Protests at Fort Campbell Over Deployment of Wounded Soldier
Monday 10 January 2011
by: Sarah Lazare & Ryan Harvey | Even If Your Voice Shakes | Report
A soldier at Fort Campbell, Kentucky is being forced to return to Afghanistan this week amidst claims he is not fit to deploy because he has not received treatment promised by the Army for severe Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder sustained during his deployments to Iraq and Afghanistan.
Jeff Hanks deployed to Afghanistan early last year with the 101st Airborne Division out of Fort Campbell, Kentucky. He returned to the base on leave from Afghanistan this past September, where he sought and was denied treatment on two separate military bases for traumatic injuries sustained in combat.
Hanks subsequently refused to redeploy and was forced to go Absent Without Official Leave in order to get medical attention from civilian professionals.
Now, less than two months after surrendering himself at Fort Campbell, the Army Specialist awaits imminent redeployment to Afghanistan against his wishes and against the advice of his team of medical professionals.
Seeking help in fighting for his right to heal, Hanks contacted Operation Recovery, a joint-campaign of Iraq Veterans Against the War and the Civilian-Soldier Alliance, which seeks to end the re-deployment of traumatized and wounded soldiers.
Volunteers from Operation Recovery came to Kentucky to support Hanks throughout November and December as he sought treatment.Yesterday, they hand-delivered an Article 138 notice of wrongdoing to several commanding officers at Fort Campbell and delivered one notice to La Point Medical Center, where Hanks was routinely denied treatment.
The notice names Captain Jason Ambrosino, the commanding officer responsible for denying Hanks’ right to heal, for violating both soldiers’ rights and military law. The group was attempting to deliver the notice to Ambrosino himself, but he was not on post at the time.
In addition to filing the Article 138 complaint demanding that his deployment be delayed, Hanks’ attorney James Branum will also be filing other formal complaints, including one with the Office of the Inspector General and another with offices of U.S. Congressional Representatives.
Fort Campbell officials could not be reached for comment as of the time of publication.
Supporters Gather at Base
Outside of the gates Fort Campbell this weekend, Operation Recovery members put pressure on Hanks’ command. “We are here today to say that troops are human beings,” said Lori Chambers, a veteran and Operation Recovery member from Nashville. “If there are issues in the civilian world, people get treatment. People in the military deserve treatment too.”
Meanwhile, Operation Recovery supporters across the country sent over 1,500 emails of protest to Captain Ambrosino. “Soldiers have a right to heal from the traumas of war,” the mass email reads, “but you have systematically denied that right in the case of Spc. Hanks. You have interfered with him receiving proper medical treatment, and you appear to be breaking the law by doing so.
Commanders had informed Hanks last this week that he was scheduled to redeploy to Afghanistan over the weekend, but as of today he has not deployed. The Army’s mandatory pre-deployment mental health screenings denied Hank’s PTSD claim, contradicting positive diagnoses by three separate civilian therapists, and results of an MRI yesterday that will not be available until after he is in Afghanistan.
“Four different mental health providers have diagnosed Jeff with PTSD, have advised treatment, and he has been denied treatment every single time. I am very worried about him,” says Johanna Buwalda, a licensed clinical counselor working directly with Hanks and other veterans. “Our soldiers deserve the right to heal.”
As increasingly reported by soldiers like Hanks, the Army behavioral health specialist who screened him suggested Hanks seek treatment while deployed in Afghanistan.
“These supposed medical professionals are the ones caving into the pressure of the military,” said Jason Chambers, a U.S. Air Force combat veteran from Nashville and a volunteer with Operation Recovery. “They need to know that we are not going to let them get away with it.
Soldiers At Fort Campbell Are Speaking Out
Though Fort Campbell officials were unable to comment on Hanks’ case at this time, they did confirm that they received his article 138 complaint. “We encourage all soldiers to use the resources available to them,” a soldier at the Public Affairs office said in a phone interview. “There’s a lot out there for guys suffering from PTSD.”
But Operation Recovery organizers say that Jeff Hanks is not the only Fort Campbell soldier that has contacted them with similar complaints, he is just currently the only one who has gone public with his case.
Operation Recovery organizers have suggested that this silence may break soon.
”The redeployment of wounded soldiers has come to underlie the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan,” said Jason Hurd, a U.S. Army Iraq combat veteran and Operation Recovery organizer. “As veterans of these wars, we are here to say that Jeff’s case is not isolated, and these cycles of trauma must end. And Operation Recovery is going to work to stop this cruel and inhumane practice.”
