Sen. Bernie Sanders: Tax Deal a "Moral Outrage"
Tuesday 07 December 2010
by: Sen. Bernie Sanders, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) issued the following statement today on the agreement announced Monday between the White House and congressional Republicans:
In my view, it is a moral outrage that at a time when this country has a $13.8 trillion national debt, a collapsing middle class and a growing gap between the very rich and everybody else that the Republicans would deny extended unemployment benefits to 2 million workers who are desperately struggling to pay their bills and maintain their dignity. It is also beyond comprehension that the Republicans would hold hostage the entire middle class of this country so that millionaires and billionaires would receive huge tax breaks. In my view, that is not what this country is about and it is not what the American people want to see. Our job is to save the disappearing middle class, not lower taxes for people who are already extraordinarily wealthy and increase the national debt that our children and grandchildren would have to pay.
The immediate political task in front of us is to rally the American people so that in the next several weeks we can find at least a few Republicans who will join us in saying no to increasing the deficit by giving tax breaks to the wealthy and no to holding the unemployed and the middle class hostage. I believe that we have the American people on our side on this issue. My office, and I come from a small state, has received more than 600 calls today, 99 percent of them in opposition to this so-called compromise that the president negotiated with the Republicans.
I will do everything in my power to stand up for the American middle class and defeat this agreement.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
I suppose Mr Sanders and
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 16:11 — Anonymous (not verified)I suppose Mr Sanders and those who agree with him would rather that the people who will be helped because of the unemployment extension and the tax breaks given to the NOT so rich just go to hades, eh? This agreement is better than being stuck in filibuster hell for months while the Republicans refuse to allow anything to pass.
@Anonymous-- And how is that
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 16:23 — Gwydion Frost (not verified)@Anonymous--
And how is that any different than what the Republicans did the last two years...?
Obama should let the Bush
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 16:58 — Lawrence Seib (not verified)Obama should let the Bush tax cuts die, along with the name. Then next year, propose tax cuts, that just happen to favor the middle class. Just let the Republicans try to filibuster that. Also, let them try to keep killing the extensions of the unemployment benefits, they are going to look like monsters if we bring it up four or five times.
Larry
BERNIE SANDERS FOR PRESIDENT
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 19:07 — Anonymous (not verified)BERNIE SANDERS FOR PRESIDENT 2012!
Thank you, Bernie, for
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 19:52 — Bite (not verified)Thank you, Bernie, for speaking out clearly on this issue. Wishy washy talk from the White House and then the predicted getting on all fours and taking it in the behind is what the Obama administration is about. Needless to say, your voice, your position, your passion for those less fortunate are a blessing to the nation. We thank you for standing up to Obama, The Republican.
more 2 party, screw the
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 20:51 — Anonymous (not verified)more 2 party, screw the people, especially minorities, baloney. They probably laugh at us "the people" in private. Obama, Bush, it makes no difference.
First of all, it's peeps
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 21:43 — Anonymous (not verified)First of all, it's peeps grossing over 250 grand, not millionaires, and second of all, just where do u think the privatsector jobs, which don't cost u a cent, unlike govt jobs, comes from? The wealthy peeps willing to risk it all to start and work their companies
Sen. Sanders is correct, he
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 22:13 — Anonymous (not verified)Sen. Sanders is correct, he is honest,
and he is courageous in this and other matters.
SenSanders =
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 23:05 — Anonarcmous (not verified)SenSanders = right:PresObama-Rep/Tax/$/deal IS NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR AMERICA!! How dare he mention a 'political fight' choicw when people are fighting for their lives--I guess he too is out of touch. Velma an many no longer stand with him--exhausted.Peeps-market/private sector jobs/growth/trickle down mythology: private sector jobs cost a whole lot--and not that much is risked when you take out a loan and keep your private assets separate.
Sanders is what we thought
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 23:33 — Anonymous (not verified)Sanders is what we thought Obama would be. Obama is Bush, just less honest.
"I was responsible and I
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 23:45 — Anonymous (not verified)"I was responsible and I paid my mortgage. I paid all my car loans. I saved for my children's education. I invested in stocks and bonds instead of taking vacations, buying X-Boxes and fancy cars, the latest high-tech cell phones, etc."
