Short Tales From Election Day Bizarro World
Thursday 20 May 2010
by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Sunfrog1)
Voters in Arkansas, Kentucky and Pennsylvania went to the polls on Tuesday in one of the first big events of the upcoming 2010 midterm election season, so of course, the "mainstream" news media absolutely lathered itself in The Stupid. Before we get into the freshet of gibberish that came with the coverage of Tuesday's vote, let's get our facts straight first.
In Pennsylvania, Sen. Arlen Specter, a man widely known for changing his mind 17 times before choosing which color socks to put on in the morning, who became a Democrat last year in a desperate attempt to avoid a pre-midterm defeat, failed to sidestep catastrophe and was thrashed by Rep. Joe Sestak by a margin of 54-46. Also in Pennsylvania, the Democrats were able to hold on to the late Representative Murtha's seat.
In Kentucky, a Tea Party avatar named Rand Paul absolutely obliterated his GOP-backed opponent, Trey Grayson, who only managed to garner 35 percent of the vote despite enjoying the full support of GOP Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and every other big gun the RNC could bring to bear. Also in Kentucky, a three-way Republican House primary went badly for the national Republican Party when their chosen candidate, Jeff Reetz, came in third with an anemic 17 percent.
In Arkansas, Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln's erstwhile attempt to appear progressive with several right-voting millstones swinging freely from her neck fell short; the oft-Bush-supporting senator failed by a pretty vast margin to garner the requisite 50 percent required to avoid a runoff election, so we'll be hearing about her again in the near future.
There were a few other races here and there on Tuesday, but none have been crowned with the title of "bellweather" like the Specter, Murtha, Paul and Lincoln races have been. Apparently, these races amounted to a huge pile of "Tea" leaves - pardon the pun - that the "mainstream" media has been happily rolling in like a dog in its own doo.
To be fair, the Big News people, who have spent the last year massaging the idea that the Tea Party movement is a real thing worthy of attention, got one part right: the Tea Party is for real. Not really, not in any larger national sense, but they are certainly a force within the Republican Party now, and boy, oh boy, it is going to get wildly entertaining from here. While the Tea Party itself is largely a creation of Big Media's desire to apply "balance" where none actually exists, like it or not, their focus on this ridiculous phenomenon has borne some bitter fruit for the GOP. Rachel Sladja of Talking Points Memo reported it thusly:
In Kentucky, the national Republican Party backed the wrong candidate in not one but two primaries. The Democrats managed to hold on to Rep. John Murtha's old seat in Pennsylvania. And while Sen. Arlen Specter is no longer a Republican, his defeat by Rep. Joe Sestak in the Democratic primary means the GOP nominee will face, perhaps, a much stronger opponent than the beleaguered Specter would have been.
It was a rough night for the Republicans.
No one suffered the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune more than Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. His hand-picked candidate was trounced by tea partier Rand Paul in the Kentucky Senate primary. McConnell's pick, Trey Grayson, only got 35 percent of the vote despite his party's backing. Grayson even lost in his home county.
In a smaller, but no less telling, Louisville House district primary last night, NRCC choice Jeff Reetz came in third in a primary to challenge Rep. John Yarmuth. Reetz only got 17 percent of the vote.
In Pennsylvania, Democrats managed to deny Republicans what would have been a symbolic taking of the 12th district seat once held by the late Rep. John Murtha. There, Mark Critz (D) narrowly won the special election over Tim Burns (R), 53 percent to 45 percent with 99 percent of precincts reporting. Burns reportedly called Critz to concede before the Associated Press had even called the race.
It's difficult to argue with this perspective. In Florida, Nevada and, now, Kentucky, the far-right, base-crazy monster that was cooked up in national GOP test tubes over the last 20 years has finally crashed out of the laboratory and gone slobbering and snarling down their electoral Main Street. The GOP does not win statewide or national elections without the combination of their social-voter Taliban-Christians and their tax-cutting, rich-people wing coming together to pull the right-side handle. For a time, this was a match made in heaven for the Republicans, but now the GOP base is out of its cage and not following the program, and all of a sudden, a lot of Republican electoral eggs are getting scrambled. If the base deserts the party for a bunch of candidates who can't hope to compete against well-funded Democrats in general elections, well, that's the ballgame for them.
