Why WikiLeaks Is Good for Democracy

by: Bill Quigley, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed

Why WikiLeaks Is Good for Democracy
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. (Photo: New Media Days / Peter Erichsen)

Information is the currency of democracy.  
-Thomas Jefferson

Since 9/11, the US government, through Presidents Bush and Obama, has increasingly told the US public that "state secrets" will not be shared with citizens. Candidate Obama pledged to reduce the use of state secrets, but President Obama continued the Bush tradition. The courts, Congress and international allies have gone meekly along with the escalating secrecy demands of the US Executive.

By labeling tens of millions of documents secret, the US government has created a huge vacuum of information.

But information is the lifeblood of democracy. Information about government contributes to a healthy democracy. Transparency and accountability are essential elements of good government. Likewise, "a lack of government transparency and accountability undermines democracy and gives rise to cynicism and mistrust," according to a 2008 Harris survey commissioned by the Association of Government Accountants.

Into the secrecy vacuum stepped Private Bradley Manning, who, according to the Associated Press, was able to defeat "Pentagon security systems using little more than a Lady Gaga CD and a portable computer memory stick."

Manning apparently sent the information to Wikileaks - a nonprofit media organization that specializes in publishing leaked information. Wikileaks in turn shared the documents to other media around the world, including The New York Times, and published much of the documents' contents on its website.

Do you like this? Click here to get Truthout stories sent to your inbox every day - free.

Despite criminal investigations by the U.S. and other governments, it is not clear that media organizations like Wikileaks can be prosecuted in the U.S., in light of the First Amendment. Recall that the First Amendment says: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or of the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

Outraged politicians are claiming that the release of government information is the criminal equivalent of terrorism and puts innocent people's lives at risk. Many of those same politicians authorized the modern equivalent of carpet bombing of Baghdad and other Iraqi cities, the sacrifice of thousands of lives of soldiers and civilians and drone assaults on civilian areas in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Yemen. Their anger at a document dump, no matter how extensive, is more than a little suspect.

Everyone, including Wikileaks and the other media reporting on what the documents reveal, hopes that no lives will be lost because of this flood of information. So far, it appears those hopes have been met: McClatchy Newspapers reported November 28, 2010, that "US officials conceded that they have no evidence to date that the [prior] release of documents led to anyone's death."

The U.S. has been going in the wrong direction for years by classifying millions of documents as secrets. Wikileaks and other media that report these so-called secrets will embarrass people, yes. Wikileaks and other media will make leaders uncomfortable, yes. But embarrassment and discomfort are small prices to pay for a healthier democracy.

Wikileaks has the potential to make transparency and accountability more robust in the U.S. That is good for democracy.

 

Creative Commons License
This work by Truthout is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 United States License.





     

»



Bill Quigley  is legal director at the Center for Constitutional Rights and a law professor at Loyola University New Orleans. He is a Katrina survivor and has been active in human rights in Haiti for years with the Institute for Justice and Democracy in Haiti. He can be reached at quigley77@gmail.com.


Comments

This forum is moderated by software. Please allow up to 15 minutes for your comments to go live and avoid posting the same comment multiple times.



Even if US officials did

Even if US officials did have evidence that the release of documents lead to someone's death, it may be a small price to pay to force an end to illegal occupations that have killed over a million people, most of them innocent civilians.

It's challenging and inspiring to imagine the courage of PFC Manning, and also Julian Assange. Bradley Manning has been in solitary confinement for 7 months! His battle, although not on the battlefield, is a worthwhile one deserving of respect and honor, not shame and derision. The MSM has it all wrong, most notably NPR (National Propaganda Radio). Our country would have a healthier democracy with more like Manning and Assange.



If only there were more

If only there were more people in the media, governments and military with the courage of Assange. It is truly amazing to see how amoral this world has become. When Assange leaked video and other documentation showing US soldiers engaging in war crimes, nobody in the chain of command talked about prosecuting the criminals. They only talk of executing Assange. Our governments and their media puppets are so corrupted, and many citizens are too. And I agree with the former commenter about National Propaganda Radio (NPR). They are not progressive at all. They are shills for the war machine. Try democracynow.org if you want real audio/video journalism.



In many respects the

In many respects the constitution is out of date, in fact Thomas Jefferson said that it may well prove to be imperfect.
But having said that i find it interesting that it is the very people who treat it as the immutable foundation stone of the American nation who are prepared, at the drop of a hat, to ignore it's tenets when it suits their narrow agenda.
Any Americans out there who disagree with my analysis please feel free to point out the error of my ways. I am always ready to learn.



