Whose Freedom?
Wednesday 31 March 2010
by: Ira Chernus, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

(Photo: michaelramallah / Flickr)
The first Passover was a bloody one, the Bible says. God spent the whole night killing off first-born males all over Egypt. But He told every Israelite family to slaughter a lamb and smear its blood on their door, so that He could recognize the Israelites' houses and "pass over" them, sparing their eldest sons. When dawn came, the Jews exited from slavery to freedom.
God also told the Israelites to keep on sacrificing lambs on that same day every year, on Passover, to commemorate their great escape.
This year's Passover in the Holy Land was a bloody one, too. Nowadays, God doesn't do the killing. The Jewish state has its own Army, the IDF, to do the job.
Israelis spent the first day of Passover reading headline stories about 15-year-old Mohammad Zeid Al Farmawi, shot dead by the IDF, according to Palestinian sources. (The IDF but denied the death report). I don't know if Mohammad was a first-born son. But his mother and father are surely crying tears as bitter as any the Israelites ever shed. Mohammad was apparently this year's sacrificial paschal lamb.
A nine-year-old boy was severely wounded in the same incident, along with numerous others injured.
Their crime? They wanted to leave Gaza for a day to join the throngs throughout Israel celebrating Land Day. On the first Land Day in 1976, a protest against Israel's expropriation of Arab-owned land, six Palestinians were shot dead. Since then, Land Day has become a worldwide occasion for Palestinian protest against Israeli injustices.
Prime Minister Salam Fayyad, supposedly the most moderate and "pragmatic" of Palestinian leaders, used a horse-drawn plow to dig a furrow in protest against Israeli control of Palestinian land. "This is a symbol of our complete rejection of settlers' plans and of our people's determination to hold onto and care for their land," he said. "Our people are deeply rooted here."
This year, by an eerie coincidence, Land Day fell on the first day of Passover. Both are proclaimed as festivals of freedom. Yet, the differences between the two could hardly be more striking. Passover celebrates a legendary escape from near tragedy. Land Day marks continuing tragedy. On Passover, a tender, innocent lamb, held in captivity with no way to escape, substitutes for human death. On Land Day, real humans insist on seeking escape from their captivity, and some die seeking that right.
Another difference, perhaps the most important, now: Despite the sometimes bitter political differences among Palestinians, Land Day is one day that all unite around the fundamental commitments that bind them together: justice and an independent state for Palestinians, resistance to all the forces that prevent them from achieving those goals.
On the Jewish Israeli side, though, this Passover brings a notable lack of political unity. It's reflected in competing interpretations of the Jewish holiday that appeared in the Israeli press on the first day of Passover.
From the right, journalist Moshe Dann paints President Obama as the new pharaoh, the hard-hearted oppressor of the Jews. But that's not a bad thing, Dann says. The pharaoh's cruelty awakened the Jews to their unity as a people and their spiritual destiny: "the conquest and settlement of the Land of Israel as the fulfillment of divine commandments." Obama's "hard-heartedness" and "wrath" against the Jews can now do the same.
Not all Israeli right-wingers are inspired by religious concerns, though, far from it. The editors of the rather conservative Jerusalem Post used Passover to call for the abolition of the office of chief rabbi, the most powerful religious post in Israel. "One of the themes of the Exodus story is freedom," the Post's editorial explained. Judaism needs "freedom from mistaken self-conceptions, dogmatism, and old modes of thinking," to which the chief rabbinate is enslaved.
But the Post's reason is most revealing: "This is the only conclusion any clear-headed observer, concerned about the way Judaism is being represented in the public domain, can draw." Indeed, Israelis across the political spectrum are increasingly worried, some even obsessed, by their fears about Israel's public image.
The widely read Israeli daily Yedioth Aharonot used Passover to publish a warning from its columnist Eitan Haber: "The State of Israel's global status has been deteriorating to the point of genuine danger." U.S. governments never recognized Israel's occupation of the West Bank and Gaza "and never recognized a united Jerusalem," he pointed out. "Obama is presenting us with the bill of all American administrations."
Haber is no fan of Obama, but he, like so many Israeli commentators, knows where the power is: "Obama is exaggerating, conducting himself too harshly, and insulting us - yet we're no angels either. Besides, Obama is allowed to do it. He's America. How many times this week did you hear and read that joke about the eight-ton elephant that can sit down anywhere it wishes? Well, Obama sat down on us this week."
Yedioth Aharonoth also printed this comment, more friendly to Obama, by Alon Pinkas, Israel's former consul general in New York: "The Arab world and Europeans are watching Netanyahu's visit to Washington and Israel's isolation will grow." To avoid isolation, "two strategic Israeli interests are overwhelming here: Firstly, preserving the alliance with the US while undertaking adjustments that would reflect an understanding of US interests; secondly, a diplomatic process vis-à-vis the Palestinians." Since Obama is actively promoting both, Pinkas concluded, he's "pro-Israel," protecting Israel's image and interests along with his own country's interests too.
In the more liberal Israeli paper Ha'aretz, just before Passover, the widely respected Jewish Israeli journalist Akiva Eldar took a harsher tone. He warned, "the plague of darkness has struck modern Israelites.... The Israeli public have been living in the darkness of the occupation, which some call liberation."
