Revolt Against the Body Scanners
Tuesday 23 November 2010
by: Matthew Harwood, t r u t h o u t | News Analysis

Full-body scanners at Logan Airport. (Photo: johnscotthaydon)
Come Wednesday, the public uproar over the government's ability to virtually strip-search air travelers or feel them up before flying could turn into widespread civil disobedience.
This month, a grassroots campaign has shot out of the electronic ether to contest the Transportation Security Administration's (TSA) decision to require all travelers to submit to either a full body scan or a law-enforcement style pat-down before moving into their sterile boarding areas of airports. The National Opt-Out Day's mission statement doesn't mince words. Tomorrow, November 24, the traditionally busiest travel day of the year, is the public's opportunity to rise up and register its dissent against an out-of-touch bureaucracy.
"It's the day ordinary citizens stand up for their rights, stand up for liberty, and protest the government's desire to virtually strip us naked or submit to an 'enhanced pat down' that touches people's breasts and genitals in an aggressive manner," the web page declares. "You should never have to explain to your children, 'Remember that no stranger can touch or see your private area, unless it's a government employee, then it's OK.'"
The goal of the campaign is simple: If enough irate travelers opt out of the full-body scanners, the TSA will have to pat them down, a more time-consuming screening method. If even a fraction of these fliers protest, bottlenecks at the security checkpoint could cause costly delays and people missing flights home for the holiday.
National Opt-Out Day has also received help from another incident a weekend ago when 31-year-old John Tyner refused both the full body scan and an enhanced pat down at San Diego International Airport. After the transportation security officer explained to Tyner that during the pat down he would feel his groin, Tyner blurted out, "If you touch my junk, I'll have you arrested." Tyner, who recorded his interaction with TSA, posted the video online. It went viral. Within days, Congress members' offices were flooded with angry calls and emails and the head of TSA was answering questions about "peekaboo scanners" and government-authorized "groping" before two Senate committees.
Apart from the visceral violation many air travelers and Americans feel from the TSA's security technology and procedures, civil libertarians, privacy advocates, pilot unions, trade associations, and Congress members and their own watchdog organization have levied serious allegations against the agency's use of full-body scanners for some time now. Allegations that include the TSA violating several laws and the Bill of Rights on top of risking air travelers' health for an illusion of security that allows the well-connected to line their pockets with government money.
Rumblings of Discontent
Resistance to full-body scanners - or in TSA parlance, advanced imaging technology (AIT) - has been gaining momentum for almost two years.
In May 2009, the Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) and 30 other public interest organizations petitioned Homeland Security Chief Janet Napolitano to conduct a public rulemaking session after the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the TSA's parent agency, decided that full-body scanners would become the primary screening method at airports when available without notifying the public. Previously, full-body scanners were reserved for secondary screening if primary screening methods detected a possible threat. The DHS failed to act on the petition's request for a public hearing.
Then came the event that led to the invasion of full-body scanners occurring now. Last Christmas, 23-year-old jihadist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab hid an explosive device in his underpants and ignited the device in an effort to destroy a Detroit-bound flight from the Netherlands. Because the bomb was composed of nonmetallic ingredients, traditional magnetometers could not detect the explosive compounds. The new threat resulted in the DHS aggressively deploying 385 full-body scanners to 68 airports nationwide in 2010, with the intent of having 1,000 machines in circulation by the end of next year.
But the DHS may have acted hastily. In March, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) called into question whether full-body scanners could have detected the underwear bomber. "While TSA officials stated that the laboratory and operational testing of the AIT included placing explosive material in different locations on the body, it remains unclear whether the AIT would have been able to detect the weapon Mr. Abdulmutallab used in his attempted attack based on the preliminary TSA information we have received," the GAO's Steve Lord, director of homeland security and justice issues, told a House subcommittee.
The GAO was also critical that the TSA had not conducted a cost-benefit analysis for the full-body scanners' deployment and maintenance. According to the watchdog's own numbers, the full-body scanners and the additional staff needed to operate the machines could cost $2.4 billion over their expected service life.
Don’t miss a beat - get Truthout Daily Email Updates. Click here to sign up for free.
A month later, the former chief security officer of the Israel Airport Authority told Canadian lawmakers that full-body scanners were a waste of money and were not deployed at Tel Aviv's Ben Gurion International Airport. "I don't know why everybody is running to buy these expensive and useless machines," Rafi Sela said. "I can overcome the body scanners with enough explosives to bring down a Boeing 747."
Then in May, EPIC and public interest organizations petitioned Napolitano again, this time including the DHS's chief privacy officer. Only, this time, the coalition argued the full-body scanners' deployment violated numerous federal laws and the Fourth Amendment's prohibition against unlawful search and seizure and pleaded for the DHS to cease purchasing further scanners and desist from operating those already deployed. The TSA responded, refusing to process the group's petition.
