say on what some U.S. corporations did in Mexico.
Another message from the
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 14:34 — Anonymous (not verified)Another message from the American Chamber of Commerce. We thank Truthout for helping drive down wages and break unions.
Thank you for this AMAZING
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 15:14 — Hedy Trevino (not verified)Thank you for this AMAZING analysis. As a Mexican American (my ancestors were here before the southwest was even a territory of the U.S) this article brought tears to my eyes. Thank you for understanding our struggle and for capturing it so eloquently. Blessings to you hermano for helping to build bridges that lead to love and understanding. Hedy Garcia Trevino
THE PROGRESSIVE JOURNALISTS
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 15:26 — cheyennebodet (not verified)THE PROGRESSIVE JOURNALISTS WRITING ABOUT ILLEGALS ARE STUCK ON CONFORMITY...EVERY ARTICLE IS A REPEAT REHASHING USING THE SAME CATCHWORDS LOGIC..SIMPERING SENTIMENTALITY..AND THE. SAME ARROGANT POSTURING..THE AUTHOR IS CORRECT ABOUT THERE BEING A GROUNDSWELL..BUT THE MOVEMENT IS AWAY FROM HIS MEEK VIEW..ITS MATURITY ASSERTING ITSELF..AND HIS ILK WILL BE LEFT WONDERING WHAT HAPPENED..
Funny how the corporate
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 15:41 — Anonymouse (not verified)Funny how the corporate hacks call those working for justice "corporate hacks" -- just like how the racists call others "racists" for calling them out. Nice strategy fellaws, but no one is buying it anymore. ps- the unions are opposed to 1070 and are on the side of working people in general; no more divide and conker tactics okay?
What about justice for poor
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 16:28 — JFK (not verified)What about justice for poor American Indians, poor Mexican-Americans, and poor Blacks who are hurt the most from mass illegal immigration? The normal "progressive" response is that these people are too lazy to work?
Its very simple, if someone needs ten workers, and chooses to hire ten illegals instead of ten poor American citizens, that is a bad thing. That is injustice. However, a workplace raid that sends 100 illegal foreigners back home is justice since 100 poor Americans must be hired to replace them.
However, faux "progressives" and "liberals" who don't need a job refuse to address this logic, and just call anyone who opposes their covert alliance with corporate American a racist, or nativist, and dismiss job logic as nonsense. These people are destroying the Democratic party and the nation.
I think he is called a corporate hack because this author is not clear about what we wants -- amnesty, or the continuation of unofficial amnesty by not enforcing immigration laws. I challenge TO to find an unskilled, unemployed American seeking work who thinks mass illegal immigration is a good thing.
I've written this before,
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 18:04 — An (not verified)I've written this before, and I write it again to try to educate the people who want to build walls, keep everyone else out, etc. We are all (except native americans) immigrants. Until the middle of the 19th century there were NO immigration laws. The first immigration laws were passed to keep the Chinese, who had been Shanghaied here to build the railroads, from staying and bringing over their families. Soon a quota system was established, favoring Western Europe and having very low numbers for Eastern Europe and Asia. This is pure racism and discrimination. And shutting our borders to Mexicans, from whom the land was taken in the first place, is unconscionable and RACIST.
E-Verify! That's E-Verify?
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 18:31 — Francis (not verified)E-Verify! That's E-Verify? Remember this abbreviation for this very efficient employer immigration enforcement program. E-Verification original dreamed up by President Bush's supervision to identify illegal labor in the workplace and strip them of jobs. It's a free, Internet-based system operated by the Department of (HS) Homeland Security in partnership with the (SSA) Social Security Administration that uses information from the Employment Eligibility Verification Form (I-9). It's intended to screen current employees, not impending hires. The program, known as E-Verify has become was contentious because of errors in the databases, which now has been resolved by revising with new photo-tools and other improvements. But the business realm is still broadcasting E-verify as inaccurate, as with the open border promoters who see it as a menace to illegal workers being rejected from jobs.
From the beginning of the Obama government, it was Sen. Harry Reid who unapologetically tabled E-Verify, sinking E-Verify to a voluntary process. If Republican Sen. Jeff Session of Alabama had found enough votes in the Senate, he would reward E-Verify to the American working man-woman as a permanent tool. Instead thanks to the commitment of Democrat Sen. Harry Reid dedicated to special interest groups; it was blocked and only enacted as a voluntary tool. It has convinced me that Arizona would not have been overrun with an illegal alien invasion had E-Verify become a mandatory law. There would have been no necessity for state Senator Peirce, or Governor Brewer signing the SB1070, police enforcement law.
