Seeing the Elephant

by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

Seeing the Elephant
(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Kuranes, kris247)

The 2010 midterm elections are still four months away, but the drama has already kicked into high gear. The seemingly settled conventional wisdom would have us believe the Democrats are running for their lives, a perception that is reinforced by any number of polls indicating there are enough seats in play for the GOP to potentially retake majority control in the House. The Senate appears safe for the Democrats, according to these polls, but four months is a long time.

The idea that the GOP could take back the House was underscored on Sunday by White House press secretary Robert Gibbs, who went on "Meet The Press" and said, yeah, it could happen. House Democrats rose up in high dudgeon after Gibbs' remarks, not so much to say he was wrong but to say, hey guy, you're really not helping.

Before getting into how ridiculous it is that the Democrats could be in position to lose the House, it needs to be said that I don't believe it is going to happen. The Republican Party has become a preposterous farce, dominated by the likes of Sarah Palin and Michael Steele. The Tea Party movement is basically nothing more than a Trojan Horse filled with hard-core GOP base members whose views on everything from religion to the constitution to freedom of choice is not shared by roughly 75% of the general population.

They are the Taliban of American Christianity, and the only reason they have gotten so much ink is because the national press corps likes to take the easy way out whenever possible. Add to this the fact that the Tea Party has shot the GOP in the foot several times already by running off electable Republicans and nominating the cast from One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest.

I genuinely believe the House and Senate are safe for the Democrats, if only marginally so, but I've been wrong before, and if the loss of majority control does indeed come to pass, it will stand in my mind as one of the grander indictments against the American voter to come down the pike in a long, long while. Is it that easy to forget what it was like when these yahoos were running the show? It wasn't so long ago, and it was so unbelievably bad that you'd think the memory would linger.

If people need a reminder, one is readily available. We are, of course, in the middle of a gut-twisting recession that a lot of smart people believe is about to get worse again. The response of the GOP and the far right, of course, is to offer up a repackaged version of trickle-down Reaganomics that would, if enacted, char the economy to cinders. Not to worry, because the very rich would get theirs, but the rest of us would wind up standing in soup lines and selling apples to stay alive.

Please donate at a level you can afford to help keep Truthout free from corporate influence and accountable only to our readers.

If people need a specific reminder, they can look to the obnoxious drama that has been unfolding in congress over the last several weeks. Democrats in the Senate have been trying to extend unemployment benefits to millions of Americans who desperately need help. Senate Republicans have filibustered the extension of these benefits at every turn, insisting that these benefits be paid for by either tax hikes or spending cuts. This view is shared by virtually every Republican in the Senate.

But wait, there's a solution right in front of them: the bloated, unaffordable Bush-era tax cuts for rich people are about to expire, and the GOP is in a tizzy. Democrats want to keep those tax cuts in place only for people making up to $200,000-$250,000 a year, and dump the tax cuts for anyone making more. This would generate billions in revenue that could pay for, among other things, extending unemployment benefits for Americans who have been screwed out of their jobs and homes by Bush-era economic policies.

But no, says the GOP, we have to keep those tax cuts as they are. Their desire to make sure unemployment benefits are paid for does not extend to making sure these Bushian tax cuts are paid for. If Senate Republicans get their way, the unemployed will get screwed and the super-wealthy will keep getting pornographically huge slices of revenue we absolutely cannot afford to give them. As it stands, the GOP's filibuster of these benefits is already screwing the people, and if the Republicans were in the majority, well, we've read this script before.

It is an often-heard lament from the Left and a lot of Independents that "Both parties are the same!" In too many instances, the sentiment is all too accurate. Quite often, however, that complaint is a shortcut around actual thinking, and this situation makes that self-evident. One party wants to extend unemployment benefits and the other wants to thwart them. One wants to tax the rich and the other wants to give away the store, again.

I'm no Kool-Aid-drinking Democrat booster, but this couldn't be more clear. If the American people allow the GOP back into power despite all the evidence of how dangerous and dumb they are, I'm going to have to think seriously about giving up on politics. If the beyond-terrible GOP option seems valid to a majority of people after everything we’ve been through, if voters who know better can’t find the motivation to pull the lever and keep the worst from happening, well, then Mencken was right: we get what we deserve.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



William Rivers Pitt is a Truthout editor and columnist.  He is also a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: "War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know" and "The Greatest Sedition Is Silence." His newest book, "House of Ill Repute: Reflections on War, Lies, and America's Ravaged Reputation," is now available from PoliPointPress.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



I beg to differ, William.

