Sundance Reveals the Dark Underside of Political Financing in the USA
Thursday 28 January 2010
by: Romain Raynaldy | Les Echos

Filmmaker Alex Gibney's new documentary, "Casino Jack and the United States of Money" - an expose of US campaign financing focused on Jack Abramoff premiering at the Sundance Festival this week - could hardly be better timed, so soon after the Supreme Court's "Citizens United" decision. (Photo: Voice of America; Edited: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t)
At the Sundance Festival, American documentary filmmaker Alex Gibney recounts the descent into hell of the former lobbyist with links to the Republican Party, Jack Abramoff, offering an indictment of the corruption that infects political financing in the United States.
Alex Gibney, a Sundance regular, won an Oscar in 2008 with "Taxi to the Dark Side," a documentary about the acts of torture Americans practiced in Afghanistan, in Iraq and in the prison at Guantanamo.
His latest film, "Casino Jack and the United States of Money", is presented in competition at the independent film festival that is taking place in Park City, Utah, until Sunday.
In the film, the director, in a deeply ironic mode, recounts the glory days and decline of Jack Abramoff - presently serving a six-year prison sentence for bribery - who also took several members of the Republican Party who profited from his largesse down along with him when he fell.
"In many respects, Abramoff was simultaneously extremely serious and deeply ridiculous," Alex Gibney declared to AFP. "And some things were too bizarre and amusing to be treated in a serious way. You had to laugh and cry at once. It's a comedy, but the joke's on us," he says.
Jack Abramoff, a staunch Republican "who saw his life as an action movie" - he was also a movie producer - embodied all the excess of American lobbying, with its millions of dollars spent to attract the good graces of members of Congress.
Alex Gibney hopes his film will open the eyes of his fellow citizens by "showing people how it works. When you go into the back kitchens of a sausage-making factory, it's rather frightening. Well, then, this film takes you into the (campaign financing) kitchen and it's not pretty."
"In what other country in the world, aside from the most deeply corrupted ones such as Indonesia or Nigeria, is money as openly distributed to buy and sell political officials? It's profoundly shocking," deplores Alex Gibney.
He considers it was Ronald Reagan's accession to the presidency in 1981 that saw the United States "change its fundamental principles." Gibney said, "We made money the sovereign principle through which everything had to be measured: success, failure, and now the political system.
"In the United States, bribery is legal and it's terrifying," the film-maker asserts. Election campaign financing, very lightly supervised in the United States, "is a system that legalizes bribery. How can we put up with that?" he wonders.
"Abramoff and people like him are political terrorists," he deems. "They don't use a revolver, but they want to destroy the government since, fundamentally, they don't believe in its principles. They believe in a kind of libertarian law of the jungle."
The film debuts just as the United States Supreme Court has lifted the limits on corporate financing of national electoral campaigns, a revolution in American electoral law that had limited this right for twenty years.
Alex Gibney makes the case for "a system of public campaign finance. We must achieve that, or else we're damned," he says, nonetheless convinced that it is still "possible to change the situation."
In a certain sense, "Jack Abramoff did us a great service," the filmmaker observes. "He showed us in a spectacular way how bad (the system) was. We should be profoundly grateful to him for that."
Translation: Truthout French Language Editor Leslie Thatcher.
Les Echos is France's premier business newspaper. Created by the brothers Robert and Emile Servan-Schreiber in 1908, it has been part of the LVMH conglomerate since 2007.
All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
Indeed the only exceptional
Sun, 01/31/2010 - 14:04 — Curt (not verified)Indeed the only exceptional thing about Abramoff was that he was caught engaging in business as usual in Congress. Few are those that are not sold out to some group or to many, even Harry Reid, once a fighter for the good and deserving of the 'Give 'em hell Harry' moniker somehow became 'Give 'em whatever they want Harry' late in the Bush regime and one has to wonder who bought him out. Now this Congress is pushing a health care plan that in it's net content is nothing more than paying 'protection money', organized crime made legal by the corrupt organization that our government has become...
one of the people that lost
Sun, 01/31/2010 - 16:12 — Anonymous (not verified)one of the people that lost his election due to ties to abramoff was Richard Pombo, and now, what a surprise he's running for congress again.
Some background would help.
Sun, 01/31/2010 - 17:17 — Anonymous (not verified)Some background would help. Abramoff is mob connected, and connected to the Bush clan as well. He was financed by an Australian mobster, who was indicted by the US on real estate finance fraud. Abramoff's was closely connected to Kidan, who was linked to the US mafia. The US mob run casinos off the Florida coast and funnel unregistered money into Republican campaigns, some of these casinos were originally fronted by native American co-investors. In return, the government under Bush ignored mob investment money made on what would have been illegal arms deals, some of them negotiated by middle east arms dealer and Bush ally Koshogi.
This corruption is nearly endless, and would all be illegal if looked into, but money as graft connected to election campaigns, makes the crime possible.
Alex Gibney makes the case
Sun, 01/31/2010 - 18:36 — Eric Rogers (not verified)Alex Gibney makes the case for "a system of public campaign finance. We must achieve that, or else we're damned," he says and I agree. And the way to do it is for a massive grassroots movement to DEMAND that our Representatives pass a Constitutional amendment to take all money out of politics, not just the elections. It should also be illegal for lobbyists to give money to, or spend money entertaining, someone who holds a public office.
Would the solution be a
Mon, 02/01/2010 - 01:33 — gehan (not verified)Would the solution be a full-out Constitutional Convention? How would this take shape in the present world - is it even possible? Is the best bet to start with a state-by-state series of conventions? I believe CA is planning one next year to correct their own governmental mess. The CA convention could appoint a delegation to a national convention. This would at least make a good plot for a movie or an HBO series. My own suggestion is a unicameral parliamentary system with no gerrymandering but I am open to suggestions.
Money corrupts democracy.
Mon, 02/01/2010 - 14:36 — fitzythecat (not verified)Money corrupts democracy. Period.