The TSA, the Right, and My Busted Watch

by: William Rivers Pitt, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

The TSA, the Right, and My Busted Watch
(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Canned Muffins, ralphbod)

For the last several days, I have been trying to locate what would appear to be the appropriate and necessary level of angst and fury over the issue of heavy-handed TSA searches at American airports. I say "appropriate and necessary" because, well, all the noise surrounding the matter seems to suggest I have no alternative other than outrage, and if I fail to react that way, I am some sort of dupe, a fool who doesn't understand the Constitutional issues at hand or the dangers represented by what has been described as a glaring governmental over-reach.

Interestingly enough, this opinion is being clarioned from the far reaches of both sides of the left-right spectrum. The electronic left - blogs, online news and commentary sites (like Truthout) and message boards - is up in arms over the violations they see involved in the TSA screening process. On the right, the hue and cry is at an equal, if not higher decibel. For their part, the "mainstream" media is giving as much play as possible to the angry voices being raised against President Obama and the TSA.

I lack the required level of outrage over this because, quite simply, I don't know how to feel about it. Do I like the idea of going through a machine without knowing what the health affects will be? No. Do I understand those who find the idea of having TSA employees looking at translucently revealing images of them to be out of bounds? Certainly. Would I myself like to endure the hard-core groping that is the alternative to going through the screening machine? No. Do I think the penalties threatened against those who refuse to comply to be too severe? Indeed.

But.

Not so long ago, a man did actually attempt to blow up an airplane with a device hidden in his underwear. Just a few short weeks ago, the entire airline industry was thrown into panicked high-alert because of suspicious packages that were either a deliberate attempt to take down planes, or a test of the security measures that defend against such attempts, or both. Recent reports have terrorist elements openly stating their new plan is to shun large, spectacular attacks in favor of smaller actions aimed at disrupting the American economy, and anyone with brain one in their head knows the holiday season is the femoral artery of the American economy. Jab that enough, especially during the heavy-traffic travel season we have entered, and the whole thing will quickly bleed to death right before our eyes.

So.

Do I like the idea of getting blown sideways out of an airliner at 38,000 feet by some brain-damaged zealot with a knot of C-4 nestled beneath his scrotum? As I plummet screaming from the blot of smoke that used to be a 727, will I find serenity in my final moments because I know the guy who killed me didn't have his rights violated by the gendarmes of the TSA? No and no. Do I think there are enough credible dangers out there to justify heightened security measures, especially during the holiday season? I'm leaning towards yes, and if that amounts to political heresy, so be it.

What I do know is that the leading voices of outrage over this issue are the likes of Charles Krauthammer of the Post, Glenn Beck, Mike Huckabee, incoming House Transportation Committee chairman John Mica (R-FL), a bunch of rabid right-wing websites which are also leading the "Obama is not a citizen" birther charge, and a "mainstream" media that continues to push messages that auger inexorably toward the claim that the "Tea Party" is right about everything even remotely related to government.

That is not the kind of company I like to keep, and it gives me great pause about jumping on the TSA-outrage bandwagon. I mean, sure, I have a busted watch at home that's right twice a day, so it's possible these far-right mouthpieces may have stumbled onto some truth for a change. But the fact that the attacks against Obama and the TSA happen to be coming from the same people who have made a cottage industry out of claiming Obama is a secret terrorist who wants to bring Sharia law to America, yet who are now saying he has gone too far in defending the nation from terrorism, even in the face of credible threats to the airline industry, leads me to suspect there is a different game afoot.

Consider the commentary offered on Wednesday by the New York Times on the issue:

The latest controversy to envelop the Obama administration is only partly about the specific rules governing body scanners and pat-downs. It has to do, too, with the federal agency Congress created to deal with airline security and the tension that has been building for years between its latex-gloved employees and the traveling public.

In this way, the "Don't touch my junk" fiasco raises, yet again, what has become the central theme of Mr. Obama's presidency: America's faltering confidence in the ability of government to make things work. From stimulus spending and the health care law to the federal response to oil in the Gulf of Mexico, Mr. Obama has continually stumbled - blindly, it seems - into some version of the same debate, which is about whether we can trust federal bureaucracies to expand their reach without harming citizens or industry.

(Emphasis added)

Perfect. Right from the jump, the article highlights Krauthammer's "Don't touch my junk" article, which was pretty much the genesis of the public hollering over TSA screening procedures. It goes from there to underlining the "mainstream" media's favorite theme from 2010: government is inept. In essence, what we have here is one more instance of the media reinforcing the theme they hammered home over the last year through their cheerful re-branding of the GOP base into the "Tea Party." Government is wrong, government is bad, and from there it is an easy leap to "The Tea Party was right all along."

Bank on this: if the year was 2002, and President Bush declared these TSA measures to be absolutely necessary to the security of the nation, the same right-bent people currently screaming about the heavy-handed Obama TSA policy would be defending those exact same policies to the teeth, with the "mainstream" media right with them all the way down the party line. For the right, this is opposition simply for the sake of opposition itself, and thanks to the media, they have once again managed to shoehorn another "Government sucks" screaming match to the forefront of the national conversation.

Nothing from the "mainstream" media about how the GOP is scuttling the all-important START treaty for no other reason than the fact that a Democrat is in the White House. Nothing from the "mainstream" media about how the GOP is letting unemployment benefits for millions of Americans lapse for no other reason than the fact that there is a Democrat in the White House. Nothing about how 71% of air travelers, like me, do not appear able to work themselves into the seemingly-required media-driven froth over the issue. That's no fun to report on. And it's awfully, awfully convenient that, instead, we have yet another circus inspired by the always-effective loudspeakers of the right.

Awfully convenient, indeed.

Like I said, I have this busted watch that's right twice a day, so it is possible those on the right who are making a massive issue out of this situation, those who find themselves in agreement, and those in the "mainstream" media who have been pushing this story with all their might, have a legitimate point. Those who say these measures are necessary likewise have a point.

One thing is certain: there are tens of millions of Americans who don't give a single damn about the issue of TSA screening, because they are broke and unemployed and getting foreclosed on, which means they can't afford to fly. They have bigger things to worry about. So, I suspect, do we all. 

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



William Rivers Pitt is a Truthout editor and columnist.  He is also a New York Times and internationally bestselling author of two books: "War on Iraq: What Team Bush Doesn't Want You to Know" and "The Greatest Sedition Is Silence." His newest book, "House of Ill Repute: Reflections on War, Lies, and America's Ravaged Reputation," is now available from PoliPointPress.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



thank god for a voice of

thank god for a voice of reason



Usually, Mr. Pitt is right

Usually, Mr. Pitt is right on. In this case, I think he's grasping at straws drawing some sort of right wing conspiracy to bring down Obama.

I recently had a colleague whose child was taken from her by the TSA into a closed and private room while she was restrained in a separate area. The child was "frisked" out of her sight by employees of the TSA and came back screaming and crying at what they did. If that had been a civilian they would be arrested on suspicion of molestation. Because it's the TSA and they're "protecting" us... it's all alright.

Face it, sir, the "underwear bomber" boarded a plan in Germany. All the groping in America wouldn't have kept him off that plane.



a voice of reason you are

a voice of reason you are so correct thank you Mr Pitt



This is the best, most

This is the best, most reasoned discussion yet on the hype and deception over the FSA and scanners.
I notice most all who are screaming about protecting our 4th amendment rights fail to notice that it reads "unreasonable searches and seizures" --- so what constitutes "unreasonable" is really the question and that is decided by the legislature and the courts, not by media pundits.
If the alarmists really believe the scanners and pat downs are legally unreasonable, then let them bring a class-action law suit in Federal Court to show that they have been harmed by the FSA procedures and to stop them. I think the probability that any Federal Court in the U.S., whether left or right leaning, would rule the procedures consitutionally unreasonable is practically nil.



this is the first time i've

this is the first time i've been seriously disappointed in a perspective articulated on Truthout. Vapid, reactionary, irrational, chauvinistic tripe. Why bother printing it at all?



Once again a long winded

Once again a long winded sophomoric screed that fails to identify the root of the problem.

When the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor FDR did not order the round up and internment of every living human on the west coast in order not to offend "certain groups" of people. It may have been one of the few things he did right in his administration.

We need to be screening for terrorists, not nail clippers.

Oh and BTW, when the 1st airliner is brought down by an 86 year old granny in a wheel chair or a 5 year old kid that slipped through the cavity search I'll expand the profile a bit.



The machines are unsafe and

The machines are unsafe and don't protect against explosives. The groping is an embarrassing invasion of privacy at the very least.

What part of that don't you get, Mr. Pitt?

You watch different MSM than I do. The ones I watch just love this new stuff. Can't wait to be groped or x-rayed or both.

And as far as us poor folk (I'm one of them) not bothering about this stuff - we ride buses and trains, and Ms. Neopolitano can't wait to extend the procedures to those.

There's no conspiracy. We're all, the ordinary people, mad as hell, and this is just one more straw on the camel's back, a big one.



Mr. Pitt is right. no story

Mr. Pitt is right. no story here folks. Move on. Move on.

Step quickly and safely into the cattle car, quickly and safely.

Soon enough you will be in paradise.



yeah well the rapescan

yeah well the rapescan machines wouldn't have spotted the underwear bomb so your argument is moot.



I did a lot of research on

I did a lot of research on these machines in the first day or two of this story breaking and posted my results on the internet, the author of this piece obviously missed my posts.

Taking naked pictures of children and groping people do not make us safer, 'journalists' who write puff pieces wondering why people are so unhappy being treated that obviously have not done their homework.

If you are wondering why there is a left-right convergence on this issue, you have two choices. See that it appeals to people across the spectrum, or accept the FACT of my leadership.