On November 1, EPIC and three other plaintiffs delivered their opening brief to a federal appeals court in Washington asking for the court to stop full-body scans until the DHS conducted a 90-day rulemaking session. According to the brief, EPIC isn't dead set against full-body scanners, but they are against the antidemocratic and unconstitutional way the TSA decided this particular technology would supplant other techniques and technologies.
"Petitioners object to Respondents' decision to make full-body scanners the primary means of screening in US airports," the brief said. "That decision disregarded the Fourth Amendment, as well as federal laws that ensure agency accountability and help safeguard privacy and religious freedom."
Well-Connected Players Profit
As the conservative Washington Examiner's Timothy P. Carney wrote last week, full-body scanner manufacturers have some well-connected players lobbying on their behalf. L3 Communications, which makes one type of machine, active millimeter wave, hired lobbying firm Park Strategies to represent their interests. There, former Sen. Al D'Amato (R-New York) and former Appropriations staffer Kraig Siracuse work to convince lawmakers that full-body scanners are necessary for the security of air travelers. Four days after the botched Christmas Day account, the TSA announced L3 would receive a $165 million contract for its full-body scanners.
The other large, full-body scanner manufacturer, Rapiscan, which makes backscatter X-ray machines, had the biggest name lobbying for them: former Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff. Days after Abdulmutallab's failed attack, Chertoff touted full-body scanners to The New York Times and even wrote an op-ed for The Washington Post, arguing that a bill to make full-body scanners only for use during secondary screening should be defeated and decried "privacy ideologues" for their objections to the screening technology.
"So, under the standards set by the House bill, a terrorist not on a 'no-fly' list or a watch list mandating closer scrutiny - like Abdulmutallab - could probably carry a concealed non-metal weapon onto a plane undetected," Chertoff wrote. "Congress should reject this restrictive bill and instead fund a large-scale deployment of next-generation systems."
Chertoff, however, never let either newspaper know that he was being paid by Rapiscan to endorse their products. According to Carney, Rapiscan also hired Susan Carr, a former senior legislative aide to Rep. David Price (D-North Carolina), chairman of the Homeland Security Subcommittee, another proponent of full-body scanners. Chertoff and Carr's efforts worked. The TSA handed Rapiscan a $173 million contract.
Not Your Typical Privacy Ideologue
What makes the recent upsurge of protest so surprising is that resistance isn't just coming from the same "privacy ideologues" that Chertoff argued against almost a year ago.
Some of the strongest reactions have come from pilot unions. The US Airline Pilots Association (USAPA) told its pilots to not submit to full-body scanners because of health concerns.
"The TSA has offered no credible specifications for the radiation emitted by these machines," wrote USAPA President Captain Mike Cleary in a statement to his fellow pilots two weeks ago. "As pilots, we are exposed to more radiation as a function of our normal duties than nearly every other category of worker in the United States."
While other people have protested full-body scanners for possible health risks, only one machine, Rapiscan's backscatter machine, emits radiation. The TSA consistently says backscatter machines are safe and notes independent studies performed by the Food and Drug Administration's Center for Devices and Radiological Health, the National Institute for Standards and Technology and the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory confirm this.
The Airline Pilots Association (ALPA) also registered its discontent with the TSA's security screening process, arguing that pilots do not present a risk and should not have to undergo the same level of screening as everyone else.
"[Pilots] are very heavily scrutinized and evaluated on a daily basis," the ALPA said in its statement. "They have been subjected to extensive FBI background checks and thousands are deputized as Federal Flight Deck Officers by the TSA who carry and are authorized to use lethal force while on duty to defend the cockpit from a terrorist threat."
And last Tuesday, two airline pilots sued the DHS and the TSA in a Washington federal court for violating their Fourth Amendment rights. Michael S. Roberts, a pilot with ExpressJet, and Ann Poe, a Continental pilot, are asking the judge to stop the TSA from making full-body scanners the primary screening method, as well as seeking damages. They are being represented by The Rutherford Institute, a conservative civil liberties organization.
Even the travel industry is upset over the effects full-body scanners could have on business. "You can't talk on the one hand about creating jobs in this country and getting this economy back on track and on the other hand discourage millions of Americans from flying, which is the gateway to commerce," Geoff Freeman, an executive vice president of the U.S. Travel Association, told Reuters last week.
Where's the Line?
In a public hearing last week with TSA Administrator John Pistole, Sen. Mike Johanns (R-Nebraska) wondered if the public had reached its "tipping point" with air security.