His scathing column accused Israelis of damaging their public image by "stumbling about in pitch darkness, bumping blindly into anyone in their way as they head toward the edge of the precipice. Warm friends, cool friends, icy enemies: Jordan and Turkey, Brazil and Britain, Germany and Australia - it's all the same. And if that's not enough, the myopic Jewish state also has gone and collided head-on with the ally that offers existential support," the United States. Israel, he concluded, "has become its own greatest threat."
Eldar also dug up a buried gem, a note from the legal adviser to Israel's Foreign Ministry written to his prime minister in 1967, just months after Israel conquered the West Bank and Gaza. He pointed out the categorical prohibition against civilian settlement in occupied territories, under the Fourth Geneva Convention, and then added: "There is great sensitivity in the world today about the whole question of Jewish settlement in the occupied territories, and any legal arguments that we try to find will not remove the heavy international pressure, from friendly states as well."
Eldar is among the growing minority of Israelis who are glad for mounting international pressure for peace. But he concluded with an ominous warning: "When we read the Passover Haggadah, we should note the plague that follows darkness. That may open our eyes." The plague that follows is the slaying of the first-born males. As it turned out though, apparently, the slain male was not Israeli, but Palestinian.
The debate about the meaning of Passover indicates that political opinion in Israel is open to change. The political climate here in the US is changing too, both among Jews and among the general public.
That bellwether of elite opinion, The New York Times, celebrated Passover with op-eds from both of its Jewish foreign affairs pundits. Thomas Friedman pronounced an Israeli-Palestinian settlement "a necessity" for the United States; Roger Cohen praised Obama's tough stance against Israel and rightly claimed that "already, there are shifts in Israeli attitudes as a result of the new American clarity."
The Israelites spent 40 years in the wilderness, according to the Bible story. Palestinians have now spent 43 years in the wilderness of occupation. Despite all the continuing tragedy, there are glimmers of hope. The change is coming.
But it is painfully slow - too slow, it seems, to protect innocent Palestinian children from being sacrificed.
Sacrificed to what? To Israeli power and the need so many Israelis feel for an enemy to dominate. For too many Israelis, that need outweighs even the importance of Israel's image, said Avraham Burg, the former speaker of the Israeli Knesset, in his Passover reflection in Ha'aretz: "Passover and its customs are imbued with a defensive sort of spirituality and imagined aggression.... The exhortation for God to 'pour out thy wrath' upon the gentiles is meant to give the impression of fearlessness when facing any enemy." And it does give a "momentary delusion of power" - as long as there is an imagined enemy out there to face.
The defining question for Jews, Burg said, is: "Can the Jewish people survive without an enemy from without ... without a pharaoh?" One option is "seclusion and the building of even higher walls to separate the Jewish people from the rest of the world, all the while creating perpetual conflicts that will repeatedly prove that 'the entire world is against us'" -even though, as he added, this tough stance is "in reality an expression of fear."
However Burg speaks for all those Jews - and there are plenty of them, though not yet enough - who choose "a victory of human rights over a lust for conquest ... a victory over fear and terror." He calls on Israelis to embrace real freedom - "the freedom to create dialogue with, and acceptance of, the 'other' who opposes me" - because "only the liberation of the 'other' from my enslavement of him will bring about my liberation from his slavery. The lord and the slave, like prisoner and prison guard, are both captive in the same facility."
Ha'aretz columnist Bradley Burston echoed Burg. Burston would have Jews read the traditional text not as a call for God to pour out his wrath on enemies, but as a call to all Jews to "let go of your wrath, let it drain out and be gone.... The freed person in us is justly terrified by the path to a shared Jerusalem.... But it is the freed person in us who takes the first step on to that uncertain path. And, in so doing, for the first time, knows what it is to be free."
So, Israelis are reading a new message: As long as Palestinians are captives, Israelis can never be free.
And as long as the US supports the Israeli occupation policy, Americans can never be free.
Perhaps, Barack Obama understands that. In his Passover message, he said, "wherever we live, there is oppression to be fought and freedom to be won ... In retelling this story from generation to generation, we are reminded of our ongoing responsibility to fight against all forms of suffering and discrimination ... [and] we reaffirm the ties that bind us all."
Obama's latest comment on the Middle East sounds like he means it: "Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu understands that he will have to 'take some bold steps.'" That's a diplomatic way of saying that Netanyahu had better understand.
Is it just empty rhetoric? Or will the "eight-ton elephant" put all his weight behind it? That depends on how the White House assesses the domestic political climate. It's up to all of us to deliver a Passover message to the president, loud and clear: Next year, in an equitably shared and peaceful Jerusalem, it is time to let all of our peoples go.

This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.



Comments
This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.
What it takes to move back
Wed, 03/31/2010 - 13:26 — Anonymous (not verified)What it takes to move back into the old neighborhood?No welcome for the long-lost relatives?
