Big Bank Bailout Redux

by: Robert Borosage  |  Campaign for America's Future | News Analysis

Central to the Tea Party revolt was a fierce reaction against the bailout of the big banks.

Will the Republican Congress now spit that sentiment in the eye and push through another bailout, this time by overturning centuries of property law and nationalizing what has always been governed by state law?

Will the power of their donors overwhelm the power of their voters and the platitudes of their ideology?

The Third Way, one of a gaggle of outlets for the corporate wing of the Democratic Party, has just published a paper "Fixing Foreclosure-gate" urging that Congress take over and overturn state laws on mortgages and property. Increasingly local courts are choking on the reality that the banks trampled all property law in their rush to market mortgage backed securities. Now as they try to foreclose on millions of homeowners, they can't establish who has the right to foreclose because they haven't kept the records required by law. The bank position is "nevermind," let us foreclose anyway.

That's essentially what the Third Way is saying. Only problem is without clarity about the title and who has the right to foreclose, the courts -- at least those that aren't bought and sold -- can't force someone out of their home.

Good reporting on this has been done by Yves Smith, Mike Konczal, Marcy Wheeler, and David Dayan. Mike Lux calls out the Third Way in the HuffPo.

Get ready for a brutal battle. Both the Bush and the Obama administrations and the Fed have done whatever they could to rescue the big banks without reforming them, throwing trillions into the effort. Now the administration and Congress will be asked to trash the law -- retroactively -- in the same cause. Will Rs stand up for established property law? Will Ds battle to force a deal -- with mortgages getting written down to current value as price of cleaning up the mess? Or will the big banks, what Simon Johnson dubs the six most dangerous government sponsored establishments, have their way? Stay tuned.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Third Way is a vicious

Third Way is a vicious little bank funded K Street lobbying group - no way in hell should anything they publish be taken as less then corrupted rot served up with Wall Street's approval. But then we have Bankster Obush up in the house, surrounded by Revolving Heads straight from the financial terrorists, including a sap he just appointed from JP Morgan Chase, things look pretty grim until the 'Murican sheep rise up and say enough is enough.



Bad records is intentional

Bad records is intentional negligence. The approach is "snow them with paperwork" — then deny deny deny.

These banks are actual people, who are frauds and thieves. Crooks.



Even conservative judges

Even conservative judges will overturn any attempt at retro-actively forcing people out of their homes.

While the interstate commerce clause and the second amendment may be vague, the stance on ex post facto is clear:

"No bill of attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed." - article one, section 9, limiting the congress. this is NOT a partial quote.

again, in section 10, specifically in reference to contracts, and to the states:

"No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility."