Through the Looking Glass: The Myth of Israeli Exceptionalism
Tuesday 15 June 2010
by: Michael Gould-Wartofsky, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

(Image: Jared Rodriguez / t r u t h o u t; Adapted: Auntie P, leah.jones)
In the bloody wake of the Mavi Marmara, with its righteous torrent of international outrage, and in view of a new confrontation impending at sea, a point of vital importance has gone missing. It is one that many Jews and many Gentiles grasp, but do not name.
It is the myth of Israeli exceptionalism, and its contradictions go to the heart of the radical disconnect between world opinion - including growing swaths of Jewish and Israeli opinion - and the actions of the war party in Israel and in the United States. Yet most of us still see the conflict through the lens of some exceptionalism, as if through Alice's looking glass.
Exceptionalism is the ideology that holds one's country above and beyond any other in the world, more righteous, more holy, and others less so. The late, great, Jewish American historian Howard Zinn wrote an essay in 2005 on "The Myths of American Exceptionalism":
Expanding into another territory, occupying that territory, and dealing harshly with people who resist occupation has been a persistent fact of American history. This was often accompanied from early on with a particular form of American exceptionalism: the idea that [our] expansion is divinely ordained.
Exceptionalism is an ideology propagated by the power elites of two nations of vastly different proportions and histories - Israel and the U.S. - but each declaring a divinely manifest destiny, each justifying a permanent state of exception, each engaging in extrajudicial assassinations and occupations, each with its second-class humanities and "internal enemies."
It is ideas like exceptionalism - and the grim realities of the state of exception - that enable nation-states to defend policies of expansionism, violations of international law, the dispatching of international activists. All the more so for young states with centuries of colonialism etched into the land and consciousness.
Through the looking glass, even for those who still have eyes to see (and who haven't, say, had eyes shot out of their sockets, as did Jewish American art student Emily Henochowicz at a West Bank protest this week), it can be hard to tell myth from fact, ideology from history.
The looking glass of exceptionalism comes in lenses of many colors, many brands:
- For the Israeli apparatchik: The State of Israel, as protector of the Jews and "the only democracy in the Middle East," has an inalienable right to use overwhelming, disproportionate force against its foes. All Jews must stand with it at all times under all circumstances. The genuine rights of the Jews, as a historically oppressed people, become the state's right to [fill in the blank].
- For the anti-Zionist activist: Israel is an exceptionally evil, exceptionally powerful entity, a "barbaric" nation among supposedly "civilized nations." And "Israel," by which many activists equate the people and the state, is facing exceptional payback. Their actions now run the gamut from boycotts to firebombs.
- For the anti-Semitic opportunist: The real problem is the "Jewish problem." This exceptionally problematic people must either be liquidated or, as Ann Coulter put it, "perfected." Zionism is a code word for Judaism, "the Zionists" for "the Jews," much as "the Reds" used to be. Anti-Semitic crimes worldwide have surged since the invasion of Gaza. And what now, with Stars of David burning in the streets?
- For the American pundit-politician: Through the looking glass of American exceptionalism and paternalism, the conflict provides a civilizational rallying point and a spectacle to sell to the public. "America and her ally, Israel, are waiting for your response," writes Sarah Palin in a Facebook note to President Obama, while VP Biden, on Charlie Rose, just wants to know, "So what's the big deal?"
(Witness the conflict's nature as spectacle, as blood and circuses for the masses, in the immediate evaporation of Middle East coverage amid news of Al and Tipper's divorce.)
For the Jewish peacenik, on the other hand, the State of Israel is inherently neither more righteous nor less righteous than other nation-state with a history of colonialism and partition, war and occupation. Yet the weight of Jewish history confers a special responsibility on the Jew, who, of all people, ought to know how uncivilized even the most "civilized" nations can become.
James Baldwin penned the following provocative lines in 1967: "The Negro is really condemning the Jew for having become an American white man - for having become, in effect, a Christian...He is singled out by Negroes not because he acts differently from other white men, but because he doesn't."
A new generation of Jews, as hawk-turned-dove Peter Beinart has observed, is refusing to accept this moral assimilation, for which ideologies of exceptionalism are but a mask. Many of them joined demonstrations this week in New York and Tel-Aviv. More and more refuse to see the conflict through the looking glasses of exceptionalism, through the blinders of extreme nationalism and tribalism.