I beg to differ, William. Sure, the Dems are currently "trying" to get a jobs bill through, and the Repugs are blocking it. But if the Repugs weren't blocking it, the Dems wouldn't be pushing it or a bunch of "blue dogs" would block it, or some such thing. We've seen this game over and over, haven't we. Congress and the President work for the wealthy elite who sponsor them, not us. The rest is theater. And our wealthy elite want us for serfs.

Moreover, we tried this "Change you can believe in" stuff last time and some cosmetic changes aside the main thrust of our "serfdom" program is right on course. I even voted for Obama, but I can guarantee it won't happen again. Ever. Anyone but a Dem or a Repug is the ticket that will get my vote. An exercise in futility to be sure, but at least a few of us have to refuse to bend over for these slimy bastards. For our own honor, and because that's all that seems to be left.



The blue dogs and go-along

The blue dogs and go-along Democrats during the Bush years are still with us, now abetted by our empty suit president. There is no way I'll ever apply the lesser of evils test to any election again. I'm putting my trust and financial support in real progressives--however few there are running. For the rest--including Obama--good riddance, whatever the alternative.



Spot-on article. The two

Spot-on article. The two parties are not at all the same--even if not as far apart as we'd like--and it makes a huge difference which one is charge. Progressives need to be realists if they're going to get anything they want to see done. There's no magic wand to be waved; you've got to fight and fight and fight, and you can't give in to pessimism, which always stands right next to idealism. You have to take the long view, and you have to assess clearly what this country really is. If progressives jump ship, they simply do a favor for the Far Right.



In early 1930s Germany,

In early 1930s Germany, granted it was a parliamentary system with proportional representation and all that. But letting the "worser" side get in is not equivalent. Incompetence, or, rather, allowing blue dogs to sway things, may be sucky. But voting for a third choice is completely counter-productive.

Things will be far worse if another 8 years like 2000-2008 ever ever occurs again. They never pass unemployment extensions. They never do anything but large tax breaks for the rich and nothing else. Yes, Democrats are spineless, but it has been Republicans who for 25, 30 years have consistently pushed teh agenda so the middle has moved rightward. It is they who are far far worse than anything we see now. Yes, Obama allows a lot to get worse, and this is crap...But if I can vote for Shumer and this time for that syophant Gildebrand, well, Obama is despised by those I despise, so, sorry, he still gets my vote. I doubt I will campaign in hilly streets in Pennsylvania. I wouldn't be able to justify a lot of Obama stuff that when I campaigned last time I said would change, when asked.

You fall for the black or white theory of politics. There are far more nuances in a mature look at things.



The deliberate dumbing down

The deliberate dumbing down of America continues full speed ahead. Attention spans continue to shrink. Apathy and gullibility are rampant. Toss potential Republican election fraud and dirty tricks which STILL have not been properly addressed into the mix and anything is possible for the mid-terms---including disaster for the Democrats and this country.



How 'bout seeing STARS;

How 'bout seeing STARS; since the rest of US have just about reached our nadir, the STARS look the same from our position in space! Vote NEITHER, in the meantime; and NADER in 2012!! Take NO incumbents!!!



All is not lost. The

All is not lost. The regressive Republican Party of NO! is in dire straits. They have no viable candidates and Americans will not be fooled again by sheep in wolves clothing. We have already been "fleeced" by the Republicans and will NOT stand for it again come November. The "Blue Dog" Democrats, if up for re-election, will also be relieved of their strangle hold on hard working Americans. It is INSANE to believe that ANYONE will vote for continued tax relief for the mega-rich while the rest of us go begging. I hope folks won't be reeled into the Nader trick again either. HE is one of the main reasons we lost to the bushniks and cheneyites. Vote SELECTIVELY America. Become knowledgeable about who is FOR us and who is for the RICH. WE outnumber them. Don't let them get away with it again!



