Skewing the Health Care Debate
Thursday 25 February 2010
by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: jgarber, lepiaf.geo)
President Obama met on Thursday with the glitterati of Capitol Hill in a much-ballyhooed confab on health care reform, and more specifically, the health of his current health care reform proposal. I was supposed to use this space to describe the details of that conference, to get into the nitty-gritty details of who said what, who made the most sense and What It All Means in the end. My intention was to do another running diary on the actual proceedings, but I couldn't do that, and for one reason: I didn't tune in to C-SPAN.
Instead, I spent my day oscillating between MSNBC, CNN and even Fox, not only to see what was happening at the conference, but to get a sense of how the three big cable news networks were covering the affair. I tired quickly of Fox, for all the oft-repeated reasons, and began flipping back and forth between the other two cans of alphabet soup. Every once in a while, CNN and MSNBC deigned to show footage of the actual event, but a majority of their air time was devoted to giving right-wing anti-reform mouth-breathing cretins free reign to spew their nonsense to all points on the compass.
Press play to listen to author William Rivers Pitt read his column, " Skewing the Health Care Debate":
Press play to listen to author William Rivers Pitt read his column, " Skewing the Health Care Debate":
Rather than go into all the gory details of the incredibly slanted display put forth by those networks, I believe a short personal story is necessary. Most intelligent people instinctively distrust what they see on television, but that often fails to disrupt the impact these networks have on our national conversation. You should know who and what you're watching, and I was fortunate (or unfortunate) enough to experience the reality of the medium that so thoroughly bulldozed the health care conversation that took place behind the media blinders on Thursday.
As I was flipping around between the cable networks, trying to find one that didn't have Ben Stein and his neo-con nonsense front and center, a memory resurfaced of a personal experience I had with MSNBC. It was the winter of 2003, and the Bush administration's hard push for war in Iraq was well underway. My book, "War on Iraq," had been out since the previous fall, making the argument (correctly, as it turns out) that there were no WMD in Iraq, no connections to al-Qaeda or 9/11, and so there was no reason to invade.
I was driving home from work one day when my cell phone rang. I had only recently purchased the thing, my first, and was as ignorant at that time of the dangers of talking on the phone while driving as everyone else. Add to this the fact that my car was a stick shift, and I was smoking a cigarette, and I was entering the multi-laned quasi-intersectioned nightmare of roadwork behind Mt. Auburn Hospital in Cambridge, Massachusetts. I put the butt in the ashtray, downshifted, and answered the call while swerving into the confused welter of traffic along the Charles River.
On the line was a producer for an MSNBC news show; she told me she had read my book and really enjoyed it, and was inviting me to come on the network to talk about Iraq. Specifically, she wanted me to come on and talk about Hans Blix and his weapons inspectors, who at that point had been in Iraq for less than 100 hours. They hadn't found anything yet, but were still looking. Very specifically, she wanted me to come on MSNBC and say that Blix and his inspectors were doing a terrible job, that Iraq definitely had WMD and 9/11 connections, and that Bush should blow off Blix and do whatever the hell he wants.
I very nearly put my car into the river. You couldn't really have read my book, I said to this MSNBC producer, because if you had, you'd know that the very last thing in the world I would ever say on television or anywhere else was the inspectors were not doing their jobs and that war in Iraq was a necessity. Let's allow Blix and the inspectors to do their jobs, I said, so maybe we can avoid a costly and unnecessary war that would certainly kill thousands and thousands of people.
The MSNBC producer chortled - literally, a deep, throaty too-many-cigarettes chortle - and hung up on me.
In retrospect, there was nothing at all surprising about that incident. MSNBC is owned by General Electric, one of the largest defense contractors on the face of the Earth. They made billions off the invasion and occupation, with their pet network MSNBC cheerleading the war from the beginning. Once public opinion turned against the war, MSNBC swung away from their support and started acting like they'd been on the right side of the issue from the start. Why not? GE had already made its money off the war, and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future, so their flip-flop didn't really matter a damn.
What does this have to do with the cable news networks and their deliberate obfuscation of Thursday's health care debate?
Money. Again.