Our generation and others must now chart a course towards the only safe harbor there is: an end to the blockade, an end to all forms of terror, a port of peace and freedom. A beginning.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
My comment is at:: http
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 10:31 — Anonymous (not verified)My comment is at::
http //wcg-chipigrams.blogspot.com/2010/06/ worshipping-ones-golde-ass.html
As usual TO's obnoxious
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 10:32 — Anonymous (not verified)As usual TO's obnoxious filter has blocked my comment which can be found
http: wcg-chipigrams.blogspot.com/2010/06/worshipping-ones-golden-ass.html
Oyl that matters to them is
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 10:38 — Vic Anderson (not verified)Oyl that matters to them is how yahweh sees it.
The full URL with all
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 10:49 — Anonymous (not verified)The full URL with all slashes and colons
http: //wcg-chipigrams.blogspot.com/2010/06/worshipping-ones-golden-ass.html
Truthout needs to fix it's
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 10:52 — Anonymous (not verified)Truthout needs to fix it's stupid spam filter which blocks at random and without reason. I have tried pasting not pasting, omitting various characters or putting them in. Nothing works
It is very annoying to all of us who wish to post comments to spend time composing something only to have it arbitrarily blocked.
FIX THE DAMN THING OR GET RID OF IT.
I dunno. Mine seems to
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 11:13 — Anonymous (not verified)I dunno. Mine seems to work just fine.
Good luck with that course,
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 11:30 — Anonymous (not verified)Good luck with that course, keeping in mind, please, that Israeli exceptionalism allows the US to sell a lot of guns and bombs to the Only Democracy in the Middle East.
Good analysis! The aspect of
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 15:21 — Anonymous (not verified)Good analysis! The aspect of colonialism in the founding of Israel is revealing, especially with regard to American and European motives in helping erase Palestine. Somehow, a brown, non-European people ended up becoming the scapegoat for the sins of Europeans, who were allowed to walk away from the genocide they had just committed. How nice for them. Would TO please do us all a favor and republish Einstein's 1948 letter to the Times? His analysis of Zionism extends Gould-Wartofsky's by daring to apply the f-word (fascist), a place nobody now seems to want to go. Given recent events, seems relevant to me.
When Israel learns to live
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 16:44 — granny (not verified)When Israel learns to live the "Never again" mantra it will begin to earn the mantle of righteousness it loves to wear. What's that about philacteries, etc?
"Our generation and others
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 17:20 — Red Erik (not verified)"Our generation and others must now chart a course towards the only safe harbor there is: an end to the blockade, an end to all forms of terror, a port of peace and freedom. A beginning."
That's inadequate. It's not even a beginning. Until Israel returns, without qualification, the land it stole from the Palestinian people in 1967 (as required by several UN general assembly and security council resolutions) one cannot speak of ' a beginning'.
All people, everywhere and always, agree that oppressed people have an inalienable right to defend their families and homes by any means necessary. The poorer the oppressed, the more their resistance looks like--and will be defined by their oppressors as--terrorism.
Neither the US nor Israel are exceptional; that notion is just propaganda for their masses. Both are imperialist regimes seeking ownership or control of resources that rightly belong to others. When those inhabitants resist this state sponsored thievery they are labeled "terrorists".
Or, to use a more pithy expression; "There is no peace without justice".
@Red Erik 'When those
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 19:32 — Mickalin (not verified)@Red Erik
'When those inhabitants resist this state sponsored thievery they are labeled "terrorists".'
Since this is "truthout" allow me to improve your "truthiness" a bit with a more factually correct statement.
When those inhabitants resist this state sponsored thievery by killing innocent civilians, including women and children, they are labeled "terrorists".
There now, much better. The truth might hurt, but not nearly as much as lying.
Can we afford Israel? We
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 19:35 — Davidson (not verified)Can we afford Israel? We give them a couple billion a year of taxpayer money, our soldiers are losing their lives, bodies and minds fighting Israel's -- but not our -- enemies, and our continual backing of Israel's wanton brutality and murder — which the rest of the world is condemning — is just making Arabs and Muslims lose respect for us. It's also helping them recruit more "freedom fighters" to oppose us, kill and wound more of our soldiers, and motivate more young Muslims to become human bombs in order to fight our illegal invasions, murder of civilians and occupations. We planned a permanent occupation of Iraq before invading it. We have built the world's largest embassy building and several huge concrete military bases. Supposedly, we learned in Vietnam that we're unlikely to win the hearts and minds of people we're killing and whose country we're destroying. This time around, we're also the friend of the Arabs' and Muslims' greatest enemy. Can we really afford Israel?