"You know, take off your belt, take off your coat, take off your shoes, take out your liquids, on and on," Johanns said. "And now advanced imaging and, as you acknowledge, very intrusive pat-down, if you choose not to do that."
It's an important question. Critics continually stress that the TSA is always protecting against the last attempted attack. Richard Reid's shoe bomb results in the TSA screening travelers' shoes for explosives. The 2006 cross-Atlantic aircraft plot to bring down at least ten airliners with liquid explosives means air travelers are banned from bringing liquids in containers of three ounces or more through security. Underwear bomber Abdulmutallab means air travelers must relinquish their final vestige of dignity and choose between allowing a government employee to either sneak a peak at what their packing or actually feel the real thing.
But this behavior pattern, begs the question: What will the TSA do when a terrorist somehow ingests or inserts a bomb into his body? This isn't a Hollywood brainstorming session taking a vulgar, outlandish turn.
In August 2009, a comrade of Abdulmutallab's did just that. Twenty-three-year-old AQAP operative Abdullah Hassan Tali al-Asiri became the ultimate Trojan Horse. In an effort to get close to the head of Saudi counterterrorism, Interior Minister Prince Mohammed bin Nayef, the young jihadist pretended he had turned away from violent extremism. Little did the prince or his security detail know, al-Asiri had inserted a bomb into his rectum. When he got an audience with the prince, the device detonated, blasting al-Asiri to bits and only grazing Nayef.
If AQAP tries this attack vector in the United States, it's disconcerting to dream up how the TSA will respond to this vulnerability.
Holding the Line
In Congressional testimony last week, TSA Administrator John Pistole stood firm. He said air travelers will either submit to a full body scan or an enhanced pat down or they will not fly. Pistole pleaded for public cooperation, telling senators that the TSA and other federal agencies and national laboratories are working diligently to deploy next-generation screening technologies to eliminate fliers' privacy concerns.
Tomorrow, he will find out whether the flying public is willing to sacrifice some security for the sake of liberty.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Is anyone following the
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 15:00 — David (not verified)Is anyone following the lawsuit over the body scanners? The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) is suing DHS over the body scanners, on the grounds that they violate privacy statutes as well as the Fourth Amendment. Check out EPIC vs. DHS at www.epic.org.
Objects up to 2 inches in
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 16:31 — Larry Glick (not verified)Objects up to 2 inches in diameter and 8 inches long can easily be inserted into the rectum. This is certainly within in the size range for a substantial explosive device.
Non-Muslim travelers with no
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 17:09 — Anonymous (not verified)Non-Muslim travelers with no criminal background should be able to get a security clearance in advance. There is no reason to treat people from low-risk groups as though they are potential terrorists. Islamic Jihad is the motivation behind these attempts at blowing up aircraft. A more focused approach would be more effective at keeping us safe.
So who's to say that some
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 17:38 — Anonymous (not verified)So who's to say that some jihadist group won't recruit/hire some blue-eyed, blonde-haired young women to smuggle bombs on board?
I feel bad for the people
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 18:02 — Stanford Siver (not verified)I feel bad for the people who work for TSA. Suddenly they're being required to do something that few of us would be willing to do. And they're being abused by public opinion, public anger, and mean comments and jokes about their being perverts and sex offenders. I would hate to have to do the things they're being ordered to do in order to live. Not that a few of them haven't made mistakes, but that's true in all kinds of work. I think they're doing a great job in a tough situation. Fight the policy, not the workers.
And a muslim looks like
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 18:09 — Anonymous (not verified)And a muslim looks like ____? What do non-muslims look like?
Figuring out whether someone
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 18:21 — Anonymous (not verified)Figuring out whether someone is a Muslim, regardless of their race or hair color, should become part of an FBI background check. It is obviously a huge risk factor, which we ignore at our peril.
Of course, it is unfair to inconvenience innocent Muslims who only share a religion with the Jihadists. However, it is even more unfair to inconvenience all the non-Muslim travelers, who do not even share a religion with the Jihadists.
For me the "tipping point"
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 19:21 — Harry Thomas (not verified)For me the "tipping point" was reached when airlines started charging extra for bags when they used to be part of the fare. With the TSA inspections, the airline overcharges and everything else, I'll take my chances on the open road. I can drive to Orlando and back for $600, including gas, food and motel. Yes, I'm spending four days in travel, but 5 days in Orlando is enough anyway. Same goes for Vegas. Best of all; I don't have to rent a car when I get there.
I hope tomorrow is hell for
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 20:25 — Semper Fi for the Constitution (not verified)I hope tomorrow is hell for the TSA and the airlines. I pray the the head of the TSA is fired for his over the top stupidity.