Right-on! I can safely bet
Wed, 03/31/2010 - 13:57 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Right-on! I can safely bet that the close-minded, separationist, isolationist, fanatical, racist, hate-filled Israel-firsters will attack such open-minded, inclusionist, responsible, reasonable, anti-racist, insight-filled articles with neverending vehemence, if not here then elsewhere. They're just too ignorant and hate-filled to do otherwise, they don't know any different, and they don't know better; nor, in all likelihood, will they. Racists usually never learn to truly stop being racists.
(Now, who is going to be the first one to falsely call me a racist?)
At last an article in the US
Wed, 03/31/2010 - 14:18 — Woodchip (not verified)At last an article in the US press that gets to the fundamentals. Alas, the fundamentals arrive via Israeli Jews rather than any (or much) independent thinking by American Jews.
Many years ago, in Jerusalem, at Hebrew University, I attended a class, conducted by a Jewish professor, on "What is a Jew?" After disproving all the alternatives (race, religion, culture, nationality), the professor announced his conclusion: "A Jew is a person who feels himself persecuted AS a Jew."
I was flabbergasted, and have thought many times about that definition. It is not just in the Passover story; it is also in Ruth, and in a prevalent attitude which insists that all of western civilization was simply a vast unceasing conspiracy against Jews while at the same time laying claim to having founded a so-called Judeo Christian civilization.
When it comes to religion people can believe whatever they want, but a colonist enterprise (Zionism) and a state (Israel) founded on such a paranoid view of self and the world, cannot be wholesome and cannot lead to good results.
Debate.. There has always
Thu, 04/01/2010 - 01:12 — Andrew Preston (not verified)Debate..
There has always been this kind of debate in Israel, nothing really changes in it's fundamental stance. For me, the time for action is now. I no longer buy items, or food, for example, tomatoes, that are marked 'From Israel.'
We are, finally, finally,
Thu, 04/01/2010 - 11:11 — Unionguy (not verified)We are, finally, finally, finally, at long last, just beginning to see the turning of American public opinion, and, as well, the mass public opinion of American Jewry. For the Israeli racist occupation state and the racist settlers, time is now starting to run short. To save Israel they must turn toward a democratic two-state solution. This would bring some level of justice to that long embattled area and its peoples.
For us in the USA, the time is finally beginning where we can begin the process of peeling our billions of public dollars and support away from that racist pariah, apartiet state of Israel. The only question is whether democratic forces will be able to do so in time to save Israel, or whether the racist settlers now running things there will be able to continue to push Israel on its suicidal drive to conquer the entire middle east.
In our nation, progressive forces are attempting to bring some level of even handed approach to American policy there. If what we continue to get in return in the back of their hands, the future is not rosey. At some point, reactionary, (and ACTUALLY anti-semetic forces), will enter the fray and there will not be much sympathy or aid in the pipe for Israel.
I very much hope that there can be a democratic and just solution, for all of our sake. While not Jewish, I have a great respect for the positive progressive traditions of that religion and culture. However, if the truely progressive voices from that community do not assert themselves, and soon, then they will be on their own, laying a bed of nails, or their own making.
I hope what I hope, but am also disgusted that our public funds are going to support the unjust occupation of Palistinian lands. I'm disgusted with the arrogance of Israeli racist settler mentality of their so-called "right to kill Palistinians and occupy their lands. I'm disgusted our nation is supporting this injustice.
The clock is ticking!!
Hooray! At last we seem to
Thu, 04/01/2010 - 13:36 — Ancient Londoner (not verified)Hooray! At last we seem to have a majority of correspondents, Jews among them, who recognise that what is being done in the name of Jewry in Palestine closely resembles what Hitler and Stalin did to their kin sixty and more years ago.
One of Chernus' biggest
Fri, 04/02/2010 - 09:02 — richard (not verified)One of Chernus' biggest problems is that he is apparently incapable of discriminating between cause and effect. He talks about Land Day and Passover as though the difference between them was the 'ongoing tragedy' of the Palestinians versus the emancipation of the Jews. That scenario is only a mere consequence of the real source issue. And that first cause was that the Israelites were enslaved by the autocratic actions of an external Egyptian tyranny which was forced upon the Israelites through no fault of their own, while the Palestinians have imposed their own isolation upon themselves by refusing to halt the violent, aggressive attacks they have been engaged in against the Jews of Palestine since the 1880's. That antisemitic violence precedes the founding of Israel by almost 70 years. It's a typical practice among antisemitic pundits to employ deceptive anachronism to make their irrational case sound very reasonable, since many readers are unaware of the real timelines and history. Chernus has been playing on this anti-reality team for a long while, joining such delightful anti-rationalists as Juan Cole, who among many other such deceptions, did the same sort of thing by attributing the 9/11 attacks to Sharon's Jenin attack. Only trouble was, Sharon had not yet been elected when 9/11 was planned, and the Jenin conflict erupted yet later still.
Chernus is deeply invested with a claque of Arab apologists who twist reality to suit their own dishonorable ends. That they get away with it so often is a sad commentary on the level of debate and the tragic inadequacy of our education and our public information systems. In this piece, Chernus talks about the "43 years of Israeli occupaton", completely ignoring the fact that the Palestinians had been occupied since the proposed establishment of that new state in 1948. The vital piece of information, which Chernus would have the gullible ignore, is that Palestine was occupied by Egyptian (again!) and Jordanian invaders upon its establishment by the UN. The neighboring Arab occupation was much harsher than the Israeli. But it was an extension of the ongoing orgy of Islamic antisemitism that had been the original cause for the establishment of Israel. However, acknowledgment of such reality would contradict Chernus's goal of fabricating a narrative which blames Israel for all the evils foisted upon the world and upon themselves by a violent and intolerant Arab-Islamic chauvinism.