Israel and the so-called
Tue, 06/15/2010 - 22:11 — Anonymous (not verified)Israel and the so-called "Jewish Race" is one of the biggest farces in all history. The other one is "for the people, by the people"
Mickalin: Those who take up
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 10:49 — S.O. Teric (not verified)Mickalin: Those who take up arms and are labeled "terrorists" are doing it because their women and children have already been killed by the policies of super-nations. My question is, given the history of man[un]kind's thinking in regard to how to use civilian populations in order "to break the will of the enemy," Is there an 'innocent civillian' or only 'collateral damage'? Depends on whose side you're on. We would have to back way away from such bloody issues in order to redefine "side."
A very interesting analysis
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 12:06 — Anonymous (not verified)A very interesting analysis that breaks down a number of psychological takes on the issues.
I think there should be some comment on those who seem, however, to view the entire world through this conflict.
You can't have a discussion about anything going on the United States without their fanaticism about Israel coming up.
It's highly irrational.
The other day, I was called a dirty Jew in the middle of a discussion about problems in the U.S. health care system. The person recalled my criticism in another discussion of Helen Thomas' remark -- which was blatantly antisemitic, but the so-called left in the U.S. has been unable to come to terms with that truth. The only point I remarked on in that earlier discussion was that the comment was antisemitic. This individual drew all kinds of demogogic conclusions about where I was coming from in terms of what's happening to the Palestinian people.
I find absolutely impossible to have a reasonable conversation with the fanatics running around in this dialogue.
Plus, no one in the left stands with you.
The writer of this article is quite a privileged individual who seems to think that no one out there in American society is vulnerable.
Which is why I can no longer support the progressives either. Because they do not take a clear enough, condemning position on antisemitism as being completely unacceptable.
Just like this website published an article praising Helen Thomas, when she made these statements.
Some of you leftists would
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 12:10 — Anonymous (not verified)Some of you leftists would stand there is they were stoning someone in the street for being a "dirty Jew."
Your article about Helen Thomas was a intellectual FARCE.
@mickalin: Since this is
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 12:42 — Anonymous (not verified)@mickalin:
Since this is "truthout" allow me to improve your "truthiness" a bit with a more factually correct statement.
When those inhabitants resist this state sponsored thievery by killing innocent civilians, including women and children, they are labeled "terrorists".
There now, much better. The truth might hurt, but not nearly as much as lying.
SO let me improve your 'truthiness': state sponsored thievery IS killing innocent civilians, including women and children, and they should be labeled "terrorists" because thats what they do wrapped in their myth of exceptionalism.
Davidson, "Israel's enemies"
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 14:56 — Anonymous (not verified)Davidson, "Israel's enemies" "but not ours" ?? Oh how I wish I had no right to vote or work or get medical care without my MAN and had to walk around in society with a potatoe sack over my body. Oh my loving friends who killed thousands of my fellow Americans in New York City. What is your name really, Davidson? Where were your family members during the Second World War ?? How did they feel about that war ?? What did they think they were fighting for ? (If they were) Oh how I love how voices like yours really inform what's going on this matter. BTW Israel has universal health care. What do your friends in Saudi Arabia and UAE have ? GET REAL.
Helen Thomas is an myth of
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 15:05 — Anonymous (not verified)Helen Thomas is an myth of exceptionalism.
There is nothing remarkable about anything she said.
I wish there were just more
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 15:14 — West Coast Mona Lisa (not verified)I wish there were just more down-to-earth discussion of the legal disputes and issues concerning this land. A lot of people seem to assume that everyone "just knows" about all of this. God help you if you stumble into a discussion of the Middle East and actually expect to learn something beyond the fact that there are people out there who hate their mythological boogeyman called "the Jews."
I will say this, though. You have to be pretty ignorant and not very self-reflective if you don't understand that there is, indeed, a Jewish people (vs. "race") that are traced back to this part of this world, and had good reason to head that way after the second World War.
A lot of the criticism of Israel, I notice, is fueled by the same kind of western exceptionalism that seems to think they can tell everyone else in the world what to do with their countries, who has a right to be where and when. This was exemplified by Helen Thomas -- who I see as long-time closet antisemite finally caught with her clothes off -- and darling of American Presidential administrations -- the European establishment that thought they could ship Jews here and there -- and now, thinks maybe they can ship them around again.
@ "Mickalin": The Israeli
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 17:44 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)@ "Mickalin":
The Israeli government and military murders women and children; and far more women and children than the Semitic "Arabs" and/or Palestinians do. Therefore, it is YOU who are lying, both by lying directly and lying by omission; not those who stand up against Isreali apartheid.
You Israel-firsters never look at or face the other side of the story. Your exceptionalism for Israel knows no bounds and cannot be reasoned with. Everyone who doesn't toe the Israeli government and military party line, is supposedly anti-Semitic automatically. You supporters of blind racism, ethnic cleansing and mass imprisonment and murder are absolutely disgusting and sickening!...