But then, there's the other side of the coin, i.e., The Stupid, in this instance represented by Charles Babington of The Associated Press. The following lines were actually printed by the AP on Wednesday:
Voters rejected one of President Barack Obama's hand-picked candidates and forced another into a runoff, the latest sign that his political capital is slipping beneath a wave of anti-establishment anger.
Sen. Arlen Specter became the fourth Democrat in seven months to lose a high-profile race despite the president's active involvement, raising doubts about Obama's ability to help fellow Democrats in this November's elections.
The first three candidates fell to Republicans. But Specter's loss Tuesday to Rep. Joe Sestak in Pennsylvania's Democratic senatorial primary cast doubts on Obama's influence and popularity even within his own party - and in a battleground state, no less.
Of course, it's possible that Democrats will fare better than expected this fall. And there's only so much that any president can do to help other candidates, especially in a non-presidential election year.
Still, Obama's poor record thus far could hurt his legislative agenda if Democratic lawmakers decide they need some distance from him as they seek re-election in what is shaping up as a pro-Republican year. Conversely, it might embolden Republican lawmakers and candidates who oppose him.
Let's all take a breath and enjoy that first sentence. "Barack Obama's hand-picked candidates," the report said.
Wha?
Blanche Lincoln took a seat in the House of Representatives in 1993, and has been a member of the Senate since 1998, making her a Democratic officeholder for the last 17 years. Hard as it is to believe, the premise that Lincoln was a "hand-picked candidate" of the president is less preposterous than the claim that Specter should enjoy the same designation. Specter, who switched parties from Democrat to Republican in 1965 in order to run for district attorney in Philadelphia, has been a senator since 1980. That's 30 years in office, and, yet, according to the AP, he was "hand-picked" to run this time around like some fresh-faced neophyte who has never been to the dance.
There's a moral in this nonsense somewhere, and here's what I think it is: ignore everyone. Maybe TPM is right, and Tuesday was a debacle for the GOP. Maybe the AP is right, and this last vote somehow translates into disaster for Obama and the Democrats. The reality, however, is that all these races were local and inter-party, subject to a wide swath of circumstances that don't translate into any sort of national Rorschach blot to be read for the edification of the masses. I mean, really. Rand Paul won by running against Mitch McConnell, who wasn't even running for anything.
There are five months to go before the midterms go down for real, and a million things could happen to change the dynamic. What happened on Tuesday was interesting and entertaining and utterly devoid of context, thanks in no small part to the machinations of Big Media.
Go back to what you were doing. There really isn't anything to see here.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Blanche Lincoln is the
Thu, 05/20/2010 - 15:51 — Anonymous (not verified)Blanche Lincoln is the lowest form of political scum that there is.
It's time for her to go back to Stuttgart and stay there!
Here in Australia, on PBS
Thu, 05/20/2010 - 16:24 — Dr Susan Moore (not verified)Here in Australia, on PBS NewsHour delayed broadcast, we briefly saw and heard the Kentucky candidates. Fortunately my phone didn't ring while this was going on. I am not exactly enamoured of Tea Party shenanigans, and I don't know where Rand Paul stands in relation to the worst ones. Far more interesting to me from this distance is the fact that he is Ron Paul's son. In America for the first time in 16 years in 2007, for my 50th high school reunion in NJ, I saw and heard Ron Paul in Maine and liked him.
In the Pennsylvania Senate
Thu, 05/20/2010 - 16:38 — Anonymous (not verified)In the Pennsylvania Senate race, more than one woman voted against Specter because of the way he treated Anita Hill during the Clarence Thomas hearings.
alaugh Was watching MSMBC
Thu, 05/20/2010 - 18:36 — davehaze (not verified)alaugh Was watching MSMBC Whitehouse commentator, an instantly forgettable guy, youngish, double chin, silly trimmed beard, opine that now knowing the results of the few primaries it was possible to predict that the Republicans could take back the House and Senate in the fall! Said with a straight face. As if he knew what he was talking about. As if he was a journalist. As if he had used logic to come to this conclusion. As if journalism was objective. As if he was any more reliable than a five buck fortune teller. As if he didn't think he needed to say these things to advance to David Gregory's job one day.
