While Giving Obsessive Coverage to the Tea Parties, Media Ignored Larger Antiwar Rally

by: Zaid Jilani  |  Think Progress

As congressional debate on health care reform comes to a close and the House of Representatives is nearing a vote on the Senate’s health care legislation, one group that has been getting more than its fair share of media attention has been the far-right tea party. As a small number of protesters gathered on Capitol Hill yesterday to demonstrate against the passage of health care legislation, the major media outlets gave obsessive coverage to the group:

- In an article titled “Raucous Tea Partiers Protest Bill,” the Politico reported that “Thousands of Tea Party protesters filled Upper Senate park” to voice their opposition to Democrats’ health care plan. [3/20/10]

- Fox News.com trumpeted the protesters in a piece titled “Tea Party Activists Make Last Stand Against Health Care Vote,” where it even uncritically reported the claim of one activist that 25,000 demonstrators attended the event. [3/20/10]

- In an article titled “GOP Leaders, Tea Party Activists Pledge to Fight On” CQ Politics noted that “House Republican leaders received a rock star’s welcome” from tea partiers. [3/20/10]

While the tea party demonstrations — which were estimated to have been attended by 1,500 – 2,000 people according to Capitol Hill police officers — received an enormous amount of press coverage, a larger demonstration took place. A crowd estimated to be 2,500-strong by Capitol Hill police officers marched through the streets of Washington to mark the seventh anniversary of the war in Iraq and to call on Obama to end the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and focus all of his efforts on domestic priorities like health care and education.

The news media did not find the second, larger march to be as newsworthy as the tea party demonstration. Using the media data-mining tool Critical Mention, a search by ThinkProgress of the keyword “protest” of the three major cable news networks — CNN, MSNBC, and Fox — found that the tea party protests were covered 31 times between March 19th and March 21st, and the antiwar demonstration was only covered twice.

Unfortunately, the media’s marginalization of war critics is nothing new. The media watchdog group Fairness and Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR) surveyed six major national news shows as well as PBS’s NewsHour during the run-up to the Iraq war. The FAIR study found that during these pre-war months, the major media outlets featured war supporters 24 times as often as it featured war opponents.

All republished content that appears on Truthout has been obtained by permission or license.





     

»




Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Network TV news is about the

Network TV news is about the money first. Ask anyone who works in it. It's a joke.



Why does this surprise

Why does this surprise anyone? All of the main media outlets are owned by General Electric, the largest provider of military equipment in the country.

People fail to realize that this country is just as fascist as the last megalomaniac super power.

As double medal of honor winning Marine General Smedley "The Fighting Quaker" Butler so presciently noted in his autobiography, "All wars are fought for profit." And since they ARE profitable for the military-industrial complex, they will, sadly and unfortunately and most heartbreakingly, continue for ever.



Don't forget the immigration

Don't forget the immigration reform rally that apparently was lost on everyone. Sad.



Obummer's Company "Tiny

Obummer's Company "Tiny Turlitzer" brainstem media continues its BushCo-dependency diversionary "reporting" on behalf of the Military Insurance Complex!



This is because the media's

This is because the media's job is no longer journalism, the media is now the propaganda or communications wing of their parent mega-corporations. We need to stop pretending that something is going wrong when coverage like this occurs, because that assumes mere incompetence is the cause.

The media IS competent. The media is comprised of extremely skilled and competitive highly paid experts in their fields. But their job is PROPAGANDA and not JOURNALISM. They're doing their jobs - the fact that they don't get fired for this kind of imbalance is proof - but their jobs are not in service to the public, their jobs are in service to the corporations.

Don't like this? Then get Congress to start enforcing existing anti-trust laws and breaking up huge corporations. But stop pretending the problem is someone else's incompetence.