Threatening World Order: US and Israel Quietly Announce Plans to Reconstitute Their Nuclear Stockpiles

by: Anthony DiMaggio, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

Threatening World Order: US and Israel Quietly Announce Plans to Reconstitute Their Nuclear Stockpiles
(Image: Lance Page / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Stephen Train, ShellyS, Kim Klassen)

The world looks like it's about to become a more dangerous place. A recent report from Israel's newspaper Haaretz finds that the United States is moving forward with plans to strengthen Israel's nuclear weapons stockpile. The report, exposed within the last few days, originated from Israel's Army Radio, which sent along a secret document chronicling the nuclear cooperation between US and Israeli leaders.(1) Israel has not signed the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), meaning that it is not technically violating international rules under the NPT regarding the development and reconstitution of nuclear weapons, despite longstanding efforts of the international community to establish a "nuclear weapons free zone" in the Middle East.

Part of the fear of those advocating nuclear abolition in the Middle East is that the United States will agree to send nuclear materials - extracted from its own civilian nuclear power plants - to Israel, much as it did for India, another country that refuses to sign the NPT.

The Obama and Netanyahu governments are seeking to obscure their contempt for nuclear abolition by calling for "nonproliferation" in the Middle East, while Israel simultaneously boycotts New-York-based discussions (at the 2010 NPT conference) of the need for a "nuclear free" Middle East.(2) "Nonproliferation," within this context, can be understood to apply only to other countries such as Iran, which has long been a target for US and Israeli military planners.

Independent journalism is important. Click here to get Truthout stories sent to your email.

The Obama and Netanyahu governments recently announced that they will oppose efforts at singling Israel out in any "nuclear weapons free" Middle East discussion. The problem with this announcement is that Israel is the only country in the Middle East to currently have nuclear weapons. In light of this fact, any attempts to shield Israel from being "singled out" will inevitably prevent progress in moving toward nuclear disarmament in the region.

Much is made of Iran's alleged efforts to develop nuclear weapons by Israel and the United States. This propaganda campaign appears to be paying off in light of Iran's recent announcement of its planned opening this September of a nuclear power plant in the southern port city of Bushehr.(3) US and Israeli officials maintain that Iran is enriching uranium under the auspices of a civilian nuclear program, while secretly using its uranium stockpile to develop nuclear weapons. Those who make such claims are at a loss to explain why the International Atomic Energy Agency - in addition to the US National Intelligence Estimate - found no evidence of nuclear weapons development in Iran, despite countless inspections by international observers.(4) Those claiming that Iran is a threat are also unable to explain why inspectors are unable to uncover any evidence that Iran is producing highly-enriched uranium (of a quality suitable to develop a nuclear weapon), but instead only produces low-enriched uranium suitable for use in nuclear power plants.(5)

Despite the critical evidence above, the US-Israeli propaganda campaign is succeeding in obscuring Israel's and the United States' own open contempt for nuclear disarmament. It should be remembered that the US openly violated the NPT late last year when it announced it would extract plutonium from its own nuclear reactors in order to create a new generation of nuclear weapons (for more see the original news report here).

According to Fox News polling, as recently as April 2010, 65 percent of Americans support "the United States taking military action to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons."(6) This represents a four percent increase since September 2009. As of late 2009, CNN polling found that an astounding 88 percent of Americans believed that Iran is developing nuclear weapons - a 27 percent increase since December 2007.(7) Similarly, a poll from the Center for Iranian Studies at Tel Aviv University found that 81 percent of Iranians believed Iran will develop a nuclear bomb, according to polling done in mid 2009.(8)

Recent revelations that Israel is moving forward with US help in reconstituting its nuclear weapons program are ignored in the US press. At the same time, the United States' own efforts to redevelop its nuclear stockpile are completely suppressed, despite the obsession of both the United States and Israel with Iran's fictitious nuclear weapons. The Obama administration and the mass media are now promoting a false narrative depicting the US as committed to nuclear transparency and disarmament, and its enemies as opposed to such practices. Nowhere is this strategy more evident than in the Obama administration's continuous attacks on Iran's "nuclear threat," pursued alongside Obama's announcement of a new commitment to "nuclear transparency." More specifically, the Obama administration publicly disclosed the (previously classified) total number of operational US nuclear warheads in existence today - which stands at just over 5,000.(9) While this step was a move in the right direction in terms of drawing attention to the United States' massive stockpile, it was cynically pursued alongside a quiet announcement by the Department of Energy (originally made in September 2009) that the US is moving forward with developing a new generation of nuclear weapons, rather than working toward nuclear disarmament as legally required under the NPT.(10)

The Obama administration makes Orwellian claims that it is moving toward disarmament - when in fact it's doing the opposite by reconstituting its aging arsenal. At the same time, Obama demonizes foreign nations such as Iran, which international inspectors and US intelligence agencies concede is not developing nuclear weapons (at least according to all available intelligence).