“I feel like it is important to demonstrate to Captain Ambrosino, along with all other commanders making the choice to deploy soldiers who need treatment, that we are not going to let them get away with it,” said Brad Thomson, member of the Chicago chapter of the Civilian-Soldier Alliance and an Operation Recovery organizer. “I don’t know how more clear we could be.”
These organizers say they will continue to uncover violations of soldiers’ rights at Fort Campbell and to bring to light those in the command structure there who are responsible for the abuses.
“We’re not going to stop until we bring an end to the redeployment of traumatized troops,” said Hannah Fritz, Chicago member of the Civilian-Soldier Alliance. “And after today, they know we are watching them.”
The Operation Recovery Campaign, launched October 7th, 2010, seeks to stop the redeployment of troops suffering from PTSD, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Military Sexual Trauma. More info on Jeff Hanks and Operation Recovery can be found on the campaign’s website, http://www.ivaw.org/operation-recovery.
UPDATE: As of Monday, Jeff had not yet deployed. In a message to supporters, Operation Recovery organizers said, "Late last night, we learned that Jeff Hanks was not deployed to Afghanistan yesterday as scheduled. Thank you for the hundreds of emails that you sent to his unit commander, Cpt. Ambrosino. His email inbox was flooded over the weekend with 2,000 emails!" But Hanks is still facing deployment or a dishonorable discharge, and base officials, citing privacy regulations, refused to comment on his situation.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
I was one of the people who
Mon, 01/10/2011 - 20:19 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)I was one of the people who signed the article-referenced letter, and I commend these great organizations for standing up for, and standing by, the psychologically wounder soldiers who have been literally "USED" in order to pursue completely illegal and unconstitutional wars of aggression, "the supreme international crime" according to international law which is also U.S. federal law because the U.S. government is still a signatory to it. Thank God there are organizations, and people like those who run these organizations, that are helping these severally traumatized and disabled military veterans to not be re-deployed, mentally damaged even further, and who potentially might an extreme danger to themselves and innocent people if they are re-deployed. As if it is not bad enough that the U.S. government and military continue to sustain these totally illegal wars, and mass-murder millions of innocent civilians, they are also putting their own soldiers, and all those who such soldiers come into contact with, in harms way and in extreme jeopardy. All of this is completely unconscionable and entirely unacceptable.
I'm sure that if it were a
Mon, 01/10/2011 - 21:20 — Anonymous (not verified)I'm sure that if it were a just war there would be no problem with men and women joining the military to "defend their country". But, we are not fighting a just war against people who threaten our country, or even want to. They just want us out of theirs.
The government's actions
Mon, 01/10/2011 - 23:50 — Martha Shelley (not verified)The government's actions have made its priorities very clear. Soldiers are there to be wasted in the service of the corporations. It doesn't matter if they get killed or horribly disabled, as long as the military industrial complex profits. If a soldier claims PTSD, keep throwing him back into the meat grinder until he is hamburger.
One's reminded of George
Tue, 01/11/2011 - 18:46 — Kootenay Coyotem (not verified)One's reminded of George Grosz' drawing:'Fit for Active Service'.
“We’re not going to stop
Tue, 01/11/2011 - 18:55 — edgar valderrama (not verified)“We’re not going to stop until we bring an end to the redeployment of traumatized troops,”
How about bringing an end to the deployment of any/all troops to any corporate induced killing field?
what would smedley butler
Tue, 01/11/2011 - 20:09 — tell the truth (not verified)what would smedley butler say? he knew what a
scam the armed services were but he couldn't
or wouldn't believe today's military nor
would he believe the evil they have succumbed to
as they deplete america's young and our
treasury in pursuit of profits by transnational
corporations! where is obama in this hiding
inside the whitehouse while the rightous
and just protest his lack of conscience morality
or fairness as he kneels in front of his corporate
masters. lets bring back the draft so his
daughters are obligated by law to fight in
this bloodbath that doubtless will still be
going as they come of draft able age!
Why all this howling? The
Wed, 01/12/2011 - 13:06 — goobagooba (not verified)Why all this howling?
The country is firmly in the grasp of the moneyed folk, and the government itself reduced to a mere agent in their hands.
The Constitution allows the people to replace the government when it ceases to represent them fairly. With a truly representative governing body, regulations would exist to curtail the overreaching of the greedy and opportunistic.
Ooops! I'm getting really retro! It seems we had something approaching that before the term "special interests" got turned on its head, and voodoo economics became "law."