I think the vote fraud

I think the vote fraud machine will try to rig the midterms for the Republicans, and their media is paving the way. If the election is close, the Republicans will gain control of the House, but if it is not close they will not be able to pull off the heist. The real time to vote is for the most progressive candidate in the Democratic primary. That is when our votes can make the most real impact. A few more Conyers, Graysons and Kucinichs could make a big difference in the House.

I really want the Green Party to step up and grab a lot of the progressive vote in blue dog districts like mine, but I haven't seen much action from the Greens around here for this election. Democrats may not run a progressive candidate against our blue dog in the primary, and without a strong Green contender I'll have to hold my nose and vote for him in November in order to not make bad matters worse.



In 2008 a huge number of

In 2008 a huge number of people worked and voted for the election of Barack Obama and the Democrats. Those people thought they were working on something historic that would lead to change in the direction of the country. Since that election, Obama and the Democrats have been pissing in our faces. They have given hundreds of billions to the bankers who caused the horrible financial collapse in whose aftermath so many are struggling and suffering, making the banks whole on the bad loans they made in the bubble. Real people have found out that their homes, their largest investment, are worth about half what they thought in 2007, if that much. There has been no attempt to bring the bankers to court for the many scams and frauds and other crimes they committed in the process of wrecking the American economy. Obama and the Democrats gave us a "health care" bill written by and for the health-care corporations and the insurance companies, a bill that does nothing to address the worst problem associated with health-care in this country, its staggering cost. They are in the process of passing a financial industry reform bill that written by and for the big banks, a bill that will do little or nothing to prevent another economic melt-down caused by the same crooks. Now they are wailing that we've got to vote for them because the Repugs are so much worse.
A plague on both their houses. They are together and singly a plague on ours.



Mark Warner VA , vote for

Mark Warner VA , vote for his exit



Mark Warner D VA, voted

Mark Warner D VA, voted against TBTF, or Too Big Too Fail. Remember Paulson's no-strings attached give away? And the press that continues to imply TARP prevented the end of the universe?

In only one line, I blow away Pitt's latest liberal fart!



The other side only acts and

The other side only acts and sounds loonier, when it comes to policy they're all the same. One big corporate lovefest. FISA, earmarks, torture, NAFTA, bailouts, Iraq, Afghanistan, Guantanamo Bay, immigration reform, abuse of power, DADT, DOMA, and health care. Let's stop pretending health care isn't a farce, forcing people to buy insurance from crooks is not progressive, and neither is the elimination of all private as well as public insurance coverage for abortion. I'm done. I want off of this merry-go-round.



Vote Fraud Is Central - But

Vote Fraud Is Central - But Not In the general election - the game is fixed in the Primaries - it's easier - less scrutiny, smaller numbers, more 'pro-active' management. Our corrupt and stupid Congress just passed a bill expanding the power of the Federal Reserve Bank - that is far bigger than whether a Dem or Repub gets elected because both parties are working for the banks and the war machine. Pitt is a dinosaur, we all face extinction with him unless we ditch the Left/Right paradigm and instead focus on whether control is centralized or local. Ron Paul - who has been absolutely right in predicting the catastrophic outcomes of the policies enacted by both parties, as we have seen, and he is one of a handful of courageous souls in DC to speak truth to power - why doesn't Pitt support him? because he is a 'conservative'? Instead of focusing on what party someone is, focus on what they stand for - abolish the FRB, restore the Bill of Rights, end the wars, outlaw eVoting without a paper trail. I voted for Nader and do not regret it - I don't think anything would be much worse had McCain gotten in, as nutty as he is - we got our own War monger rattling the sabre at Iran and more. What's more, we really are barreling full bore towards becoming a Communist country - those on this board who think that's not such a bad thing need to take the time to visit with some immigrants from those places and get an education, if you weren't able to actually visit some of them as was able to in years past. You want to live a truly grim life as a society and institutionalize poverty and unfair division of resources, that's the short road to making things much worse than they are now. Read End The Fed - that's where our focus should be.