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced, following the administration's report on the US nuclear stockpile, "We think it is in our national security interest to be transparent as we can be about the nuclear program of the United States ... the important part is that the US is no longer going to keep other countries in the dark."(11) Such statements are disingenuous at best when the US decides to redevelop its aging weapons, while any discussion of this is omitted in media and political discourse. Instead, readers are subject to reporting from The Associated Press that frames the Obama administration as "serious about stopping the spread of atomic weapons and reducing their numbers."(12)

US attention to Iran's nonexistent nuclear weapons program is all the rage in the US media. According to a comprehensive search of the Lexis Nexis database, the words "Iran" and "nuclear weapons" appeared in nearly 1,000 stories across The New York Times, Washington Post, ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, Fox and MSNBC from January through June 2010. In contrast, the United States' own openly declared "Complex Modernization" program - in which the US allocated $55 billion to extracting plutonium pits and enriched uranium from existing nuclear power plants to place in new nuclear warheads(13) - received not a single mention in any of the above media outlets from September 2009 when the plan was first announced, through June 2010, shortly following Obama's announcement of his renewed commitment to nuclear "transparency" and "disarmament."

It is disturbing that the US plan for nuclear weapons production is completely censored from public discourse. Obama promised to "seek the peace and security of a world without nuclear weapons." The Department of Energy's plans clearly violate this promise, and run counter to US obligations under the NPT to pursue US nuclear disarmament, rather than rearmament. It is no surprise that the US media establishment is ignoring this story, considering that American journalists are heavily reliant on official sources to write their stories and since journalists see US foreign policy as benevolent and humanitarian in intent. By ignoring the United States' contempt for nonproliferation, the mass media is guaranteeing that Americans will remain ignorant of the United States' brazen commitment to power politics at the expense of global security and stability.

Footnotes:

1. Barak Ravid and Reuters, "Report: Secret Document Affirms US Israeli Nuclear Partnership," Haaretz, 8 July 2010.
2. Mark Weiss, "Israel to Boycott Nuclear Free Middle East Plan," Irish Times, 31 May 2010,
3. DPA, "Iran Says Bushehr Nuclear Plant to be Ready by September," Haaretz, 7 July 2010.
4. Sylvia Westall, "No Sign Iran Seeks Nuclear Arms: New IAEA Head," Reuters, 3 July 2009.; Mark Mazzetti, "US Says Iran Ended Atomic Arms Work," New York Times, 3 December 2007.
5. BBC, "Iran Claims Higher Enriched Uranium Production," BBC, 24 June 2010.
6. For the figures provided on public opinion of Iran, see the poll aggregator, Polling Report.
7. Ibid.
8. Djallal Malti, "Israel Keeps Anxious Eye on Iran Turmoil," Agence France Presse, 24 June 2009.
9. Associated Press, "US Releases Details of Nuclear Weapons Inventory," Foxnews.com, 3 May 2010.
10. Matthew Cardinale, "US Nukes Agency Pushes New Bomb Production," Truthout/Inter Press Service, 30 September 2009.
11. Associated Press, "US Releases Details of Nuclear Weapons Inventory," Foxnews.com, 3 May 2010.
12. Ibid.
13. Matthew Cardinale, "US Nukes Agency Pushes New Bomb Production," Truthout/Inter Press Service, 30 September 2009.

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Anthony DiMaggio taught US and global politics at Illinois State University prior to becoming a casualty of this year's Illinois budget cuts. He is now the editor of the online journal, www.media-ocracy.com, which is devoted to studying issues of public opinion, mass media and current events. He is the author of "Mass Media, Mass Propaganda" (2008) and the forthcoming "When Media Goes to War" (2010). He can be reached at: mediaocracy@gmail.com.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Maybe they will have an

Maybe they will have an accident.