We all have to unite and refuse to submit to this crap.
All these previous idiotic comments about whether someone is Muslim or not demonstrate how clueless many of these posters are.
Get a grip folks, who gives shit what religion you are, I for one do not and as a Patriotic American I am disgusted by any suggestion of questions, background check or any thing else for me to travel in my country or outside of my country as well.
See the Nation for a
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 20:28 — Anonymous (not verified)See the Nation for a different perspective on what may be the real issue behind the sudden "outcry" about pat-downs: Privatization
I wonder if those in power
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 20:47 — Anonymous (not verified)I wonder if those in power are deliberately using this TSA issue as a controversy to get everybody up in arms, then to use that as grounds to say that there's an imminent danger of unrest, rebellion or insurrection or something, and then start rounding people up.
Sincerely,
Delta2477A@hotmail.com
Say, suppose our government
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 20:48 — Anonymous (not verified)Say, suppose our government were to stop killing Muslims. I wonder whether that would have any effect on this situation. Hmm.
see what some physicians and
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 22:08 — Patti (not verified)see what some physicians and scientists have to say about back-scatter body scanners and radiation:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/3685/cancer-ray-opt-out.pdf
I just went through security
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 22:33 — Don (not verified)I just went through security at SFO on Sunday and was on my way in a total of <20 minutes including a full scan. IT WAS NO BIG DEAL!!
Having an artifical hip, I always set off the metal detector and have had pat downs every time I fly. This time they gave me the option of the scanner. It took 10 seconds and MUCH less invasive. A big improvement in my book!
The scanner used on me uses submillimeter RADIO waves (NOT X-rays) and the dose is supposed to be less than using a CELL PHONE.
There are some scanners that use weak X-rays but the dose is said to be less than the radiation you get when flying at 35000 feet for 2 MINUTES (because of higher exposure to cosmic rays at high altitudes).
To me, the "uproar" fanned by a few and hyped by the media is MUCH TO DO ABOUT NOTHING.
If you don't want to have a body scan because of fear of radiation exposure, then you should NOT be using cell phones or even flying in the first place!!!!!
Look at all these so-called
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 23:03 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Look at all these so-called "Americans", who don't know much if anything about their liberties and civil duties that are supposed to be protected by the Constitution, and who write comments calling for racial and/or religious profiling, and/or for giving up our liberties for elusive "security". If they were Muslim, they would be screaming bloody murder against being religiously and/or racially profiled. Also, most of them probably don't even know what the Fourth Amendment is or what it says. And far too many of them are totally for allowing an out of control government to do almost anything it wants, and already completely bend over for the government to screw them.
In short, we now live in a country, the U.S., where most of its people are braindead and don't understand at what cost they willingly give up their liberties. They don't even know that history teaches that EVERY TIME government has gotten so out of control as the U.S. government is now, the government has eliminated liberty(ies) for the sake of so-called "security"; with, in-truth, "security" meaning absolute control of the citizenry. So, unless the vast majority of We, the People completely stop giving up our liberties for illusory "security", we are screwed as a country and world, and we will very soon find ourselves completely and irrevocably enslaved.
Oh bullshit, this is about
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 23:13 — the First Place (not verified)Oh bullshit, this is about the Government + Industry swindlng tax dollars for "security" after 9/11 , not your review of a trip to the airport. It's also about the 4th amendment.
Chertoff isn't an idiot, he's a very successful business man, and the fear that helps seal the sales for Defense Contractors is overwhelming. These machines are no way cheap, but the idiocy, the insanity of assuming that everyone is a potential airplane attacker which is what the US has decided to do, is simply promotion of the police state. Al Qeada is no where near American Airports. Billions spent on goons, security guards, detection, and survelliance are here to watch you, the citizen, the guilty.
Sure, let's not consider
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 23:27 — Anonymous (not verified)Sure, let's not consider whether a traveler is a Muslim, when that is the single unifying factor for all recent attempts at blowing up an airplane. We'd rather get blown up than consider the actual risk factors.
Don, giving up your
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 23:29 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Don, giving up your liberties is a VERY big deal! The more you give up, the more the government will take away until this isn't a free country any more at all. This country was designed by the resistance of tyranny, and for the continued resistance of tyranny. Even God wouldn't have us bow down to ANYONE except Him, and then only if such bowing down is truly to Him and not some misrepresentation that government(s) give that bowing to them is supposedly bowing to God, like the U.S. government is already doing, as Hitler did, through the misinterpreted use of Romans, Chapter 12 (which was Hitler's favorite Bible chapter) and getting preachers to preach that we're allegedly supposed to bow to government no matter what, WHICH IS A LIE! Dear God, people, wake up and stop voluntarily giving up your liberties!...