General Electric is deeply invested in the health care industry, specifically in the manufacture and sale of very expensive equipment to be used during very expensive medical tests. The proper, more cost-conscious application of these tests has been targeted by virtually every health care reform proposal proffered by the Democrats since this whole debate began. Try to contain your shock that MSNBC might do the bidding of its parent company by trying to crush any actual debate on the subject. The last thing General Electric wants is to see Obama's health care reform become a reality, because it would cost them money. Just as GE did when it wanted to make money off Bush's war in Iraq, it was manifestly obvious that GE used MSNBC to skew the health care debate in their favor. That's just how they roll. I've seen it with my own two eyes, and again, in retrospect, it should surprise absolutely nobody.
Think the other networks, and their parent companies, are any different? You wouldn't if you watched their despicable performances on Thursday.
This is our "news" media. Never forget.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
After 9-11 I went seriously
Thu, 02/25/2010 - 19:46 — Anonymous (not verified)After 9-11 I went seriously online for the first time in my life to find out what´s going on in this country. It didn´t long to find out - took a little longer to sink in. Finally I couldn´t stand the agitprop 24 hours a day: ¨Is al-queda recruiting in your high school?¨ I spent some time in a country that was not the US nor the UK and thought maybe this has played out. I came back to find the same people and family members I knew profoundly transformed, weak, incapable of listening for more than a few seconds to anyone who doesn´t reflect what they´ve heard for years by then. I found previous friendships trashed, professional relationships trivialized, and honesty as rare as orange roughy. A serious conversation can only go about a couple rounds before they lower their heads and shake them sadly. All that really excites them is to moan and whine about their private misfortunes. Obama can say the sky is blue and up blast a thousand rabid differing opinions screaming that no one knows what color the sky is and no government official should stay in office for another second if he is that delirious with power. And the whiners nod their heads. Americans don´t have a sense of self. They don´t have a community to fall back on - they have only the agitprop to keep them ¨in the loop.¨ We all need to bring Franklin, Whitman, Emerson, Thoreau back into our intellectual lives to get a sense of real independence and identity and how ridiculous the video heads are.
Brainstem Media, indeed!
Thu, 02/25/2010 - 20:06 — Vic Anderson (not verified)Brainstem Media, indeed!
Well, schmuck, waht do you
Thu, 02/25/2010 - 23:09 — Anonymous (not verified)Well, schmuck, waht do you expect from our
schmuck from Chicago? We get the Chicago
shuffle , that's it. Want something different?
We need a new turn of the century progressive
upheaval to throw all the bastards out, but
first rupert, first and before all else, get rupert
kicked all the way back to some dust ridden
shit hole in Australia where he belongs.
Aussies! listen up! bring this bastard son of yours,
rupert, home and chastise him with 800 years
of outback!
And I thought it was just me
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 00:13 — completmayhem (not verified)And I thought it was just me thinking CNN seemed to spend an awful lot of time talking about how the Republicans performance was so great, right after they would take a break the minute a Democrat was given time to make his/her point. I'm shocked they actually showed Obama's closing statement without going to a commercial and then have one of their "brilliant" talking heads continue to frame the debate as the healthcare reform bill had been ripped to shreds by the amazing debating skills of the other party and it was now a dead deal.
WRP: I well appreciate your
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 02:28 — Joel R. (not verified)WRP: I well appreciate your assessment of NBC and its role as a subsidiary of war-profiteering GE. I also agree that daytime MSNBC news coverage tends to be slanted to a conservative (or, more precisely, pseudo-centrist) vantage point. But give MSNBC some credit. If you tune in after 5 p.m., you'll find some of the best liberal news commentary on television (the rest of the best being mostly Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert). Even disregarding the fact that Chris Matthews often blows in both directions (lately, however, he's been left of Obama in quite commendable ways), you also get Ed Schultz, Keith Olbermann, and Rachel Maddow, all of whom are as outspokenly critical of the conservative establishment and Beltway newspeak as anyone on TV. Keep in mind the folks who were bumped from MSNBC (Tucker Carlson!) or from the evening slot (Joe Scarborough) to make room for the liberal hosts. It took a certain civic courage on NBC's part (or perhaps just a wish to attract an untapped demographic) to move MSNBC in this direction. Whatever the network's motive, the end result has been terrific, and I, for one, as a longtime reader of liberal blogs, am grateful for it. I share your anxieties over the political bleakness of our era, especially in the reigning news media, but don't undervalue what MSNBC
has accomplished. Tune in after 5 p.m. sometime and see for yourself , because your column makes it seem a if you haven't.