Regarding B. Manning: when

Regarding B. Manning: when does solitary confinement become "cruel and unusual"? Is there any possibility to fight against it? (And does "unusual" punishment become "usual" if used enough?)



@Ivan Thomas. To keep the

@Ivan Thomas. To keep the constitution up to date we have an amendment system. You know, the first amendment, the second amendment, and so on.



As Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld

As Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and the rest of the criminals said of "collateral damage" with the killings of civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan - that if you want to make an omelet you've got to break eggs. Well guys here's your omelet. Welcome to the frying pan.



@anon 16:58. The UCMJ is a

@anon 16:58. The UCMJ is a different penal system than in the rest of the US. I still believe you can put a person on a diet of bread and water only for up to three days at a time. Forget about "cruel an unusual" when it comes to the military. A famous quote -"Military justice is to justice what military music is to music."



theres a silver lining to

theres a silver lining to this dark cloud,and , these arrogant politicians who are screaming fowl , show exactly how this outing of info has harmed the lives of our troops and or our war or diplomatic initiatives with exact substance not mc carthy like zealous conjecture, if he has he may have to pay a price,one thing is for sure, aguy can walk out with all this stuff on a cd shows how goddamn stupid somebody is at the top,the justice dept doesnt trust computers ,i wonder why



@ anonymous, which

@ anonymous, which particular amendment is it that no longer allows free speech? particularly the freedom of speech of people who happen to live elsewhere on the planet?



Boycott Amazon.com! (for

Boycott Amazon.com! (for bowing to Joe Lieberman and cutting off Wikileaks from their servers)



The State Department is

The State Department is disingenuous warning of potential "blood on Wikileaks' hands." How about the real, actual provable deaths caused already by US errant policies - 6,000 deaths of brave American soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Iraqi deaths (remember that Saddam did not have WMD nor was Iraq anyway responsible for 9/11). If there had been more transparency during the buildup to the Iraq war, these actual deaths might have been avoided. Go Wikileaks, Go Assange. Go transparency.



Racing. Too busy to read

Racing. Too busy to read article or responses. Read abstract. Consider it idiotic, missing the whole point. Classified info, released by an egomaniac, endangers the world: certainly Oz (Australia), where I live with part of my family, and--I'd have thought--America, obviously. NZ, where my son lives with his family, is more peripheral. No Bali there, no direct involvement in terrorism and security issues. Confusing Mr Obama with George W Bush beats all!



There's a vast territory

There's a vast territory between death and embarrassment or discomfort. We really don't know what damage may have been done by these leaks, and we may never know. I am not convinced that this is a simple issue... but I do feel if it leads to our getting out of our two wars, it would definitely have great value. This release of information essentially comes across, though, as an attack on America, and on America only. We are left reeling, as if we're the only perpetrators of deceptive behavior. I'm watching and listening, but reserving judgment on the value of the leaks....



There was a time...like

There was a time...like during WW1, WW2, Korea....when people were proud of the wars their government was fighting. And the government was proud enough to boast about its accomplishments. Now the government hides behind secrecy and disinformation. Makes one wonder why we have troops all over the world.



Anyone who knows anything at

Anyone who knows anything at all about international intrigue and the role of intelligence (or lack thereof) in defining world outcomes in the last 100 years realizes this to be devastating.

Any country which FAILS to gather intelligence (RE: Britain and the US "Gentlemen do not read other people's mail" philosophy which nearly cost the free world it's freedom in WW II) is criminal in their failure to provide the governing body with ALL the information necessary to conduct world affairs.

Mr. Assange needs to be tried under National Security Laws in place since WWII and put there by Democrats.

As to the punk "marine" who outed these documents, he will never see the light of day again. That is due and prudent, and necessary under a government fighting numerous world fronts, weather rightfully or not.

It amounts to Treason, pure and simple, and he will pay.



We recognize that honesty in

We recognize that honesty in relationships is a good thing, right? Well, in our relationship with our government and the relationships between governments the forces that wish to hide their activities behind a veil of secrecy are the most destructive forces to democracy. Countries spying on each ...other to try and determine true intentions is a pretty good definition of insanity.