As with any other x-ray

As with any other x-ray machine, nobody sees "naked children" with these machines. What a ridiculous load of conspiracy crap.

And yes, I've been through these machines a number of times (in countries other than the U.S.) and no, nobody saw my private parts.



Funny how the people who are

Funny how the people who are screaming about these invasions of privacy have not raised their voices to protect kids in inner-city schools who go through x-ray machines, or the many teens living in designated "rough areas" who are thrown to the ground and searched unreasonably, with no cause whatsoever.



'Reasonable'. The scanner

'Reasonable'.
The scanner were mandated. The Chinese use a hand held device costing 1/10th as much that actually works to screen drugs, etc.
The search for 'perfect security' ignores not only that the passengers themselves provide the most committed and immediate resource against nonsense ; but that in a real, actual, and known environment of 'terrorism' - Afghanistan - such procedures are not enforced because the local population would murder the perverts perpetrating such a scheme.



Groping has taken on far too

Groping has taken on far too much of the nation's imagination. Next thing you know, homophobes will demand someone of the opposite sex grope them at airports. Indeed, it is surely as creepy to some who are frightened that our bad ass soldiers might have to shower with a same sexer. The thought of some goofy TSA guy fondling the genitals of some major league star, pleasuring themselves at our expense, could have repercussions. I'm just glad you can pay a higher price and avoid all that nonsense.



"Those who would give up

"Those who would give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

The government admits to reading our e-mails and listening to our phone calls. This is the next step in violating your right to privacy. This is when it becomes physical. This isn't about being safe. This is about fear, shame, humiliation, and a lot of crooks making a lot of money. The pat downs are punishment for not going through the machines. Anyone who wants to smuggle explosives on to a plain can put enough c4 into a condom and put it in his/her rectum. The machines won't pick that up and neither will the pat down. So, the next logical step is an actual strip search.

To the author. This isn't about whether or not you can afford to fly, so you don't care. This is about the precedent being set. This is about the American people becoming willing and submissive sheep, apparently, you included. As has been stated above, the "Underwear Bomber" boarded a plane in Germany.

I personally find it appalling that this issue is even debatable among the people. What's next? Chertov has said he wants these machines in bus stations and train stations. Anywhere where money can be made from them, they will be there. A police state is being put into place while the public remains distracted and hypnotized with technology. We are given just enough cheese to keep satisfied while the country is being looted and we are being distracted. I hope and prey that the people really are waking up. The alternative is truly frightening.

"It is as bad as you think and they are out to get you."



Screw it all. I suggest that

Screw it all. I suggest that we all just strip down and go through, bare tits and ass naked. Who give a whit. We are such prudes. Send our clothes through the scanners, and leave our bodies out of the cumulative reactive radiation.



To some extent the checks

To some extent the checks are part of a show of security. It reminds me of the armed kids in camos walking around airports after 9/11 I was more worried about them than I was about terrorists.
Re the TSA, .I don't like being on the same wave length as the right wing and would not make a fuss about this other than asking for frisking rather than radiation.
However it is true that the machines are not foolproof and do constitute a risk, especially if they are not well maintained.
At the same time, I wish someone, anyone, would raise the same stink about the far worse practice of torture of prisoners.



The chances of being blown

The chances of being blown up are 1 in 25,000,000, but even if they were "better," I resent with a passion the TSA's measures no matter who is against them, and have just blogged about it for HuffPo:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lev-raphael/the-tsa-and-the-power-of-_b_787168.html

Mr, Pitt should do his research. There are enough experts who aver that the underwear bomber would not have been caught by the body scanners to make their use ridiculous.

And yes, there's a lot to be outraged about, but if we dismiss these gross violations of our dignity because something else is more offensives, then we are fools and don't deserve our rights.



It seems the Dutch have it

It seems the Dutch have it right: a machine that does not Xray but rather uses a non-invasive method to identify suspicious items on a body--which, presumably, could then be hand-searched. We need to lobby for this.

Since there's no indication that any threat originates in the US, somebody is lobbying for Xray machines so money can be made. Given that, it's doubly and painfully obvious that Xray and groping are not necessary.

I'm planning to fly this month and am practicing saying, "Privacy, please, a same-sex officer and same-sex witness."



Most of the time, I tend to

Most of the time, I tend to agree with WR Pitt. However, this time, I'm a little disappointed. First of all, there are some in the media who are paying very close attention to the fact that the RepugTeacans are thwarting the START issue. It's been on MSNBC recently being discussed by every one of their liberal pundit crew, as has the story of unemployment benefits or lack thereof, so someone is paying attention, if not the viewing public.
As to the TSA issue, I'm not convinced that their extreme measures are going to prevent any terrorist determined to carry out his/her threat, nor am I convinced that every TSA employee is a raging perv who got his or her job solely for the purpose of getting to feel up grannies or look at nekkid scans. I think there's got to be a better way to handle the real (if minimal) threat of bombs, boxcutters or other weapons on planes.
I am also skeptical of Chertoff's involvement and profiting from all of this business and the cronyism that is probably involved.
But, as always, I support Mr. Pitt's right to speak his mind. He's spot-on more than often enough to make up for any disagreement I might have with him.



Pitt Is As Lost As An Easter

Pitt Is As Lost As An Easter Egg Here - trying to shoehorn every issue into his precious Left/Right paradigm, as it disintegrates before our very eyes. Note that the 'underwear bomber' who Pitt embarrassingly evokes - in his lockstep service to the DHS - committed his ridiculous crime just days before the rollout of these ridiculous machines, which had been ordered a year before. Many citizens are awakening from their long slumber now, but Pitt is still asleep, clutching the comfortably familiar Liberal/Progressive teddy bear who has told him that the 'right' caused all problems. I worked on Kerry's campaign and gave a lot of money to O's, and voted for Nader (after I figured out O was not for real) - I was sickened by everything Bush did, AND O is continuing the very worst of it. Time to Grow up and Wake up, Pitt - we need adults in this debate. If posters here at all represent popular sentiment, TSA is finished - and most will not be fooled again by whatever contrived crisis emerges to justify their illegal actions - no matter how big it is.



Reading another person's

Reading another person's post I am reminded of the security wanding I have undergone because I have artificial hips. That person had a good point that the wands which is probably what he saw used in China are far less expensive and probably cause less exposure to radiation. I am struck that Chertov has a history of profiting from the scanners which must cost a fortune. Better we should have more thoughtful intelligence and more people actually trained in the needed language skills.



There is no defense for a

There is no defense for a police state. There is no defense to use invasive machines when non-invasive (infra-red) exist, but obviously owned by entities without the right connections. There is no defense to lie, lie, and lie about the machines, what they can do, and why you do it.

The government supposedly wants us to "feel" safe when they well know this is not about real safety. I will not condone violating our Constitution for a farce.....And now, as typical... bring on the next false flag event.



Mr. Pitt is so wrong. These

Mr. Pitt is so wrong. These security measures have neither deterred nor caught any would be bomber. Just about every time the security measures are tested they fail.

Examine the history: The 9/11 terrorists would not have been able to get into the cockpit of the planes had the U.S. carriers installed secure doors on the aircraft. They didn't do this to make money - allowed them to carry an additional passenger.

The shoe bomber was caught by alert passengers (as was the Detroit underwear bomber). As it was neither "bomb" was workable. Both got through security with no problem.

The packages were in the cargo hold. The body scan would not have caught them.

In all these cases, the intelligence agencies had information ahead of time alerting them to the possible attack. They were - and still are - so disorganized they aren't effective. Instead of cleaning up their act, they place all the burden of the airline passengers. And to point out how phony the whole system is - the Republicans want to deny the TSA workers the right to unionize and some even want them privatized. Security for the lowest price, except for the scanner machines which is costing millions and lining the pockets of people like Michael Chertoff.

Why is it that we are not dealing with the root causes of these terror actions? Why, with the fortune we are spending, we can't find and capture Bin Laden? It is now the security industry, and its primary goal is to keep itself in business.



Two writers from the

Two writers from the Nation.com tried this same partisan tack and got scolded for it by Glen Greenwald at Salon.com-Fact is that this should be an issue that should unite Democrats, Independents, Greens and Republicans. This is too important to dismiss so.

TSA BLINKED! OPT OUT WORKS-KEEP IT UP through New Years Day.

The TSA Opt Out Day Protest Worked Beautifully And Caused TSA To Change Its Body Scanner Policy for the day. Reports from around the country indicate that TSA primarily used metal scanners. At many airports the body scanners were turned off. Passengers did not have to make a choice between the body scanners or a pat down. TSA changed its methods to marginalize the Opt Out protests and the Major Media who wanted it to fail from the get go are pretending absolutely nothing happened. One day protests are difficult, But TSA BLINKED!

Citizens participating in Opt Out Day were told that "The Safe and Legal Way for Airline Travelers to Protest TSA Scanner Radiation Is To Just "politely" Opt for the Pat Down. Don't make a fuss", so no one including media would know that they were protesting while in the screening line. They just made a choice not to be harmed by the radiation of the scanner.



Just another apologist for

Just another apologist for the exhibition of power. The unending display of obsequiousness to authority.



It's dishonest and

It's dishonest and ridiculous for the far right to include this in their shrill litany of anti Obama tirades. The heavy handedness of TSA and Homeland Security agents began with the Bush administration. And, when the GOP dominated both houses. At that time they were actively trying to declare that anyone who would want to diminish the stringent security measures being employed were literally 'terrorist sympathizers'. They even tried to enshrine it in the PATRIOT ACT.
As WRPitt mentioned, the blatant cynical use of the current TSA public outrage for political gain by the GOP/teabaggers is all too clear. One or two years ago GOP politicians were clamouring over Obama's promise to close Guantanamo... they, declaring that only the GOP could keep the US safe. Now look at them, sabotaging the SALT Treaty, and whining about Obama's TSA. And they do so solely out of partisanship.
Buuuuut,.... the TSA's tactics ARE dangerous because they compel us to consider such indignities as justifiable. As if any erosion of our civil liberties could be rolled back once the 'eternal war' has ended.