...Don't give up your
Tue, 11/23/2010 - 23:30 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...Don't give up your right(s) to privacy, or any other rights, or very soon the government will be taking them all away. In reality, as far as the government is concerned, we already don't have any freedoms as embodied in God's Word(s) and the Constitution left. "Homeland 'Security'" teaches local law enforcement that 1.) we (supposedly) don't have any Constitution any more, 2.) those who talk about the Constitution (the Supreme Law of the Land) "too much" are terrorists, and that 3.) the Founding Fathers of this country were terrorists. All of that is treason, but do most "Americans" get that? No, they applaud it. That's what this country is coming to, a bunch of sheep letting the government give it to them in the hind quarters with nary a bleat, and then only as if they are enjoying it! God help us!
"I just went through
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 02:30 — Anonymous (not verified)"I just went through security at SFO on Sunday and was on my way in a total of <20 minutes including a full scan. IT WAS NO BIG DEAL!!"
It's a huge deal. They're stripping you nude using technology instead of their own hands, and meanwhile there's a huge crowd of people who have not been scanned or even background checked standing there, a massive open target, in a fairly confined space (SFO terminals are fairly confined).
The stupidity is astounding.
Please, Truthout readers,
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 08:54 — Anonymous (not verified)Please, Truthout readers, where is the discussion about radiation, a very real and verifiable threat? I agree that many other issues should be of concern as well. Though, I think the concerns about nudity are being overstated, so this can become a discussion between Puritanical Americans versus rational people making decisions about our safety. I don't think anyone can argue effectively, that most people would want to drastically increase cancer risks for their own "safety." Nudists airlines, anyone?
how many federal policing
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 09:54 — Bearzerker (not verified)how many federal policing agency's do we need? can't people recognize the simple fact their are too many chiefs and not enough Indians in the current federal plan and its becoming obvious with the numbers of incarcerated... because the priority of a federal policing agency is to get results and to do that and prove their worth they justify themselves with arrests and convictions... even if the results are scandalous make work projects that make victims sit in corporate slave camps... Is this the actual end game of the neo-cons Project for the New American Century?
by collating all power within a small circle of radicals... for them maybe, but somehow I don't think it was part of the plan as envisioned by the founding fathers.
If airport security doesn't
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 10:17 — Bliss Doubt (not verified)If airport security doesn't do its real job, then no amount of scanning and groping will help. The Christmas day bomber had a one way ticket bought with cash, which is supposed to raise red flags all over. The Christmas day bomber did not have a passport, so should never have been allowed to board that flight. I smell false flag, or perhaps machinations by the scanner manufacturers who were lobbying governments to buy and use their junk. In any case, security last Christmas did not do its job, and now the traveling public is paying for that negligence.
Americans!
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 10:22 — David Brookbank (not verified)Americans! Whining about body scans versus intrusive pat downs. Not exactly equivalent to the choice some have in other countries between capitulating to occupying, murderous US forces and mercenaries versus having US drone missiles slaughter hundreds of their civilians. Seems Americans can’t connect personal privacy concerns with the brutal and cynical conduct of US foreign policy. Cowardly US drone attacks in multiple countries; US-backed coups in Latin America; 737 military facilities worldwide; US blackmail regarding debt service; awarding Israel $3 billion in taxpayer-financed fighter jets (really to preposition weaponry to attack Iran) in exchange for a 90-day halt to settlement building. The US – the modern-day Holy Roman Empire—has ever fewer friends, mostly a global ruling class. Every day fewer here and abroad are willing to accept the lies justifying its aggressions, crimes, and resource wars. Now, faced with mulit-trillion dollar costs for all this, a class war is underway featuring the destruction of programs for children, retired, elderly, poor, disabled and the middle class. Pity poor Americans! Forced to literally play the collective role of the emperor with no clothes or get felt up by their "democratic" government's security forces. Whining all the while about the consequences of government misuse of tax dollars for war, corporations, and the wealthy, rather than organizing and mobilizing in their common self-interest.
Here's the Fourth Amendment,
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 11:01 — oudiva (not verified)Here's the Fourth Amendment, since several of you seem to have forgotten what it says:
"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probably cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." In other words, if TSA doesn't have a warrant with your name on it, stating specifically what they suspect you of being up to, THEY HAVE NO RIGHT TO LOOK AT YOU NAKED OR GROPE YOUR BODY! It's true that the government has been violating this amendment for years. All the more reason why THIS HAS TO STOP. I hope the protests Wednesday are massive. I won't be there, as I have decided not to fly as long as sexual assault is part of the screening process. How does having my body violated make me "safe"?