The reckless success of Senator Harry Reid, a strong advocate of Amnesty for foreign nationals has claimed his shameful price on behalf of businesses that hire in volume illegal workers; expressly on the backs of hard working blue and white collar workers, while 8.5 million illegal aliens still hold jobs. It's my suggestion that if you have countless numbers of illegal households in the state of Nevada, you are beholding to these people. IN MIDTERM ELECTION ALL SANCTUARY CITIES AND STATES WITH A HONOR SYSTEMS FOR VOTING, MUST BE SCRUTINIZED FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS AND THE VOTING BOTH FOR ILLEGAL ALIENS VIOLATING FEDERAL LAW? During the great real estate building boom period of 2000 to 2007, hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens moved into the Nevada state, Capturing jobs from American workers in the construction industry, as a low wage group.
Now with the current meltdown of the housing industry, hundreds of thousands of illegal workers have turned to public welfare to support their large families. For the past five years, E-Verify has been accessible on a voluntary basis, but now with the fury and frustration is growing amongst the people, against those in Washington of both political parties. Coast-to-coast, about 144,000 companies at more than half a million work sites use E-Verify and it is escalating. To lesser extent Sanctuary Cities have turned their back on the American labor otherwise they would not be setting up labor shelters such as Home Depot. For now, there's no indication that Congress plans to make E-Verify required for every employers; New, transitory or stable jobs. The numbers of business owner using E-Verify, today would have intensified, if Sen. Harry Reid hadn't eclipsed it as a voluntary basis.
Two things that can suffocate the annexation of America by foreign nationals and that would make illegal workers and families flee from every state. 1. Make entering the United States a felony, with a mandatory prison term as Mexico does. 2. Revisit E-Verify as a perpetual tool for every business, factory or office nationwide, with a punishment for non-users, a hefty fine, confiscation of business assets and time in prison. With these laws implemented no business owner is going to risk his freedom or loss of his company. Without the possibility of employment, illegal alien workers would begin en-masse to exodus the US. There are more citizens and legal residents, and then the open border people and we should start pushing through these laws.
NOW! TODAY! Get on the phone now and demand from Washington E-Verify, MANDATED at 202-224-3121. Bombard all state and federal Senators and Representatives to build the Real, double border fence and no bloody AMNESTY of any kind. Join the millions of patriotic Americans at the pro-sovereignty website. NumbersUSA. Investigate all corruption in the Capitol and at state level by the facts, not lies at Judicial Watch.
Attn: Another intoxicated slaughter on the highway today of a nun by an ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT. Deported and returned several times.
An, why do insist on making
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 19:26 — Anonymous (not verified)An, why do insist on making a fool out yourself, again and again? American Indians migrated from Asia. Mexicans are mestizos, half Spanish and half American Indian. The illegal Mexicans nor their ancestors are from Arizona, but have traveled hundreds of miles to illegally cross the US border and illegally work in the USA, displacing American workers.
Most immigrants today are from poor nations that come here to take advantage of our modern infrastructure, which cost our ancestors trillions of dollars to construct.
This is the strategy of corporate America. Take advantage of ignorant Americans to help them flood the nation with cheap labor.
Does the author support
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 19:28 — Anonymous (not verified)Does the author support E-verify? I'd like to hear the answer, because it would solve the problems he worries so much about. Foreigners would not come here for jobs, so they wouldn't live in fear of arrest. That's what he wants, right?
One twisted PR slogan is
Tue, 08/03/2010 - 20:50 — Anonymous (not verified)One twisted PR slogan is that "we are all immigrants". Doesn't anyone understand English anymore! If someone was born in Phoenix and lived there all their life, they can't be called an immigrant. And they are a "native" American and Arizonan, no matter their ethnic background.
Being against the Arizona
Wed, 08/04/2010 - 00:36 — Anonymous (not verified)Being against the Arizona law doesn't mean being for open immigration. Even Cesar Chavez was against open immigration.