Mr. Pitt is a pot calling

Mr. Pitt is a pot calling the kettle black. Remember when the left used to complain about invading other nations? Now they support a surge - until 2014! It's not a left thing OR a right thing. It is simply politics as usual. Pitt is just too hypocritical to realize this.



USA PATRIOT ACT = remember

USA PATRIOT ACT = remember THAT invasion of privacy and usurpation of rights? Remember all the "foreign" looking and sounding people who were rounded up, hounded, intimidated, with little howl or protest? Remember all the illegal wire tapping, all the lies and obfuscation that led to the Iraq invasion? Remember all the times Repugs vowed "this must never happen again" to justify repression, the raising of the threat levels, etc, etc, etc? And remember how all of it was, at least tacitly, endorsed by the Repugnican "leadership"?
Anyone who denies that the current hue and cry is other than politically and perhaps racially motivated should pull his/her head out of whatever crevice it is iin.



I expect better than this "

I expect better than this " clap-louder" bullshit defense of the indefensible from you. If I wanted to read this crap, I'd be on an Obama fansite.

Your readers deserve a retraction and an apology. Or you should be moving to the Third Way DLC site.



Being groped or irradiated

Being groped or irradiated doesn't interest me, so I either stay home or find alternate means of transport. Maybe if I ate a lot of beans and could master the art -- when I was in college I knew a guy who could -- of breaking wind precisely when the groper's face was ...

Nah. I'd rather stay home or find alternate transportation. OTOH ... hmmm.



The chances of getting blown

The chances of getting blown to pieces, as Lev Raphael points out, are not any greater than your chances of getting blown.



EPIC FAIL! You have pulled a

EPIC FAIL!

You have pulled a strawmen argument brilliantly, Mr Pitt! The opposition to the TSA policies come from all sides. Would you like to check the comments at Huffington, Democratic Underground, Crooks and Liars, Truth Dig, Common Dreams and Think Progress? Really, just get on the internet, will you? This has nothing to do with the tea party clowns, Glenn Beck or any of that BS. Granted, they are in because they hate Obama. But this is something bigger you obviously have failed to grasp.

The security policies are reactive. The terrorists are always one step ahead. Because of the liquid bombs we now have to limit/expose all liquids. Because of the shoe bomber we now have to take off our shoes. Because of the underwear bomber, who got on an airplane in Europe (how effective, doesn't it?) we now have to go through scanners or groping. Have you realised there's no conclusive scientific evidence on the risk of using such scanners? Have you followed the lead that ends with politicians being lobbied by scanner manufacturers? Nothing to see there, right? After all, America is run by corporations. No news here. Just move along. Correct?

How about the fact these scanners can't detect what's inside a cavity? Still having warm feelings about security?

The next time a terrorist gets into a plane with a bomb inside his/her rectum then what, Mr Pitt? Colonoscopies for all? Seriously, where do you draw the line? How can you fail to see this is an issue of safety (false at that) versus freedom?

America is scared to death and most people keep going with sheep's herd mentality giving up freedoms for the delusion of security. Isn't that what the terrorists wanted?

Just google the chances of getting struck by lighting versus dying on an airplane for ANY cause and put your drivel in perspective!

You want to improve security? Stop blind support for Israel. Keep supporting, though. Just not so blind the puppet master's strings are obvious.

And guess what? You didn't have to mess up with your freedoms!



Without sounding like some

Without sounding like some lunatic I find these so called attempts at blowing up airplanes to be nothing more than staged ruse to intrude further and further into the lives of everyday citizens. The completely lost it when the twin towers where hit and the resulting differences of opinion on this particular event are for another day. But to now try and appear like the heros of the day by managing to find these bombs in the nick of time goes against logic. For all the information that was known by various agencies and yet all were asleep at the wheel and then to witness the fact that no one in charge lost his or her job? telling. This is just another smoke and mirrors attempt to keep our eyes off the ball.



I haven't flown in eight

I haven't flown in eight years and have no need or desire to ever fly again. I've dropped out of the fast lane and am loving it. Problem solved here.



Is anyone wondering what the

Is anyone wondering what the next step is after body scans and pat-downs are declared insufficient? The list of invasions air passengers must cope with gets longer every year. Does it ever end? Not yet. . .

People are right to question who is getting rich of this, our foreign wars, our foreign aid, our domestic disasters, etc.

And we are right to question the wisdom of strengthening corporate power at the cost of our government, the only line of defense we have in that war on the middle class.



I'm glad I don't have to fly

I'm glad I don't have to fly these days. There is no question in mind which side I'm on, and it's NOT on the side of the companies that are making money off of these machines or feeling people up.

The story about the person's colleague's child should be enough for folks. It is NOT safe to fly, and the reason is, for the most part, NOT because of foreign terrorists.

I, too, had my child taken from me by airport security -- BEFORE these measures were enacted (and post 9-11) -- WITHOUT my permission, and by the time I'd turned, there he was -- an elementary school youngster being publicly frisked down by an officer in public, while a blond family - the conventional father, bourgeoise mother, and two blond bourgeoise children went through next, untouched.

continued



Sad to say, but Mr. Pitt has

Sad to say, but Mr. Pitt has missed the boat on this one. I guess he really doesn't mind if fear is the governing factor here...or that the 4th Amendment is being stomped on.



continued Needless to say,

continued

Needless to say, if I were accompanied by a male, and lighter, this would not have happened to us, at the hands of a rural honky at a rural airport, pissed off because I questioned what was happening to my luggage earlier in the boarding process, as if I were an American citizen with rights.

The Republicans were happy with things back then, and none of them had any complaints. The problem, now, however, is that EVERYONE is being searched, including THEM and their dear ones.

True, I have a sense of satisfaction imagining them getting their due comeuppance, and at the rubber gloved hands of an immigrant worker in a crowded urban airport ..

But this is fleeting, given the reality of what is really happening in America. (And something btw John Kerry has hundreds of thousands invested in, the way Sessenbrenner, after bringing in illegal labor then sunk hundreds of thousands into a useless fence.)

Fascism is here, everyone. (Anyone listening?)



P.S. This guy with the

P.S. This guy with the underwear bomb was just a convenient excuse for these companies. They were planning their little capitalist security-terror enterprise earlier, and he was their blessing in disguise to whoop up the stupid television-zombied American public, as usual.



Just because there are other

Just because there are other things to worry about like the manufactured economic collapse doesn't mean people should just say fuck it and let the would be controllers take away more of our rights. Even if you don't fly I would think this issue should outrage every American who believes in the constitution because of the fact that the pat-downs, etc. violet the Fourth Amendment. Also I use to call myself part of the Tea Party but not anymore know that it has been taken over by the neo-cons but this website tends to blame everything on them and I think its a little ridiculous, you are falling right into their trap playing the fake left-right paradigm.



This isn't about our safety.

This isn't about our safety. It's about selling "new & improved" security equipment. Follow the money. Others here have mentioned Chertoff. His client, Rapiscan, and Rapiscan's parent company OSI also stand to make huge profits from this, which might be seen as good for the economy if the stimulus funds (ostensibly to be used for creating jobs) that has been spent on these scanners so far had actually resulted in a significant number of jobs. Giving that money to Rapiscan has only managed to create 84 new jobs. If what the government has reportedly paid out on the machines so far is accurate, that comes to over $1.400.000 per job. We deserve better from our investment than 84 new jobs and a questionable increase in air travel safety.



Here's how everyone should

Here's how everyone should feel about it: If the system that issues visas worked properly, then the terrorists would not be traveling to this country. Instead, EVERY SINGLE AIRLINE TERRORIST has been issued a visa IN SPITE of being on watchlists up the freakin' wazoo. Yes, the 9/11 guys too. Oh, we've stopped some Muslim intellectuals by refusing visas, but not a single terrorist. So why are we being treated like criminals who have just been arrested and need frisking instead of the guys who ARE the criminals? Because the guy who helped Bush let New Orleans drown only to resurrect it as part of a private-sector take-over conspiracy is using this to line his pockets once again. Chertoff snaked oiled the TSA into spending taxpayer millions that CONGRESS REFUSED TO APPROVE for these machines, and those who refuse to use them are penalized by being abused in ways that would be illegal outside the airport except among consenting adults. The cancer issues and sexual assualt and boiled-frog power issues are another discussion, but if you want bare-bones dollars-and-sense reason to appreciate our outrage, there it is.



I have to say I am in

I have to say I am in complete agreement with "Anonymous Coward" above - you took the words right out of my mouth! Sorry, but I don't want to be x-rayed - not because of what the security gawkers might see - but because x-rays accumulate in the body and I have already had too many in my lifetime. And I certainly resent being groped!! Women in particular should be incensed about this. The reasons not to have this "security" apparatus are seemingly endless: including the fact that Israel seems to manage just fine without them in their airports (and are known for having stellar security).

Normally I appreciate Mr. Pitt's opinions and analysis - but not this time! Don't you realize that the line between "security" and freedom is being insidiously moved one step at a time - and it's not going in the direction of freedom...