Chernus continues his depredations with a deceptive reference to blood-letting and a deliberate misrepresentation of Israel's reaction to aggressive attacks by terrorists as a continuation of the bloody Biblical narrative. Confounding truth with fiction, cause with effect, victim with aggressor is Chernus' stock in trade. That doesn't make his viewpoint correct. But it helps make a lot of people misinformed.
Chernus' worst deception is the Jerusalem illusion, the notion that there is a rationale for Israel to cede their holy city to Arabs who have repeatedly attacked them. There is none! The UN envisioned Jerusalem as an open city. With the Arab attack and conquest of 1948, all synagogues within their grasp were destroyed. Jewish headstones were ripped up and used for building materials. Almost all traces of 3,000 years of Jewish presence were obliterated in a deliberate Arab attempt to alter history. It is only after the Arab's third formal attempt to wipe out the Jews that Israel successfully entered Jerusalem, and for the first time since the original Arab attacks, Jerusalem was finally open to all. Chernus employs his deceptive logorrhea to fervidly further vile Islamic fabrications. The reality is the opposite of what he claims.
The overall truth about this conflict is much simpler than Chernus comprehends: the irredentist Muslim hordes are continuing a tradition begun in the 7'th Century. There is underlying all else an absolute religious intolerance - even one sect of Islam battles with another; an absolute Islam-defined oppression of women - they are chattel; an Islamic-inspired martial intrigue - lie and deceive those whom you would conquer until you are strong enough to attack; and an Islamic enlistment of insiders - recruiting such fifth-columnists as can be conned into assisting in fiendish conquest schemes. While they haven't yet conquered the world, that is their clear and publicly avowed goal. Muslims have already enslaved tens of thousands of Christians and Animists in Africa, killed millions all over the world, are infiltrating and slowly altering the landscape of Eurabia, even altering the awarenesses of the US. Only in Israel is the Muslim agenda and the blatant action Islam secretly adheres to fully observable, yet people like Chernus have managed to completely invert truth and fabrication on behalf of the aggressor Muslims. The Muslims attack Israel - it's got to be Israeli aggression. The Arabs kill Jews for 130 years - it's because Israelis control parts of Palestine for 40 years. The Arabs demand Jerusalem - it's because they are entitled, since they started five wars, conquered and then lost it in their failed aggression... Chernus and his ilk should be medicated or muzzled. His distorted perceptions do not derive from any factual history of the Middle-East conflict.
Somebody please correctly
Fri, 04/02/2010 - 23:17 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Somebody please correctly and fully respond to this foregoing Zionist propagandist shill and anti-Arab/Muslim racist, Richard. I don't physically feel up to it, and/or have the energy to do so, right now; but he shouldn't be allowed to get away with having the last word in this thread.
Excellent and truthful
Sat, 04/03/2010 - 08:46 — Kathy van Praag (not verified)Excellent and truthful piece! I recommend that those who want a just settlement for the Palestinians join the sanctions and divestment movement. Do not buy goods from the 'West Bank', which are grown on stolen land, or Israel itself, and encourage divestment from Israeli corporations and businesses in the country in which you live.It worked in South Africa.
Mr. or Ms. Wolf - However
Sat, 04/03/2010 - 13:04 — Anonymous (not verified)Mr. or Ms. Wolf - However much you may not like this truth that I've scriven, I challenge you to demonstrate errors in my factual descriptions of the history and evolution of the Middle East conflict, and indeed, of what Muslims have done and are doing all over the world.
It's Mr. Britain, "Idyot".
Sat, 04/03/2010 - 14:33 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)It's Mr. Britain, "Idyot". And, please, call me "Wolf" everyone, not "S. Wolf" or "S. Wolf Britain" or "Mr. Wolf" or "Wolfe" or whatever.
I'm waiting for someone more knowledgeable on the subject than I to respond to your twisted, hate-filled, racist, truly anti-Semitic, and undoubtedly history-twisting screed. Someone (or more than one), come to the rescue, not of me but of truth, please.
Ach du lieber, Mr. Volf - -
Sat, 04/03/2010 - 19:40 — Anonymous (not verified)Ach du lieber, Mr. Volf - - I'm intrigued that you admit your own ignorance, yet you are certain that I'm wrong. There's no blarney like the bigoted, uninformed blather that you spew. You admittedly are less knowledgeable on this subject than I - and gawd knows how many others - yet you are certain that I have twisted history. I have not!! In the combined first-wave Arab invasion of Palestine and Israel by seven Arab armies, one percent of the Jewish population were killed. KILLED. That is a huge proportion. Think of the US for a scaled comparison: 3.6 million!! That the Israelis carried on was due only to the fact that they had no alternative, having been driven out of Europe, where they'd resided off and on for a thousand years, and from Arab countries, where they'd lived for 2600 years. We refused the Jews safe haven during the Nazi slaughters, and the few remaining wretched refugees fled wherever they could go, Palestine being one option that appealed for historio-religious reasons as well as in hope of finally re-establishing self-determination and freedom from the past 2000 years of antisemitic tyranny imposed by the tolerant, Jesus-loving Christians whose principal messages were "love, peace, and kill the Jews."
