Small Foreign News Staffs Threaten US Democracy
Tuesday 02 March 2010
London, United Kingdom - Recently, I sadly said goodbye to former colleagues who were fired in another round of cost cutting by CBS News. The CBS London bureau now stands half empty, and the dwindling band of survivors wonder who will go next.
Now ABC News has announced much deeper cuts. Hundreds of employees will be let go in a wave of corporate bloodletting that will decimate its worldwide staff. The opening announcement of ABC World News still boasts that it comes “from the global resources of ABC News,” but does not mention how thin they now are. NBC News has already cut its overseas operations to the bone.
Here in Britain, even the mighty BBC is said to be planning widespread spending reductions which include closing several radio stations and slashing output on its websites. But these cuts seem minor compared to what is being done to the American news media.
Coverage of foreign news for American audiences has been one of the major casualties and is in danger of disappearing. Each of the mainstream American news broadcasters (with the exception of CNN) now maintains only a handful of full-time foreign correspondents, and does very little original news gathering abroad. Few American newspapers have any foreign correspondents at all.
GlobalPost aims to fill the void in foreign coverage and has hired more than 70 part-time contributors from the small army of American foreign correspondents who are now under- or unemployed. But most will never work again in their field.
I know many of them. They are dedicated professionals whose expertise had to be learned the hard way. Their employers tossed them in the dustbin in pursuit of corporate profits. Their unique knowledge and hands-on experience will be lost forever. (Unless they decide to teach journalism, but where would their students find jobs?)
Broadcast news has taken a big hit in the frenzy of downsizing, but things are no better in the world of American newspapers. In the past two years, they have been shedding more than a thousand employees a month.
In a visit to my hometown of Baltimore last month, I was shocked to see what corporate cost cutting has done to the paper where I began my journalistic career. It was like meeting an old friend who has been mugged and robbed of everything valuable he possessed. The Baltimore Sun now has no foreign correspondents, and only a skeleton domestic staff. And in a final indignity, it has been sliced in half, vertically, which makes it a skinny paper. It looks silly, and you would be silly to spend money buying a copy. You could read it in 10 minutes.
The are a number reasons for the slow death of the mainstream American media. Most of them are economic. The business model is broken. Newspapers are overloaded with debt that was piled on in corporate takeovers. And so on.
Some of the wounds were self-inflicted. The decline in viewers and readers did not happen overnight. It has been going on for two decades, but the big newspapers and networks were complacent, even arrogant. They failed to move with the times and grasp the potential of the internet. Now they are alienating their remaining audience by dumbing down the news to the point where it is no longer worth the time to view or read it, let alone pay for it.
Traditional newspapers and broadcast news still thrive in many other parts of the world, but it may be too late to save the old model of news gathering and delivery in America. At some point in the future, a new model of news will evolve, one that can finance and deliver the full range of worldwide and local reporting that Americans used to get on their doorsteps and on their television sets and radios.
The internet, hand-held devices and gadgets still unknown will all play important roles. But what are Americans to do in the meantime? That's what disturbs me.
I fear that in the interim, as I wrote in my recent book “Junk News,” our country is in danger of falling into a two-class system for news. There will be a small elite who read highbrow journals and make the effort to search for news on the web from specialized or foreign sources. And there will be the masses who are mesmerized by the daily dumbed-down news, talk shows and trash television, and therefor know little about their own government or the rest of the world.
The elite will be privy to the information they need to face the future, but it's the masses who elect our presidents and representatives.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Yeah, I heard they were
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 15:13 — Vic Anderson (not verified)Yeah, I heard they were caught outside the White House, threatening a torturous coup in their trenchcoats, while SMOKING Obie's favorite brand!
This is not surprising to me
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 15:50 — Charli (not verified)This is not surprising to me for I have seen the decline going on for years now, look at the NY Times, pitiful at most. And as for the "two-class system", it is not in the future, it is here now and has been. Fortunately I do not watch television nor do I own one. I search for what is happening across the globe from sources via the web. As long as libraries and schools offer public access to computers, there is no excuse for ignorance, but then again ignorance can indeed be blissful, no?