Here's how everyone should

Here's how everyone should feel about it: If the system that issues visas worked properly, then the terrorists would not be traveling to this country. Instead, EVERY SINGLE AIRLINE TERRORIST has been issued a visa IN SPITE of being on watchlists up the freakin' wazoo. Yes, the 9/11 guys too. Oh, we've stopped some Muslim intellectuals by refusing visas, but not a single terrorist. So why are we being treated like criminals who have just been arrested (on a probable-cause warrant or because of imminent threat) and need frisking instead of the guys who ARE the criminals? Because the guy who helped Bush let New Orleans drown only to resurrect it as part of a private-sector take-over conspiracy is using this to line his pockets once again. Chertoff snaked oiled the TSA into spending taxpayer millions that CONGRESS REFUSED TO APPROVE for these machines (the insubordinate TSA and Napalitano ignored the will of the PEOPLE), and those who refuse to use them are penalized by being abused in ways that would be illegal outside the airport except among consenting adults in order to ensure that millionaires make more millions off the taxpayer, finding YET ANOTHER WAY TO EXPLOIT everyone who isn't a millionaire. The cancer rates that will spike next year and sexual assualt and boiled-frog power issues are another discussion, but if you want bare-bones dollars-and-sense reason to appreciate genuine and realistic outrage, there it is. You don't have to be left or right to be sick of this exploitation and ongoing evisceration of the Fourth Amendment.



Consider how many violent

Consider how many violent bank robberies there have been in history. In spite of modern security.

So do they search every single person who walks into a bank?

Why not? Given their reasoning regarding the underwear bomber?

I guess people need to fly more than they need to put their money in banks.



Oh, dear. I understand the

Oh, dear. I understand the ambivalence, but really! Deciding that this is not a valid issue just because the Right has agreed that it is an issue is disappointingly reactionary and not what I had hoped for from W.R.Pitt. It IS an issue. These procedures violate at our social norms, create a police state mentality around travel, and train the citizenry to accept endless incremental loss of personal and civil rights on which this country was founded. Yes, unemployment, hunger and homelessness are more urgent to more people. That doesn't mean this issue doesn't count, or shouldn't count.
Winter



Why is no one else saying

Why is no one else saying this?? It's so obvious!



Disagree completely Mr.

Disagree completely Mr. Pitt. This is just further along the slippery slope to a police state/oligarchy/dictatorship, call it what you will.

The terrorists are winning because we are scared sh_tless of them and have changed the way we live, the way we travel and how we govern because of them. They still hate us, and they still will conger up other terrorists plots. If we want that to stop we have to jettison our empire-building warmongering attitude and stay the heck out of their countries.

Then maybe we can fly without having our health compromised or our privacy violated by so called security measures.



Perhaps you haven't noticed

Perhaps you haven't noticed yet? The terrorists have won. U.S.A., the land of hysterical nervous-nellies is on the run, metaphorically bleeding the death of a thousand cuts. How much blood and treasure has been spent and continues to be spent. The U.S. is being bankrupted. The country is visibly crumbling before our eyes, lurching from crisis to crisis while the traitorous oligarchy enrich themselves from their harvests of fear reaped from the dragon's teeth they sowed.



I usually agree with William

I usually agree with William Rivers Pitt, but, and yes, The only reason the Republicans are jumping on this is to trash Obama HOWEVER, I have come to the conclusion that Obama is the third Bush term. We are still in Iraq, We are still in Afganistan, 911 has not been investigated, We still consider the Geneva Convention as a suggestion, We seem to be more interested in chasing whistle blowers than the crimes and malfeasance they were blowing the whistle on, The health care reform essentially criminalizes the crappy corporate system which is basically designed to DENY CARE and maximize the casino rake off.

Yes I voted for Obama and probably will do so again BUT to me he looks like a total capitulation to the same forces that Bush was working for.

I am for a genuine populism, and I appreciate the status quo being harassed from either side.



"I don't support this cause

"I don't support this cause because the Tea Partiers do, and I don't support everything they do," says Pitt.

That's cutting off your nose to spite your face. If the Tea Partiers refused to jump off a bridge, would you jump?

It does not matter why the Tea Partiers are against TSA sexual assault (Let's call it what it is). It does not matter that they have terrible reasons to be. The issue of whether the issue is an important one does not rest on the question of what the Tea Partiers think.

If YOU have a good reason to be on one side of an issue, listen to your OWN conscience. Don't look around and say, Gosh, what do the Tea Partiers think? Don't base your thinking on theirs. When the Left and the Right can agree on an issue that's the most powerful thing there is. After all, we are all people before we are put into the political paradigm. We don't like being touched by strangers. Why can't we all call out as one voice to defeat those who are against all of us?



Considering that the 911

Considering that the 911 investigation was a stage managed coverup, and considering that Operation Northwoods , The Gulf of Tonkin Incident, and possbily 911, were False Flag operations, then I don't really understand what terrorists we are trying to defend ourselves against.



Mr Pitt you seem to be

Mr Pitt you seem to be convinced that these machines actually contribute to security. If they did, then we could all have a debate about whether or not all this indignity is worth it. But they don't.



Terrorism industries are

Terrorism industries are good business. You can get rich trading on fear.



"voice of reason" my

"voice of reason" my backside..

"Not so long ago, a man did actually attempt to blow up an airplane with a device hidden in his underwear. "

And, according to testimony from people used to securing far more threatened and vulnerable targets than midwestern airports, that would have slipped through the scanners.

as would the packages, as would everything else.

There is no such thing as 100% security, and people who sacrifice security for freedom deserve neither.



err.. freedom for security.

err.. freedom for security.



All True Americans stand in

All True Americans stand in defense of that which is against the un-American heresy and its proponents who buy all of the "U.S.-government-manufactured-terrorism" lies that supposedly justify our doing away with our Constitution and its embodiment of our rights which we are born with, and that we must NEVER sacrifice for so-called "security".

The U.S. government now creates "Reichstag fires", and creates and sets-up patsies, like Nazi Germany did in order to "justify" invading Poland, and in order to get the "good Germans" to give up their liberties and freedoms, and accept the setting up of a totalitarian police state in their country, a dictatorship taking over everything, and exterminating all dissenters and opposition from all walks of life and political persuasions.

All of that is being repeated in "America" today, but those who defend the totalitarian takeover of the U.S., or who refuse to face that IT IS HAPPENING, call all those who speak the truth about it, so-called "threats", as happened in Germany, feeding right in to what the government wants in order to stir up enough opposition to the truth and its proponents, to be able to eradicate all dissenters and opposition from all walks of life AGAIN...



...Even though history is

...Even though history is repeating right before the very eyes of "Americans" today, they refuse to face it, and they fall right into the government trap of decrying all those who do face it, who are trying their darnedest to fulfill their duty(ies) to warn everyone that it's happening, and to get every True American to stand up against it before it's too late, if it isn't already too late.

Those who speak the loudest against these truths, and against those who speak them, won't be satisfied until all of the truthtellers are taken away and never heard from again, just as in Germany. They believe it supposedly won't happen, just as most Germans believed as well; and no amount of warning them, appealing to their "reason", trying to get them to wake up---as many of those in Germany tried to do, and who were as a result "disappeared" and never heard from again---will get them to see what's really happening until it's FAR too late.

Even the "William Rivers Pitts", who used to tell it completely like it is about the threats of overreaching government, "Richard Lichtmans", and "Michael Winships", etc., of this country are falling for it, and defending that some sort of so-called balance must supposedly be found between destroying our Constitution and preserving it, which is a complete impossibility.

Why do they do this? Because they don't want to be called those who are supposedly aiding the "terrorists"; because they want to protect and save their own hides, and the hides of their families, whether they're conscious of it or not, from the "Fourth Reich" corporate-fascist scourge that is sweeping and taking over the U.S.; and because, whatever it takes, they too want some illusory "security", even at the expense of our liberties and freedoms bought at the cost of so many extremely courageous and heroic lives...



...All of these so-called

...All of these so-called "Americans" have lost sight, or are losing sight more and more, of the fact that we must NEVER compromise with the destruction of freedom and liberty; and that we must be willing to stand against that destruction---even if it means sacrificing ourselves and dying at the hands of the totalitarian plague that is overcoming "America"---in order to warn our fellow-citizens that they better rise up en masse against this destruction of everything we should hold dear above all else except God Himself, which are our liberties and freedoms that were purchased at the monumental price of millions of American lives, no matter what.

Because, if they don't rise up en masse against it, no one except those who sell-out and betray their very souls, their liberties and freedoms, their Constitution, their country, their fellow-citizens, and their entire world will be supposedly "safe" and "secure"; and because, in truth, they will be no more safe and secure than all of their fellow human beings, and everything else, that they betrayed and sold-out.

So, the most important question at this point in time is, are we going to be cowards and traitors like those people named above, and far too many "Americans"; or are we going to exercise the True Heroism and Courage that our forbears exercised, "come liberty or come death" (my words), to preserve, protect and defend our freedoms and liberties no matter what it takes, as long as it does NOT, IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, FORM OR FASHION WHATSOEVER, "take" surrendering those liberties and freedoms?



A truly pathetic piece of

A truly pathetic piece of journalism. Mr. Pitt would do well to actually do some research on the scanners and the 'terrorist' threats he discusses. Mr. Pitt does do a masterful job of conflating issues. Truth Out can do far better than this.



Underwear "bomb" a lie. A

Underwear "bomb" a lie.
A bomb has two main components - an explosive and a detonator. The underwear "bomber" did not have a detonator and could not have blown up anything. The evil geniuses of al-qaida who can suspend the laws of physics forgot the detonator? Yeah, right! It was a ruse, another false flag operation to generate irrational fear among the sheep, ease the transition to a police state, and make more money for the military/security industrial complex.

I risk death every day on the freeway. I'd rather risk being blown out of the sky than live in a totalitarian police state.



My donation to Truthout was

My donation to Truthout was a mistake I will not repeat.
Pitt burned a bridge with this pile of crapola.



