White House: Women Especially Impacted by Recession
Thursday 21 October 2010
by: Nadia Prupis, t r u t h o u t | Report

(Photo: Craig Allen / Flickr)
American women have been particularly impacted by the recession, according to a White House report to be released today, which puts forth several measures to combat the blow. The report, authored by the National Economic Council (NEC), notes that women have been seeking and gaining employment in increasing numbers in the past 50 years, making this recent economic hit especially troubling.
The recession has created an economically unstable future for many Americans, but particularly American women, the report states. "From day one, President Obama has been committed to designing and implementing policies to address both the challenges women face in the wake of the Great Recession and the longer-term challenges women have faced over the past decades."
According to the NEC report, because women today make up the majority of college graduates in the US and nearly 50 percent of the country's workforce, the current recession's negative impacts on women affect the economy at a greater rate than in past recessions. Women have seen their median annual earnings fall by 2.8 percent since December 2007 and have lost a total of 2.6 million jobs. According to the US Department of Labor, women who provide the sole income for their households had an unemployment rate of 13.6 percent, their highest in more than 25 years.
Although men have seen a greater statistical drop in employment, with a 4.1 percent median annual earnings decrease, women face additional long-term challenges that affect their ability to endure the recession and the future economic climate. Among the obstacles women face are the gender wage gaps and the disproportionately small representation of women in higher levels of management.
Obama's goals are to "support women in the workforce and help them achieve economic security in retirement," senior adviser Valerie Jarrett said in a press conference call Wednesday. "It is so important that people understand what tools will be available to them to protect themselves."
Marital status, age and race also compound the issues with which women contend. According to the NEC report, women who applied for mortgages and credit cards were often vulnerable to unfair lending practices. "Women are disproportionately disadvantaged," Jarrett said. A large number of women seeking to buy homes or apply for credit cards were saddled with "higher cost loans than were appropriate."
The NEC report details provisions of the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2009 and responsibilities of the recently established Consumer Financial Protection Bureau that will combat these types of predatory lending techniques; particularly, "the Bureau will prevent evasion of the Credit CARD Act of 2009, which bans arbitrary rate hikes on existing balances and other unfair practices. For women who have used credit cards to get by when times are tight, the law will give them clarity on the interest rates they are charged," the report states.
The Bureau will also "for the first time provide ongoing federal oversight of both nonbank companies and banks in the mortgage market and protect borrowers from unfair, deceptive or other illegal mortgage lending practices."
The NEC report also outlines the workplace flexibility, a component of the plan that has garnered increasing credibility since President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama hosted a forum on the issue last spring. Workplace flexibility can lead to "increased worker productivity, a better bottom line and help companies attract and retain the best workers," the NEC report states. Employees benefit as well because they are not forced to "relinquish other responsibilities, such as taking care of their families," Jarrett said.
Obama's budget also proposes a $50 million State Paid Leave Fund at the Department of Labor, which would provide competitive start-up grants to states that launch paid leave programs. The program will enable workers to take a hiatus to care for their families without sacrificing paychecks that are essential to their well-being.
In addition to these proposals, the NEC report outlines plans to promote Small Business Administration (SBA) loans, which are three to five times more likely to go to women and minorities; community college funding, where women comprise 56 percent of students; and the importance of Social Security, as women represent 58 percent of all beneficiaries.
Jarrett specified that the report's release is not a political move. "We're not going to let the fact that there's an election coming up keep us from announcing something that's important to women," Jarrett said. However, she added, "the election season allows us to show a contract between [President Obama's] agenda and what he's doing for women and what would happen if the election went the other way."

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
This is why the Dems are
Thu, 10/21/2010 - 14:52 — GT66 (not verified)This is why the Dems are going to lose big and why Obama is doomed to be a one term President. In EVERY legitimate study, of this DEPRESSION, men have been the losers by majority. Because Obama is in the enthrall of the feminist whitewash, he's going to lose the male votes that many credit with putting him in office.