I hate to make this analogy,

I hate to make this analogy, but I'm curious of the anti-Democrat progressives out there - would you vote for the Democrats if they were running against the Nazi party? Yes Democrats are disgustingly too pro-corporate, but unlike the Republicans they at least attempt to consider liberal ideas. This does actually mean something, much in the same way that the rhetoric about liberty and justice that this country was based on meant something even though it has always been somewhat of a lie. A country, person or party which has a set of decent stated values, no matter how corrupted, can be shown where those values are corrupt and pushed in a better direction. A country, person or party country with no values or the wrong values will be incorrigible. The Democrats have failed many times at making progress, and have sometimes even set us back, but the Republicans have actively pushed for regression. There is a difference.

Republicans would like to make this a referendum on what they call "big government", but which really is the social contract. If they succeed it will not only strike a blow to the Democrats, it will strike a blow to the the very fabric of liberal philosophy in this country. The stakes couldn't be higher. So yes, we must grit our teeth and bear the thought of voting for the lesser evil once again, because the other evil is much worse. All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. And voting third party or not voting at all is the same as doing nothing.



The libertarian above

The libertarian above confuses communism with totalitarianism. What is actually total is the hegemonic reach of capitalism. It controls not only markets but the charade called politics.

Twain had it right: If voting actually changed anything they wouldn't let us do it. Forget about legislation and build an anti-capitalist social movement.



As much as I am

As much as I am dissappointed in the democrats, I'm voting for them because they keep the Republicans at bay.



It's suicide for the country

It's suicide for the country to let Republicans win by voting for candidates like Nader who had obviously little chance of winning. We saw what happened when voters went for Nader instead of Gore. We got Bush. And most Americans can't be convinced that Gore would have been the same as Bush. We must reform within the party. and within the country. I do think that we also need many voices outside the party to convince the entire population. What freaks me is that the majority population listens to mostly mainstream news.



The two sides are not simply

The two sides are not simply the same on policy. As Mr. Pitt notes:

"'Both parties are the same! In too many instances, the sentiment is all too accurate. Quite often, however, that complaint is a shortcut around actual thinking, and this situation makes that self-evident."

Just look at actual votes in Congress. Look how the Republicans have opposed health care reform, opposed the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Act, opposed financial reform, opposed the extension of unemployment benefits, opposed . . . well, everything decent!

Sometimes "progressives" sound paralyzed and utterly unprepared to face the forces arrayed against them. Sometimes they seem as simplistic in their "thinking" as their Ayn Rand-inspired enemies on the other side. "Capitalism is all evil!" "Capitalism is all good!" Both are mindless slogans.

With health care reform, let's not lose sight of the fact that it was Joe Lieberman who killed the public option, not Obama. Obama can't make it happen without the votes, and they weren't there. Let's also not lose sight of the fact that the bill, though flawed, does make tremendous improvements in terms of the number of Americans covered and in terms of curbing insurance abuses. It's not just a "gift" to the insurance industry, even if the industry was, of course, involved in crafting it. That's the way the system works--lobbyists and all. Don't expect a miracle. Get real.

Progressives have to work within the Democratic Party to pull it and the rest of the country further to the Left. There's no other realistic option out there in this system. You can throw away your votes on a third party that hasn't a snowball's chance in hell--but all that does in the end is help the Elephant.



Centralized Power Corrupts -

Centralized Power Corrupts - look at the FDA - it is a mouthpiece for Pharma and Monsanto - we have truly horrific medicine at wildly inflated prices because of the profound conflicts of interest that infest that corrupt administration - to crow about how great it was to pass univeresal 'health care' is nothing for the Dem's to be proud of - it will lead to more wide-spread death and suffering, while bankrupting us at the same time. Most Federal agencies are similarly crippled ethically and there is almost nothing good that has come out of this administration since taking office - and it is not because of the 'evil pubs' obstruction, either. Do you really think there are not enough Dems and Pubs who are fed up with the wars and the banking corruption to put down their other differences and come together to elect a Libertarian who is focused on restoring the Bill of Rights and ending the wars? That's how I'm going to vote, and it's worth the risk. And I'm not at all sure that Gore wouldn't have been as bad as W. A modern translation of Twain's comment above is 'if someone is actually running to help 'we the people' they won't get past the primary - that's where the fix occurs - if they get the Dem or Pub nomination, they're working for the same boss. Also, the voting machines are totally hackable - time to get rid of them.