Learn some history before you condemn the accurate observations of someone who's paid attention.
There you go jumping to
Sun, 04/04/2010 - 02:34 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)There you go jumping to conclusions. I did NOT say I knew less than you on the subject. I SAID I didn't feel up to responding to it (I'm physically disabled), and that I was waiting for someone MORE knowledgeable on the topic than myself to respond to you. Perhaps what I should have said is that I was waiting for someone more knowledgeable on the subject than you OR me, respectively. Besides, I believe it's a waste of time to try and reason with you, as you are brainwashed with a great deal of false "history", etc., that you will probably never face is fraudulent; and perhaps that's also why others here haven't tried to set you straight either.
Anyway, I've had a long, trying day and I'm exhausted, so I'm going to bed. Goodnight.
"Wolf" is NOT my second last name, it is my middle name and what I go by. My last name is Britain; so please STOP calling me "Mr. Wolf". How many times do I need to spell it out, or are you (most likely) wrongly calling me "Mr. Wolf" intentionally? I'm NOT "Mr. Wolf from Britain" either. My last name has been Brit(t)ain since the day I was born (I legally dropped a 't' in a court of law). And my mother and father were both born in the U.S.A., and so was I.
Somewhere along this blog
Mon, 04/05/2010 - 17:40 — gene - Berkeley (not verified)Somewhere along this blog line richard omits to mention occupied Palestine. Someone, I suspect Israel, and its "defense" stormtroopers has managed to steal/borrow/take lands belonging to Palestinians...this is an ongoing fact. And it goes on and on. But it will stop...one way or another.
Lets talk peace/shalom/salaam...it is much less brutal
than oppression-occupation.
All it takes are people, on both sides, willing to sit down and negotiate.
Of course if only you are right and the other is always wrong...send others, with open minds, to talk.
Well, the sacrificial lamb
Tue, 04/06/2010 - 05:24 — Happy and Proud (not verified)Well, the sacrificial lamb has risen. Mohammad Farmawi was not 'shot dead by the IDF', but in an Egyptian prison. Seems like the IDF was truthful and the Gazans....liars. After all, his death was confirmed by "medical personnel" and several "eyewitness"!
Did it ever occur to you that Gazans and other "Palestinian" Arabs might by LYING about certain things, including made-up 'ivilian' deaths? The vast majority of those killed in Operation Cast Lead were Hamas members, yet the fact that it was a defensive war that happened only after years of rocket attacks is not mentioned.
You don't like when Jews defend themselves by killing the 'bad guys' with targeted air strikes. You don;t like it when we defend ourselves by finding the 'bad guys' with house-to-house searches. You don't like it when we defend ourselves passively with the anti-terror fence. What type of self-defense against terrorists DO you approve of?
And than you for your excellent analysis, Richard, and the excellent follow-up by anonymous.
funny that the first
Tue, 04/06/2010 - 08:25 — Anonymous (not verified)funny that the first sacrifice, was found to be alive and well, better to check the facts first before you slander, but them again facts are not so important to people like yourselves
I'm really tired of having
Wed, 04/07/2010 - 14:06 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)I'm really tired of having to say this; but, NO, it is you Israel-firster shills who are the ones who are not interested in true facts.
What happens to a majority of innocent civilians in Palestine, mostly children, at the hands of the Israeli government and military is twisted around by you into the lie, "The vast majority of those killed in Operation Cast Lead were Hamas members...'; and the fact that hardly any Israelis are killed by the rocket attacks, and FAR MORE non-combatant Palestinians are murdered by the IDF ["Israeli (Destructive) Force", aka "Israeli (Aggression) Force", far outside of so-called "defense"], four to five times more, is twisted around to, "...it was a defensive war that happened only after years of rocket attacks...".
I'm so tired of your lying propaganda. You will go to almost any lengths to have the last word and to counter the truth gaining more and more sway over your lies, as it is doing more and more every day.
Certainly Hamas members lie, but so does the "IDF" and Israeli government; again, FAR MORE...
...You ask, "What type of
Wed, 04/07/2010 - 14:08 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...You ask, "What type of self-defense against terrorists DO you approve of?" The answer is very easy. The kind of self-defense by the Palestinians against THE FAR GREATER terrorism of the Israeli government and military.
But, of course, you shills never mention the Palestinians LEGAL RIGHT(S) to defend themselves. The Israeli government and "IDF's" disproportionate, by four to five times greater, or more, aggression compared to Palestinian aggression, is always spoken of by the former, and the defenders of Israeli terrorism, as being "self-defense"; but what little self-defense the Palestinians are able to muster with extremely limited resources and against insurmountable odds is very conveniently labeled as "terrorism".
Yes, there are war crimes and human rights violations on both sides, but the war crimes and human rights violations of the Israeli government and "IDF" are, once more, FAR WORSE. Again, four to five, or more, times worse...