The Arizona law as written is not evenly applied to all people, that is its flaw, its racism. The law must be equal, and it must be fair.
if we are to talk about what corporations want, then we should broaden the discussion a bit. The issue is about where a problem is approached. We can vilify, punish, jail, and deport the workers who are feeding their family, as are we all OR we can eliminate the incentive; employment. We let the corporations do it, but we punish the little worker? Stopping the hiring companies is a much cheaper and efficient spigot to turn off.
But go a step further. The devastation being route across the border is also being caused by corporations. This creates refugees just as any natural disaster- flood, hurricane, volcano -would. Yet this one is caused by letting private interest and capital decide what should be done with the natural resources of our planet. All convenient when you do not live in the smitten area. Where the Gulf of Mexico is reduced to a monetary figure of its value..
Perhaps the better spigot is to take back our local economies and let people care for people whom share the same local fate.
"Everyone drinks from the same well."
..and our pollution now circles the global well.
Re-examine the concept of
Wed, 08/04/2010 - 09:31 — Mike Strong (not verified)Re-examine the concept of borders. Does moving from one state to another steal from the destination state's people? Does moving from one city to another city steal from the destination city? We move between boundaries all the time within our country. No trauma.
A country border is not so different. Wherever you move you earn and spend money, get taxed, and so forth. The only for sure freebies are the ones the very rich get, the people who control the system.
We are all in the same boat, and there is nothing saying that anyone person is sinking that boat. We all pull the oars and we all bail.
The only thing a border does is to specify the where of who, what and how controls the way our communities work, from water, to fire, to the rest of our living environment.
The American states are
Wed, 08/04/2010 - 12:29 — Anonymous (not verified)The American states are roughly equal in development. If we had open borders as some fools want, we'd have a billion poor desperate refugees here within four years, sparking a revolution as these new arrivals demand their fair share of the wealth.
Open border is something we
Wed, 08/04/2010 - 13:55 — Mike Strong (not verified)Open border is something we already have - for CORPORATIONS and BANK ACCOUNTS.
All they have done is to take advantage of the poor in other countries to take the labor away from the USA to those poor countries.
Don't you get it. This is gamed by those in the "decider" seats. Immigrants don't control this. Lower and middle class laborers don't control this.
All closing borders does is to make sure there are more spots outside our border for our businesses to take their manufacturing and then turn around and sell it in our borders, transferring the money from us to them (the rich skimmers, not the poor laborers over there).
Borders are only a distraction away from the ways in which those in the position to take all the money they want can do so. If a mid-level employee were to re-assign the money to his/her account it would be called embezzlement. When a CEO takes 200 times the average wage it is called "earned" even though any line worker sweats a hell of a lot harder.
Not too far away from
Thu, 08/05/2010 - 10:39 — EDGEOFNOWHERE (not verified)Not too far away from Arizona lies the weird and wacky state of California. Here, if you are and illegal immigrant, you cannot obtain a driver's license. Without the license you cannot obtain insurance. However, there is no restriction on purchasing a car. Therefore, we have hundreds of thousands of illegals buying cars and driving without license or insurance. When they are stopped by the police and are unable to produce a valid license, they are fined about $500, their car is impounded and towed. They are released with a citation. So they tend to buy beatermobiles since the cost of retrieving the car will be somewhere between $600 and $1000 for towing and storage fees. They just go out and buy a new beater, rather than own a newer vehicle.Thus, we have illegals driving beaters with no insurance! Of course, legal residents must have insurance, including a hefty charge for uninsured motorist!! Only Franz Kafka could have done a better job of creating this situation which is bad for both legal residents and illegal immigrants at the same time.
Listen up, all you
Wed, 08/11/2010 - 13:52 — Frances in California (not verified)Listen up, all you ignoramuses pushing E-Verify: It's the first step - and it's pretty much irreversible - down the road to the FASCIST STATES OF AMERICA. If you can't figure that out, you haven't read enough history. Look up Berlin, 1930.
And it's poster "Francis"
Wed, 08/11/2010 - 14:08 — Frances in California Again - Really Mad Again (not verified)And it's poster "Francis" angering me. You should be forbidden to use my name, you belligerent ignoramus! You're wrong, incorrect and flat out lying. Arizona, along with heaps of California, New Mexico and Texas were all STOLEN from the real indigenous population. The "trillions" you extol didn't build Arizona, they were extorted from the less rich. Man, you need to go far, far away from decent people.