...@ "West Coast Mona
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 17:46 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...@ "West Coast Mona Lisa":
You too are disgusting and sickening. Your "apologism" (sic) for stealing much of an entire country or territory, whether under the cover of so-called "legality" or not, makes you very typically brainwashed and ignorant of the True Facts, just as the so-called "exceptional" states of Israel and the U.S. governments and their blind supporters want you to be. Wake up and stop supporting mass murder!
Helen Thomas isn't, as far as I know truly anti-Semitic. She was just expressing that she, as millions of other Americans and others, including millions of Jews, realize, that since Jews have been unconscionably expropriating land that did not rightfully belong to them, with much genocide and ethnic cleansing in the process, they should have to give up all claim to that territory completely, and go wherever they can go. Of course, it will never happen, but it is nevertheless the truth. Helen Thomas just got persecuted for speaking the truth, as is also typical, particularly at the hands of the so-called "exceptional" states which have no true divine right to anything more than everyone else has a divine right to, which is freedom from exceptionalism and mass-murder...
...There is true, real free
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 17:46 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...There is true, real free speech; and then there is so-called "free speech", or limited "free speech". We are supposedly not allowed to speak the truth about Israel, especially if you are in a "privileged", "exceptional" position at the "pleasure" of the oligarchy. So, when someone, anyone, speaks the inconvenient truth, they are pilloried. That is the way of evil "discrediting" the truth, and has been for thousands of years. Helen Thomas' problem was that she should have spoken this truth a long time, as in many years, before she did, and not been willing to remain silent for the sake of "privilege" and remaining within the fringe of the "bad old boy network's" circle.
Oh,were you finished? Then
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 23:17 — Mickalin (not verified)Oh,were you finished? Then allow me to retort.
@S.O. Teric: You said, "Depends on whose side you're on." I agree completely. If you choose sides, then by definition, you are biased. Best to not choose and remain objective. The world is not simply black and white, even if simple people wish it were so.
@Wed, 06/16/2010 - 17:42 —
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 23:18 — Mickalin (not verified)@Wed, 06/16/2010 - 17:42 — Anonymous: "state sponsored thievery IS killing innocent civilians, including women and children, and they should be labeled "terrorists" because thats what they do wrapped in their myth of exceptionalism."
You were doing well until you called them terrorists. Murderers would probably be a better description. You see, when you receive state sponsorship, then you're in the big-time. Sort of like the difference between professional and amateur athletes. Also, this myth of exceptionalism is just that. A myth. If no other country on earth ever violated it's own laws, international laws, or just plain human decency then it would be exceptional. Unfortunately that's not the truth. Show me a country that DOESN'T maim, kill, kidnap, torture or generally act in a selfish manner and I will show you a truly "exceptional" country.
@S. Wolf Britain: You, my
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 23:19 — Mickalin (not verified)@S. Wolf Britain: You, my friend, have some anger issues. But to take your rant one point at a time...
"The Israeli government and military murders women and children; and far more women and children than the Semitic "Arabs" and/or Palestinians do."
So, at least you admit that your Arab friends do indeed murder women and children. You just think that the Israeli gov't does it more. That's a start.
"Therefore, it is YOU who are lying, both by lying directly and lying by omission; not those who stand up against Isreali apartheid."
Are you saying I'm a liar because I corrected someone else's post? Do you disagree that those who kill innocent people are terrorists? You don't seem to think that when Israel does it. You can't have it both ways, Wolf.
"You Israel-firsters never
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 23:20 — Mickalin (not verified)"You Israel-firsters never look at or face the other side of the story"
See my previous rebuttal.
"Your exceptionalism for Israel knows no bounds and cannot be reasoned with."
If you've shown some reason, I've yet to see it. To reiterate, Israel isn't the first, last or only gov't to protect it's people, sometimes violently. If it were, THEN it would be exceptional. Which pacifist regime do you live in?
"Everyone who doesn't toe the Israeli government and military party line, is supposedly anti-Semitic automatically. "
Incorrect. Otherwise there would be plenty of anti-Semitic Jews, both in and outside of Israel, including me. Just because I think Israel has the right to exist, doesn't mean I agree with everything the gov't does.
"You supporters of blind
Wed, 06/16/2010 - 23:21 — Mickalin (not verified)"You supporters of blind racism, ethnic cleansing and mass imprisonment and murder are absolutely disgusting and sickening!..."