Assange is my hero. And

Assange is my hero. And having reached the age of 80 this month, I can name very few in the public arena more deserving of thanks and praise than him - - for finally opening up the flood gates to the truth about how we Americans have been swindled by the thieves who pretend to love this country. Their new mantra should be: "In Greed and Gold We Trust" branded on their foreheads for all the world to see.



Maybe too busy to

Maybe too busy to thoughtfully consider anything.



Wikileaks is very

Wikileaks is very definiately good for Democracy. It is also a good lesson to those who claim that knowledge of their misdoings is a form of terrorism. For now we can see in the glaring light of information just how lacking in grace and dignity are those who see themselves as our "leaders" in our government, in our justice system, in our supreme Court, in our Congress, in our Cabinet, in our Administration, in our corporate marketing system. It is they who should be in solitary confinement. Private Bradley Manning is a hero and thank God for Julian Assange.



we get mad at people who

we get mad at people who catch us lying.



As a democracy, our default

As a democracy, our default state should be that everything is open for every eye to see. Secrecy belongs in totalitarian states such as North Korea and China. If our motives are so generous, pristine and innocent as our government claims, we should have nothing to hide.



I for one would give mr

I for one would give mr Assange safe harbor here in my home. The same way I would give safe harbor to a freedom fighter when we go to war with our own Government. Jefferson had it right-"the tree of liberty, from time to time needs to be refreshed with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

Go wikkileaks!!!



Bradley Manning support

Bradley Manning support group.

It would appear that some of you may be interested
in Bradley Manning's website: http://www.bradleymanning.org/
Or perhaps his support group at:
http://lists.bradleymanning.org/listinfo.cgi/supporters-bradleymanning.org
As you can imagine, he has many supporters.
Thanks for your concern, Steve Zimmett



King James Version of

King James Version of Proverbs 11:9

An hypocrite with [his] mouth destroyeth his neighbour: but through knowledge shall the just be delivered.



@Mark Ostrum: How do you

@Mark Ostrum: How do you suggest we (the US) try the citizen of another country for treason. I'm no lawyer (thank goodness), but I believe treason is only conducted against one's own country. I guess if Australia wishes to charge him, that might be appropriate.

Many of us, especially those of us from the Vietnam era, are tired of the lies promulgated by government to hide the fact that our "wars" are little more than barely cloaked acts of imperialism, focused on gaining the resources of another country or a strategic geopolitical advantage. Most of them since 1945 have NOT been fought for our freedom, and many to destroy the freedom of others in countries beyond our borders.

This is NOT what the Founding Fathers (or President Eisenhower) saw as in our best interests as a nation.



A military secret involves

A military secret involves some detail such as the time of sailing and destination of a troop ship. But policy decisions (such as whether or not to be at war in the first place) should never be "state secrets" in a democracy. The people need to know what is being done in their name.



I say again: Nobel Peace

I say again: Nobel Peace Prize for Bradley Manning and Julian Assange. The U.S. government has demonstrated how anti-democratic it is, and now, let the truths come out.



From reading this article

From reading this article and its responses it seems that Americans no longer have much self respect. A pity. Apparently you want all your washing displayed for the neighbours to see (As long, I suspect, as its not your own personal dirty washing). There is a vast difference between an open democracy where difficult, often morally tortured and vital decisions need to be made, and one where every note passed between government officials can be poured over, scrutinised and vilified. All with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight. All without being accountable for making any decisions except to point the borax at your paid officials. The internet makes all of this possible in a way undreamed of 20 years ago. Perhaps if you had a 15 year embargo on Goverment papers this would stop. And it needs to. One likely long term effect of such capers as this Wikileaks release is that government employees will become more concerned with how their decision appear than with making the right one. We will all be the losers.



Where is your mind? These

Where is your mind? These are controlled leaks to assist in the next war. Have you not noticed WTC 7 and the false flag that is 9/11 and now the bogus Wikileaks portraying Iran as the enemy of everyone? Buy a clue. You're being played like a violin.



Transparency--real

Transparency--real transparency and not the political buzzword--I'm 100% for. At the same time, there's a difference between open information and legitimately sensitive information owned by governments that if released would harm its future actions. Hopefully that kind of information is purposefully kept as small in amount as possible (through general adherence to morals at least) and restricted to critical things like immediate military plans in the case of a justified military action. To me, the litmus test for justifiably secret information is information that if disclosed years after its relevance does not unduly harm its government's image as viewed by the populace.