There is no RIGHT to fly. As
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 11:02 — Don (not verified)There is no RIGHT to fly. As I said, if you don't want body scans or exposure to tiny amounts of radiation, then DON'T FLY!!
The so-called "invasion" of privacy and 4th amendment rights ( search and seizure) are being overblown -- in the media and in the comments above.
Basically, you agree to security checks and search when you buy your airplane ticket. If you don't want to be searched, then take a train or bus or car or bicycle or walk.
Just stop flying, stop
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 13:42 — Anonymous (not verified)Just stop flying, stop paying taxes, stop buying junk from Korporate Amerika, that has made record profits. Shut down this corrupt, immoral, and illegal government and bring the politicians and bureaucrats to justice.
The latest news is that the
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 14:55 — Anonymous (not verified)The latest news is that the "protests" against the searches and scanners was a big fizzle. Very few protesters or scan refusals.
There will always be people who get all worked up over change of any kind. And a few get enough attention to make the "news" and then it gets hyped by the media and internet.
Good security is an issue. Body scanners and security checks are a non-issue.
Get a life, folks!! And stop believing everything you hear on the news and internet!
Welcome to the
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 15:30 — Adoregon (not verified)Welcome to the plantation.
Bend over.
If you want to fly without hassles, buy your own jet like rich people do.
Otherwise STFU and comply.
Be a good German.
Don, you are another idiot
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 17:19 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Don, you are another idiot and traitor who doesn't understand the Constitution, and/or who doesn't take it seriously like it is your DUTY as a so-called "American", and the DUTY of ALL of us as "Americans", to do.
We have basic, foundational, innate rights to "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness", without any government interferrance, and/or prevention from being able to enjoy those rights, WHATSOEVER! Thus, almost everything IS a RIGHT! AND NONE OF THOSE RIGHTS are a privilege! We don't waive ANY RIGHTS when we buy an airline ticket, or anything else; and the Constitution is VERY clear that we CANNOT waive those rights even if the government claims we supposedly can and/or have!
We have the basic, innate right(s) to go almost anywhere we want, freely, and to get there any way we want to, as long as it isn't intentionally seeking to harm anyone else; and just because the government has for decades been little by little, more and more claiming that rights are supposedly privileges, doesn't make it so! Decades ago we began to fall for the lie(s) that driving, etc., is supposedly a privilege, and thus such false beliefs have snowballed until the government is taking away all of our rights and calling them "privileges"! Enough of this hogwash!
Truly Free people have the right(s) to do almost ANYTHING that doesn't intentionally harm other people, period! And that includes being able to drive and fly without having to show our "papers", or so-called "required licenses" which is the same thing, like in Nazi Germany; and especially without having to be technologically strip-searched and/or to have the private parts of our bodies groped because all of us are now, completely unconstitutionally, presumed guilty until we prove our innocence!
Don't you understand, Don and others, that the government has got it completely backwards?! Under the U.S. Constitution, and the state Constitutions, they have to PROVE our guilt of something, and NOT through presuming us guilty, IN ANY WAY(S) WHATSOEVER, to start with!! In other words, the burden of proof is on THEM!! The burden of proof is NOT on us to prove our innocence!! Therefore, every time we consent to being electronically strip-searched and/or to having our private parts groped, the government is requiring us to prove our innocence in violation of the Constitution(s)!!
Also, every time we consent to that, we are waiving our rights as well, which is an extremely steep, "straight-down-to-hell-on-earth", slippery slope leading to no rights at all, and to everything supposedly being a "privilege"; privileges which will more and more be denied to us if we continue to voluntarily give up our innate rights! So stop believing the lies of the corporate-fascist government and their propaganda arm, the mainstream, corporate-fascist media, that innate rights are supposedly "privileges" and that we supposedly have to give them up in order to exercise our other innate rights!
The government(s) has, and/or have, always used the apparently-plausible excuse that turning our liberties and innate rights into so-called privileges is for our "security", or for our own "protection"; but taking away, and our capitulating to it and consenting to giving up, our innate rights, and/or to have them turned into so-called "privileges", makes us MUCH LESS secure in our innate freedoms and rights; and, as we have seen, more and more opens the floodgates to government turning almost every innate right into a so-called "privilege", thus making us more and more unsafe at the hands of government!
Look at what's going on: Millions of completely innocent Americans are being visited by the government alphabet agencies to prove their innocence in order to exercise their innate, and Constitutionally-given, rights to stand up against all of this madness of doing away with our rights; to stand up against preemptively attacking defenseless countries and mass-murdering millions of their innocent citizens; also murdering those freedom fighters who are doing nothing but exercising their innate rights (and rights under international law) to defend themselves, their fellow countrymen and their country(ies) against completely unlawful preemptive wars; and the list goes on and on and on.