Great. More nuclear weapons

Great. More nuclear weapons in the hands of madmen. The world is run by fools.



The US is run by war

The US is run by war mongering, corporatist, idiots. Unbe-fucking-leavable!



I am glad I am in the last

I am glad I am in the last years of my life. I fear for my children and grandchildren.



Whose idea was this,

Whose idea was this, Rumsfeld's?

What idiocy.

The Israelis, once heroes, are not acting in the interest of peace--nor have they for 25 years. Don't blame (or even mention) the "rockets". Israel sets them off themselves, I believe. They cause less damage than traffic accidents.



More of that Hope & Change.

More of that Hope & Change. I'm sure Obama will keep on delivering what he promised ... to the Establishment in his second term.



The partnership that was

The partnership that was created many years ago through the use of guilt by the Israeli's should now end. It should just now be one that we have limited trading and commerce connections with.
Nor should we learn about sharing of nuclear weapons via one of their newspapers but should have had it announced at the end of the last meeting in the White House. We need to act now to create a new world order of Peace not perpetual conflict. War is good for the gross national product. How are we doing with that right now? Peace can be Productive. The anger of one nation should not be the compass guiding the actions of another. Let the Israeli's stew in their own potage of anger and let America work for Peace in our own nation.
It is time to find and elect the leaders who will not be used by small minded corporations, individuals or countries looking for the quick profit, safe harbor or good life.



Why are we fighting Israel's

Why are we fighting Israel's wars? Neither Iraq nor Afghanistan (nor Iran) constitute any threat to us. Why wouldn't we be better off by dropping Israel -- are we still giving it $2 billion a year? -- and forming alliances with Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, as we have with Saudi Arabia?

This looks and feels like the preparation for another "false flag" operation as an excuse to annihilate the Middle East -- maybe with nuclear weapons -- to rid the world of Israel's -- but not our -- enemies.

I keep thinking of Chekov's statement that "if there is a gun on the stage, it must be used." It seems that we have had absolutely no idea who or what is really running the show, though there is enough nasty coherence to suggest that the plans are clear, far-reaching, and chugging along just fine.

Germans wrote about how quickly and seamlessly their media went from free to party-line Nazi. We're rated, what -- 25th or so for freedom of the press? Wasn't it near 50th a few years ago?

And how convenient that "conspiracy theory" is the one thing we're not allowed to suggest, when everything unfolding for ... well, what? Since 9-11? Since Reagan came to power? Since our CIA and Friedman's economic theories destroyed Chile in 1973? Since our CIA and Berkeley economists destroyed, brutalized and looted Indonesia in 1965? Since General Smedley Butler said "War is a racket" in 1933-35, detailing the battles he had led in his career for the benefit of our corporations? Since our 1893 coup in Hawaii, also at the bidding of our well-connected corporations? Since the Monroe Doctrine? I think a lot of us feel, both that we have no idea what in hell is going on, and -- more frighteningly -- that we do.

Over a century ago, Vienna's Karl Kraus -- who seemed almost alone in seeing and saying that the Empire was crumbling -- wrote, almost romantically: "I hear noises which others do not hear. And those noises disturb for me the music of the spheres -- which others don't hear either."

How idyllic it would be if we were only losing the music of the spheres! It feels like we're on the verge of losing so much more, without even the pyrrhic comfort of seeing the script it appears that the puppetmasters have been following for a long, long time.



The sooner the human race

The sooner the human race extincts itself, the better for the planet.



Having Blue-Dog Democrats in

Having Blue-Dog Democrats in the Congress has been a great coup for the Neoconservatives & Republicans. Claiming to be in the Democratic Party while supporting the philosophies of the other is absolutely shameless. But now it becomes clear that we have a Blue-Dog administration in power; no wonder Obama received so much financial backing during the campaign of 2008.

To represent to the world that the US seeks peace and diplomacy in place of further aggression is just another card-trick, one that can destroy the planet. I doubt if any nation takes us seriously for what we say, when what we do is so obviously the opposite.

The [b]Hope & Change[/b] that so many believed in back in 2008 has become [b]Smoke & Chains,[/b] due to this Blue-Dog Administration. I'm wondering if a Republican administration could be any worse.



Why didn't we invent world

Why didn't we invent world peace before Nuclear weapons?