...So, ENOUGH of your
Wed, 04/07/2010 - 14:09 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...So, ENOUGH of your neverending litany of evil propaganda, misrepresentations, lies, exaggerations and attempted-brainwashing, etc. Millions of people in the world are exceedingly tired of, and fed up with, your rationalizations and "justifications" for the Israeli government and military's extremely unconscionable, intolerable, inexcusable, indefensible and inhumane terrorism. More and more people are waking up to the truth about Israeli terrorism, and you're not going to be able to stop that awakening no matter what you do.
I'd love to respond, but
Sun, 04/11/2010 - 12:14 — Richard (not verified)I'd love to respond, but TruthOut doesn't really want truth. They've blocked me. So much for open discourse and honest discussion.
Sorry, Gene from Berkeley
Sun, 04/11/2010 - 12:16 — Richard - maybe the blockage has been cleared? (not verified)Sorry, Gene from Berkeley (where else?). Perhaps reading is not your strong suit. I clearly stated: "Palestine was occupied by Egyptian (again!) and Jordanian invaders upon its establishment by the UN...." and "The Muslims attack Israel - it's got to be Israeli aggression. The Arabs kill Jews for 130 years - it's because Israelis control parts of Palestine for 40 years. "
I didn't bother with the British occupation which preceded the Arab one, nor the Turkish (Ottoman) which preceded the British. Nor the predecessors to them. While I didn't choose to belabor the point, the reality is that Palestine has been a lot of things to a lot of people - but trouble to virtually everyone. The Arab custom is one of extreme hospitality to guests, and murder to anyone else they feel like killing. It's a tribal thing, and to understand it, you have to have an open mind and a reasonable amount of history under your belt. That's HISTORY, not indoctrination. They come from a very different culture than the one which produced the closed minds of our Western "Progressives".
It's not that hard to understand that when the Arabs attack their neighboring Jews for over a century that those victim Jews might become wary of trying to make nice. You obviously have never experienced pain, so you couldn't possibly understand.
The entire Arab apparatus is
Sun, 04/11/2010 - 12:19 — Richard - part 2 (not verified)The entire Arab apparatus is devoted to antisemitism and Jewish extermination. (They learned it from the Church, even as they learned "Conversion or the sword!") Read some of their official websites. Notice that the "President" of Palestine has a PhD in Holocaust Denial, and spent his entire adult life killing people. Still does. Take a break from innocence and see the aggressive Arab pogroms for what they have been, and then recognize that murderous Muslim religious intransigence (and misogyny and various other intolerant hatreds) are not going to dissipate just because left-wing naifs think they should.
The accompanying picture was
Sun, 04/11/2010 - 12:20 — richard - part 3 (not verified)The accompanying picture was an interesting deviation from the topic - it shows a policeman, shield down, mingling in a crowd next to a kid who is more interested in some other activity than the evil Israeli brutes. This is far more the norm than Chernus and the other deceivers would have you believe. It's only when there is violence that Israelis respond firmly. That fact is disguised and distorted by the anti-Israel crowd, whose stock in trade is inverting truth and masking the defensive nature of Israeli actions.
Omitted from my previous
Sun, 04/11/2010 - 13:49 — richard - part 2½ (not verified)Omitted from my previous diatribe was my sarcastic observation that we Westerners are tribal, too. But we kill for democracy and profit (we've progressed from killing for Jesus), and have become so good at it that we had to begin numbering our World Wars. One was a start, but we really got up to speed in Two, when we killed 50 millions. Muslims aren't so venal. They only kill for the glory of god, and that's why leftwingers and Progressives are so supportive of them. You have to choose your murders for their ideology. Israeli self-defense is unacceptible, but killing women for being raped, teaching children to suicide bomb school buses - that's an ideology TruthOuters really dig!
Man, there's just so much to
Sun, 04/11/2010 - 19:53 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)Man, there's just so much to say to you, Richard, that one hardly knows where to begin. Of course, it's a complete waste of time because you're so "sure" of the propaganda and false, and/or exaggerated, history you've been brainwashed by, probably for a very long time.
First of all, I personally am NOT a "left-winger", or a "right-winger", or a "progressive" like most that go by that so-called moniker. I am a True Conservative and a Constitutionalist, you might say a "Constitutional Republican, though I have NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with the "Republican Party" which is anything but. Both main political parties in the U.S. are neo-liberal, totalitarian socialist (or very soon leading to it; in fact, we're well on the way), and corporate-fascist; and I have no connection with ANY of that WHATSOEVER.
You also might say that I'm a True Liberal as well in that I am first, foremost and always about True Liberty. And lastly, I am also NOTHING BUT a True Progressive; in other words, for nothing but True Progress, NOT what most so-called "progressives" accept as "progress". Nor am I complicit in ANYTHING they are complicit in, if in no other way than by the fact that they keep voting the "Democrat(ic)" version of the neo-libs into office to turn the U.S. into more and more of a corporate-fascist police state, etc.