The US is an example of how quickly the disease of greed and power can destroy its people, animal life, lands, waters, forests, schools and freedom. Ironic how other countries wanted to be like Amerika and with our help they now are...pathetic. How long until our currency is changed and all the saved dollars hidden away under mattresses, etc. will be 100% worthless?
I am so sorry for the young ones, so very sorry. for their future is surely bleak.
Holy jeeze, what a double
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 16:12 — Anonymous (not verified)Holy jeeze, what a double entendre the title of this article is.
Aren't news services *outside* of the US presenting different, and frequently less vapid then crumbling domestic news/entertainment corporations, including FAUX?
Sure they do, in fact, Al Jazeera, also a corporate news entity would frequently give reports that were all but censored by other companies in the US. To think that any large News Corp in any nation is somehow not beholden to elites is naive. However, some organizations are under no restraints to openly crititize the US.
The NYT, Washington Pot and largely the BBC are state compliant, and blatantly neo-con, that goes for the Voice of America, still run by defense contractors, still pumping "news" overseas right behind our illegal war efforts.
This article needs more
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 16:29 — Anonymous (not verified)This article needs more comment!
Remember that the people who ruined the news business are the same creatures who:
exported much of the US manufacturing economy;
created the housing bubble
and
nearly gave the US a second great depression.
"Financial genius.."
The people who read
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 19:07 — Anonymous (not verified)The people who read newspapers want something serious and professional, factual and objective. And those who do not read newspapers find better entertainment somewhere else. The papers blame the readers because they do not read and the readers blame the papers because they do not provide anything worth to read. Commuting one hour to Manhattan from Connecticut I used to read a leading newspaper. But the paper, already voluminous, was full of opinions presented as news. The obituaries were the exception. Some of these opinions were sometimes infantile and offensive to the intelligence. In addition the newspapers started being discredited because they were no longer independent and watchdogs but lapdogs. Repeating like parrots what they are told. The newspapers do not give people what they want. So why to buy tem?
It does not take anyone with
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 19:58 — Anonymous (not verified)It does not take anyone with much intelligence to know that the newspaper they are reading is Biased in favor of the Right...so why bother. You will not get unbiased news from that source. That is way past relevant to expect to get equal time given to any subject, either on TV or in Newspapers. Now all we get is a talking head, or a 'columnist' telling us what we have just been told...in case we were too stupid to understand in the first place. Then all we get is a Slanted opinion that leans far right. Now the powers-that-be are doing all in their power to Foul the Internet the same way. I have news for them...it will not work. We are finally wise to you and your propagandizing ways. The Phoenix is waking up.
This is yet another example
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 20:28 — Brian (not verified)This is yet another example of the "short-term profit above all else attitude" prevalent in U. S. large corporations is devastating the corporations and ruining the real economy. Someone noted recently that since corporations are people, according to the Supreme Court, Wall Street should be tried for slavery. That is true, but Wall Street should also be charged with murder for the many corporations it has killed of completely (usually via forced mergers and acquisitions).
Wall Street seems to be the main reason U. S. corporations no longer care about the long term or their own survival. The reason corporations moved factories to China, even when a requirement was to give China the technology to start their own competitors, is that they would reap much bigger short-term profits. But in the long term, competition from China is killing off those same corporations. It's bad for U. S. workers, bad for the corporations, bad for our economy, and a huge security threat. (Remember how our manufacturing power was so essential to our winning WWI and WWII? Well, that is almost gone now. We would be in big trouble if another big war started.)
Thank goodness there are some alternatives, at least in the realm of news. Truthout is a great example, and so is Mother Jones. Many people will gladly pay for quality reporting, and since they are non-profit, not only is it easier to be unbiased, they also don't have to care about constantly increasing short-term profits. Maybe people should consider starting other types of non-profits in other industries. It could be a revolution that transforms the economy and makes Wall Street irrelevant. That could actually save our country from the decline it's been in for the past few decades.