It's all sound and fury ---
Thu, 05/20/2010 - 22:06 — Don (not verified)It's all sound and fury --- signifying nothing!
WHY is it called 'MAINSTREAM
Thu, 05/20/2010 - 22:55 — Anonymous (not verified)WHY is it called 'MAINSTREAM MEDIA' here, there or anywhere.
THERE IS ONLY CONSERVATIVE GLOBAL CORPORATE MEDIA or VERY CONSERVATIVE GLOBAL CORPORATE MEDIA expressing itself from one of just a few of the huge, gigantic GLOBAL CORPORATIONS which now own almost all Media Enterprises in America...
So, from now on, and just be 'correct'.., its not 'MAINSTREAM MEDIA'... Its simply 'GLOBAL CORPORATE MEDIA' expressing its 'agendized' newz and opinions...
Davehaze: I think the guy
Thu, 05/20/2010 - 23:55 — S.O. Teric (not verified)Davehaze: I think the guy you're describing is Chuck Todd. He was the one in 2008 who kept saying that the numbers showed Obama would get the nomination over Hillary Clinton. His colleagues kept kissing his butt saying "Chuck, you're a wizard with numbers." It went to his head. So now he thinks anti-incumbent fever is sweeping the nation. The elections last Tuesday didn't confirm or dispel his thesis: but he's hanging onto to it because he thinks he's a genius. What he is is a guy who makes me change the channel every time he's brought on to play "the expert," which he ain't. It's Washington. And what it does to you. And now Rand Paul has stuck his foot in his mouth with his quibbling over the Civil Rights Act. Other TRUTHOUT articles have explained this libertarian/republican/conservative idea about hoisting individual rights above social rights. It appears to be a philosophy. It is not. It is a rationalization to stop regulation of the Wall Street thieves and the BP despoilers and looters and the corporate brigands.
Excellent as usual, Mr.
Fri, 05/21/2010 - 00:28 — flo chapgier (not verified)Excellent as usual, Mr. Rivers Pitt,
and...
funny too !!
:))
Do you think these primaries
Fri, 05/21/2010 - 02:25 — Anonymous (not verified)Do you think these primaries will lead to stoppage of the $3billion per day-- laundered thru the "wars"?
Open season on incumbents.
Fri, 05/21/2010 - 09:05 — Anonymous (not verified)Open season on incumbents. That's what it really means.
The tea party thing is quite universal. Assuming that the GOP was 95% corrupt and the Dems were perhaps 70% corrupt, the Tea party movement is there to chuck out the lying pigs of either party. November should bring some solid gains to the Dems, but NOT the entrenched DNC. The dem-repub balance of the congress is not an issue at all in this election. The real issue is crook removal.
As an ex-patriot US citizen
Fri, 05/21/2010 - 09:14 — Anonymous (not verified)As an ex-patriot US citizen living outside of the country for the past two years, the States appear more and more like watching the inmates of an insane asylum through a glass door. We are allowing oligarchs to steal every last crumb of civil societies wealth and openly manage the body (corpse?) politic in their narrow interests. We are poisoning a huge, pristine marine ecosystem and we are busy invading other country's to further a corporate agenda... It goes on and on.
Then we have this little side show from the "GLOBAL CORPORATE MEDIA" trying to (and often-times succeeding) convince people that this drivel is actually important and will make a difference in their lives.
Gotta say, looks pretty weird when you step outside of it.
There's plenty of
Fri, 05/21/2010 - 09:54 — Sharonsj (not verified)There's plenty of anti-incumbent fever, but the outcomes still depend on the candidates, not necessarily the parties i.e. corporate Dems are getting thrown out but if they are running against truly crazy Republicans, they keep the seat.
Also, the tea partiers (and unfortunately the progressives) are too small in numbers to elect anyone by themselves. All the people who voted for Rand Paul equal about half the people who voted Democrat. When more of Paul's crazy ideas come out, it will be even harder for him to win.
What gets the
Fri, 05/21/2010 - 10:19 — PublicAdvocate.com (not verified)What gets the establishmentarian dems all in a snit is the entry of any 3rd party making it into the political ring of BS.
expat - it looks just as
Fri, 05/21/2010 - 14:00 — radline9 (not verified)expat - it looks just as weird to me from the inside.