To answer 22:34, Yes...

To answer 22:34, Yes... Sarah would be the one to push the button!



Our policy with regard to

Our policy with regard to Israel and Iran is wrong. We should be talking with Iran about an enhanced inspection regime that would assure everyone that Iran is not developing nukes.

The Department of Energy does not make policy regarding nuclear weapons.

The US has not developed a new nuclear weapon for about two decades, and it doesn't appear to be doing so now.

What it is doing is maintaining the the stockpile that is permitted under the arms control treaties to which it is a party.



Someone really ought to

Someone really ought to forcibly steal & destroy Obama's Nobel Peace Prize. He is completely undeserving of it, as proven yet again by this despicable evidence. Orwellian doesn't even begin to describe the sort of lying and doublespeak the US government has been engaged in for the past 50 years.



Good last line. "By ignoring

Good last line. "By ignoring the United States' contempt for nonproliferation, the mass media is guaranteeing that Americans will remain ignorant of the United States' brazen commitment to power politics at the expense of global security and stability."

Americans, which I assume here means the general population of the US, willfully choose to remain ignorant. The MSM is simply assisting them in that choice. When the MSM and Israel have succeeded in prodding an obliging US administration into a war with Iran, things should really get interesting.



Israel causes more harm to

Israel causes more harm to the United States than good… We give billions above the table (and below) yet we get nothing in return… Who is wagging whose tail? Why would we do this?

The US electorate being misinformed… spineless politicians unwilling to change… Christians supporting murder, containment and theft of land… and Jews smiling behind the scenes… Disgusting...

Who cares about justice? Who cares about humanity and freedom? We in the United States talk the talk… but DON’T walk the walk…



The U.S. allowing nuclear

The U.S. allowing nuclear material to be sold certainly can be regarded as belligerent, yet one must also consider the possibility of re-arming warheads with newer, and perhaps "safer," radioactive matter. Israel has officially both an unknown and an undisclosed arsenal that might be in need of, or simply could benefit from, an upgrade.

Stockpiling these weapons is something that should be avoided. All non-signatories and violators of Non-Proliferation should be inspected by the IAEA. No need to single out anyone in particular.



"The Obama and Netanyahu

"The Obama and Netanyahu governments recently announced that they will oppose efforts at singling Israel out in any "nuclear weapons free" Middle East discussion." In fact, these two "governments" are one in the same. The Zionists and the Neocons have been merged for many years now and are responsible for the great majority of wars and aggression worldwide. They pulled off 9/11 quite handily while the cowering elected officials kept quiet and took their bribes from the lobbyists. Their goal is world domination through conventional wars of aggression and nuclear threat. That they are insane is a given; whether they will destroy life on earth is the question.



Israel is the U.S.'s dog in

Israel is the U.S.'s dog in the ME. It makes sense that their nuclear program would be done in conjunction with the U.S. and not a secret conspiracy. Barry Chamish years ago exposed the new missile base construction going on in Israel under GWB2. They have already built missile silos in Israel.



How's that "Hope and Change"

How's that "Hope and Change" going? How about a government that actually abides by the laws and the will of the people? Pretty "radical" huh?
Because everyone knows that Israel has nukes it is a violation of the Symington Amendment to provide any form of aid to them. We send $3B per year in direct aid alone as well as many times that in "indirect" aid while our citizens sleep in the streets.
Wake up people, we are living in an occupied country.



You are wrong a Soviet

You are wrong a Soviet General(Russian) slipped about the Iranians already having Nuclear weapons.

Date and time sure !! The Iranians are the Russians middle east Dog so what they all have em. The question is do you have all the preps to survive hits?? if no quit whining