Here you show your true colors. You make a judgement without knowledge. That is called prejudice. By doing so you are also a hypocrite. You know nothing other than that I believe that killing innocent people is terrorism, yet you have come from on high to brand me as an uber-Zionist. The rest of your diatribe against Israel is similarly tainted with bile and hatred. If this is your way of helping the Arabs in Palestine, small wonder they are doing so well.
SWB "...@ "West Coast Mona
Thu, 06/17/2010 - 00:51 — West Coast Mona Lisa (not verified)SWB
"...@ "West Coast Mona Lisa":
You too are disgusting and sickening."
Ad hominem.
" Your "apologism" (sic) for stealing much of an entire country or territory, whether under the cover of so-called "legality" or not, makes you very typically brainwashed and ignorant of the True Facts,"
I have openly stated my ignorance of the facts, but I fail to see how seeking to learn about a situation makes one "disgusting and sickening."
Nor do I see how expressing my frustration with the challenges of finding in an information in a dialogue clouded with the atmosphere which you so greatly exemplify with your attacks, makes me an "apologist" or "brainwashed," for that matter, since an apologist seeks to justify a position which I have not stated and being brainwashed means a person does not seek information.
So you are being illogical and irrational, in addition to be offensive and making personal attacks, which is a fallacious argument in and of itself.
"Wake up and stop supporting mass murder!"
I have never supported mass murder.
"Helen Thomas isn't, as far as I know truly anti-Semitic. She was just expressing that she, as millions of other Americans and others, including millions of Jews, realize, that since Jews have been unconscionably expropriating land that did not rightfully belong to them, with much genocide and ethnic cleansing in the process, they should have to give up all claim to that territory completely, and go wherever they can go. Of course, it will never happen, but it is nevertheless the truth. Helen Thomas just got persecuted for speaking the truth, as is also typical, "
All I heard were two anti-Semitic remarks.
Her specialty is English, and she well knows what she said for all your rationalizations on her behalf.
As far as what millions of Americans think of her and millions of Jews, that's quite a factual leap you made without any documentation to back you up.
I do not see you as arguing logically or the basis of empirical reasoning. Nor do I see you, in the presentation of arguments, as modeling yourself as anyone familiar with rules of ethics.
So why should I believe anything you claim insofar as what has happened in the Middle East ?
SWB I do have a bias towards
Thu, 06/17/2010 - 01:03 — West Coast Mona Lisa (not verified)SWB
I do have a bias towards Israel in the sense that I understand more about what Israel is about in terms of its meaning to Jews than I do insofar as whatever you are talking about.
But you see, I never really get what you are talking about, because you don't approach arguments on the basis of traditional rules of dialogue and reasoning.
You may very well have legitimate arguments, but you don't express it in a way that is understandable. Because you're apparently so paranoid and seem to think that everyone has the same knowledge and understanding as yourself. By some magical form of osmosis.
I don't agree with everything the Israeli government does, but I do think Israel has a right to exist as a nation. Obviously people should not be shipped around, including the Palestinians, and people must find a way to live in peace together.
I don't think the Israeli government handled the activists correctly, I don't agree with what happened with the attack on Gaza, and I do think there should be an end to what people are calling "the blockade" insofar as humanitarian goods are concerned.
That being said, I don't profess to have any great knowledge of all the land disputes. That may seem remarkable to you, and unbelievable, but it's true.
And I don't wish to be pushed into taking a position on a number of land and international legal issues that I am not sufficiently informed on.
I hope that serves to better understanding of where I am coming from.
Shalom.
Saalam.
Peace.
It's not just about land,
Thu, 06/17/2010 - 02:19 — Anonymous (not verified)It's not just about land, it's also about water. Much of the dispute along the Golan Heights is about who gets to control which watercourse. The kibbutzniks want to grow citrus, the Arabs want to keep growing their olive trees which are far less thirsty.
Well, you two really outdo
Thu, 06/17/2010 - 03:59 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Well, you two really outdo yourselves in self-contradiction, especially "Mickalin". He or she claims that what the Israeli government and military does is supposedly not terrorism, then turns around and admits that it is, and claims that I am supposedly against calling it the terrorism that IT IS, when I very much call it by its real name, terrorism, or state-sponsored terrorism; as I also call the U.S. government and military's so-called "counterterrorism" by its true name, terrorism, or state-sponsored terrorism.
I agree, there is in reality NO exceptionalism unless countries are truly exceptional, as in truly humanitarian with absolutely no mass-murder and other human rights violations such as torture, etc.