Pitt justifies the TSA

Pitt justifies the TSA measures with the story of the underwear bomber.

But if he had looked into the details, he would have seen the telltale signs that the underwear bombing, like so many other "terrorist attacks" was actually suspiciously connected to agents within our own government.

The entire "war on terror" is bogus. We need Truthout to be telling us this straight. It's what we have a right to expect from a news organization that purports to be getting at the truth.



Since we already know the

Since we already know the general description of 99% of the perpetrators why are we not concentrating our efforts on them?

BOLO & ATL 19 t0 35 YO middle eastern looking male suspects attempting to do harm to our transportation infrastructure.

Problem with that? TT the hand.

Hey Achmed, step out of line there would ya?



I agree with Mr. Pitt much

I agree with Mr. Pitt much of the time. This is not one of those times. All the points I might have made have already been made. Terrorism in America began on 9/11. I am still not so sure that 9/11 happened as we've been led to believe. I see more evidence that 9/11 was at least partially contrived, and possibly totally contrived. I want to see the Pentagon videos ... all of them. Until everyone comes clean, the TSA measures are merely a joke. Look, anyone that can charter a private jet can put anything they want on board and the TSA does not get to peek at any of it. With that giant hole, screening passengers is a waste of taxpayer money.



If I were to ask what has

If I were to ask what has been found in the years of searching we have endured, I'll bet that information would be classified. So I say nothing has been found. It's all useless CYA crap and I am secure that I would never be proved wrong.



The Islamic terrorists have

The Islamic terrorists have very little to no power. The TSA, has overreached it's authority and unless something is done we will never get those civil liberties back. We got the government we deserve.



Mr. Pitt is engaging in a

Mr. Pitt is engaging in a common fallacy known as "ad hominem".

The truth of a group's particular statements cannot necessarily be measured by the quality of their other opinions.



So our daughters tampax is

So our daughters tampax is government fodder for investigation but we do not investigate the 9/11 free fall or the lack of an airplane in the hole in the pentagon. So tell me what other dignity are we going to abandon when we are told.



Is this guy snookie stupid

Is this guy snookie stupid or what? Read the constitution! If you are worried about getting blown up in an airplane, then don't travel. Don't get out of bed,you might trip and fall! Read Webster Tarpley's book on Synthetic Terrorism! Start thinking for yourself, and if that's too difficult then get on the VIEW and join the rest of the jabbering brainless no-nothings!



I can't believe your opinion

I can't believe your opinion on this issue reached the editors desk over at Truthout - completely disappointed.



Is everyone forgetting that

Is everyone forgetting that we did not commit any crime? We did not destroy the World Trade Center, especially the highly questionable Building Number 7. We did not attack our own nation. We are not terrorists. We do not deserve our underwear searched because of the also highly questionable "Underwear Bomber."

No one could have pulled off these acts except those in power. Search them, and them alone. Leave us to a nation free of their tyranny, and also free of the tyranny of Right and Left opinions.



I will not fly while the

I will not fly while the system gets more unpleasant and expensive. The TSA is irrelevant.



This long winded article

This long winded article seemed to me like a long winded discussion whether or not water boarding is torture.
The TSA is nuts to think that they can catch a terrorist grandmother going through their obstacle course. It is useless and demeaning and reminds me of the German soldiers guiding their "customers" into the gas chambers.
So if the motivated troublemakers fill their teeth with explosive or swallow it in condoms - what torture for all of us comes next?
The only answer is to stop creating more terrorists by not terrorizing the world.



The following article

The following article completely tells it like it is:

Article title: The TSA and America’s Turning Point

Article written by, "Hobbes"
Originating website: "Scragged"
Date: November 26, 2010

infowars.com/the-tsa-and-americas-turning-point/

Mostly awesome and right-on comments too "everyone", btw!



I guess writers can be

I guess writers can be naive' but should check all sources available. The whole TSA thing is reputed to be an operation of Mr. Chertoff, who reportedly had these machines and contracts in the making or already in place BEFORE the "underwear bomber" incident took place. At least, this is what I have read. If so, this is another plot on the part of the government and certain agencies who stand to gain financially, as well as more massive control and "conditioning" of Americans for what is to come. Which means more invasion of our privacy and erosion of our rights. Our Constitution means nothing any longer, as it has been "mis-read", misconstrued, manipulated to suit certain parties, corporations, etc. for the profit of a select few who have the most money and control our government and our leaders, and consequently CONTROL US.



The people saying they have

The people saying they have no problem with the nude photo are mostly male. Many women, particularly older women like myself, have been brought up to resist being exposed naked to strangers, or groped by anyone (and a same sex groper is only marginally better). I know it's easy to say "just get over it" as many proponents have, and I'm willing to try to overcome half a century's worth of conditioning, but first I want something from the TSA:
1- How many terrorists have you caught by these methods (or any other method)?
2-Why, since there have been no terrorist attempts in the US in nearly a decade (shoe bomber and underwear bombers both originated outside our borders) do we need to pay for, and be subjected to these new machines?
3-Where is the hard evidence showing how this method is an improvement over the previous one.



On one poster's daughter's

On one poster's daughter's tampax (as the subject of government investigation), I have to add that, this has been the case at the border for some time, now. Crossing back into the United States from Canada, many years ago, on a Greyhound Bus, we were stopped by U.S. border officials who humiliated any number of the passengers while detaining our group, as we watched, aghast, at their searching of every day citizens' belongings -- including one young man who happened to be carrying (for who knows what reason?) a box of tampax in his backpack. Maybe he was picking it up for his girlfriend before heading home to the nearest U.S. border town?
continued



continued "Look what I got

continued

"Look what I got here Charlie?" shouted one to the other, as he waved the box of tampax for all at the border to see. Meanwhile, another at the long table, went through an African American woman's underpanties, as she stood there silently, with a man who appeared to be her husband. We watched in silence on our Greyhound, until a man with a Chinesse accent, stood up and began to make a speech on the bus. "I have been everywhere in the world, traveling. But no where have I seen people treated in such a degrading way at the border except in Communist China! People of America! I warn you ! THIS - is the beginning of communism in the United States!" Whatever it was the beginning of, it was not right or moral or ethical. Only it was not 2010. It was the early 1980's under Reagan. At least, now, Americans are speaking up, too.



You know, it's articles like

You know, it's articles like this that urge us to be Good Little Sheeple and go along w/the rape of our Precious Civil Liberties (which started under *Bush*, and Obama promised to end - thus abandoning yet another campaign promise, for those of you who wondered why the Dems lost the House!) that are why I gave up on BuzzFlash originally, and haven't bothered to support "Truthout"....



Where are the women's groups

Where are the women's groups on all this? Is it suddenly o.k. for women to be molested in the name of national security, and with the history this nation has, of employing hooligans at the border? Or what happens to women at the hands of the police? Or as members of our armed forces?

And is this o.k. because it's women? Who have not been checked for criminal records, including child molestation? What about the adolescents who are searched by abusive women in detention centers?

You have to be kidding me if you want me to believe that it's all "professional" and "innocent" ! What a betrayal of females, "women's movement" ! What a betrayal of young females who are minors !



I must say that I am so

I must say that I am so pleased to read the many posts here decrying the absurd, and artificial, left/right dichotomy that is ruining the discourse in our beloved nation. The fact that this dichotomy is relentlessly pushed by politicians and their media lapdogs is enough to dissuade me from thinking along those lines. And while I hate flying and all the indignities that go with it, I will be ever so grateful to the TSA if they help catalyze our rejection of the left/right political dichotomy- a classic version of divide and conquer.

We must reach out to one another across political divides if we are to survive and prosper as a nation. Those who would destroy us, label us- thus usurping our power to define ourselves, and make common cause for the common good. We are all conservative in some ways, liberal in others. Let us liberally love one another, and conservatively care for our planet.

Thank you all so much for this incredible set of posts! It has been a rough couple of weeks for me, and reading them has really lifted my spirits.



Ya know what Pitt? I am

Ya know what Pitt? I am willing to give up a few rights to remain safe, THE RIGHTS OF A FEW MIDDLE EASTERN LOOKING INDIVIDUALS. If they don't like it let them control their own g-damn monkeys, I'm sick of offending everybody to avoid offending a few, it's just not worth it anymore.



"Anonymous @ Sat, 11/27/2010

"Anonymous @ Sat, 11/27/2010 - 06:34", giving up the rights of others, especially minorities, and/or carrying out racism and racial profiling, is NOT the answer. But, you're obviously a racist, so you're defending such an indefensible and unconscionable position is not at all surprising, but please stop being racist and promoting more madness and mass-insanity...



...Look at how that turned

...Look at how that turned out for Germany and the victims of it before and during WW2. The "good Germans" gave up the rights of Jews, Roma (gypsies), gays, the disabled, the elderly, blacks, dissenters, critics of the regime including former government officials, professors, civil liberties lawyers and many others. Is that what the "good Americans" are to do today?



I am amazed at the complete

I am amazed at the complete lack of discussion regarding how these machines came to be at our airports. I was out of the country when I read one story that indicated that these machines were approved by people at the TSA during the Bush administration who are now making a pretty penny by the sale of these machines to the government. Could we have a little more coverage of that?



Those who would give up a

Those who would give up a "few freedoms," etc. etc., What S. Wolf Britain states above is something we all need to think about, including WRP.



Sometimes, not often, but

Sometimes, not often, but sometimes, the right is right and the commentators on the left have left their common sense behind. I'm glad that many commenters are trying to get TruthOut back on track on this issue.