"Health is wealth" is known
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 05:50 — Anonymous (not verified)"Health is wealth" is known to all and everyone wants good health. So, Let us build a food habit discipline, keep pace with work, rest and or exercise to Achieve good health, The ultimate wealth.
The Health Dude
When you buy a whole life
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 06:14 — CheapLifeCover (not verified)When you buy a whole life insurance, you have many advantages that will help you in many ways. These may be the cost, coverage duration and the value of the cash that you pay for your whole life insurance policy.
Cheap Life Cover Online
Of course, the only thing
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 07:54 — Anonymous (not verified)Of course, the only thing more annoying than the obviously slanted TV coverage is its simpering sister sycophants in the written media, like this tripe here.
Maybe MSNBC and others do slant coverage to favor republicans.
So what?
The real story is how Truthout and everyone else continue to believe or pretend that there is any substantive difference between the parties. Gay marriage, abortion, school prayer...these may be differences, but no matter--
TRILLIONS continue to migrate upstream to the with speed that would shame a spawning salmon, if there were any salmon left to spawn.
You are part of the apparatus, and your article is a disservice to your responsibility as a journalist.
Just quit.
I really worry when there's
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 08:36 — Anonymous (not verified)I really worry when there's no footnotes or competent analysis. I put forward 'stupid' as the biggest source of medical waste.
(see smoking, drinking, trauma centers have 68% uninsured in them) and...
file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Owner/Desktop/My%20Documents/Phamacology/druid/anna%20prayer/Pygame%201.8%20Documents%20and%20Examples/examples/aaa/never%20do%20well%20project/Medication%20Nonadherence%20%20An%20Unrecognized%20Cardiovascular%20Risk%20Factor.htm
and look up term 'limited health literacy'
Sources say it's 40-50 billion a year on JUST stupid (factoring out smoking/drinking/preventable disease). That dwarfs all the waste in studies/tests.
Wonder why nobody is mentioning that ?... could it be that everyone INCLUDING THIS SITE is pandering to stupid ?
As far as I have seen,
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 10:49 — Anonymous (not verified)As far as I have seen, everyone is in agreement that the main two things that are contributing to kill America's Health care system are the skyrocketing costs of care for SMOKERS and OBESE people. Why should those that try and take care of their bodies pay towards this? SMOKERS and the OBESE should not be getting compensation for all the resulting diseases they suffer from due to their irresponsible lifestyles!
GOP members lying and
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 11:12 — cheaptalker (not verified)GOP members lying and whingeing with their talking points became bearable when accompanied by the Democratic responses and refutations. 7 hours listening to adulatory spin with the demagoguery and missing good bits of the exchanges? You, sir, are a glutton for punishment.
P.S. I hope that you have kicked the cigarette habit to the curb. Heartless Republicans, by their nature, avoid one of the hazards of smoking. They only risk their lungs, eyes, and manhood.
I am really offended by 4:09
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 16:16 — Jan Boudart (not verified)I am really offended by 4:09 Anonymous (unverified). You'll notice that it does not use it's name. (I'm Jan Boudart.) Lately, it seems like all the comments on Truthout are prefaced by someone like that who gets their vulgarity addiction off by saying derogatory and revolting things about the writer of the article.
Can Truthout not afford to have a human being monitor the comments so that such will be screened out?
I remain impressed by Mr.
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 17:00 — Tom Camfield (not verified)I remain impressed by Mr. Pitt's column of a few days ago (titled when it appeared Feb. 21 in the Seattle Times "Don't confuse them with the facts"). In part it read:
"Increasingly, we are a people estranged from critical thinking, divorced from logic, alienated from even objective truth. We admit no ideas that do not confirm us, hear no voices that do not echo us, sift out all information that does not validate what we wish to believe . . . any people thus handicapped sow the seeds of their own decline; they respond to the world as they wish it were rather than to the world as it is . . ."