Secondly, it probably would be "telling" if you weren't such a coward and you gave your real last name (assuming "Richard" is your real first name). You're probably Jewish; you're probably a Zionist [and a believer in the Likud and/or Kadima political party(ies)]; you're racistly anti-Arab and anti-Muslim; and, regardless of whether or not you are any of the foregoing, you have been heavily indoctrinated and conditioned by far "right-wing" extremist Zionism, probably all of your life (thus, you're most likely Jewish)...
...Thirdly, you probably
Sun, 04/11/2010 - 19:56 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...Thirdly, you probably won't respond to much if any of the foregoing, just as you didn't respond directly to most of what those like myself, who bring up many of the very important points that prove the "error of your ways (and beliefs)", brought up. You're trained not to answer that which proves you almost completely "off-base", but to instead attempt to cloud the facts and the true reality of matters with endless attempted-side-tracking rhetoric which you no doubt really believe; and your lord and master, Evil, leads you to do so in the hope that such clouding and side-tracking will rub off on people and bring them over to the racist, extremist side, by sheer force of will if nothing else (truly rational anyway).
Fourthly, now getting in to some of the so-called "meat" of your latest screed, if I understand "Gene from Berkeley" correctly, which I believe I do (please correct me if I'm wrong, Gene), he was NOT saying that you didn't mention Palestine at all; his point was that you and your ilk always very conveniently leave out their side of the story, their right(s) to self-defense, the apartheid open-air prison conditions that the Israeli government and military keep them under, the true fact(s) that the vast majority of the casualties every time the "Israel (AGGRESSION!) Force(s)" attack, especially by air, are civilians who are NOT hiding Hamas insurgents as you and your kind almost always claim, and so on.
Instead, you cloud the issues with false and fraudulent claims about "Palestinian aggression", etc., as well as false and fraudulent allusions against Palestinian supporters. A good example of the latter is, if you don't come right out and make the unsupportable allegation, you allude to your false and fraudulent belief that all or most supporters of the Palestinians are supposedly "pro-Hamas and/or Hezbollah", which they most definitely and certainly are NOT. Most supporters of the Palestinian cause(s) are COMPLETELY against terrorism on both sides, but they also recognize the right of all oppressed, terrorized, invaded and occupied peoples constantly subjected to human rights violations and war crimes four to five, or more, times worse than those violations and crimes committed by Hamas and/or Hezbollah, to defend themselves as authorized by international law...
...Fifthly, you and your ilk
Sun, 04/11/2010 - 19:59 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...Fifthly, you and your ilk of course also very conveniently leave out that the Israeli government and military are much less hospitable to most non-Jews, are guilty of an extreme amount of "murder to anyone... THEY feel like killing (and the Jewish people have been for thousands of years)", and that it too is "a tribal thing" with an extremely heavy seasoning of having a superiority complex over everyone other than fellow-Jews (even though they are NOT superior TO ANYONE IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, FORM OR FASHION WHATSOEVER). And talk about closed minds! Jews have some of the most indoctrinated and closed minds of any people in history!
But now, having said all of that, I agree with you about so-called "Western 'Progressives'". They too are some of the most close-minded people, and that's one of the main reasons I'm NOT a "dyed-in-the-wool", or mainstream, "progressive".
Yes, Jews "come from a very different culture" alright. They come from a primarily self-superior, racist culture that leaves no room for any true peace with anyone, even those they take advantage of and/or "use" while it suits them, like they are using the West to suit their advantage(s) for the time being and/or right now; until, as the most extremist among them hope, they soon will have no need of the West and would seek to eradicate them as well. Yet, thank God, there are millions of Jews who don't have this closeminded, self-superior, racist, mass-murderous mindset! Though, of course, the extremist Jews make those much more properly enlightened ones', who don't associate themselves with the hateful, extremist mindset, and take umbrage with it, out to be "self-hating" Jews, one of the most preposterous notions in existence, like calling every Gentile who doesn't cow-tow to racist, extremist, mass-murderous Zionism, so-called "anti-Semites"!...
...Presenting the obvious
Sun, 04/11/2010 - 20:02 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...Presenting the obvious reverse-truth from some of your foregoing statements, "It's not that hard to understand that when the [Jews] attack their neighboring ['Arabs', Muslims, etc.] for [many] centur[ies] that those victim ['Arabs', Muslims, etc.] might become wary of trying to make nice. You obviously have never experienced [their] pain [to the level that they have], so you couldn't possibly understand. The entire [Jewish and/or Israeli] apparatus is devoted to antisemitism and ['Arab', Muslim, etc.] extermination. (They learned it from the [completely corrupt Sadducee, Pharasaical Jewish] Church [aka 'the Synagogue of Satan' along with Catholicism, apostate 'Protestantism', all other counterfeit 'Christianity', etc.] even as they learned[,] '[No mercy]!')"
Of course, you'll make what I've said out to be "anti-Semitic", and supposedly "racist" and "hateful", against Jews and/or Israel; because, also very conveniently, Jewish hatefulness and racism supposedly isn't racism and hatefulness, but speaking the truth about it supposedly "is". And the truth itself, if it doesn't completely side with Israeli hatefulness, racism, repression and mass-murder, is supposedly "anti-Semitic; but the latter against a Semitic people, the "Arab" Muslims, supposedly isn't anti-Semitism. Again, how convenient!...
