The Petroleum Broadcast System Owes Us an Apology

by: Greg Palast, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

The Petroleum Broadcast System Owes Us an Apology
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: visionshare / Flickr)

Last night, my dog Pluto and I watched the Public Broadcast System's (PBS) "Frontline" investigation of BP, "The Spill."

PBS has uncovered a real shocker: BP neglected safety!

Well, no shit, Sherlock!

Pluto rolled over on the rug and looked at me as if to say, "Don't we already know this?"

Then PBS told us - get ready - that BP has neglected warnings about oil safety for years!

That's true. But so has PBS. The Petroleum Broadcast System has turned a blind eye to BP perfidy for decades.

If the broadcast had come six months before the Gulf blowout, after the 2005 BP refinery explosion in Texas or after the 2006 Alaska pipeline disaster or after the years of government fines that flashed DANGER-DANGER, I would say, "Damn, that 'Frontline' sure is courageous." But six months after the blowout, PBS has shown us it only has the courage to shoot the wounded.

But hey, at least PBS is now on the case.

Or is it? Despite press release hoo-hahs that this "Frontline" investigation would break news from a deep-digging inquiry, what we got was "Investigation by Google," old stuff from old papers that PBS forgot to report the first time around. Well, that's O.K. It's not like I was expecting Edward R. Murrow.

Well, something's better than nothing, right?

No, not in this case. What us viewers were handed was a tale that could have been written by the PR department at BP's competitor Chevron. The entire hour told us again and again and again, the problem was one company, BP, and its "management culture." (They used the phrase management "culture" seven times - I counted.)

So, according to PBS, the problem is: BP ain't got no culture ...

... Unlike Shell Oil's culture which has turned Nigeria into a toxic cesspool; unlike ExxonMobil's culture which remains in denial about the horror it heaped on Alaska. And unlike Chevron's, which I witnessed in the Amazon. Chevron's culture left Ecuadorian farmers with pustules all over their bodies and a graveyard of children dead of leukemia.

If you want to know the point of the PBS show, just go to the network's "Newshour" web page where Chevron's logo has sat atop the news as PBS' top corporate sponsor.

The PBS "investigative" report lovingly features the statements of Shell, Conoco-Phillips, ExxonMobil and Chevron that, "BP did not act to industry standards." Really? Did "Frontline" investigate these claims, or just run their sponsors' assertions?

Perhaps the oil executives are right: The oil industry's "standards" typically involve mass poisoning, outrageous bribery and the use of mercenary death squads to silence media and activists.

There's a lot on the line for Big Oil. And that's why the petroleum giants have a big motive to control the message.

And their message is this: BP bad! Chevron good! ExxonMobil good! Shell good!

And that's the message that "Frontline" repeated for them.

Let Truthout send our best stories to your inbox every day, for free.

The "Frontline" story was an exercise in damage control. If it's just bad-boy BP's "management culture," then the rest of the industry is off the hook. Then the crazy-ass deepwater drilling can continue and the Big Oil destruction machine can stay in high gear.

PBS sponsor Chevron is desperate to resume drilling in the Gulf. Shell is drooling over its delayed offshore project in Alaska's Arctic seas. If they can isolate BP, the horror show can go on.

I have just returned from the Gulf filming for ... well, not PBS. In a four-seater, we skimmed low over a filthy rig still spewing oil into the water. It was not the Deepwater Horizon well. It was not BP's. Yes, oil pollution and drilling have destroyed the Gulf Coast. But state records show that Shell Oil has destroyed 2,707,767 cubic yards of Delta wetlands versus BP's 234,201.

So, BP is not the worst, but that's not saying much. Indeed, while PBS was touting its former sponsor BP's clean-and-green PR bullshit, I and many others were writing one furious story after another on BP's lethal penny-pinching. (See for example, "BP Failed to Act on Warnings of Alaska Tragedy" 1999, and "British Petroleum's Smart Pig" 2006, both from The Guardian.)

The danger to our waters, the danger to oil workers' lives, is not BP's management culture, but the industry's profits-over-people greed gone wild.

Why am I picking on poor, little PBS? I'll be the first to tell you they are the best you're going to get on the US boob tube. And PBS has spared us embarrassing scenes of Anderson Cooper pretending to save an oily pelican while floating in a canoe with Bobby Jindal. But I expected more from a public broadcast system than a repetition of the oil industry's self-serving propaganda campaign.