Still, the need for minimal secret information seems to exist within legitimate governance. I get the gist of the article here and agree since it's talking about the majority of info needing to be free. And most of the info I've seen leaked this time can be argued as falling in the transparency category. The thing is, I don't think outlets like WikiLeaks care about releasing the other kind of info, either.

That's why I think it's good to keep in mind that while transparency is essential, some minimal amount of secrecy is still needed. Since some people still don't care about the difference, it's still important to safeguard that information. If the information is legitimate, then the government's people can rest assured that say 50 years into the future it can be disclosed with no damage done.



"What would WikiLeaks say if

"What would WikiLeaks say if a war breaks out between Saudi Arabia and Iran because of the publication? Dealing with freedom and information implies one thing above all: responsibility. But that's a word the online anarchists appear not to understand. Their actions are simply criminal!"

This from a German popular newspaper: Tages Zeitung.

It would have nothing to do with WikiLeaks's responsibility, but with the responsibility of the respective countries.



Re Christchurch's comment: I

Re Christchurch's comment:

I respect your thinking on this. The problem is that the level of trust among thinking Americans in the processes of government is very low. There is far too much happening behind closed curtains, what used to be called "in the smoky room." Our politicians seem to be mostly at the service of giant corporate interests, whose owners care nothing whatsoever about American interests, only their international corporate profits, cheap labor, weapons sales, and so on. And much of our foreign policy may be assumed to be similarly oriented as well. Sure, people need to be able to talk without always being under public scrutiny, agreed. But at some point, people get fed up because the system does not seem to be working. We need more information, and Wikileaks is helping do just that. So I applaud them and their information suppliers. Dirty laundry? We have plenty of it, and let the dirt fall where it may.



Jeremy Lynes: read Chomsky

Jeremy Lynes: read Chomsky and you will find out that Iran is not portrayed as the enemy of everyone.

"...bogus Wikileaks portraying Iran as the enemy of everyone"
No.



"Everyone, including

"Everyone, including Wikileaks and the other media reporting on what the documents reveal, hopes that no lives will be lost because of this flood of information. So far, it appears those hopes have been met: McClatchy Newspapers reported November 28, 2010, that "US officials conceded that they have no evidence to date that the [prior] release of documents led to anyone's death.""

Your kidding, right. What separates you from the NeoCons.



The leaks will make

The leaks will make diplomacy more difficult, wars more likely, since without confidentiality there is no trust and therefore no diplomacy. The leaks are not pro-democracy, they are anti-diplomacy.

The content of the leaks is more embarrassing to other countries than t0 the US. Considering the sheer volume of documents leaked, it's amazing there aren't more embarrassing documents leaked about Americans.



If nothing else, Wiki leaks

If nothing else, Wiki leaks has stated the debate about
excessive secrecy in government. The shear volume of
leaked material shows that classifying every darn thing is nothing more than keep the people ignorant of the misdeeds of government.



Shakespeare himself couldn't

Shakespeare himself couldn't have come up with such a comedy. It is truly a miracle to see so many so undone. It is not just the emperor with no clothes, it is the entire ruling elite. I am thrilled to see them so exposed. Until now I had little hope for the disinfectant effect of sunlight. Now it is like all the King's men are racing around to find the pieces to Humpty Dumpty.

This isn't just good for our democracy it is good for the spirit of all thinking people.



Kudos on that last comment,

Kudos on that last comment, Shakespeare...



"The content of the leaks is

"The content of the leaks is more embarrassing to other countries than t0 the US. Considering the sheer volume of documents leaked, it's amazing there aren't more embarrassing documents leaked about Americans."

I've been pondering this for a while. I am getting a nasty suspicion that this leak might really be an elaborate psy-ops program by elements of the US government. Everything seems to fit a common narrative: US diplomats are hard working, NKorea is isolated, Iran is crazy dangerous, everyone wants us to attack Iran, and so forth.



It's all fun and games,

It's all fun and games, until somebody gets killed as the result of a leak.



We have only to ask if it

We have only to ask if it was good that the atrocity of Mi Lai was exposed. The military has gotten their way in this country long enough. With over 800 high-paid generals, they are too much a burden on the U.S. economy.



Whether 'progressive'

Whether 'progressive' humanitarians or less intrusive, 'smaller' government conservatives, citizens of the US and the world demonstrate daily their lack of faith and confidence in the leadership/political process/economic future of virtually every ruling class of every 'active' nation on the planet.