You are preaching to the

You are preaching to the mostly still brainwashed by the left-right paradigm, "Bill O'Rights". As a result, I, almost completely, can't stand commenting here anymore. William Rivers Pitt is braindead. He and all those like him who are compromised and complicit in the truly one-party system that is enslaving and destroying us all, can't see the forest for the trees, and the bigger picture of what is really going on; and they think that all talk of what is really happening is supposedly "extremism", so you can't reach them. They will keep being complicit and continue to compromise with evil, and voting for "Democrats" who are selling them out, and setting up a socialist, totalitarian corporate-fascist, globalized militarized police state enslaving all of us, just as much as the "Republicans" are selling us out; and most of them won't realize the error of their ways until it is far too late. But I respect and admire your continuing to fulfill your duty to at least try to reach them in the face of the well-nigh insurmountable odds against being successful in attempting to do so.

Look at how Pitt believes that "thinking" like his is supposedly "intelligent thinking". When people like him really believe that moronic thinking is "intelligent thinking", you can't get through to them. They refuse to face that both of the main parties are capitalists, and that capitalism is completely evil, even though it has been more than proven time and time again, particularly in the last ten years or so. They will keep clutching to "holding their nose(s)" and voting for evil, and thus being complicit in all the evil those they voted for commit in office, while they also refuse to face that complicity. That is exactly how successful the indoctrination, conditioning, programming, brainwashing and "chemical-lobotomization" process has been. They will continue to believe and parrot lies, and be complicit in their own complete enslavement and destruction, until doomsday. Such Godless people are mostly irredeemable, and will never come around. But we've got to keep trying to get through to them, no matter how fruitless it is in most cases, because that is our responsibility.



Nothing wrong about voting

Nothing wrong about voting of course, but it's important to discover the unspeakable aspect of every icon, including the unspeakable about elections. What is this truth that can not be spoken of? That the course of political action results from reality, not from desire. So, for example, consider the political changes that were shaped by the gadget...or those emerging from the gulf blow-out.

New "ground", new reality, new perceptions - these cause change in the political arena. The pre-selection of clients staged on a ballot and the reality of what the elected can do - these create the political flux, not voting itself.



Another braindead comment,

Another braindead comment, Ivy. Nothing wrong with voting?! Stop being an ostrich, and pull your head out of the sand. The elections are all stolen now, particularly every single one since 2000, including the midterm (s)elections. But even if they weren't, every single candidate you vote for who continues, or would continue, the completely illegal, mass-murderous wars, the fraudulent "War (OF!) Terrorism", the dismantling and eradication of our Bill of Rights through such unconstitutional "laws" as the "U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act", and the destroying of the U.S. republic and its sovereignty, etc., makes you complicit in all of it and more.

Why can't people not understand and/or recognize complicity, and realize that if they are to be true citizens of the U.S. and the world, they can't be complicit in ANY of this evil whatsoever? By some "magical", "phantasmagorical" thinking, they convince themselves that somehow they're supposedly not complicit by voting for those who commit evil, and that somehow they are allegedly absolved of all complicity because they supposedly did the right thing by voting, even if they vote for the lesser of two or more evils who is, and/or are, still evil. Dear God, most people are insane! Please don't be complicit in ANY of the madness, people!



So, Anonymous on 7/17 at

So, Anonymous on 7/17 at 17:29 - you must be from Karl Rove's thoroughly toxic stable. Did you even read the article? Your jealousy is potently obvious. You engage in bashing the author, accusing him of doing exactly what you are doing. Bill O'Rights has his own agenda-pretty thoroughgoing Libertarian; whadayou got? Lazy vituperation . . . go back to Alternet; they have to put up with you. We don't.



No, Anonymous on 7/15 at

No, Anonymous on 7/15 at 20:38, your "out" is too easy, too lazy and too useless. If Obama had not been elected in 2008, there would have been no alternative to the already brain-dead John McCain. Think about how much worse Palin is than even Quail, hm? If we don't maintain a Democratic presidency in 2012, we will revert to someone like McCain that the GOP thinks they can handle (where were you 2001 to 2009?). We will start a third war with Iran; we will all start having to show our "papers" - especially if we registered Democrat - and the drilling and blowouts will continue until nothing at all lives in any ocean anywhere on the planet. Is that really what you want? Your Good Guy won't win this time. Once the Electoral College is abolished he (or she) will have a chance. Not before.