This type of security is all about building a bigger bureaucracy at the expense of our rights and has nothing to do with security. The underwear bomber was handed to officials by his father on a platter and this essential intelligence was ignored. By ignoring him officials created a multi-million dollar economic opportunity both for the (probably far-right) businessmen who are the true parasites on this issue and for the empire builders within the government (who will probably end up with cushy jobs in business after their stint in government).



THEY'RE HEEERE.... I'm very

THEY'RE HEEERE.... I'm very disappointed in WRP! Let's just call them what they are. People that do these things used to be known as NAZI's. Everyone is now being conditioned to unquestioningly queue up in lines (PAPERS pleese!!) so that there is no panic, fear, or resistance when they actually start culling the people they deem undesirables. You'll be shunted off behind closed doors and asked to put your possesions into a box... told to take off your clothes... a barber will cut your hair... and you'll be asked to take a shower for nit control. Once you are in the sealed chamber you'll be reduced to a blip on a video screen in a command center as some simple minded, pimply faced teenager executes you - deluded into thinking he's playing some sort of high tech video game. Or worse yet... you'll be placed into an ominously misnamed "Ministry of Love" to be tortured and brainwashed until you confess to loving Big Brother! It's happened before and this will be the price we'll pay for having an ignorant citizenry. Best put a stop to it now, people. TIME TO WAKE UP!! Forget the politics. There is no left or right... only RIGHT and WRONG. And this path is definitely wrong!



Pitt is spot on. The

Pitt is spot on. The two-year-old mentality of the right - (imagine a little child's voice) "No", "No", "No" - is laughable to anyone with even half a brain. How do these clowns keep getting elected? Oh, that's right - many of these clowns are paid media "entertainers". Connecting the No-Bird dots to START and unemployment benefits is profoundly appropriate in this commentary.



I thought you were on OUR

I thought you were on OUR side, WRP? I guess there really is NO ONE on our side anymore.



Service ceiling of 727 is

Service ceiling of 727 is 36,100 feet.

You would be hard pressed to find a 727 in US where you would have to go through TSA security to get on it.

Not everyone who spews out some numbers knows what he is talking about. Apparently.



Like most of the other

Like most of the other articles on the patdown/scanner nuisance, this one misses the point.

These security measures don't work. I was a 97B, but have been out of the Army for years- yet even I can think of 3 easy ways to get explosives past this security. There are probably explosives out there that have a density similar to human flesh that could be molded into prosthetic breasts or rolls of fat.
I wouldn't care so much if the system worked, but it's not as effective as explosive sniffing dogs.



Dogs! use Dogs! For heavens

Dogs! use Dogs!
For heavens sake must we always attempt the most complicated/expensive/liberty depriving solution?



Pitts seems to have missed

Pitts seems to have missed the reality that both examples he cites as valid reasons for knuckling under to the TSA were non-events.

Both incidents would not have occurred if procedures then in effect were followed!

Why was the undies bomber escorted AROUND security at Schiapol? How could he get on plane with NO passport? Think about it.

How does inspecting passengers help in screening cargo?

DUH!



Whoever is screaming about

Whoever is screaming about using dogs remember that the perpetually offended Religion of Peace consider dogs to be unclean and would be offended again....

Hey maybe in a round about way you're on to something. Dogs and maybe those truffle snuffling pigs too. Might at least keep some of the trouble makers away from the airports.



Ding Dong, the Witch is

Ding Dong, the Witch is dead... it is now a full fledged 'bi-partisan' uprising, judging by the reactions on this board - the 'left' and the 'right' are both truly outraged and waking up and this is the first gesture of sending 'big sis' packing, along with the TSA. It is beginning to unravel now, and like the boy who cried wolf - their next desperate move will be recognized for what it is, and that will be the beginning of the end. Good riddance.



Expect the Christmas Tree

Expect the Christmas Tree bomber incident - the Somali kid - to be a dud, set up by Feds. This is the moment when people get bored with being scared, and when the requisite cattle prod event triggers an unexpected response from a public who recognizes the fraud, finally - widespread civil disobedience.



The terrorists are those

The terrorists are those people in power who profit from illegal wars based on lies. Investigate 9-11 for yourself and demand that we bring our homegrown elected terrorist overseers to justice. Let's stop our genocidal wars in the middle east and restore America.



It's so funny to see

It's so funny to see right-wingers get so mad about this when they completely supported every invasion of privacy and inconvenience enacted while Bush was the president. In fact, they called people on the left unpatriotic for questioning invasions of privacy or weakening of civil liberties.

Now, all of a sudden, they get all upset about the next step in a process that started almost 10 years ago. What is the difference? Obama is president now instead of Bush. That’s the ONLY difference!

Actually, there is another difference. The same pat-downs have been going on for years, with no protest from the right, but they were reserved for people who "look like a terrorist" or who were on a list of people to harass. Now that it applies to EVERYONE who refuses to go through the new scanners, suddenly it's a terrible thing to do.

Don't you right-wing people see how utterly hypocritical and selfish you are? Liberals who are against this have been against similar invasions of privacy all along, whether it was targeted at them personally or not, whether a Republican or Democrat was in charge.

Here is the difference: Liberals have real values, while for right-wingers, it all boils down to us against them and what about me me me. Make Obama fail, no matter how much damage it does to the country. Make the rich richer no matter how much it hurts the economy. Screw the minorities and the poor, but not me. Screw life on earth so I can drive my gas guzzling vehicle and fly whenever I feel like it.



Amen, Brian. Sad, isn't it?

Amen, Brian. Sad, isn't it?



On the right, this seems to

On the right, this seems to be about getting rid of TSA as a governmental agency, and replacing it with a private contractor (think Blackwater), as the current Homeland Security statutes allow, and as has been done already in some smaller airports. On the left, at least from where I sit, the objections are about unnecessary intrusion into personal liberty with no evidence (none, really) that the additional measures are in any way effective, or will actually make anyone safer.



Like Pitt, I noticed early

Like Pitt, I noticed early on that the right wing was having a wonderful time using another excuse to incite anti-government feeling. At least one commenter here has accused Pitt of promoting a spurious conspiracy theory to bring down Obama; this person has obviously missed the announcement by prominent Republicans that that is indeed their intention; and one can observe it in every bit of obstructionism the Republicans have mounted.

I applaud Pitt for his presentation of all the pros and cons of the TSA procedures and especially for his plea to keep things in perspective. In my opinion many of the other invasions of privacy (various forms of domestic spying and suspension of Constitutional protections for the accused) undertaken in the name of security are far more dangerous than a brief brush with nudity or so-called groping in an airport. I do in fact agree with the person who cited the quote, ""Those who would give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." I just don't think that a professional search in a potentially dangerous situation is a serious abridgment of "essential liberty," nor the top of a slippery slope.

The occasional true outrages perpetrated by the TSA, especially involving children and people with special medical appliances, are cause for concern; and I agree that already existing technology should be applied to the screening process; but the degree of hysteria exhibited by a vocal minority and championed by the media because of its titillation value is wholly unwarranted and bespeaks a pathological shame involving the human body.

Evidently, even after all the media hype, a majority of the American flying public believes that even the statistically unlikely chance of being bombed to smithereens is more of a threat than non-sexual exposure of their private parts. I say "non-sexual" because anyone who has had an "intimate" examination by a physician should be able to discern the difference between a leering, sexually-charged encounter, and an unromantic examination involving a bit of visual or tactile nudity. Mr. Pitt "gets" that, so it is entirely appropriate that he not "get" what most of the uproar is about. Count me among those who say, "Grow Up, America."



Why the TSA pat-downs and

Why the TSA pat-downs and body scans are unconstitutional

Jeffrey Rosen
Washington Post
Nov 27, 2010

prisonplanet.com/why-the-tsa-pat-downs-and-body-scans-are-unconstitutional.html



Another Bush legacy product.

Another Bush legacy product. Swatting at flies with anvils! Mr. Pitt forgot to mention that Rep. Mica was for the machines before he was against them. His current lame excuse? He had no idea they would be so revealing in their detail. I guess only having eyes for Bush fogged up his lenses.



end the TSA, HLS, DEA, ATF

end the TSA, HLS, DEA, ATF etc etc... just how many federal policing agencies do we need anyways?... they can only justify their existence if they can get the arrests and convictions to prove their worth... is this how and why America became the most incarcerated nation in the world?



Test to see if spam filter

Test to see if spam filter triggers.



Damn, am I tired of people

Damn, am I tired of people calling intelligent people children; of people being patronizing and/or condescending; of people attacking the majority who see through and give intelligent, well-reasoned responses to all of the unreasonable and unconstitutional "security" measures being taken more and more by "our" government, and of those who defend them; and of people who just don't get it, and who refuse to get it.

The U.S. has already been well-headed down the slippery slope for a long time now, and it is getting worse and worse every day! From the so-called "U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act", the "Homeland Security Act" (creating the Department of Homeland Security in the first place, that should not exist except in police-state countries like China, the former USSR, East Germany, and Nazi Germany), the "Military Commissions Act", the "John Warner National Defense Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2007", the creation of TSA in the first place, the instituting of the full-body scans of everyone, the pat-downs of everyone who opts out of the scans, and many other things, the U.S. has been turned into more and more of a police state where everyone is presumed guilty until they prove their innocence! What is so hard to "get" about all of this, and why to we have to keep trying to reason with so-called "Americans" who still can't see where all of this has already headed, and where all of it is heading more and more every day?! But "I guess" they won't get it until it is far too late and the U.S. is another, full-fledged Nazi Germany! That is NOT hyperbole; but, of course, they will probably continue to falsely believe, and continue to fraudulently claim, that it supposedly is until, like I said, it's far too late!...