"West Coast Mona Lisa" contradicts "herself(?)" by claiming to believe in Israel's so-called "right to exist", while allegedly being against mass-murder. But to support Israel's so-called "right to exist", IS to support mass-murder; because that is what the Israeli government and military are doing in order to continue to secure their so-called "right to exist". Don't you get it?! You support a terrorist apartheid state's so-called "right to exist"; therefore, you DO support mass-murder!! Wake the hell up!!
And both of you please stop being the ones' truly contradicting yourselves.
Oh, and in response to "Mickalin's" false claim of my allegedly having anger issues, OF COURSE I AM ANGRY ABOUT ETHNIC CLEANSING AND MASS MURDER!! Anyone who isn't has no true conscience, and lives in deep avoidance and denial, intentionally burying their their head in the sand ignoring, excusing and/or rationalizing mass mayhem and bloodshed; and if the latter, also contradicting themselves as you "experts" at contradiction(s) are doing.
Helen Thomas: an
Thu, 06/17/2010 - 12:05 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Helen Thomas: an Appreciation
www.infowars.com/helen-thomas-an-appreciation/
@West Coast Mona Lisa: I
Thu, 06/17/2010 - 15:44 — Mickalin (not verified)@West Coast Mona Lisa: I like your style. There is a lot of (mis)information out there on both sides of this issue and no shortage of those willing to shout down those who disagree. Or even appear to disagree. As is so often the case, the truth lies somewhere muddled in the middle. From your restrained and intelligent reply to SWB I can only guess that you are intelligent enough to eventually come to this conclusion yourself. Oh, and I'm pretty sure that to be a true "Ad hominem" SWB would have had to be making a logical fallacy argument. I sincerely doubt that SWB has the wherewithal to make a logical argument, fallacious or otherwise. I salute you and wish you luck in your truth-seeking endeavors.
@S. Wolf Britain: I wish you luck as well. May you find someone who will listen tirelessly to your incoherent polemic against the state of Israel. I, however, will not be that person.
Michael, I see ambiguities
Thu, 06/17/2010 - 21:50 — Kolea (not verified)Michael,
I see ambiguities in your commentary which suggest a lack of clarity. First, you described 4 different manifestations of an "exceptionalist" view of Israel. Obviously, they are all distorted. You then offer the balanced, clearsighted view of a "Jewish peace activist," who is free from any such exceptionalism and sees all nations as roughly equivalent. Except, of course, that the Jewish people, OF ALL PEOPLE, ought to have a higher moral standard, having been the victims of anti-semitic persecution, reaching its extreme expression in the Shoah.
So I guess the Jewish people ARE "exceptional" after all? I am not playing semantic games here. You appear to accept that Jewish people are "special", but want to pick and chose what is meant by that.
So when will I see Truthout
Fri, 06/18/2010 - 08:48 — sharonsj (not verified)So when will I see Truthout do an article called "The Myth of Muslim Exceptionalism"? It is a well-know fact that the entire Arab world has a huge percentage of illiterate, oppressed people. Gays and non-Muslims and Muslims of the "wrong" sect are often murdered. Women and girls who don't toe the line are killed with impunity. I'm not sure of the exact numbers, but I think all the books published in the entire Arab world is less than what is published in Israel. There is no freedom of speech. There is no legal equality unless you are a Muslim male. You may enjoy bashing Israel, but do you really want the alternative?
@ S. Wolf Britain .. why do
Fri, 06/18/2010 - 20:06 — Anonymous (not verified)@ S. Wolf Britain .. why do you support Christianity, a religion that has committed so much mass murder and butchery over the centuries ? In the name of your Jesus Amen. Or is it really Allah and being a Christian in your bizarre online identity is just a cover-up ? You must be a real bloodthirsty killer, babee.
First of all, in Old
Fri, 06/18/2010 - 21:37 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)First of all, in Old Testament and/or Old Covenant times, it was the Jews who did most of the mass-killing, and Christianity didn't exist yet until the end of the B.C. era and the beginning of the A.D. era.
Second, it has been nothing but counterfeit, false, so-called "Christianity" that has carried out the mass-killing in New Covenant and/or New Testament times, and wasn't God's or Jesus the Christ's will at all.
Third, Jesus did away with the "eye for an eye" of the Old Testament, in Matthew, Chapter 5 of the New Testament, verses 38-48. There is a True Christianity, but it was not THAT Christianity that carried out the mass-killing.
Fourth, if in referring to my "online identity" you're referring to my name, S. Wolf Britain IS my legal name. I don't hide who I am online; because, even if you're "Anonymous", the government can find out who you are anyway.
Fifth, I have never killed anyone; I have never taken part in any war; and I have always been against war, all of my life. And the government couldn't have gotten me to go murder people no matter what they threatened.