Last night, in a deep, serious voice, the PBS narrator told us, If BP had only paid attention to the warnings of experts and regulators, the Deepwater Horizon tragedy could have been prevented.

Damn right. And if PBS had paid attention to the oil story, maybe that too could have prevented the tragedy.

In 1998, a prestigious producer working with BBC Television approached PBS and "Frontline" with a bombshell of a project: The story of British Petroleum and its partners with revelations, then confidential, of reckless disregard, if not downright fraud, in preventing and containing massive oil spills.

PBS smacked it away.

Instead, "Frontline's" producer, WGBH, spent several million dollars on "The Commanding Heights." The six-hour extravaganza was a panegyric to the entrepreneurial spirit of newly privatized oil and power companies. Production was paid for by Enron. But when Enron's Chairman Ken Lay was arrested, PBS had to find a new sugar daddy. The new loot poured in from Margaret Thatcher's privatized commander of the heights, British Petroleum.

I could give you 20 more examples of PBS' see no oil evil, though its recent failure to run "Crude," about Chevron in the Amazon, certainly stands out.

PBS takes our tax money. It owes us something, no? If we can't get the real story about Big Oil, at least we deserve an apology.

I was waiting for the "Frontline" narrator to say: "BP has kept the truth locked in its files for years - and so have we at PBS. AND WE ARE ASHAMED. Send us back your coffee mug for a refund."

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Greg Palast directed the fraud investigation of BP and Exxon in the grounding of the Exxon Valdez for the Chugach Natives of Alaska. Palast's investigative reports can be seen on BBC Television Newsnight. See them at www.GregPalast.com.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Two questions; Is there a

Two questions;

Is there a light?
Is there a tunnel?

No!



PBS and everyone else could

PBS and everyone else could have been paying attention when it was not "politically correct". Nice to see you on Truthout, Greg Palast.



PBS is not really, as Greg

PBS is not really, as Greg Palast might have it, "the best you're going to get on the US boob tube." But to get whatever "best" there is depends on what your service provides. When we had DISH sattelite service, we could get Democracy Now and Grit TV, both far superior to anything available on PBS. But we switched to another provider, and the new network does not carry either Amy Goodman's program or Laura Flanders and her show. Luckily, they're both available on-line.
Otherwise, we watch the main stream media to get the local news, the weather, and the mass-media, Big Brother party line. To get the truth, we go on-line.
Robert Berner



PBS has a very wide range of

PBS has a very wide range of programming. Criticizing them for not being the "watch BP oil and only BP oil obsessively" media just seems absurd.

What about national for-profit news media's role in investigative journalism? Shouldn't they be the ones you criticize, instead of the people who also air Sesame Street?



@Robert... you've got that

@Robert... you've got that right. Fortunately I have satellite so I'm a regular viewer of Democracy Now! And I go on line. However, we shouldn't be complacent. We should be fighting hard for Net Neutrality because the big boys in mass media are working day and night to take the Internet away from us. @Anonymous, PBS is supposed to be our watchdog on the affairs of the nation both politically correct and those deemed corrupted. PUBLIC BROADCASTING, not only those stories that have been sanitized or are strictly entertainment. Just a few days ago on Democracy Now there was an update on the Gulf disaster which is ONGOING and getting worse. They listed all the animals, and PEOPLE who are sick and dying from the residue that is NOT cleaned up, and may never be since our wholly subsidized government has deemed the crisis OVER. I haven't seen that story on PBS or anywhere else except DN and on-line if you care to look for it.



Palast obviously doesn't

Palast obviously doesn't know how public television works, since he seems to believe that "Frontline" producers at WGBH/Boston would have been influenced by Chevron (even though any station's ethics guidelines could get them fired if that happened), even though Chevron is a corporate underwriter of a series (the "News Hour") produced on the premises of WETA/Washington, another, independent station. PBS program-producing stations are fiercely competitive with one another, and WGBH would never do favors for the interests of corporate underwriters of a series produced under the auspices of another station, even if it were ethical or allowable for them to do that for their own underwriters, which it is not. Besides, anybody who thinks that Jim Lehrer carries water for Chevron has consumed too much of another kind of liquid beverage.
Sorry, Greg, but whatever was wrong editorially with this program was not because Chevron was an underwriter of another series produced by another station.



Why do I find the argument

Why do I find the argument presented above by Tribunus completely unconvincing? To follow it to it's logical conclusion, the complete lack of investigative journalism regarding Big Oil by PBS is just happenstance. And the fact that they get major sponsorship from Big Oil is just a coincidence. The corporations own and control everything, including, now increasingly, your mind.