The superficial, tabloid
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 21:55 — arias (not verified)The superficial, tabloid nature of American newspapers has long been a farce and its demise predictable. A decade ago, I discovered the qualitative difference in getting my news from the UK based Independent's world section, to where it became my most trusted, then singular source of news. Only then could I no longer ignore the systemic bias and dumbing down of news by American news organizations. Often I would marvel that my reading of the same news item on an American news site would be deprived of particular details present in its British counterpart that seemed essential to an objective portrayal and journalistic integrity. After witnessing this distressing trend time and again, I sadly never again bothered to seek news from American sources although the irony of having to go to a British paper to get the truth on American news is not lost on me.
I would take the Indy's or BBC's world section to any American newspaper a decade ago, and this was before Rupert Murdoch's acquisition of the WSJ, which has only further polluted what passes as journalism in America today.
Yeah, well yes, das stimmt.
Tue, 03/02/2010 - 22:50 — Anonymous (not verified)Yeah, well yes, das stimmt. But it is now happening everywhere, the European journalistic
tradition is in trouble now too.
Dennis Potter was right about Rupert.
Once upon a time in Amerika
Wed, 03/03/2010 - 01:03 — Joe the Seldes Fan (not verified)Once upon a time in Amerika people were delivered rubber banded volumes of enlightenment...
NOT.
Our international coverage has been poor my whole life and for long before that.
Data and the control of it is a form of power. And power is seldom shared by the power hungry.
Amerika has a rather large wall of ignorance built around it.
I am sorry that that wall is getting higher.
Good night and good luck.
now we have blurry cell
Wed, 03/03/2010 - 10:37 — Anonymous (not verified)now we have blurry cell phone movies and tourists reporting from their rooms
to find out what's happening in Chile, the local station spoke on the phone to somebody who moved from there years ago and had not been able to contact anyone
mesmerizing indeed!
Main stream media have been
Wed, 03/03/2010 - 13:53 — Phot (not verified)Main stream media have been mouth pieces of corporations for a long time. Their demise is welcomed. Perhaps now in the void - some real, people orient news sources will be forth coming. There is hope that the internet and other new media will develop that is centered on people.
USA is loosing everything it
Wed, 03/03/2010 - 15:55 — Anonymous (not verified)USA is loosing everything it made it, the envy of the world,the bill of rights,the government of the people ,by the people, for the people,their once mighty economy,and now their journalists.
what is left?
US Democracy is not
Thu, 03/04/2010 - 05:00 — PSmith (not verified)US Democracy is not threatened by the loss of foreign news reporters. That is entirely achieved deliberately by the thugs of the "one Property Party - with two right wings, Dumbocrat and Re-thuglican" - Gore Vidal, edited for emphasis. ; )
Further, to the contrary, if it gives USans the impetus to get decent foreign coverage from Europe, or elsewhere, it will be a huge improvement over the censored rubbish of the US MSM.
Robert Fisk has commented that US newspapers do actually have some excellent and informed correspondents. But nothing they know or wish to write about ever makes it into their papers, he says. Particularly on the Middle East, obviously enough. Where the Zionist entity screams bloody murder if the US MSM does not show it pathetic subservience and practise relentless self-censorship to the point of utter incoherence.
Interestingly enough, the Israeli press is far more open and a wide range of issues are debated that are completely verboten for the supine lapdogs of the US MSM, says Mr. Fisk.
For those brought up on a European standard of journalism it is quite pathetic to observe the imposed ignorance deliberately inflicted on USans.
Noam Chomsky made the point that those running the country need to have a 'fairly accurate' view of the world and the WSJ and UK's Financial Times provide unfiltered news. But that was some years ago. No more. No more for the WSJ at least. One wonders what will become of the leaders of US business without accurate information.
Perhaps the same as US investors without accurate financial data - given that Charles Munger of Buffett and Munger -- Berkshire Hathaway -- tells us that the corporate books are mostly utterly cooked.