If at my age (54) the government could legally draft me, if there was a draft, I would leave the country, or I would refuse to serve or support the war machine in any capacity, even in a non-combatant capacity.
I would not be, and I am not now, complicit in any of the government's programs of mass-murder; and I am against all of them, including abortion and the death penalty. I have been a man of peace my entire life.
Lastly, TRUE Christianity, only that which Jesus the Christ represented and continues to represent, is all that I have anything to do with. I am not a part, nor will I have anything to do with, counterfeit, so-called "Christianity".
If you support Christianity
Fri, 06/18/2010 - 23:34 — Anonymous (not verified)If you support Christianity you support mass murder.
Christians have killed and massacred more people than any other group on earth. The numbers of people they have killed are literally staggering.
So you don't know what you're talking about.
I am not referring to your name. I am referring to your claim of being a Christian when you could be a fanatic Muslim who hates Jews and is pretending to be a Christian. Muslims have European names also.
But I suppose fanaticism in any faith looks very much the same, which is why it is easy to imagine you as either one.
Look, Ignoramus, I never
Sat, 06/19/2010 - 12:51 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Look, Ignoramus, I never claimed to be a Christian; and I don't claim to be one. I just know that True Christianity is 100% the Truth; and, thus, I defend it, stand up for its principles, and promote God's Word(s).
I have studied the Word(s) of God for over thirty years, in-depth; so, because you don't know what YOU'RE talking about, and on the contrary, I DO know what I'M talking about. And, Moron, I do NOT hate Jews.
Let me try to spell it out for you one more time even though you're apparently too ignorant to understand or interpret correctly what I'm saying: I do NOT support counterfeit "Christianity" AT ALL!
It is that counterfeit, so-called "Christianity" that carried out the mass murder of which you speak. Not the true principles of Christianity. No True Christian(s) could have carried out any of that mass murder.
Also, I am NOT a Muslim either. Islam is one of the worst counterfeits of Christianity on the face of the planet, along with Buddhism, Hinduism, Catholicism, Mormonism and the Jehovah's Witnesses, etc.
I have absolutely nothing to do with ANY false religion(s) and/or counterfeits of Christianity, nor with organized religion or spiritualism. I completely separated from all of that many years ago...
...You are obviously
Sat, 06/19/2010 - 12:51 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...You are obviously ignorant of God's Word(s); otherwise, you would either be a True Christian yourself, at least be a believer in True Christianity, or you would yourself be a counterfeit "Christian".
So you really ought to cease talking about that which you know none of the Truth about. You also ought to stop making unrighteous judgments of me, for you know little or nothing about me.
From the time I was 15 until I turned 18, I lived in a Jewish foster care agency, and my best friend who died when he was 23 was Jewish. I am not against Jews; I am against Zionism, the far right-wing Jewish extremism.
And I am against ALL extremism and fanaticism. But it figures that you would ignorantly jump to conclusions that because I quote the Word(s) of God and defend True Christianity, that I'm supposedly a "fanatic".
If God Himself in the person of Jesus the Christ was walking the earth today in human form, you would think He was a "fanatic"; and, as was done to Him then, you would help to crucify Him all over again.
Therefore, call me whatever you like; for, when it comes to True Christianity and my belief(s) in it, your false claims concerning me, no matter how negative, are compliments and do not deter me from it.
"True Christianity" has
Sun, 06/20/2010 - 11:25 — Anonymous (not verified)"True Christianity" has killed more people on this planet than any other people or faith.
The very definition of fanaticism is a "True Christian."
I'm so glad I don't have The Truth, just as you state, SWB. You are certainly correct on that one narrow point.
As they say down south: "If a fool talks long enough eventually he will say something that makes sense."
BTW, Nazis had Jewish friends, lovers, even wives and children. Try that one on for size, jackass.
S WOlf Britain -- how did
Sun, 06/20/2010 - 11:29 — Anonymous (not verified)S WOlf Britain -- how did you get to be so *exceptional* when it comes to The Truth ? And how did you get such an exceptional right to call others names while you think they don't have the right to call you out for being the fucking asshole that you are?
Another dog whistle to the
Sun, 06/20/2010 - 11:31 — Anonymous (not verified)Another dog whistle to the antisemites article by Truthout.
When you make unprovoked
Sun, 06/20/2010 - 20:28 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)When you make unprovoked attacks of me, you can expect to be called the names that describe you to a 't'. Anyone who blindly supports the fascist actions of the state of Israel, and calls everyone who doesn't an "anti-Semite", IS an ignoramus, a moron and ignorant.