..."DonDeGeorge" (is this

..."DonDeGeorge" (is this the same "Don" in other typically-blind-"good-German/good-American" comments, or a new one trying to appear more "reasoned"?), you keep missing the point, whether intentionally or not! ALL of the intentional government deterioration of our human rights and civil liberties have been growing more and more invasive and blatant over time, and added altogether represents a massive attack on, and attempted-destruction of, those rights and liberties; and it continues to go on, and on, and on! So what it is it going to take before you people who refuse to get upset about it and to take a stand against it as you should, and/or who keep attempting to marginalize the seriousness of it, finally realize just how much of a truly grave threat all of this evisceration of our freedoms, and of the protections of those freedoms, really IS?!?!?!?! TO ALL OF US?!?!?!?!

Please read my blog article FROM THREE YEARS AGO about how truly serious all of it really is(!) [and EVERYTHING in that article IS JUST AS APPLICABLE TO TODAY AS IT WAS THEN!], at:

wolfbritain.com/?p=241#TyrannyAndTreason (I give MANY links to proof backing up EVERYTHING I say in the article---sorry I couldn't find replacements for two of the "broken" videos in the article; but the most important of the videos therein still work, at least at time of this posting)

Then, PLEASE, completely wake the hell up before it's too late, if it isn't already too late (especially because of all of the far too many people who refuse to completely wake up to how exceedingly serious all of this IS)!



Mr. Pitt, I have admired

Mr. Pitt, I have admired many of your writings in the past, but you are in error with this article.

So the far right is taking this opportunity to bash the TSA, in an effort to make Obama look bad? That is not surprising, but it does not change the facts of the situation:

1) Context: we have undergone a decade of fear-mongering on the part of the government, for the purpose of scaring Americans into accepting unnecessary wars and the loss of our civil liberties.

2) The security establishment is still up to the same old tricks, hyping underwear bombs that don't work and plots invented by FBI informants as "terrorism".

3) The purpose of 2) is the same as ever, to persuade us to fall in behind government policy that we would other wise not accept, while continuing the loss of our civil liberties.

Yeah, so some Republicans are also upset about being searched as if they were county prisoners, just to get on an airplane. That does not mean it's not a disgrace, and that NO ONE should have to put up with that kind of treatment, just to travel about the country.

Think about it.



The mainstream media has

The mainstream media has acted as a cheerleader for the new security practices, starting with the bogus CBS poll which continues to be presented as gospel truth. The poll was taken before the "touch my junk" episode, before many people knew what the issues were. The LA Times had an editorial called "Shut Up And Get Scanned". The New York Times featured stories offering maudlin advice on what to tell your toddlers to prepare them for the pat-downs or scanners. All wire services ran stories which featured bland reiterations of TSA talking points.



So disappointing. I refuse

So disappointing. I refuse to stand aside while my countrymen and women are abused for a lie.

BBBBBAAAAAAAaaaaa, BBBBBBAAAAAaaaaa.



Don DeGeorge, Since when do

Don DeGeorge,

Since when do you get the right or get off telling other people about their CHOICES as individuals on whether or not to be touched?

Bully for you, you're so liberated with your naked body, that you get to tell other people to take it off, including their children!

continued



continued As for non-sexual

continued

As for non-sexual touching, none of these airport employees have been screened for criminal backgrounds regarding sexual offenses, including pedophilia! A doctor's office? Your comparison is ludicrous! People CHOOSE to go into a doctor's office, it is a PRIVATE relationship, and doctors are LICENSED PROFESSIONALS.

You might as well be felt up by a cashier at your local grocery outlet - I really like the cashiers at Trader Joe's, for example - but that SURE AS HELL doesn't mean they're qualified to run their hands and fingers over my breasts, my vagina, my penis, my testacles, my buttocks, OR MY CHILD'S MISTER.



The poor, dumbed down,

The poor, dumbed down, moronic American public. Be afraid, very afraid. That way you will keep giving up your rights for the corporate lock-down.

The corporation owns your body.

They touch you as they please. ("But It's Good For Us!")

They give or deny health care as they please. ("But they couldn't help it, they did all they could on it, the Democrats!")

You live or die as they please. ("But but but they keep saying social security must go so it must be true!")



If a "terrorist" surgically

If a "terrorist" surgically inserted a plastic shell encasing C-4 into their abdomen and blew up a plane would TSA now "have" to cut every flyer open and check for C-4? Of course not.
These "enhanced pat-downs" are no different.

It's crossing the line between "safety" and straying into absurdity. Now that these so called "terrorists" know they have to get Pat downs, do you really think they'll take a bomb in their underwear again? No

if they really want to blow up a plane they'll keep taking up more extreme measures until it will be impossible to tell bomber from citizen without slicing into everyones flesh.

If you really want to solve this problem you have to look at the root cause and not just treat the symptoms. WHY do the bombers want to blow up planes? NO one up in our political hierarchy has asked this question yet, even though it's the most important question and the FIRST question that should be asked before trying to solve ANY problem.



all you have to read is

all you have to read is right here:

http://counterpunch.org/roberts11242010.html



All those who find this porn

All those who find this porn action on it's flying citizens justified and cannot speak out against these 1984 policies, I submit to you... will you allow full cavity searches once a crazy stuffs the C4 up their arse? Or now that it is a situation where hundreds upon hundreds are forced into these cattle lines funneling down and ever closer together creating an ideal situation for mass effect detonates it right there, will you stop flying? Crazies do what crazies do... to give your personal liberties of undue search and the protections within your person does nothing to stop crazy. It only erodes our liberties that you will never get back and gives those crazies another point in the win column.



You're talking less then 2%

You're talking less then 2% of the population will go through a body scanner, but by the responses to the article, I would say you have all proved Mr. Pitt correct.



This is the last article I

This is the last article I will ever read from Truthout (sic) and, needless to say, I will stop contributing to this spineless blog for progressive wimps. Mr. Pitt accepts unwanted sexual contact and assault, which is what the TSA is doing, as being "reasonable" because it is the job of the State to interpret the "reasonableness" provision of the -4th Amendment! Horsehockey!



As cattle travel down the

As cattle travel down the slaughter chute, they really don’t care much other than what is going on right in front of them.  No doubt, Mr. Pitt, you remind me of the steer or cow about to lose the whole zest for life thing and become steak.  Only at the last one or two steers ahead of you will you know they are definitely COMING FOR YOU.  Lol.  As I read your limp ed, I was actually quite irate how stupid or insensitive or blatantly hypocritical you can be, but then it would be like me getting irate, etc., about the plight of the steer.  You have become a SHEEPLE.  Not much guessing there.  Follow the One in front of you.  No comments or you will be prodded, probed, fondled and of course, ultimately detained (the polite way of saying you are an enemy combatant, civilly disobedient, and a prime candidate for the $200 Detention Center Plan).  But, they are not COMING FOR YOU, yet. 
 

You say, “Naw, it’s just another surrender of your rights, your privacy, dignity and respect.” That’s right – RESPECT.  You have an Agency (and, it seems, yourself) that simply don’t have any respect for their fellow travellers, human beings and citizens.  (Oh and remember, that little document called the Constitution?  You know the one that was created because a whole bunch of Brit's didn't respect us colonials?  Read 1776 and get a woodie for once.  The New Americans, that are running this new game, are just like those Brits.  It is just a Paycheck, ala Nuremburg.)  Worse, when the Israeli’s tell you point blank that TSA’s current Grope, Pat and Scan will not make you safer, you flip them off.  Good job.  And then, as any good corporatist will declare, this is good for the country…..you have lost what country is about and given it to Ossama Bin Laden’s predictions.  Good Job.  Hope you have the same Job when they come to get you.  There is no accounting with the old or now new crop of politicians.  They will be owned by the Corporate sellouts and traitors, just as it has been going for decades….or centuries.  Blatantly, this pathetic diatribe “of what’s the big deal?” by you, leaves me stunned by your usually more astute and attuned reactions and observations.  Now it seems there is only a hollow argument against privacy, respect and dignity to suit your phobic belief that YOU will be safer traveling with this procedure.  Sorry, but when you get to the root f…ing cause, it is impossible to be safe from the people “running” the system.  They have a vested interest in keeping you scared, afraid, paranoid, dependent (on them), and stupid.  In your case, the later is NOW YOUR STRONG SUIT.
 
This commentor refuses to travel.  Americans vote with their wallets.  The more they find it uncomfortable, inconsiderate or repugnant, the more they will stay locally, travel by other means, or choose new technologies to somewhat stay connected for business, as families and friends.  Don’t worry the Collapse has already occurred.  You are stuck in your STRONG SUIT.  Perhaps 1830 waterboarding sessions, lots of nano-thermite (for your nasal passages) and a great interview with Dick “Heartless” Cheney will bring you around.  Naw…you haven’t been getting your daily allotment of hugs (it’s a dozen or so a day), so travelling a lot will help all you greedy, obese and insensitive types to find a new way to get your cheap thrills.  That’s why most of the folks that travel seem to be the one’s most rewarded from the Great Recession/Depression (Depression - you idiots).  You’ll believe anything that the Corporatist’s shrill shills spout, so…go for the Grope.  You’ll be safer (in your convoluted, delusional mind – but not from the Cons running the TSA System.  They’ll never be caught, that’s why books have been written about it for many years.  Mr. Pitt, do you remember those stories and historical events?  Apparently, not.  Go for the Grope.).

 



Common folks, have any of

Common folks, have any of you seen the screen shots of from these machines? Every person in them looks like a blob of goo. Its not porn or indecent. Just a blob of goo.



For those who believe

For those who believe scanners are dangerous (even though some don't use Xrays) and that searches violate the 4th Amendment ("unreasonable search and seizure"), let's just get rid of the TSA altogether and take our chances! Plus, putting those TSA screeners out of work would save billions and reduce the deficit! A win-win!
 