Imperialism seems always to eat its young along with its 'enemies'. Corporatocracy (whether fascist or capitalist) bleeds out its human and natural resources. Collectivism has systematically failed through the foibles of individual greed and power as well. Faith in its various forms suffers the same narrowness of vision and lust for absolute power and righteousness against the real teachings of the various prophets.

Have we, as an alleged sentient species, proved we are incapable of evolving further? Can't we do better?



Bravo to Wiki and Jullian

Bravo to Wiki and Jullian and Manning!
The egg currently on the faces of the hypocritic diplomatic corps is well deserved. If some of you think that the diplomats and embassies of all nations do not help out with spying, please get a grip.
State secrets? Hardly! Foolish behaviour and ill-considered languaging?,yes, that most certainly occurred, in spades.
What chaps my hide is that a real she-ro like Valerie Plame Wilson, an official who was actually doing good, solid work for the CIA in the arena of terrorism, was hung out to dry and actual people did die because of her outting by the Bu$h-Cheney White House.
Tenent, Cheney, Libby, Armitage and the rest are criminals of the highest order.



Last book I bought from

Last book I bought from Amazon was a few months back. Over.WikiLeaks is essetianl air for real humans.



7:55 If you don't believe

7:55 If you don't believe Iran is crazy dangerous, you haven't been paying attention. That's OK, neither has Obama.



Once again WikiLeaks proves

Once again WikiLeaks proves it's absolute preeminence as the WORLD'S SOURCE for information about secretive Govt organizations that keep secrets under FALSE PRETENSE

The PLUTOCRATS come crashing back down to earth when their FALSe EffrOntErIEs are EXPOSED as LIES and attempts to cover up GrIEvOUs INCOMPETANCE

WikiLeaks is for the PEOPLE!



You people are absolutely

You people are absolutely amazing. I find it hard that Americans can feel this way. PFC Dumbass should spend the rest of his life in prison. He's no hero.



Yes, you people truly are

Yes, you people truly are amazing! Thank you for the work you do to help save democracy.



I think most of you,

I think most of you, including the author of the lead article, have not understood Mr. Assange's purposes and practices. He does not intend to improve democracy. He regards the government of the U.S. (and of many other countries) and the major corporations -- the ruling classes -- as malign conspiracies. In order to function, a conspiracy must be opaque to the outsiders, but transparent within. Encouraging and publishing leaks does not cause the ruling class to become more overt; quite the opposite, it impedes their ability to communicate with each other because each internal channel of communication may be compromised. Thus it decreases their ability to function, to cohere, to act upon and against outsiders. If they are indeed malign conspiracies -- I believe a rational argument can certainly be made for that assertion -- then this must be a desirable outcome, a kind of political chemotherapy.
 
See http://tinyurl.com/2fhmu5o and http://tinyurl.com/39bnlgx for two perceptive interpetations of Wikileaks and Assange.  A link to Assange's own words can be found on both pages (assuming they haven't all been eliminated by the secret police).
 



The owners of this site

The owners of this site should be tried for espionage and put in prison.



long year acer trends show

long year acer trends show only 001 more acelenolysunci topics now pr59 in 2012



burberry outlet

burberry shirts for more mSdubybS http://www.burberryoutlet--online.com/



handbags designer cheap

[URL=http://www.cheap--designer-handbags.com/ - cheap designer handbags[/URL - for promotion code QdlLtsMM http://www.cheap--designer-handbags.com/



cheap ugg boots online uk

uggs boot uk with confident XhwgdFzG http://www.uggboots--uk.net/



swivel chairs living room

you must read swivel chairs for living room with low price OCHZzLva http://www.living-roomchairs.com/



replica bags

best for you replica purses for more WnwGlEAM http://www.replica--bags.com/



coach outlet

for coach outlet to take huge discount hrehdBvn http://www.coach--outlet-online.net/



pvpqmzl

xbfrorn



我本沉默传奇

今天在马路上看到个老奶奶摔倒在街上,我跑过去把老奶奶扶起来,结果看样子她又要倒下,我想着估计要讹诈我钱,我果断先倒地,在地上不停的抽搐并且口吐白沫,老奶奶一下呆了,我边抽搐边蠕动,大概蠕动到两米之外,站起来拍拍灰走了,老奶奶还愣在原地发呆。我深藏功与名。