I find this to apply particularly to Republicans, on matters such as health care, global warming, the economy . . . what have you.
Jan Boudart is right on. In
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 17:07 — Tom Camfield (not verified)Jan Boudart is right on. In this and other forums, nearly all contributors utilize the anonymity of cute little nicknames. Their wearing of such masks pretty much indicates the value of their comments.
Coarse and rude language also certainly is no indication of intelligence.
It's all BS, this so-called
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 21:32 — badbf (not verified)It's all BS, this so-called health care debate. No one wants to confront the reality which is that people's health in this country HAS to be a for-profit industry which makes yet MORE money for the few at the expense of the many. Even the new "reform" bill does really nothing to get the profiteers out of the equation.
It might do a few things to correct certain injustices, but it leaves the money-grubbers in FULL control.
Why can't we learn something from other countries who insure EVERYONE at a much lower cost? Because in this God-forsaken country, the power and the money are the rulers of the game!
Geezzz; I thought it was
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 22:04 — Union Guy (not verified)Geezzz; I thought it was just me feeling like we were all getting the "corporate mushroom" version of this so called health care reform...
I was feeling it as I read this piece because I too was doing the channel surfing, and feeling sick every time it hit Fox with that B/S Propaganda Agenda they put out.
Thanks For An Insightful Contribution...
All this discussion is
Fri, 02/26/2010 - 22:23 — An (not verified)All this discussion is ridiculous. We should just extedn Medicare to everyone. For those under 65 who say this is Socialism, I say, will you turn down Medicare when you reach 65? and for those already 65 or older, I say, "have you turned down Medicare?" Why is Socilaism OK for those over 65 , but not for those under? And for those who say Medicare operates in the Red, let me remind you that if Medicare funds had not been raided for other government expenses, it would be in the black.
Why didn't CSPAN cover the
Sat, 02/27/2010 - 00:03 — Jane Teaford (not verified)Why didn't CSPAN cover the Health Care Summit as it had been advertised that they would? I had the same reaction that William Rivers Pitt did about the skewed coverage that was available.
"Why didn't CSPAN cover the
Sat, 02/27/2010 - 02:25 — Don Tingle (not verified)"Why didn't CSPAN cover the Health Care Summit . . ?" They did, on C-SPAN3, C-SPAN Radio and C-SPAN Live Streaming on-line. For future reference, bookmark http://www.c-span.org/Watch/C-SPAN3.aspx.
02-27-0323 An is right. Why
Sat, 02/27/2010 - 10:18 — Anonarcmous (not verified)02-27-0323 An is right. Why can't PresObama say the simple, the observed & obvious & get this done as he promised?How can anyone take the 'let's take healthcare reform in increments 'seriously? like McCain & Boehner--you don't build your house or plan anything else in increments unless you are some poor slobb immigrant who can only afford to build one room @ a time & add on so everything is mismatched!!What a crock from leader???
I watched, was bored, and
Sat, 02/27/2010 - 10:43 — Dr. Stephen R. Keister (not verified)I watched, was bored, and quite angry about the half screens and talking heads interjected by the networks. Happily I did not come across Ben Stein. I adhered to MSNBC, in spite of knowing the G.E. connection, in view of the fact that I do watch their generally progressive news weekday evenings. Keith Olberman surely gave one of the most compelling statements for health care I have seen when discussing his father's terminal illness.
As you, who read my column on The rag Blog know, I am a member of PNHP and a single payer advocate. I fear that somekind of absurdity is going to pass the congress and I do not agree with Paul Krugman that anything will do--tho I am a great respecter of Dr. Krugman. Any bill must include anti-trust legislation, be financed by requiring the wealthy to pay their share,do away with Medicare Part D and Medicare Advantage, provide fair pricing and coverage for those with pre-existing conditions, include a Medicare for all provision, aqnd include provisions for training more primary care physicians and paying them a decent income.