Millions more are having to prove their innocence in order to exercise their innate right(s) and liberty(ies) to travel, and so on. It just gets worse and worse, as we have been seeing for decades, but particularly since 9/11, and everything under the sun is used to to supposedly "justify" it. But NOTHING justifies our giving up our innate and Constitutional rights! NOTHING! Yet, what the government is doing is unconstitutionally backing us into a corner where there is no other way "out" but to either give-in and voluntarily waive our rights and submit to police-state tactics over and over again, with no true regard for our innate rights, liberty and true safety, especially from government encroachment, erosion and eradication of our innate human and civil rights, freedoms and liberties; or to give-in and choose to no longer exercise our innate right(s) to travel, etc.
It is so obvious where all of this encroachment and erosion of our innate civil liberties is leading, and that it is leading to the complete eradication of our innate civil liberties. But most so-called "Americans" are, with extreme stupidity, allowing themselves to bow down to and accept this madness and call it "patriotism". Yet it is NOT patriotism; it IS nationalism; just like the so-called "good Germans" who bowed down to and accepted "national socialism", aka Nazism, surrendered to, giving up all of their innate rights, and letting what few so-called "rights" they had left be completely turned into "privileges". True Patriotism is standing up AGAINST all such madness, NOT bowing down to it!
Wake up to the thuggery of the U.S. government that is masquerading as "protecting us" while they stealthfully do away with all of our innate rights, or what little of them we have left! Wake up to the fact(s) that what they are doing with all of these "checkpoints" and "prove-our-innocence" hoops that we supposedly have to sheepishly jump through "or else", which are an extreme invasion of our privacy and liberty, is conditioning us to more and more accept our innate rights being done away with, and to waive our innate rights to be Truly Free, and to be free from ALL of these invasive, rights-violating, oppressive and repressive control tactics being used to herd us like we're supposedly cattle, not human beings! The so-called "good German citizens" accepted this, but we must NEVER accept it! And they were a warning to all of us not to fall for this kind of human-rights-and-civil-liberties-destroying madness EVER AGAIN!
When we have no privacy, which is what the government is basically telling us to a gravely-extreme extent right now, WE HAVE NO TRUE FREEDOM! Don't you understand? You might appear to be free because you can continue to buy all of these electronic baubbles that don't make you Truly Free; and, by design of the powers-that-be, distract you from what's really going on, from the complete eradication of your innate human rights and civil liberties, and distract you from you DUTY(IES) to stand up against it; but you will more and more, as is happening already, be controlled at every turn, other than in your purchases of your "false-freedom gizmos" which they have bought us off with!
What it has already led to is our being corraled more and more, and what it is very quickly leading to is our being slaughtered like cattle---like the total of over ten million human beings, not just Jews, who were exterminated during the FIRST Reich! But, for God's sake, for your sake(s), for all of our sakes, wake the hell up and stop being "good little, complacent, sheepish, cowed, servile, capitulating, corraled slaves", and stand up against all of this larger and larger evisceration of our innate human rights and civil liberties! Stop being cowards, and take a stand against all of this madness before we don't have any control over any of it at all anymore! Remember, We the People are the ones who are supposed to be in control, and we are NEVER to surrender ANY of that control over ourselves, our bodies, our privacy, and the retention of our innate civil liberties and human rights, TO ANYONE ELSE, EVER; ESPECIALLY TO GOVERNMENT!
Once again:
"...(W)hen a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce (The People) under absolute Despotism (as IS happening right now), it is their right, IT IS THEIR DUTY, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security (and liberty, freedom and happiness)..."! --Declaration of Independence, 1776. [Emphasis and/or clarification(s) added by me.] Since the Declaration of Independence is joined to the U.S. Constitution under the Supremecy Clause of the latter, it is part and parcel of the Constitution, and it is part of the Supreme LAW of the Land just like the rest of the Constitution; therefore, it is also the DUTY of every single American including government officers to OBEY it, just as it is their DUTY to obey ALL of the Constitution. So do it, COMPLETELY! Or you can't truly call yourselves Americans; and you are nothing but traitors to God, to the Constitution, to the United States of America, to human rights and civil liberties, and to the entire world!
LONG LIVE NOTHING BUT TRUE FREEDOM, AND GOD SAVE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND THE ENTIRE WORLD FROM THE CORPORATE-FASCIST SCOURGE THAT IS SWEEPING OVER THE U.S. AND THE WHOLE PLANET, ERADICATING ALL OF OUR TRUE FREEDOMS AND HUMAN RIGHTS, AND THUS ENSLAVING ALL OF US! FIGHT BACK AND TOTALLY STOP THIS MADNESS, YOU SHEEP AND CATTLE, OR YOU ARE DOOMING YOURSELVES AND ALL OF THE REST OF US!