...Most Israeli leaders,
Sun, 04/11/2010 - 20:02 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...Most Israeli leaders, past and present, come from a very strong lineage of terrorists and terrorism, who carried out, and still carry out, "black-op" and "false-flag" terrorism against countless peoples, including Palestinians, the Lebanese, Syrians, Iraqis, Afghanis, Pakistanis, Americans, and the list goes on. That is the true history which you will probably never read or listen to. Therefore, the very fact that you have the nerve to bring up the much more limited so-called "'Arab'/Muslim/'Islamo-fascist' terrorists", most of whom have not been complete terrorists at all, but have been freedom and/or resistance fighters against Israeli and other aggression, for a long time now totally illegal aggression under international law, is the ultimate (in) absurdity!
But the so-called "murderousness" of the "Arab"/Muslims, etc., is supposedly just that, "murderousness"; but the Israeli murderousness supposedly isn't! Please give us all a break from all of this absurdity! "Take a break from innocence and see the aggressive [Israeli] pogroms for what they have been, and then recognize that murderous [Israeli] religious intransigence (and misogyny and various other intolerant hatreds) are not going to dissipate just because [any so-called] 'naifs' think they should"!
The facts are "disguised and distorted by the... Israel[-first] crowd, whose stock in trade is inverting truth and masking the defensive nature of ['Arab'/Muslim, etc.] actions[!]... ['Arab'/Muslim, etc.] self-defense is [supposedly] unacceptable, but killing [mostly innocent and/or relatively defenseless 'Arab'/Muslim babies, children, women, and men] - that's an ideology [Israel-firsters] really dig!"
Herr Wolf. You've got your
Wed, 04/14/2010 - 18:53 — richard (not verified)Herr Wolf. You've got your history backwards, your facts totally bollixed, and much of what you are raving about has nothing to do with Chernus's failed logic and everything to do with your own perverse prejudices. If you believe an entire false narrative - as you clearly do - then there' s not any possibility that those beliefs will lead you to truth, understanding, or even an accurate perception of those distorted facts you claim to study.
"Jews coming from terrorism"? For two thousand years, until well into the Twentieth Century, Jews had no capacity to even protect themselves from the British, Spanish, Portuguese, etc. Inquisitions, the Cossacks, the Pogroms, the Muslim ethnic cleansing. That's for 2,050 years. So for a few years some Jews fought back, and you label THEM the terrorists? Get a grip! You' have so many facts confounded with your fantasies that it's impossible to even begin to correct you. With the exception of Progressives, you are probably more accurate if you reverse everything else you said.
And you're right - I'm not giving out my last name, nor do I have any interest in an intellectual contest with someone so clearly unarmed.
You wouldn't know "unarmed"
Tue, 04/27/2010 - 00:00 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)You wouldn't know "unarmed" if you looked in the mirror, Richard, because you can't see the forest for the trees. Hell, you can't even see the "trees" due to the fact that you won't face your complicity in mass murder through your defense of it; and thus that, through your complicity in it, you are a mass murderer yourself because you are part of it.
Like I said earlier, there's no reasoning with psychotics like yourself. You are evil; and, like Dr. M. Scott Peck so aptly said in his great book, People of the Lie, "(T)he evil are the most insane of all". You condone, support, rationalize and defend evil due to your lord and master being Evil himself.
So, talk about who is "unarmed"; for, all you are armed with is evil and the "defenses" for it, and you do nothing but go on and on and on "justifying" pure evil. It is, after all, a pathology that most people in this evil world are part and parcel of because they see that world as "normal" when it is anything but.
It is supposedly "normal" and "acceptable" for Israel and the U.S. to mass murder and mass imprison people without any true recognition of human rights and fairness of law. But it is allegedly "not" normal for the Palestinians, Iraqis, Afghanis and Pakistanis, etc., to defend themselves and their countries from foreign invaders...
...Such is the "rational" of
Tue, 04/27/2010 - 00:01 — S. Wolf Britain (not verified)...Such is the "rational" of evil and evil people like yourself. And, if the Messiah, Jesus the Christ, wasn't going to return VERY soon as He IS, it would go on and on and on like the travesty that is and/or are Evil's minions like yourself, ever rationalizing and defending evil, and continuing to carry it out over and over and over again.
Well, I for one of many am sick and tired of it; and, thank God, it will NOT go on much longer, and Evil himself, all evil people like yourself, and all of evil itself will very soon be entirely eradicated from the face of the earth. And I mean ALL EVIL, including ALL evil Americans, Brits, Palestinians, etc., as well as all evil Israelis and Jews.
No one who is evil, and/or who defends, supports and is complicit in evil, is going to be spared; but this earth is going to be wiped completely clean of all of it, praise God! All suffering and man's inhumanity to man are going to very soon come to a complete end, thanks be to God in Jesus the Christ's name.
And that is why I pray the final prayer in the God's Word(s), the Bible, "Even so (return very quickly), Lord Jesus (the Christ)"! [Revelation 22:20; etc.; emphasis and/or clarification(s) added by me.] "It is written, thus says the Lord [God in Jesus the Christ, the Word(s) of God, and the Maker / Creator of all things except evil]."