Look, learn some basic rules
Thu, 10/21/2010 - 20:28 — Anonymous (not verified)Look, learn some basic rules of graceful prose. "Impacted" used as an adjective or verb part is in very poor taste. If you don't believe me, ask a nurse. What you are saying is that women are especially constipated by the recession.
Another article, here, at
Thu, 10/21/2010 - 22:53 — Anonymous (not verified)Another article, here, at truthout, is very relevant to the issues discussed. That, social security should be doubled, with the entry age lowered.
Also, you cannot talk about women being impacted by the "great recession" -- which they most certainly are -- since women are more likely to wind up in poverty -- if you're not talking about a national health plan, such as opening up Medicare.
One of the first things the administration and Congress could do, towards these ends, is getting us out of our endless military involvements, such as Afghanistan.
Where no mother wants her son to be headed, as a future.
There are no women's rights, without human rights. I believe that one cannot be a feminist unless they are a humanist.
\
They need to uncover the
Thu, 10/21/2010 - 22:54 — whaler (not verified)They need to uncover the real figures as to how many women are unemployed, unwillingly.
No, wrong. I'm saddened by
Fri, 10/22/2010 - 07:01 — Scott (not verified)No, wrong. I'm saddened by the distortion here. Men have been the real losers in this recession, because they work more in construction and other kinds of jobs that got hit hardest.
http://blog.american.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/jobreport11.jpg
Know the truth. Expose lies.
The Obama Administration is
Fri, 10/22/2010 - 12:35 — Anonymous (not verified)The Obama Administration is hell-bent on swimming against the tide on this one, aren't they?
The country's mood at the moment, as evidenced by the Rep candidates and politicians with this philosophy this year, has squarely identified themselves as opting for the removal of "personhood" and all rights afforded to women in this country.
Palin, Angle, Buck, DeMint, Huckaby, (there are more, but I just can't list them all.) I expect the Supreme Court to start ruling against any and all amendments/rights afforded to those of female status coming up in the near future.
The Admin is swimming upstream of the coming tsunami tide of misogyny that will grip our nation after the election.
No, the administration is
Fri, 10/22/2010 - 18:35 — Anonymous (not verified)No, the administration is doing well to focus on this issue. Their major problem in alienating voters is that they have worried themselves too much with what the "right will think." Hence, the mess with health care, instead of going strongly for opening up Medicare, or a robust public option. In this case, too, they should not fear the right. Only the right would tell them too.
Obama has done well, too, in appointing two more female justices to the Supreme Court. Perhaps we can now send Clarence Thomas packing, and put a judge who is much better on women's issues in, as well.
Sarah Palinists, take
Fri, 10/22/2010 - 21:23 — Anonymous (not verified)Sarah Palinists, take that:
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Election-2010/Vox-News/2010/1021/Obama-targets-women-voters-in-Seattle-trip-with-talk-of-jobs-cupcakes
There's no way those Palinists and tea baggers can compete with the force of the voices of tomorrow.
Women hold up more than 1/2 the world.
We are your mothers, your wives, your lovers, your sisters, your daughters.
Of course the son of a beautiful and independent minded single mom anthropologist would understand this.
It is quite obvious he was well loved.
This President has displayed
Sat, 10/23/2010 - 18:52 — douin (not verified)This President has displayed dereliction in his duty by not doing as he Said he would before he was elected by the Majority in this nation. Get us out of those unnecessary trumped up wars that the Far Right lied us into..to please Israel and the Corporations. He should have listened to The People and made sure that we got the Health Care Plan that we told him we wanted. BUT NO, he was too busy kissing up to the far right Republicans in the Senate-- trying to placate them and forgot about his base...US . So what if they 'filibustered !' Now it is Hurry Up and Try To Make Up for all the lost opportunities he wasted while kissing up to what we all knew were his Enemies as well as Ours. When you consider what the alternative is..you must make sure this time that there is no wiggle room for the Far Righter Republicans to squeeze around Obama and sabotage his agenda. He knows now what he did wrong, and he deserves the chance to redo what he attempted to do. He does not deserve a No, No, No chorus of Republicans in the Senate that are determined to allow Nothing be done by this President that will endear him to The People...us !