But, if you're still worried about terrorists, let's exercise our 2nd Amendment rights, too, by letting passengers (at least those who look Christian) carry loaded guns on board. Maybe, with the money saved by shelving the TSA, we could even LOAN everyone a gun for the flight? What terrorist would want to chance being blown to Kingdom Come by an airplane full of gun-toting grandmas before he could set off his tennis shoe?  Oh, the humiliation!
 
So, there you are --- preserving our 4th AND 2nd Amendment rights, less government intrusion and regulation, no radiation exposure, lowering the deficit --- truly a proposal the liberals(?) on this page AND the TeaBaggers can all enthusiastically embrace.  
 
And you can still pray that God Almighty will protect you from being blown to bits --- assuming you believe in the right God.



Hurray for "DonDeGeorge"!

Hurray for "DonDeGeorge"! You got "WolfBritain" to go into one of his bully tirades, so you must be saying something right!



The following just makes me

The following just makes me literally cry, for this woman and mother, the other such women and mothers put through this kind of indignity, for our country, and for everyone in this country (including the willful idiots who stick together, above; and probably, very unfortunately, again as well, below):

TSA Targets Breastfeeding Mother

Christie Haskell
"THE STIR: A CafeMom Blog"
November 29, 2010

thestir.cafemom.com/baby/113023/tsa_targets_breastfeeding_mother



I couldn't disagree with you

I couldn't disagree with you more, William. You have totally missed the point about the Fourth Amendment infringement and the terrible precedent of allowing warrantless blanket searches of everyone within a premises. We're back to the old British Writs of Assistance that were supposed to be completely gone based on our Bill of Rights. This is Franklin's comment about losing the republic because we're not courageous enough to keep it. I suspect this is all about support for Obama, but it's more important to support the republic than one president.



In my opinion, the threat

In my opinion, the threat does not justify the response by the TSA. Over 40% of radiation acquired by the body is from X-rays, as compared to 7% from the sun. Patting down old ladies and children is ridiculous. Flying is dangerous. The odds that you are killed while flying by a terrorist are miniscule compared to human error or mechanical failure. The underwear bomber was flown in from overseas. There is no word that we are doing these scans and patdowns on overseas flights. Are we safer? NO! The whole response to the 9/11 tragedy has been way over the top compared to the statistical threat. In fact we have killed a million civilians in the middle east since then. America, get a grip!



The comments claiming the

The comments claiming the low "odds" of being killed by a terrorist in an airplane ---so we don't need to worry---- is the most ridiculous BS I've seen. There are no "odds." If you took away airport screening, terrorists would be on the next plane. Even with the TSA, when the next airplane is blown up, these same people will be up in arms because the government didn't do to enough to protect them!!!
Give it up folks!



"Anonymous @ Tue, 11/30/2010

"Anonymous @ Tue, 11/30/2010 - 16:28": Look you deceptive propagandist who is trying to get people to support the police state tactics and practices of the now "United Soviet Socialist States of Amerika", nobody said there shouldn't be any airport screening, just screening that conforms with the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land! So, please quit YOUR intentionally disingenuous, misleading and ridiculous b.s., and YOU give up trying to deceive the American people into accepting turning the U.S. into a totalitarian police state! Joseph Goebbel's, Nazi Germany's propaganda minister, would have loved the help of un-American, anti-American, anti-liberty people like yourself! It is your kind among the public who help the more and more unconstitutional, oppressive, invasive and repressive U.S. government turn this country into such a police state! Therefore, you and your ilk stop being traitors to this country, and to everything that this country is ONLY supposed to stand for, "...LIBERTY AND (TRUE) JUSTICE FOR ALL", WITHOUT ANY EXCEPTION(S) WHATSOEVER!

You don't give up liberty and the protections of our freedoms, without ANY destruction of those liberties and freedoms, for "security", or you end up with neither security nor liberty!

NO SURRENDER TO ANTI-AMERICANISM AND TURNING THIS COUNTRY INTO A TOTALITARIAN POLICE STATE!!!!!



Excuse me, apostrophe in the

Excuse me, apostrophe in the wrong place: ...Joseph Goebbels'...



Excuse me again, there

Excuse me again, there shouldn't have been an apostrophe at all! LOL! Sometimes my serious physical disabilities make me so spaced out!



Intentional social

Intentional social engineering at its worst. Government message: Submit to total tyranny or else. It starts out as "simply" humiliating people ("soft fascism"); making them feel hopeless (Obama's so-called "Hope"---Orwellian, "the-reverse-is-actually-true", kind of language; aka "double-speak"); and getting them to feel powerless (Obama's so-called "Change"), to voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms, to give up trying to stand up for their rights and freedoms, and to give in and bow down to the corporate-fascist totalitarian police state completely.

They are sending the message, you resist tyranny and you will be punished, with "slight" punishment at first, and then it will be ratcheted up a little bit more, a little bit more somemore, and so on, until no resistance whatsoever will be tolerated at all. So much for the "land of the free, and the home of the brave", now become "the land of (slaves), and the home of the (cowards)":

Mother Kept In “Glass Cage” For Almost An Hour By TSA For Resisting Over Breast Milk

Steve Watson, M.A.
PrisonPlanent.com
InfoWars.net
November 30, 2010

prisonplanet.com/mother-kept-in-glass-cage-for-almost-an-hour-by-tsa-for-resisting-over-breast-milk.html

Do you now see what's going, and do you now realize that it IS happening? God help us all if we don't completely put an end to all of this madness!



Mother Kept In “Glass

Mother Kept In “Glass Cage” For Almost An Hour By TSA For Resisting Over Breast Milk

Steve Watson, M.A.
PrisonPlanet.com
InfoWars.net
November 30, 2010

prisonplanet.com/mother-kept-in-glass-cage-for-almost-an-hour-by-tsa-for-resisting-over-breast-milk.html

Do you now see what's going on, and do you now realize that IT IS happening? God help us all if we don't completely put an end to all of this madness!



Based on recent comments to

Based on recent comments to several TruthOut articles, I'd say "WolfBritain" must be the most paranoid, irrational, obsessive commentator I've seen. Apparently, a believer in (and promoter of) the "World Order" conspiracy hoax. I'm all for free speech, even for the guy on the corner soap box wearing the aluminum hat to receive messages from Outer Space -- but frankly it gets tiresome to see these tirades and ad hominem attacks constantly showing up here. My advice -- seek help!



What's the use in my

What's the use in my commenting anymore when there are truly irrational, ignorant and deep in avoidance and denial people like the immediately-previous commenter; and when most people are like that even though they might not comment and make it clear that they are? The NWO "conspiracy FACT" is in our faces constantly if the deniers and avoiders would look; but, because most people like the ignorant commenter above prefer to live in "la-la-land", they won't even check to find out whether it's a fact or not. The globalists call for it right out in the open, over and over again, including former president George H.W. Bush, G.W. Bush's father, who called for it in a speech in 1991 when he was president; and there are many examples like that right up to the present day, including famous authors like H.G. Wells advocating for it.

It's also being brought right into existence at this time, with obvious signs all around us of its being instituted, from the creation of the U.N. and the European Union to the destruction of independent, sovereign nation states including the U.S., in order to bring them under world-government dominance. Yet, as I've said many times before, most people will either deny its existence or will be fooled into believing that the NWO's global subjugation and enslavement of everyone is supposedly the cure-all for all of the world's ills, and that it will supposedly bring about a "world peace" that has never been known before in the history of the planet. But it will bring about nothing of sort, and will only bring about the exact opposite, with some surface appearances of good for the world, while eradicating all True Freedom(s) and free will...



...Yet, again, one can't

...Yet, again, one can't tell the avoiders and deniers the truth; or, one can try, but it's a waste of time ninety-nine times out of a hundred; for they will keep living a lie, and/or series of lies, in their lives, and believing that "everything will work out for the best", even when everything begins to crash down all around them. Actually, it already began with 9/11 and the creation of the many subsequent draconian, unconstitutional "laws" eviscerating our liberty(ies) and freedom(s) in the name of a "national 'security'" dictatorial police state. Hell, most "Americans" are so blind and ignorant of what's really going on, plain as day right in front of their noses, that they actually accept that this country is no longer run by "the People", and are actually happy to have the state dictate greater and greater controls over them...



...So, once more, what's the

...So, once more, what's the use? Why should I keep trying to reason with the willfully ignorant who are marching in lock-step, like good little corporate slaves and lemmings, right over the edge of the cliff into global enslavement in the lying guise of "global salvation"? The U.S. has gone completely insane; and it is only going to get worse and worse; but there is no reasoning with the majority of people, all of whom prefer evil over saving the goodness, self-governance and liberty that this country was founded on. They have been prepared by the powers-that-be, to accept and bow down to it; and because, for a very short time, it will spare them from what they will see happen to most of those who stand up against the rising tide of evil, they will actually be convinced that they're "doing the right thing"; but, very soon thereafter, they too will suffer the wrath of evil...



...No, because it is my

...No, because it is my duty, I will probably not give up on people; and, yes, I will probably continue to try and wake people up to what's really going on, and to take a stand against the deluge of evil in the guise of "good"; even though most of them will never do anything but take the coward's way out, and really believe that doing so, and betraying God, the world, this country, the U.S. Constitution, and their fellow-humankind in the process, is supposedly the "good" and "right" way to go, like the completely-subjugated and enslaved people they have already become. For, when the enslaved and subjugated have all of the outward trappings of "freedom" and "liberty" so-called, why would they, for True Goodness, Self-Governance and Liberty, want to jeopardize their false "liberty" and "freedom", and incur the wrath of their masters? They would rather die as subjugated slaves.