I was responsible too. I worked HARD in school, to the point my parents yelled at me to STOP studying. I achieved a place in an excellent school. I spent responsibly, I cringed any time I had to use a credit card. Then my stepfather died and my mother got cancer while I was still in school with a double major. The debt skyrocketed, I had to take out student loans which were privatized by the republicans, and had no consumer protections on them like federal loans. As I graduated, my mother miraculously recovered, then the economy crashed, the middle class's reward for deregulation allowing rampant corporate malfeasance. I was unable to get a job, but unlike federal loans, the new republican variety didn't have financial hardship protection.
I finally did get a job, but now my credit is in shambles. I worked damn hard, I followed the rules, and I'm asserting to you that wealth and financial status are as much a function of luck as they are of work ethic.
Anonarcmous: you're almost
Tue, 12/07/2010 - 23:51 — Anonymous (not verified)Anonarcmous:
you're almost there.
The reason "supply side" doesn't work is supply does not drive the economy. If it did, the soviets would have won.
Employees are an EXPENSE, a cost of production. The forces of the market act to drive that expense down. Unless faced with the utter requirement to hire, employers won't hire. Unless faced with the utter requirement to pay a living wage, they won't pay a living wage.
And when they do feel compelled to hire, they will make the room in their budgets to do so, taxes, debts, and all else be damned.
DEMAND drives the markets, DEMAND creates jobs, DEMAND is boosted when you give cash to those who most need it, rather than those who hoard it in offshore accounts.
"where do u think the
Wed, 12/08/2010 - 02:48 — Giovanna Lepore (not verified)"where do u think the privatsector jobs, which don't cost u a cent, unlike govt jobs, comes from? " Oh yes, we know Wed, 12/08/2010 - 02:43 — Anonymous: they come from China and to a lesser extent from India made possible by the folks that brought you regressive taxation and offshore tax havens. When the wealthy pay substantially less (let's not forget that there is also caps on taxable income) than the working class we as a nation have a problem. Now if they payed into the system even equally with NO caps the extra money could be used to create decent paying jobs for the masses of people including the unemployed.
There is absolutely nothing 'grand" about the Grand Old Party which would rather see the nation and its not-so-rich become devastated by endless militarism and tax breaks for the wealthy and nothing "democratic" in The Democratic Party which sells out to corporate interests. The wealthy do not create jobs--not here in the USA, they export them overseas-- and in the few instances where they do they are low paying. If you are not going to redistribute the wealth then redistribute the land so people have a fighting chance at survival.
Sooner or later a "green" socialism must come if we are going to survive.
That's the problem Bernie!
Wed, 12/08/2010 - 15:55 — Steve Consilvio (not verified)That's the problem Bernie! Your last line says it all.
You want to stand up for the middle class, and not for the poor. So why is middle-class greed any better than upper-class greed?
04:45 — Anonymous - You
Wed, 12/08/2010 - 18:12 — Anonymous (not verified)04:45 — Anonymous - You are absolutely right to call out D'Angelo above regarding his sanctimonious, and yet simplistic mantra for a very limited and elementary definition of "responsibility."
As your post suggests, his brand is obviously callous and lacks any depth of concern for the very basics of decency and humanity.
look folks bernie is the
Thu, 12/09/2010 - 22:36 — tell the truth (not verified)look folks bernie is the socialist eqiuavelent
of arlen spector and john mc cain . both men(?)
talked a tough game their entire careers in
politics and then folded and did as ordered
by the man behind the curtain! spector made
it his enduring legacy and it helped force his retirement
as a senator! mc cain is still there because jd
whatever his primary opponent was regarded as
the dumbest man in congress and the dnc didn't
help fund his democratic opponent in the arizona race.
in a day or two all the real players will tell everyone
what to do and that will be the end of this
charade! i'm open and willing to take bets. anyone?
care to make a nice friendly wager? please don't
i will collect my winnings! bernie will shut up
and do as ordered. we miss russ feingold already.
this would have been a place for him to do some real
mucking up the works but he is tired of all this!