Those so afraid of
Sat, 02/27/2010 - 12:39 — CB (not verified)Those so afraid of government running health care are too ignorant to realize that the health care industry is already running government.
CB - right on! They run the
Sat, 02/27/2010 - 18:12 — Anonymous (not verified)CB - right on! They run the government at a ratio of 8 to 1. Eight lobbyists for every Congress person and Senator on the Hill.
Health insurance companies run the show! They decide what will be covered, how many and which treatments, where you will go for treatment, and which providers (doctors) are allowed to practice - through the credentialing process of their provider networks. They also decide who will die by dropping the sickest people from their rolls. Everything the Right says will happen with "socialized" medicine has already happened in the private market.
I not only watched the whole
Sat, 02/27/2010 - 20:18 — RWNorman (not verified)I not only watched the whole event during the live broadcast on C-Span3, but then watched the whole thing again on the rebroadcast in case I missed something (hey, there are necessities that require attention), and then put on one more rebroadcast whilst I was doing other things around the house.
In case no one remembers, the Republicans were a part of the initial subcommittee meetings in both the House and the Senate, until they essentially decided they were not going to attend any more.
The Baucus committee voted on every Republican amendment and even accepted over 160 which are part of the current Senate version of the bill. But after a while there were no Republicans attending and so they missed offering up other amendments and left themselves out of the equation. And they did so intentionally.
So I don't want to hear more about how the Republicans weren't asked to the party. Hell, President Obama invited them and even had them over for his own party.
I find nothing compelling about what the Republicans say, particularly when they lie outright about what they said.
For instance, the Repubs have talked about knocking $600 Billion off of Medicare but their idea is to simply cut $600 Billion so Medicare doesn't function anymore. The Dems want to cut $500 Billion of waste ($50 Bil over 10 years).
The Repubs want Tort Reform, but that isn't just a problem with Health Care, it is a problem across the board. The problem is that by giving the Repubs their Tort Reform within Health Care they open the door to stifle the ability for anyone injured by bad medicine, bad judgment, or rife hospital infections to gain recompense.
The Repubs want sales across state lines but they never mention that any company offering a product has to make that product comply with the particular state it is being sold.
They offer nothing and require everything. Well, everything but true and proper health care for every American, just like most of the western world does for its citizens today.
You all should watch the Keith Oberman special comment about his Dad asking Keith to kill him. It is touching and important.
RWNorman
The Healthcare Summit and
Sun, 02/28/2010 - 11:07 — Anonymous (not verified)The Healthcare Summit and the whole Insane National Non-debate on HealthCare is just another indication of Obama's inability to Lead and his personal need for some Political CYA to cover his Fear of Being an actual Leader, and the fact that the Democrats, even when in control of the White House and a super dooper majority in Congress backed up by a huge voter mandate--- just can't govern and will always fear the Republicans and their huge, monopoly-like Cabal of CONservative Media Empires... Whatever happened to 'The Only Thing To Fear Is Fear Itself' ..?.. and 'Patriotism'..?.. and 'Doing The Right Thing'..?.. and 'Representing The People' (and not only Corporate Interests) and most of all---TRUE LEADERSHIP...??!!... AND---The Republicans practically destroyed this Nation and now, its obvious they are unfit to govern because apparently they also suffer from complete collective amnesia and can't remember a damn thing about what actually happened during the previous Dictatorial, War Mongering, Economy Destroying, Civil Rights Trampling, Historical Deficit Creating Administration.... So, I gotta ask ya--- If the Democrats can't govern and the Republicans only destroy government, what the hell does that mean for what little is left of our Republic and any concept of WE THE PEOPLE..?
Nobody in the US health
Sun, 02/28/2010 - 22:26 — Garrett Connelly (not verified)Nobody in the US health insurance debate seems to understand is that Medicare for all, starting tomorrow, will cost far less than the national wealth created by healthy citizens who are not driven into poverty by illness or paying the health insurance chief executives 4 - 12 thousand dollars per hour. I have no problem with success, but, really, $12,000/hr ? What does that mean?
this is my website
Mon, 03/04/2013 - 02:48 — this is my website (not verified)Say “thanks” you to your parents that they gave you the globe