To Don, above, what the heck
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 17:19 — Bliss Doubt (not verified)To Don, above, what the heck do you mean, "there is no RIGHT to fly"? Your comments are becoming tedious. Our constitution guarantees us life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It also protects us against unreasonable search and seizure. Are you saying that my government has to give me the right to fly? Give me a break. Yours is a standard fascist mantra, and it makes no sense whatsoever.
Don is correct when he says
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 20:39 — Harry Thomas (not verified)Don is correct when he says that the searches are part of the airline ticket contract. When you buy the ticket, the fine print (which is routinely ignored) says that you allow yourself to be searched.
Wolf and the others are correct when they assert that the methods being used amount to violations of the 4th Amendment. They're also right that we are being led down the path where we're giving up our rights incrementally to the point where we will soon have no rights at all.
At the moment, we can cross state borders at will. I wonder how long it will be before they institute border crossing stations for states in the name of security and cracking down on illegal immigration?
Traffic surveillance
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 20:39 — Harry Thomas (not verified)Traffic surveillance software, not to mention credit card tracking, can easily track our movements across the country. How long before they pass laws dictating how far we can drive in a day in order to protect state commerce?
The changes are gradual and always incorporated with "our best interests" in mind. And our TV news interviews people at the airports that all say "they would rather be safe than dead."
"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety." - Benjamin Franklin.
The majority of us will not complain loudly enough until it is too late. We have become Boxer, the horse from Orwell's "Animal Farm," who worked himself to death while trusting in the state.
Please check this
Wed, 11/24/2010 - 23:21 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Please check this out:
Article Title: TSA Gestapo Empire
Article Author: Paul Craig Roberts (former U.S. government employee as a member of the Reagan administration)
Website: Infowars.com
Date: November 24, 2010
Website Address: infowars.com/tsa-gestapo-empire/
Gauging threats based on
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 12:49 — David Craine (not verified)Gauging threats based on ethnicity or religious affiliation is not only racist and un-American, it's monumentally ineffective. I don't see where anyone has suggested we screen Anglo-Saxon Christians from approaching federal buildings after Timothy McVeigh's terrorist attack, or Polish-Americans from approaching postal facilities after Ted Kascynski's terrorist attacks, or white, Southern Christians from approaching any African-Americans in the wake of the worst terrorist attacks in our nation's history: the murders of over 5,000 victims of lynchings from 1880 to the present.
Not disagreeing with you,
Thu, 11/25/2010 - 18:03 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Not disagreeing with you, but agreeing with you, David Craine: You see, one of the primary problems is, that most "Americans" have become un-American. Things have been designed, and they were intentionally made, that way. Why do you think most of them don't know the Constitution or take it seriously, even though it is the Supreme Law of the Land and the most important document in their lives? Do you think that is an accident? Americans have been intentionally dumbed-down about human rights and civil liberties, and why they are extremely important to them, so that they will willingly go along with, and even blindly support---all the while claiming to be "patriots"---the destruction of this country, their freedoms, and even of themselves with blind devotion to the very powers-that-be and government that are destroying their country, their world and them! Those powers-that-be absolutely love it when their targets, most of us, revel in and aid in their own destruction! Therefore, the ONLY One who can help us now, is God through Jesus the Christ (John 14:6)!
Excuse me, what I should
Fri, 11/26/2010 - 01:20 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Excuse me, what I should have said is that the Constitution is the most important document in their civil, civic and/or secular lives.
...Or, civil, civic,
Sat, 11/27/2010 - 02:56 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...Or, civil, civic, temporal and/or secular lives.
America, beware the
Wed, 12/08/2010 - 15:23 — Frances in California (not verified)America, beware the mentality that insists there must be a needle BECAUSE it's a haystack.
imitation coach purses
Mon, 10/15/2012 - 18:23 — ByncCity (not verified)for [URL=http://imitationcoachbags.komunitasonline.com/imitation-coach-bags/]imitation coach bags[/URL] with confident fEDufLgH [URL=http://coachreplicapurses.mzk-pulawy.pl/coach-replica-purses/ ] http://coachreplicapurses.mzk-pulawy.pl/coach-replica-purses/ [/URL]
qwaiye bwegbv ckbfkx
Wed, 05/15/2013 - 17:32 — Wahseday (not verified)http://louisvuittonbags.citationguide.net wejmsgw shop louis vuitton 2012 handbags Louis Vuitton