Your tax cuts at work. PBS

Your tax cuts at work. PBS has been on a downhill slide since the ADM fiasco many moons ago. You (I mean they) get what you pay for & they pay high. Now if you could take all corporate money out of at least one network; if you could develop an audience with an IQ greater than a gnat which would demand quality & enlightenment rather than more "reality shows & dancing with the stars, more drama & less violence & on & ON". The scam is not new "the Romans called it bread & circuses" & it seems the mass of people will never wake up. Hey, they got people who believe that, "if you believe the right myth you gonna live forever". As long as you can sell that & you still can & by the billions of customers, we are beyond hope.



BP has facilities all over

BP has facilities all over the place. The disaster hasn't happened yet in Alaska. So not exactly like shooting something that's already happened. It was a story stated from the beginning that it was about the management culture in BP and their unwritten policies of neglecting maintenance in order to pursue profits. That isn't over by a long shot! Not only that, you don't mention ProPublica - I kept up with the ProPublica news as the spill was going on and seems to me most of the work in the story was theirs - so maybe it just took that long to get the video done and scheduled for broadcast. I certainly didn't walk away from the video thinking they said the other oil companies were good - there's like ONE scene and I thought that accurately portrayed the immense foolishness on the part of the committee - i mean, what did they think the competition was going to say?! People who don't watch TV know that PBS isn't the news organization to keep up with for important stories like the BP oil spill - it's ProPublica, Mother Jones, etc. To blame PBS and say they get our tax money - please. You wanna talk about where our tax dollars are going and who owes us apologies? Just not sure what the benefit is to rant on PBS when even you say it's one the best we have.



Oh, and how could I leave

Oh, and how could I leave them out: Dahr Jamail and Erika Blumenfeld did a fabulous job documenting the spill and getting information and photos when no one else was! Sorry guys.



O.k. The author has a

O.k. The author has a point. I have a few points as well. #1. Donate to PBS so they don't have to take corporate donations. #2. Donate to PBS so they don't have to take corporate donations. #3. Donate to PBS so they don't have to take corporate donations. There are more points I'd like to make but your attention span wains during "pledge week" on PBS. At least Olbermann and Madow will turn the pistol to their own heads when their sponsors go sour. I watched Olbermann online every day during the BP spill coverage, and between each segment of him lambasting BP was a BP ad. How's that for gall ?



Quit being cry

Quit being cry babies...Drill baby Drill you GOP lovers.BP is their favored nation along with Dubai Halliburton for contracts of oil. The best part BP is using taxpayers royalties to pay off their sludge fund. Be sure to put the GOP in charge again because we already know their track record. What idiots the voters have turned into.



GREAT post, as always, Greg.

GREAT post, as always, Greg. Thanks!!



Thanks for making PBS's

Thanks for making PBS's deceit seem so obvious. It's tempting to imagine that those who manage PBS do so with the understanding that Big Oil pays the bills but does not tell them what to produce or broadcast. That what they broadcast is actually what makes PBS "public". Increasingly, the sponsors have seemed to creep into the content, and that is disturbing because it makes you wonder how far it goes. I no longer trust PBS "Newshour" and "Frontline" for honest reporting that tells the whole story, and haven't for several years. It does seem though, that PBS is about as good as it gets here in the ol' USA, for their other programming choices. Greg Palast makes an important point about who you can trust for your news in these days of corporate empire.



PBS is pwned.

PBS is pwned.



Just as the fundamental

Just as the fundamental corruption of the other institutional aspects of what many call "the West" is obvious, so too the hijacking of PBS (and NPR) is also obvious. So, Greg, you have merely written the, well, obvious. Nevertheless, that's important.

If one discounts on account of the somewhat pedestrian national interests and national agenda involved, one may well prefer to throw away the TV and just listen to radio Havana...



Chevron "we control

Chevron "we control everything" is the microwave auditory effect and have been killing employees at chevron gas stations as the corruption in the company unfolds soon to have this terrorism in the company come forward and the years of horror these people who operate there individual stores tell all.



faux coach handbags

I am sure you will love faux hermes at my estore YKUEaecy http://fauxdesignerhandbags.blogcindario.com/2012/10/00002-fauxdesignerhandbags.html



coach outlet online

for coach outlet suprisely ZDIYMVQZ http://www.coach-outlet--online.org/



kxdhaf

zlekjx