You make it obvious that such is the case. And now you are showing your true colors, as if you hadn't already. You can't stand it when people "call YOU out for being (exactly what) you are", a troll and shill for mass-murder, mass-imprisonment and repression.
Maybe you work for the
Sun, 06/20/2010 - 23:17 — Anonymous (not verified)Maybe you work for the Israelis S Wolf Britain. You do such a bad P.R. job for the Palestinians.
Do you really anyone takes you seriously who isn't completely devoid of a thinking mind ?
Clearly WSB has been the one
Mon, 06/21/2010 - 00:22 — Anonymous (not verified)Clearly WSB has been the one making unprovoked attacks from the outset. He doesn't even know what he's disagreeing with when he disasgrees with someone. Rather than seek to determine and discuss what their point of view, he looks to create a point of view for a given person, and despite any of their attempts at clarification. It's called STRAWMAN.
"It is written, thus says
Mon, 06/21/2010 - 07:07 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)"It is written, thus says the Lord [God in and through Jesus the Christ, the Word(s) of God, and the Maker / Creator or all things except evil]...":
"...Get... behind Jesus (the Christ), Satan(ist{s})..."! "...You are of your father (and lord and master) the devil, and the lies of your father you... do (perpetrate and perpetuate)..."! [Matthew 16:23 and John 8:44; etc.; emphasis and/or clarification(s) added by me.]
Please, TruthOut, take
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 21:21 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Please, TruthOut, take appropriate action against this liar. I don't know what he or she is talking about with the claim of my having websites "loaded with viruses", as my sites are hosted with companies that constantly scan their servers for viruses, my computer has multi-layers of protection against malware, and I would never intentionally infect ANYONE'S computer(s) with malware or viruses. This is the ultimate in completely illegal libel and slander now, obviously in revenge for my telling it like it is with regards to this (these) "Anonymous(')" being (a) troll(s) and/or shill(s) for Israeli Zionist mass-murder, mass-imprisonment and repression.
This person, or these people, clearly want(s) to do me harm, and is seeking to do so any way(s) they can. I am sure you don't allow this kind of lying, venomous and vindictive activity on this site, so please prevent these attacks from continuing to occur against people telling the truth, and don't allow this illegal activity to continue. Thank you for all of your assistance, as well as all of your appropriate action.
CORRECTION(S): ...This
Tue, 06/22/2010 - 22:41 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)CORRECTION(S): ...This person, or these people, clearly want(s) to do me harm, and is, or are, seeking to do so any way(s) they can. I am sure you don't allow this kind of lying, venomous and vindictive activity on this site, so please prevent these attacks from continuing to occur against people telling the truth, and don't allow this illegal activity to continue. Thank you for all of your assistance, as well as all of your appropriate action.
I made an earlier comment
Sat, 06/26/2010 - 01:00 — Anonymous (not verified)I made an earlier comment (Tue, 06/15/2010 - 20:21)
I have checked back days later and find the conversation degenerated into the inane stupidity of name calling. We all have opinions. In the end, opinions don't matter so much (mine included); what matters are facts.
1)Did Albert Einstein and 27 Jewish intellectuals have the courage in 1948 to write a letter to the Times equating Zionism with terrorism and fascism? I have never seen that letter reproduced in its entirety. I wonder why. Maybe it is just a figment of my imagination.
2)The early diaries and writings of the founders of Israel, (Golda Meir, David Ben-Gurion, etc.) - did they or didn't they all without exception call for the “involuntary transfer” of Palestinians? Either it was an irrational mass hysteria that vacated Palestine in 1948 or it was a carefully planned ethnic cleansing. What do those diaries tell us?
3)What exactly happened at Kafr Kassem in 1956? What was the exact “punishment” for the leader of that massacre and how did his career prosper subsequently?
4)In his book The Fateful Triangle, Noam Chomsky places the number killed by Israel in its occupation of southern Lebanon at 20,000. Chomsky cites UN figures. Is this accurate or not?
5)Did Ariel Sharon allow the 1982 massacre at Shatila in Beruit or not?
6)I have the name of the unfortunate Leon Klinghoffer seared into my brain, indeed an innocent victim in 1985. However, in the first intifada of the early 1990s, Israeli forces shot and killed 1200 children throwing rocks. Can any of us remember even one of their names? Just one?
A final plea to all of us on both sides of this issue. Please do not fall into the simplistic use of the term “anti-semitic.” The term had a meaning in pre-WWII Europe, but at this point to support Palestinian majority rule is not anti-semitic because, after all, Palestinians are also a semitic people. It is far more accurate to use the terms zionist and anti-zionist.