NEWS BRIEF: "RUSSIAN GENERAL CONFIRMS IRAN HAS NUCLEAR WEAPONS!", Stratfor Intelligence, Week of June 4, 2002.
""A Russian general's statement about Iran's nukes fails to register with media. Sometime a slip of the tongue is so incredible that no amount of doctoring can explain it. And sometimes a slip of the tongue is as intentional as could be. Take an appearance by Russian Deputy Chief of Staff Gen. Yuri Baluyevsky. He gave a briefing on Friday in Moscow during the Bush-Putin summit and was asked about whether Iran actually fired the Shihab-3 intermediate-range missile in a successful test earlier this month. The second question was whether Iran can threaten Israel, Russia or the United States with its nuclear and missile programs.
Then the Russian general takes a surprise turn: 'Now, as to whether or not Iran has tested something like that. Iran does have nuclear weapons,' Baluyevsky said. 'Of course, these are non-strategic nuclear weapons. I mean these are not ICBMs with a range of more than 5,500 kilometers and more."
Now this is shocking news, indeed! This Russian general has just confirmed that Iran has nuclear warheads and theater missiles with which to deliver them! And, he seems not to be concerned because these warheads cannot yet hit Russian soil. If Iran has nuclear weapons and the missile capability with which to deliver them to Israeli targets, then the entire calculation of military balance in the Middle East may just have changed.
For the longest time, the Arabs have realized their conventional armed forces were no match for the Israeli Defense Forces. The IDF has large enough manpower resources that, when married to the world's most radical cutting edge military technology, produces a definitive military edge over all combines Arab forces.
Therefore, Arab war planners have sought to achieve a "asymmetrical" capability that would neutralize the Israeli advantage enough so that the small population of Israel could be annihilated even if the IDF was winning decisively on the battlefield. The 270 million population of the combined Arab states in the region has literally been put on the line by current Arab leaders in order to wage the kind of war that would finally exterminate the pesky 6 million Jews in Israel.
Weapons of Mass Destruction fitted on theater missiles, aircraft, and human bodies are the "asymmetrical" weapons chosen by the Arabs. These missiles are now aimed at Israel, and are fitted with nuclear, chemical and/or biological weapons. For this reason, Israel and the United States have rushed into production the most sophisticated anti-missile weaponry in existence. U.S. upgraded patriots are now in Israel, as are increasing numbers of the Israeli Arrow missile.



"...as recently as April

"...as recently as April 2010, 65 percent of Americans support "the United States taking military action to keep Iran from getting nuclear weapons."(6) This represents a four percent increase since September 2009."

This is incorrect. 65% is 6.56 percent higher than 61%, not the four percent indicated. (e.g. an increase from 4% to 8% is an increase of 100%, not 4%, to use an extreme example).

Should be "four percentage point increase".



With all the flaws of ANY

With all the flaws of ANY religion, Islam has never committed the uncountable inhuman atrocities on mankind, and on Earth herself, as has been done by the Jewish and Christian powers.

Here in the U.S.A., propaganda has has completely taken over the MSM to the extent that many concerned citizens only receive it in order to get a 'reading' of its current pervacations.



What a bunch of idiots you

What a bunch of idiots you have reviewing stories like this.
The point of the whole Israel thing is: If the arabs disarmed there would be peace, If Israel disarmed there would be a massacre.



purses lvreplica-purses

check for gift lvreplica-purses.com-0121 , just clicks away



dressesforyou.net

view ru.dressesforyou.net at my estore



designer boutique online

shop designer online , just clicks away YEDvtXeo http://designerboutiqueonline.metroblog.com/



vuitton online shop

to buy louis vuitton online shop for less TWCAVdaf http://www.louis-vuittononline-shop.com/



hermes outlet

buy hermes outlet online jXsqNTPg [URL=http://www.hermes-outlet2013.net/ - hermes birkin price[/URL - to your friends odWMmKrW http://www.hermes-outlet2013.net/



burberry quilted jacket

click burberry quilted jacket mzzybdfL [URL=http://blog.easybranches.com/karenmillenuk/ - burberry wallet[/URL - and get big save dvVQNKFX http://blog.easybranches.com/karenmillenuk/



panasonic lumix

get panasonic lumix SUVQMAWW [URL=http://lepress.net/panasonic123 - panasonic lumix[/URL - at my estore SvPnbpEN http://lepress.net/panasonic123



LV Boucles d'oreilles marque

Vous avez certainement des opinions et des vues agréables [url=http://www.marqueachat.com/425-lv-boucles-d-oreilles]LV Boucles d'oreilles marque[/url] LV Boucles d'oreilles marque



Gucci Femmes Haut Chaussures marque

Merci pour le partage. [url=http://www.marqueachat.com/332-gucci-femmes-haut-chaussures]Gucci Femmes Haut Chaussures marque[/url] Gucci Femmes Haut Chaussures marque



sacs longchamps

1 cell computer audio system, I fear I might becoming a klipsch fanboy!